Physical Educators’ Judgments About Inclusion: A New Instrument for Preservice Teachers

2002 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 435-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel R. Hodge ◽  
Nathan M. Murata ◽  
Francis M. Kozub
Keyword(s):  
Preservice Teachers ◽  
Physical Education ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Physical Educators ◽  
Physical Education Teacher Education ◽  
New Instrument ◽  
Pete Programs ◽  
General Physical ◽  
General Physical Education

The purpose was to develop an instrument for use in physical education teacher education (PETE) programs that would yield valid evidence of the judgments of PETE preservice teachers toward the inclusion of students with disabilities into general physical education classes. Both the conceptualization that judgments represent the cognitive expressions of attitudes (Ajzen, 2001; Sherif & Hovland, 1961) and focus group discussions were used to create the Physical Educators’ Judgments About Inclusion (PEJI) instrument. Following content validation procedures, we administered PEJI to 272 PETE preservice teachers. Subsequent principal component analysis to generate construct validity evidence indicated 15 items should be retained; they collectively explained 53% of the variance using a three-component model. Dimensions of the PEJI pertained to judgments about inclusion, acceptance, and perceived training needs. Alpha coefficients for the three subscales ranged from .64 to .88.

PREPARING FUTURE PHYSICAL EDUCATORS FOR INCLUSION: CHANGING THE PHYSICAL EDUCATION TEACHER TRAINING PROGRAM

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin E. BLOCK ◽  
Eun Hye KWON ◽  
Sean HEALY
Keyword(s):  
Physical Education ◽  
Online Education ◽  
General Education ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Adapted Physical Education ◽  
Physical Educators ◽  
Physical Education Teacher ◽  
Education Teacher ◽  
Physical Education Teacher Education ◽  
General Physical

Students with disabilities around the world are leaving special schools and special classes and are receiving their education in general education schools. In addition to attending general education classes, these students with disabilities are attending general physical education classes. Unfortunately, research has clearly demonstrated that physical educators do not feel prepared to include students with disabilities into their general physical education classes. Such findings are not surprising given that the typical physical education teacher education program in the United States only requires one course in adapted physical education, and in many countries around the world not even one adapted physical education course is required. However, many physical education teacher education programs do not have the space to add more adapted physical education classes, and other universities do not have professors with specialized knowledge to teach adapted physical education. What can be done to better prepare future and current physical educators? Online education is a relatively new method for delivering information about disability in general and more specifically how to include students with disabilities into general physical activities. The purpose of this paper is to introduce online education and present preliminary research that supports the use of online training with physical educators.

Promoting Social Acceptance and Inclusion in Physical Education

2021 ◽  
pp. 004005992110296
Author(s):  
Kason O’Neil ◽  
LeAnn Olson
Keyword(s):  
Physical Education ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Social Inclusion ◽  
Social Acceptance ◽  
Cognitive Learning ◽  
Teacher Behaviors ◽  
National Standards ◽  
Physical Educators ◽  
General Physical ◽  
General Physical Education

In addition to psychomotor and cognitive learning, social development is one of the three pillars of the national standards for physical education instruction. Though a plethora of research has exhibited the benefits social inclusion can have for students with and without disabilities, inclusion cannot be successful unless physical educators are deliberate, persistent, and continually reflective on the needs of students. The purpose of this paper is to outline the state of inclusion of students with disabilities in a general physical education classes and to highlight teacher behaviors and instructional techniques that promote social acceptance and inclusion for all students in physical education.

Adapted Physical Education in the Special Education Process

2020 ◽  
pp. 61-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Mcnamara ◽  
Cheng-Chen Pan
Keyword(s):  
Physical Education ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Individualized Education Program ◽  
Adapted Physical Education ◽  
Physical Educators ◽  
Special Education Process ◽  
Adapted Physical Educators ◽  
The Individual ◽  
General Physical ◽  
General Physical Education

Adapted physical education (APE) services have the same overall objectives as general physical education; however, adapted physical educators should implement accommodations and modifications to personalize the programs to meet the individual needs of students with disabilities. Because of the high levels of health disparity for people with disabilities, as well as cognitive and socio-emotional benefits associated with physical activity and exercise, it is crucial that students with disabilities receive high-quality APE programming. To give the readers a broad overview of APE and how it should be implemented, this chapter covers the following topics: physical education and physical literacy, the benefits of physical education and exercise for students with disabilities, federal laws in relation to physical education for students with disabilities, the role of adapted physical educators in interdisciplinary team approaches within the individualized education program process, and highlighting specialized teaching strategies and specialized equipment for students with disabilities.

Beliefs of Chinese Physical Educators on Teaching Students With Disabilities in General Physical Education Classes

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lijuan Wang ◽  
Jing Qi ◽  
Lin Wang
Keyword(s):  
Physical Education ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Eastern China ◽  
Physical Educators ◽  
Behavioral Beliefs ◽  
Teacher Assistants ◽  
Attitudes Toward Teaching ◽  
General Physical ◽  
General Physical Education

This study examined the behavioral beliefs of physical education (PE) teachers about teaching students with disabilities in their general PE (GPE) classes and to identify the factors that contribute to their beliefs. A total of 195 PE teachers from a region in eastern China were surveyed. Results of the Physical Educators’ Attitudes Toward Teaching Individuals With Disabilities-III survey indicate that although some teachers felt that including students with disabilities in GPE classes provides benefit for them, they were concerned about the practical difficulties of teaching students with disabilities in GPE classes, the lack of support, and the possible rejection of students with disabilities by their peers. Moreover, the behavioral beliefs of teachers vary according to the disability conditions of the students. Results show that there is no significant effect of demographic factors on the beliefs of PE teachers. Quality of experience predicts positive beliefs. The study has important implication for teacher training, provision of equipment, and support from teacher assistants.

scholarly journals Effect of practicum experiences on pre-professional physical education teachers' intentions toward teaching students with disabilities in general physical education classes

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 361-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kathleen Ellis ◽  
Monica Lepore ◽  
Lauren Lieberman
Keyword(s):  
Physical Education ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Physical Education Teachers ◽  
Individuals With Disabilities ◽  
Practicum Experience ◽  
Pete Programs ◽  
General Physical ◽  
Practicum Experiences ◽  
General Physical Education

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of practicum experiences on pre-professional physical education teachers' intentions toward working with individuals with disabilities. Pre-professional physical education teachers were students in their respective university's PETE programs and were categorized based on level of practicum experience. Over a three year period, a total of 596 PETE students completed the Physical Educators' Intention toward Teaching Individuals with Disabilities (PEITID) questionnaire (Rizzo, 2007). Significant differences were found among groups for overall intention to teach students with disabilities in their general physical education classroom. Additionally, trends of more positive intentions among pre-professionals with greater practicum experiences lead to higher Quality of Experience and Perceived Competence. The results of this study indicated that the level and quality of practicum experience significantly influence pre-professional teachers' intentions and competence toward teaching individuals with disabilities. (138 words)

Adapted Physical Education in the Special Education Process

2022 ◽  
pp. 172-190
Author(s):  
Scott Mcnamara ◽  
Cheng-Chen Pan
Keyword(s):  
Physical Education ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Individualized Education Program ◽  
Adapted Physical Education ◽  
Physical Educators ◽  
Special Education Process ◽  
Adapted Physical Educators ◽  
The Individual ◽  
General Physical ◽  
General Physical Education

Adapted physical education (APE) services have the same overall objectives as general physical education; however, adapted physical educators should implement accommodations and modifications to personalize the programs to meet the individual needs of students with disabilities. Because of the high levels of health disparity for people with disabilities, as well as cognitive and socio-emotional benefits associated with physical activity and exercise, it is crucial that students with disabilities receive high-quality APE programming. To give the readers a broad overview of APE and how it should be implemented, this chapter covers the following topics: physical education and physical literacy, the benefits of physical education and exercise for students with disabilities, federal laws in relation to physical education for students with disabilities, the role of adapted physical educators in interdisciplinary team approaches within the individualized education program process, and highlighting specialized teaching strategies and specialized equipment for students with disabilities.

Chapter 2 Creating a Before-School Physical Activity Program: Pre-Service Physical Educators’ Experiences and Implications for PETE

2014 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 449-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaimie McMullen ◽  
Hans van der Mars ◽  
Julie A. Jahn
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Preservice Teachers ◽  
Participant Observation ◽  
Physical Educators ◽  
Systematic Observation ◽  
Physical Education Teacher Education ◽  
Physical Educator ◽  
Before School ◽  
Pete Programs

The purpose of this study is to describe the experiences of physical education teacher education (PETE) majors enrolled in an internship course that provided them with authentic experiences promoting and facilitating a before-school physical activity (PA) program and to examine the associated implications for PETE programs within the Comprehensive School Physical Activity (CSPAP) framework. In this study, five PETE majors were recruited to participate. Data were collected from several sources including participant observation, interviews, systematic observation, and document analysis. The results show that preservice physical educators struggled with PA promotion as a consequence of perceptions of early programmatic success, feelings of nervousness and influences of their existing beliefs about the role of the physical educator. Therefore, when considering the role of the physical educator relative to a CSPAP, PETE programs should consider making adjustments to their curricula to include experiences that allow preservice teachers to practice skills associated with out-of-class PA promotion.

scholarly journals Enacting assessment for learning in the induction phase of physical education teaching

2021 ◽  
pp. 1356336X2110562
Author(s):  
Björn Tolgfors ◽  
Mikael Quennerstedt ◽  
Erik Backman ◽  
Gunn Nyberg
Keyword(s):  
Preservice Teachers ◽  
Physical Education ◽  
Beginning Teachers ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Initial Study ◽  
Assessment For Learning ◽  
Induction Phase ◽  
Physical Education Teacher Education ◽  
Pete Programs

In many countries, assessment for learning (AfL) is recommended in both policy and research as a concept that should be integrated into the teaching of physical education (PE) in schools. AfL is also part of physical education teacher education (PETE) programs in several countries and, consequently, something future PE teachers are expected to practice in their teaching. In a previous study ( Tolgfors et al., 2021 ), we showed how AfL was transmitted and transformed between a university course and a school placement course within Swedish PETE. In the current study, we have more closely followed three of the preservice teachers who took part in our initial study into their first year of PE teaching. The purpose of this follow-up study is thus to explore how AfL is enacted in the induction phase of PE teaching. The more specific research question is: how is AfL enacted in beginning teachers’ PE practices under the contextual conditions provided at the schools where they are employed? The data were generated through Stimulated Recall interviews and follow-up interviews via the online meeting software Zoom. The analysis was based on Braun et al.’s (2011) contextual dimensions of policy enactment and Bernstein’s (1996) pedagogic device. Our findings illustrate how AfL is generally enacted through (1) progression and (2) “rich tasks.” However, the contextual dimensions of each school provide different conditions that either support or hinder the use of AfL in PE. AfL is accordingly enacted in different ways in the induction phase of PE teaching.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document