Risk of Nutrient Inadequacies in Elite Canadian Athletes With Spinal Cord Injury

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 417-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Krempien ◽  
Susan I. Barr

Energy intakes of adults with spinal cord injury (SCI) have been reported to be relatively low, with many micronutrients below recommended amounts, but little is known about the diets of athletes with SCI. The purpose of this cross-sectional, observational study was to assess energy intakes and estimate the prevalence of dietary inadequacy in a sample of elite Canadian athletes with SCI (n = 32). Three-day self-reported food diaries completed at home and training camp were analyzed for energy (kcal), macronutrients, vitamins, and minerals and compared with the dietary reference intakes (DRIs). The prevalence of nutrient inadequacy was estimated by the proportion of athletes with mean intakes below the estimated average requirement (EAR). Energy intakes were 2,156 ± 431 kcal for men and 1,991 ± 510 kcal for women. Macronutrient intakes were within the acceptable macronutrient distribution ranges. While at training camp, >25% of men had intakes below the EAR for calcium, magnesium, zinc, riboflavin, folate, vitamin B12, and vitamin D. Thiamin, riboflavin, calcium, and vitamin D intakes were higher at home than training camp. Over 25% of women had intakes below the EAR for calcium, magnesium, folate, and vitamin D, with no significant differences in mean intakes between home and training camp. Vitamin/mineral supplement use significantly increased men’s intakes of most nutrients but did not affect prevalence of inadequacy. Women’s intakes did not change significantly with vitamin/mineral supplementation. These results demonstrate that athletes with SCI are at risk for several nutrient inadequacies relative to the DRIs.

2014 ◽  
Vol 73 (OCE1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Wong ◽  
I. Gainullina ◽  
A. Graham ◽  
S. P. Hirani ◽  
A. Forbes

PM&R ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. S153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thornton G. Williams ◽  
Reza Ehsanian ◽  
Kazuko L. Shem ◽  
Jerry Wright ◽  
Linda Isaac ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathy Zebracki ◽  
Miriam Hwang ◽  
Pamela L. Patt ◽  
Lawrence C. Vogel

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilke Coskun Benlidayi ◽  
Sibel Basaran ◽  
Gulsah Seydaoglu ◽  
Rengin Guzel

2016 ◽  
Vol 97 (5) ◽  
pp. 726-732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arcangelo Barbonetti ◽  
Alessandra Sperandio ◽  
Alessandro Micillo ◽  
Settimio D'Andrea ◽  
Federica Pacca ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 23 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 571-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugues Barbeau ◽  
Sylvie Nadeau ◽  
Christiane Garneau

2018 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marliza Du Plessis ◽  
Cassandra R. McGaffin ◽  
Thamsanqa Molepo ◽  
Roleen Oelofse ◽  
Susan Van Zyl ◽  
...  

Background: Successful discharge from rehabilitation for patients with spinal cord injury (PWSCI) relies on a smooth transition home. Assessing readiness for hospital discharge (RHD) is important in reducing secondary health conditions and improving satisfaction and function. Perception of PWSCI on RHD may be different from their physiotherapists, leading to difficulties.Objective: To compare the perceptions of PWSCI and physiotherapists with regard to RHD.Method: A comparative cross-sectional study included 50 PWSCI and their physiotherapists in Tshwane. They completed the Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale (RHDS) and their responses to the subscales were compared. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Relationships between variables of interest and the general perception of RHD were determined using Pearson’s chi-square test. An independent samples t-test was used to analyse the difference in RHDS scores (including subscale scores) between PWSCI and physiotherapists. Results were significant if p < 0.05.Results: The total score of the RHDS was not significantly different (t = 1.31, df = 98, p = 0.19). Patients had higher perceptions in coping ability and expected support subscales (t = 3.15, df = 85.97, p = 0.002 and t = 4.23, df = 98, p = 0.0001, respectively). Physiotherapists had higher perceptions in the knowledge subscale regarding what to do and not do at home (t = -2.05, df = 82.08, p = 0.044) and follow-up sessions (t = 2.625, df = 85.28, p = 0.010).Conclusion: There was no difference in perception of readiness to go home, although physiotherapists gave lower scores for emotional readiness and ability to handle demands at home and higher scores for knowledge.Clinical implications: The use of the RHDS in the spinal cord rehabilitation units will better align the goals of rehabilitation and discharge planning to improve overall satisfaction with care and discharge outcomes. All members of a multidisciplinary team can achieve consensus and comparisons can be made on their patient’s perceived RHD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document