scholarly journals Touchscreen Pointing and Swiping: The Effect of Background Cues and Target Visibility

Motor Control ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 422-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raimey Olthuis ◽  
John van der Kamp ◽  
Koen Lemmink ◽  
Simone Caljouw
Keyword(s):  
Target Location ◽  
Movement Execution ◽  
Pointing Gestures ◽  
Target Visibility

By assessing the precision of gestural interactions with touchscreen targets, the authors investigate how the type of gesture, target location, and scene visibility impact movement endpoints. Participants made visually and memory-guided pointing and swiping gestures with a stylus to targets located in a semicircle. Specific differences in aiming errors were identified between swiping and pointing. In particular, participants overshot the target more when swiping than when pointing and swiping endpoints showed a stronger bias toward the oblique than pointing gestures. As expected, the authors also found specific differences between conditions with and without delays. Overall, the authors observed an influence on movement execution from each of the three parameters studied and uncovered that the information used to guide movement appears to be gesture specific.

scholarly journals The Effects of Incorrect Occlusion Cues on the Understanding of Barehanded Referencing in Collaborative Augmented Reality

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan Li ◽  
Donghan Hu ◽  
Boyuan Wang ◽  
Doug A. Bowman ◽  
Sang Won Lee
Keyword(s):  
Augmented Reality ◽  
Target Location ◽  
Target Identification ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Target Position ◽  
Depth Cues ◽  
Pointing Gestures ◽  
Close Range ◽  
Collaborative Augmented Reality ◽  
New Strategies

In many collaborative tasks, the need for joint attention arises when one of the users wants to guide others to a specific location or target in space. If the collaborators are co-located and the target position is in close range, it is almost instinctual for users to refer to the target location by pointing with their bare hands. While such pointing gestures can be efficient and effective in real life, performance will be impacted if the target is in augmented reality (AR), where depth cues like occlusion may be missing if the pointer’s hand is not tracked and modeled in 3D. In this paper, we present a study utilizing head-worn AR displays to examine the effects of incorrect occlusion cues on spatial target identification in a collaborative barehanded referencing task. We found that participants’ performance in AR was reduced compared to a real-world condition, but also that they developed new strategies to cope with the limitations of AR. Our work also identified mixed results of the effect of spatial relationships between users.

Expectation and priming affect pop-out target visibility

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Pascucci ◽  
T. Mastropasqua ◽  
M. Turatto
Keyword(s):  
Target Visibility

Comparison between different boost dose delivery techniques to the tumor bed of right sided breast cancer patients.

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 4605-4617
Author(s):  
Aly Mahmoud El-Hdidy
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Target Location ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Photon Beams ◽  
Lung Dose ◽  
Dose Volume Histograms ◽  
Tumor Bed ◽  
Boost Dose ◽  
Treatment Plans

Comparisons between three different techniques by which the boost dose was delivered to the tumor bed were carried out , aiming to present the best technique of treatment for right breast cancer patients.In this study, ten right sided breast cancer computed tomography (CT) scans were selected for ten early right breast cancer patients. We made three different treatment plans for each patient CT using three different irradiation techniques to deliver a prescribed boost dose of 10 Gy in 5 fractions to the boost PTV. In the first technique, two tangential photon beams were used, in the second technique we, two oblique photon beams were used and in the third technique, a single electron beam was used. The comparative analyses between the three techniques were performed by comparing the boost PTV- dose volume histograms (DVHs), the ipsilateral breast (right breast) DVHs, the ipsilateral lung (right lung) DVHs and the heart DVHs of the three techniques for each patient. Furthermore the dose that covering 100% , 95% of the volume (D100% , D95%) and the volume covered by 95% of the dose (V95%)of  the boost PTV of all techniques, were calculated for each patient to investigate the dose coverage of the target.Results showed that there were variations of the dose received by tumor bed, right breast and OARs depending on the technique used and the target location and size. A decrease of D100% than 90% of the prescribed dose was observed with the 3rd technique for patients 8, 9 and 10, and was observed with the 2nd technique for patient 5. A reduction of right breast dose was observed when the 3rd technique was use in comparison with the 1st and the 2nd techniques for patients 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8.  Also reduction of right breast was observed when the 2nd technique used in comparison with 1st technique. An increase of lung dose was observed with the 3rd technique for patients 1, 2, 5 and 6, also was observed with 2nd technique in patient 3, 5 and 7. A decrease of lung dose was observed with the 1st technique for patients 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9An individualized treatment, several plans using different irradiation techniques should be developed for each patient individually to reach the best boost PTV dose coverage with minimal OARs’ dose. 

Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities is driven by distractor suppression not by target activation

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Failing ◽  
Benchi Wang ◽  
Jan Theeuwes
Keyword(s):  
High Probability ◽  
Target Location ◽  
Target Selection ◽  
Visual Space ◽  
Alternative Interpretation ◽  
Distractor Location ◽  
Target Presentation ◽  
Statistical Regularities ◽  
Low Probability ◽  
Presentation Experiment

Where and what we attend to is not only determined by what we are currently looking for but also by what we have encountered in the past. Recent studies suggest that biasing the probability by which distractors appear at locations in visual space may lead to attentional suppression of high probability distractor locations which effectively reduces capture by a distractor but also impairs target selection at this location. However, in many of these studies introducing a high probability distractor location was tantamount to increasing the probability of the target appearing in any of the other locations (i.e. the low probability distractor locations). Here, we investigate an alternative interpretation of previous findings according to which attentional selection at high probability distractor locations is not suppressed. Instead, selection at low probability distractor locations is facilitated. In two visual search tasks, we found no evidence for this hypothesis: neither when there was only a bias in target presentation but no bias in distractor presentation (Experiment 1), nor when there was only a bias in distractor presentation but no bias in target presentation (Experiment 2). We conclude that recurrent presentation of a distractor in a specific location leads to attentional suppression of that location through a mechanism that is unaffected by any regularities regarding the target location.

The Novel TEM Sample Preparation Approach for Targeted via with Barrier/Cu Seed Layer Inspection

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Fei Hsieh ◽  
Shih-Hsiang Tseng ◽  
Bo Min She
Keyword(s):  
Sample Preparation ◽  
Cross Section ◽  
Seed Layer ◽  
Target Location ◽  
Process Development ◽  
Process Integration ◽  
Ion Beam ◽  
Main Tool ◽  
Dual Beam ◽  
Sample Preparation Procedure

Abstract In this study, an FIB-based cross section TEM sample preparation procedure for targeted via with barrier/Cu seed layer is introduced. The dual beam FIB with electron beam for target location and Ga ion beam for sample milling is the main tool for the targeted via with barrier/Cu seed layer inspection. With the help of the FIB operation and epoxy layer protection, ta cross section TEM sample at a targeted via with barrier/Cu seed layer could be made. Subsequent TEM inspection is used to verify the quality of the structure. This approach was used in the Cu process integration performance monitor. All these TEM results are very helpful in process development and yield improvement.

scholarly journals A multivariate intersection over union of SiamRPN network for visual tracking

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhihui Huang ◽  
Huimin Zhao ◽  
Jin Zhan ◽  
Huakang Li
Keyword(s):  
Aspect Ratio ◽  
Visual Tracking ◽  
Target Location ◽  
Coincidence Degree ◽  
Distance Ratio ◽  
Geometric Factors ◽  
Fast Motion ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Overlap Area ◽  
Center Distance

AbstractSiamPRN algorithm performs well in visual tracking, but it is easy to drift under occlusion and fast motion scenes because it uses $$\ell _1$$ ℓ 1 -smooth loss function to measure the regression location of bounding box. In this paper, we propose a multivariate intersection over union (MIOU) loss in SiamRPN tracking framework. Firstly, MIOU loss includes three geometric factors in regression: the overlap area ratio, the center distance ratio, and the aspect ratio, which can better reflect the coincidence degree of target box and prediction box. Secondly, we improve the definition of aspect ratio loss to avoid gradient explosion, improve the optimization performance of prediction box. Finally, based on SiamPRN tracker, we compared the tracking performance of $$\ell _1$$ ℓ 1 -smooth loss, IOU loss, GIOU loss, DIOU loss, and MIOU loss. Experimental results show that the MIOU loss has better target location regression than other loss functions on the OTB2015 and VOT2016 benchmark, especially for the challenges of occlusion, illumination change and fast motion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document