scholarly journals Quantification of the acoustic reflex latency parameters in humans

1977 ◽  
Vol 62 (S1) ◽  
pp. S13-S13 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. McPherson ◽  
D. Thompson
1982 ◽  
Vol 71 (S1) ◽  
pp. S108-S108
Author(s):  
Scott W. Spence ◽  
Dennis Kisiel ◽  
Hugh Catts

1984 ◽  
pp. 301-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANDREA BOSATRA ◽  
MARIO RUSSOLO ◽  
CAROL ANN SILVERMAN

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahamad Almyzan Awang ◽  
Nurliyana Nasuha Zamri ◽  
Maziah Romli ◽  
Rosdan Salim ◽  
Mohd Normani Zakaria

1980 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 601???611 ◽  
Author(s):  
JACK D. CLEMIS ◽  
CYNTHIA N. SARNO

1980 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
pp. 296-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack D. Clemis ◽  
Cynthia N. Sarno

The acoustic reflex latency test (ARLT), an indirect measure of neural conduction time utilizing the electroimpedance method, was used to evaluate 43 highly suspect, nontumor patients who demonstrated abnormal latency results on brainstem electric response audiometry (BERA), false-positive for tumor. Normative values and criteria for tumor-positive ARLT results were established on a control group using a second generation test unit, comprised of dual impedance bridges and a digital signal averager, designed especially to perform the ARLT. When cut-off criteria for both absolute reflex latency and interaural latency difference (ILD) values were applied to this BERA false positive population, the ARLT correctly identified 93% of patients as having end-organ lesions. Differences in ARLT and BERA test results are attributed to differences in 1) method of measurement, 2) characteristics of the eliciting signal, and 3) generation of the response. These factors are discussed as sources of variability. Both ARLT and BERA are recommended as tandem procedures when screening for acoustic or angle tumors.


1983 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles A. Mangham ◽  
Patricia A. Burnett ◽  
Roger C. Lindeman

Persons with cerebellopontine angle tumors often have an increase in the latency of the acoustic reflex response that is comparable to the auditory brain stem response (ABR) in its sensitivity. However, reflex latency is less specific, since it may be prolonged in patients with Meniere's disease.


Author(s):  
Mahamad Almyzan Awang ◽  
Nurliyana Nasuha Zamri ◽  
Wan Najibah Wan Mohamad ◽  
Mohd Normani Zakaria

Abstract Introduction Acoustic reflex (AR) is a valuable clinical test for hearing diagnosis. Parameters of AR such as its amplitude and threshold have been commonly reported in research. Acoustic reflex latency (ARL) has not been widely studied and more research is warranted to determine its basic properties and clinical usefulness. The present study aimed to determine the influences of stimulation mode and stimulus frequency on ARL. Methods In this study, 52 healthy young adults were enrolled (mean age = 23.2 ± 0.8 years, 61.8% were males). They underwent the standard AR testing and ARL values were computed. Both ipsilateral and contralateral recordings were made at 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz frequencies. Results The ARL values obtained are consistent with the findings from the previous studies. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that the ARL values were not statistically influenced by either stimulation mode (p = 0.061) or stimulus frequency (p = 0.598). Conclusion Among young adults, ARL does not appear to be influenced by stimulation mode and stimulus frequency. Further large scale research is warranted to support the present study’s findings. The preliminary normative data for ARL obtained in this study can serve as the reference for future research involving this particular population.


1998 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
William W. Qiu ◽  
Frederick J. Stucker

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document