THE WILLIAM H. WELCH FUND OF THE JOHNS HOPKINS MEDICAL SCHOOL

Science ◽  
1913 ◽  
Vol 38 (983) ◽  
pp. 621-622 ◽  
PEDIATRICS ◽  
1958 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 655-660
Author(s):  
James L. Gamble

WE OWE Edwards A. Park a large debt for the sketch of John Howland illustrated by anecdotes displaying his personality which he gave us in his John Howland address. Howland was a New Englander to the core and a loyal son of Yale of the Class of '94. His medical career began in New York where, after 3 years as a student in New York University Medical School and a 2-year internship at the Presbyterian Hospital, he became associated with L. Emmett Holt, Sr. and decided to enter the then opening field of pediatrics. His fine abilities as a physician were rapidly recognized. He also began his investigative career in New York. In the year 1910 at the age of 39 he was appointed Professor of Pediatrics at the Medical School of Washington University in St. Louis, which had just been reorganized on a full-time basis. He was disappointed by the inadequacy of the equipment there and unwilling to wait several years for the building of the projected new hospital. He resigned after 6 months and returned to New York. This hiatus in his careen in academic medicine was a short one. In the year 1912 he was called to the chair of Pediatrics at the Johns Hopkins Medical School to succeed Von Pirquet who had returned to Germany to accept the professorship at Breslau. This was a much coveted post. Also, I have been told, he was much aggrieved over having contracted trichinosis from eating Baltimore sausages. During the 2 years that Von Pirquet was in Baltimore, the Department of Pediatrics had no quarters of its own and was obliged to use space borrowed from the Medical Outpatient.


2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 189-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles T Ambrose

In 1905, William Osler was the pre-eminent physician in American medical circles but was unknown to the general public. The latter suddenly learned of him through damning newspaper accounts of his address announcing his retirement from the Johns Hopkins Medical School. In it Osler mentioned two “fixed ideas” he held—(1) that most major advances in civilization have been made by men under age 40 (the “fixed period”) and (2) that those over 60 should retire because they create little of significance and sometimes stifled the initiatives of younger colleagues. He highlighted the second idea with a Victorian novel describing a mythical society which chloroformed men at age 60. He never imagined that this literary allusion would be taken as a serious solution for his second idea. However, countless newspaper articles ridiculed the first and condemned him for the second. Scurrilous press attacks on him continued for several months and resurfaced occasionally thereafter. The extent of the public approbation can also be found in poems and stories linking him with euthanasia. Also discussed here are the sources of Osler’s equanimity in the face of such public derision and the inner drives which accounted for over 1300 publications by him—nearly half of which were composed after age 40.


1927 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 136-140
Author(s):  
E.M.K. GEILING ◽  
BAISE

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document