Development of a soil moisture prediction model based on Xinanjiang model and GIS

Author(s):  
Jingwen Xu ◽  
Wanchang Zhang ◽  
Changquan Wang ◽  
Ziyan Zheng ◽  
Jiongfeng Chen
PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. e0214508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Cai ◽  
Wengang Zheng ◽  
Xin Zhang ◽  
Lili Zhangzhong ◽  
Xuzhang Xue

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 107
Author(s):  
Ilyes Elaissi ◽  
Okba Taouali ◽  
Messaoud Hassani

2011 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 1148-1154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui-Yan JIANG ◽  
Mao ZONG ◽  
Xiang-Ying LIU

Agronomy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Xiaodong Huang ◽  
Beth Ziniti ◽  
Michael H. Cosh ◽  
Michele Reba ◽  
Jinfei Wang ◽  
...  

Soil moisture is a key indicator to assess cropland drought and irrigation status as well as forecast production. Compared with the optical data which are obscured by the crop canopy cover, the Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) is an efficient tool to detect the surface soil moisture under the vegetation cover due to its strong penetration capability. This paper studies the soil moisture retrieval using the L-band polarimetric Phased Array-type L-band SAR 2 (PALSAR-2) data acquired over the study region in Arkansas in the United States. Both two-component model-based decomposition (SAR data alone) and machine learning (SAR + optical indices) methods are tested and compared in this paper. Validation using independent ground measurement shows that the both methods achieved a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of less than 10 (vol.%), while the machine learning methods outperform the model-based decomposition, achieving an RMSE of 7.70 (vol.%) and R2 of 0.60.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document