Static secondary ion mass spectrometry study of the decomposition of triethylgallium on GaAs (100)

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 3127-3133 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. C. Wong ◽  
M. S. Jackson ◽  
M. T. McEllistrem ◽  
R. D. Culp ◽  
J. G. Ekerdt
1994 ◽  
Vol 210 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Zou ◽  
G.M. Hood ◽  
J.A. Roy ◽  
R.J. Schultz ◽  
J.A. Jackman

1994 ◽  
Vol 76 (11) ◽  
pp. 7552-7558 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Caccavale ◽  
P. Chakraborty ◽  
I. Mansour ◽  
G. Gianello ◽  
M. Mazzoleni ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 600 (6) ◽  
pp. 1319-1325 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.J. Nelson ◽  
T.E. Felter ◽  
K.J. Wu ◽  
C. Evans ◽  
J.L. Ferreira ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 3057-3064 ◽  
Author(s):  
De-Long Zhang ◽  
Bei Chen ◽  
Liang Sun ◽  
Yu-Heng Xu ◽  
Edwin Yue-Bun Pun

At 1100 °C, the diffusion properties of Ti4+into congruent LiNbO3crystals codoped with 0.5 mol% Er2O3and different MgO concentrations of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mol% have been studied by secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS). ThreeY-cut and threeZ-cut plates with different Mg doping levels were coated with a 60-nm-thick Ti film at first and then annealed at 1100 °C for 28 h in a wet O2atmosphere. SIMS was used to analyze depth profile characteristics of diffused Ti ions and the constituent elements of the substrate as well. The results show that the diffusion reservoir was exhausted and the Ti metal film was completely diffused. All measured Ti profiles follow a Gaussian function. No Mg out-diffusion accompanied the Ti in-diffusion procedure for all crystals studied. The 1/ediffusion depth is similar to 8.3/10.2, 7.4/8.7, and 6.6/8.2 ± 0.2/0.2 μm/μm for theY/Z-cut crystal with the Mg doping level of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mol%, respectively, yielding a Ti4+diffusivity of 0.62/0.93, 0.49/0.67, and 0.39/0.60 ± 0.03/0.03 (μm2/h)/(μm2/h), respectively. The diffusion shows definite anisotropy and a considerable MgO doping level effect. Under the same Mg doping level, the diffusion in aZ-cut crystal is faster. The diffusivity decreases with the increase of the Mg doping level. This effect is qualitatively explained from the viewpoint of the Mg doping effect on concentration of the intrinsic defects in LiNbO3crystal.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document