scholarly journals Afabicin, a First-in-Class Antistaphylococcal Antibiotic, in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: Clinical Noninferiority to Vancomycin/Linezolid

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick Wittke ◽  
Catherine Vincent ◽  
James Chen ◽  
Barry Heller ◽  
Heidi Kabler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acyl Carrier Protein ◽  
Acid Synthesis ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Skin Structure ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Mitt Population ◽  
Parallel Group ◽  
Intent To Treat

ABSTRACT Afabicin (formerly Debio 1450, AFN-1720) is a prodrug of afabicin desphosphono, an enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase (FabI) inhibitor, and is a first-in-class antibiotic with a novel mode of action to specifically target fatty acid synthesis in Staphylococcus spp. The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of afabicin were compared with those of vancomycin/linezolid in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) due to staphylococci in this multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, and double-dummy phase 2 study. Randomized patients (1:1:1) received either low-dose (LD) afabicin (intravenous [i.v.] 80 mg, followed by oral 120 mg, twice a day [BID]), high-dose (HD) afabicin (i.v. 160 mg, followed by oral 240 mg, BID), or vancomycin/linezolid (i.v. vancomycin 1 g or 15 mg/kg, followed by oral linezolid 600 mg, BID). The most frequent baseline pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus (97.5% of microbiological intent-to-treat [mITT] population), and 50.4% of patients had methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Clinical response rates at 48 to 72 h postrandomization in the mITT population were comparable among treatment groups (94.6%, 90.1%, and 91.1%, respectively). Both LD and HD afabicin were noninferior to vancomycin/linezolid (differences, −3.5% [95% confidence interval {CI}, −10.8%, 3.9%] and 1.0% [95% CI, −7.3%, 9.2%], respectively). Most common treatment-emergent adverse events were mild and were headache (9.1% and 16.8%) and nausea (6.4% and 8.4%) with LD and HD afabicin, respectively. Afabicin was efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of ABSSSI due to staphylococci, and these data support further development of afabicin for the treatment of ABSSSI and potentially other types of staphylococcal infections. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02426918.)

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of AFN-1252, the First Staphylococcus-Specific Antibacterial Agent, in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections, Including Those in Patients with Significant Comorbidities

2015 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 1695-1701 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Hafkin ◽  
N. Kaplan ◽  
B. Murphy
Keyword(s):  
Acyl Carrier Protein ◽  
Early Response ◽  
Multicenter Trial ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Skin Structure ◽  
End Of Treatment ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Intent To Treat

This open-label noncontrolled, phase II multicenter trial was designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of 200 mg of AFN-1252, a selective inhibitor ofStaphylococcus aureusenoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase (FabI), given by mouth twice daily in the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) due to staphylococci. Important aspects of the current study included a comparison of early response efficacy endpoints with end-of-treatment and follow-up endpoints. Many patients in the intent-to-treat population (n= 103) had significant comorbidities. The overall early response rate at day 3 was 97.3% (wound, 100%; abscess, 96.6%; cellulitis, 94.4%) in the microbiologically evaluable (ME) population. Within the ME population, 82.9% of patients had a ≥20% decrease in the area of erythema, and 77.9% of patients had a ≥20% decrease in the area of induration, on day 3.S. aureuswas detected in 97.7% of patients (n= 37 patients with methicillin-resistantS. aureus[MRSA], andn= 39 with methicillin-sensitiveS. aureus[MSSA]). No isolates had increased AFN-1252 MICs posttreatment. Microbiologic eradication rates forS. aureuswere 93.2% at short-term follow-up (STFU) and 91.9% at long-term follow-up (LTFU) in the ME population. Eradication rates for MRSA and MSSA were 91.9% and 92.3%, respectively, at STFU and 91.9% and 89.7%, respectively, at LTFU. The most frequently reported drug-related adverse events, which were mostly mild or moderate, were headache (26.2%) and nausea (21.4%). These studies demonstrate that AFN-1252 is generally well tolerated and effective in the treatment of ABSSSI due toS. aureus, including MRSA. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01519492.)

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of Tigecycline in Treatment of Skin and Skin Structure Infections: Results of a Double-Blind Phase 3 Comparison Study with Vancomycin-Aztreonam

2005 ◽  
Vol 49 (11) ◽  
pp. 4658-4666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Breedt ◽  
Jüri Teras ◽  
Janis Gardovskis ◽  
Frans Jacobus Maritz ◽  
Tiit Vaasna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Adverse Event Reporting ◽  
Combination Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Skin Structure ◽  
Mitt Population ◽  
Complicated Skin ◽  
Clinical Responses ◽  
Intent To Treat

ABSTRACT In a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, 546 patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections received tigecycline 100 mg/day (a 100-mg initial dose and then 50 mg intravenously twice daily) or the combination of vancomycin 2 g/day (1 g intravenously twice daily) and aztreonam 4 g/day (2 g intravenously twice daily) for up to 14 days. The primary end point was the clinical response in the clinical modified intent-to-treat (c-mITT) and clinically evaluable (CE) populations at the test-of-cure visit 12 to 92 days after the last dose. The microbiologic response at the test-of-cure visit was also assessed. Safety was assessed by physical examination, laboratory results, and adverse event reporting. Five hundred twenty patients were included in the c-mITT population (tigecycline group, n = 261; combination group, n = 259), and 436 were clinically evaluable (tigecycline group, n = 223; combination group, n = 213). The clinical responses in the tigecycline and the combination vancomycin and aztreonam groups were similar in the c-mITT population (84.3% versus 86.9%; difference, −2.6% [95% confidence interval, −9.0, 3.8]; P = 0.4755) and the CE population (89.7% versus 94.4%; difference, −4.7% [95% confidence interval, −10.2, 0.8]; P = 0.1015). Microbiologic eradication (documented or presumed) occurred in 84.8% of the patients receiving tigecycline and 93.2% of the patients receiving vancomycin and aztreonam (difference, −8.5 [95% confidence interval, −16.0, −1.0]; P = 0.0243). The numbers of patients reporting adverse events were similar in the two groups, with increased nausea and vomiting rates in the tigecycline group and an increased incidence of rash and increases in alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels in the combination vancomycin and aztreonam group. Tigecycline was shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections.

scholarly journals Comparative Susceptibilities to Fidaxomicin (OPT-80) of Isolates Collected at Baseline, Recurrence, and Failure from Patients in Two Phase III Trials of Fidaxomicin against Clostridium difficile Infection

2011 ◽  
Vol 55 (11) ◽  
pp. 5194-5199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellie J. C. Goldstein ◽  
Diane M. Citron ◽  
Pamela Sears ◽  
Farah Babakhani ◽  
Susan P. Sambol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clostridium Difficile ◽  
Restriction Endonuclease Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Single Strain ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Intent To Treat

ABSTRACTA 10-day course of oral fidaxomicin (200 mg twice a day [b.i.d.]), a potent new macrocyclic drug, was compared to vancomycin (125 mg four times a day [q.i.d.]) in 1,164 adults (1,105 in the modified intent-to-treat [mITT] population) withClostridium difficileinfection in two phase III randomized, double-blind trials at sites in North America and 7 European countries. Of 1,105 mITT patients, 792 (71.7%), including 719/999 (72.0%) in the per-protocol (PP) population, provided aC. difficilestrain at baseline, of whom 356 received fidaxomicin with 330 cures (92.7%) and 363 received vancomycin with 329 cures (90.6%). The susceptibilities (MIC90) of baseline isolates did not predict clinical cure, failure, or recurrence for fidaxomicin (MIC90, 0.25 μg/ml for both; range, ≤0.007 to 1 μg/ml), but there was a one-dilution difference in the MIC90(but not the MIC50) for vancomycin (MIC90, 2 μg/ml [range, 0.25 to 8 μg/ml] for cure and 4.0 μg/ml [range, 0.5 to 4 μg/ml] for failures). A total of 65 (7.9%) “rifaximin-resistant” (MIC > 256 μg/ml) strains were isolated in both treatment groups on enrollment, which increased to 25% for failures at the end of therapy. No resistance to either fidaxomicin or vancomycin developed during treatment in either of the phase III studies, although a single strain isolated from a cured patient had an elevated fidaxomicin MIC of 16 μg/ml at the time of recurrence. All isolates were susceptible to ≤4 μg/ml of metronidazole. When analyzed by restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) type, 247/719 (34.4%) isolates were BI group isolates, and the MICs were generally higher for all four drugs tested (MIC90s: fidaxomicin, 0.5; vancomycin, 2.0; metronidazole, 2.0; and rifaximin, >256 μg/ml) than for the other REA types. There was no correlation between the MIC of a baseline clinical isolate and clinical outcome. MIC90s were generally low for fidaxomicin and vancomycin, but BI isolates had higher MICs than other REA group isolates.

A randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous ondansetron alone and in combination with intravenous dexamethasone in the prevention of high-dose cisplatin-induced emesis.

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 596-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
P J Hesketh ◽  
W H Harvey ◽  
W G Harker ◽  
T M Beck ◽  
T Ryan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Parallel Group Design ◽  
Parallel Group ◽  
Abdominal Colic ◽  
Safety Parameters ◽  
Blind Comparison ◽  
To Receive

PURPOSE This study compares the efficacy and safety of ondansetron alone with that of ondansetron plus dexamethasone in the prevention of emesis induced by high-dose cisplatin (> or = 100 mg/m2). PATIENTS AND METHODS This multicenter study used a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group design. Chemotherapy-naive patients were randomized to receive intravenous (IV) ondansetron (Zofran, Cerenex Pharmaceuticals, Research Triangle Park, NC) 0.15 mg/kg for three doses every 4 hours beginning 30 minutes before cisplatin administration either alone or in combination with dexamethasone 20 mg administered 45 minutes before cisplatin. Cisplatin (> or = 100 mg/m2) was administered as a single infusion (< or = 3 hours). Patients were monitored for emetic episodes (EEs), adverse events, and laboratory safety parameters for 24 hours after cisplatin administration. RESULTS A total of 275 patients were enrolled. Of these, 245 were assessable for efficacy. Patients who received ondansetron plus dexamethasone had a higher complete antiemetic response rate (61% v 46%, P = .02) and less nausea (posttreatment visual analog scale mean 18.2 v 32.8, P < .001) than did those who received ondansetron alone. The time to the first EE was longer for patients in the group that received ondansetron plus dexamethasone (P = .005). Headache (12%), diarrhea (2%), and abdominal colic (1%) were the most common antiemetic-related adverse events reported. The incidence of adverse events was similar between the treatment groups. CONCLUSION IV ondansetron in combination with dexamethasone is safe and more effective than ondansetron alone in the prevention of emesis induced by high-dose cisplatin.

scholarly journals Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase II, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Safety/Tolerability and Efficacy of JNJ-Q2, a Novel Fluoroquinolone, Compared with Linezolid for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection

2011 ◽  
Vol 55 (12) ◽  
pp. 5790-5797 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Covington ◽  
J. Michael Davenport ◽  
David Andrae ◽  
William O'Riordan ◽  
Lisa Liverman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Systemic Disease ◽  
Treatment Success ◽  
Risk Difference ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Skin Structure ◽  
Fda Guidance ◽  
Intent To Treat ◽  
Cure Rates

ABSTRACTJNJ-Q2 is a fluoroquinolone with broad coverage including methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA). A double-blind, multicenter, phase II noninferiority study treated 161 patients for 7 to 14 days, testing the efficacy of JNJ-Q2 (250 mg, twice a day [BID]) versus linezolid (600 mg, BID) in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). The prespecified criterion for noninferiority was 15%. Primary intent-to-treat analysis was unable to declare noninferiority, as the risk difference lower bound of the 95% confidence interval between treatments was 19% at 36 to 84 h postrandomization for the composite end point of lesion assessment and temperature. Prespecified clinical cure rates 2 to 14 days after completion of therapy were similar (83.1% for JNJ-Q2 versus 82.1% for linezolid).Post hocanalyses revealed that JNJ-Q2 was statistically noninferior to linezolid (61.4% versus 57.7%, respectively;P= 0.024) based on the 2010 FDA guidance, which defines treatment success as lack of lesion spread and afebrile status within 48 to 72 h postrandomization. Despite evidence of systemic disease, <5% of patients presented with fever, suggesting fever is not a compelling surrogate measure of systemic disease resolution for this indication. Nausea and vomiting were the most common adverse events. Of the patients, 86% (104/121) hadS. aureusisolated from the infection site; 63% of these were MRSA. The results suggest JNJ-Q2 shows promise as an effective treatment for ABSSSI, demonstrating (i) efficacy for early clinical response (i.e., lack of spread of lesions and absence of fever at 48 to 72 h), and (ii) cure rates for ABSSSI pathogens (especially MRSA) consistent with the historical literature.

scholarly journals Phase 1 Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of the β-Lactamase Inhibitor Vaborbactam (RPX7009) in Healthy Adult Subjects

2016 ◽  
Vol 60 (10) ◽  
pp. 6326-6332 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Griffith ◽  
Jeffery S. Loutit ◽  
Elizabeth E. Morgan ◽  
Stephanie Durso ◽  
Michael N. Dudley
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Clearance ◽  
Healthy Adult ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Multiple Doses ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Lactamase Inhibitor

ABSTRACTVaborbactam (formerly RPX7009) is a member of a new class of β-lactamase inhibitor with pharmacokinetic properties similar to those of many β-lactams, including carbapenems. The pharmacokinetics and safety of vaborbactam were evaluated in 80 healthy adult subjects in a first-in-human randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, sequential single- and multiple-ascending-dose study. A total of 10 dose cohorts were enrolled in the study, with 6 subjects randomized to receive 250 to 2,000 mg of vaborbactam and 2 subjects randomized to receive placebo in each cohort. Maximum concentrations for vaborbactam were achieved at the end of the 3-h infusion. Vaborbactam exposure (Cmaxand area under the concentration-time curve [AUC]) increased in a dose-proportional manner following multiple doses. There was no evidence of accumulation with multiple doses, consistent with the terminal half-life of ∼2 h. Both the volume of distribution (Vss) and plasma clearance were independent of dose. For the 2,000-mg dose, the plasma clearance was 0.17 ± 0.03 liters/h, the AUC from 0 h to infinity (AUC0–∞) was 144.00 ± 13.90 mg · h/liter, and theVsswas 21.80 ± 2.26 mg · h/liter. Urinary recovery was 80% or greater over 48 h across all dose groups. No subjects discontinued the study due to adverse events (AEs), and no serious AEs (SAEs) were observed. All AEs were mild to moderate and similar among the vaborbactam- and placebo-treated subjects, with mild lethargy as the only unique AE reported with the high dose of vaborbactam. Overall, this study revealed the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic profile of vaborbactam and formed the basis for advancement into patient studies in combination with meropenem, including treatment of patients with carbapenem-resistantEnterobacteriaceae(CRE) infections. (This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT01751269.)

scholarly journals High-Dose, Short-Duration, Early Valacyclovir Therapy for Episodic Treatment of Cold Sores: Results of Two Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Studies

2003 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 1072-1080 ◽  
Author(s):  
Spotswood L. Spruance ◽  
Terry M. Jones ◽  
Mark M. Blatter ◽  
Mauricio Vargas-Cortes ◽  
Judy Barber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Day Treatment ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Herpes Labialis ◽  
Lesion Development ◽  
Multicenter Studies ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Cold Sore ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Cold Sores

ABSTRACT Oral valacyclovir is better absorbed than oral acyclovir, increasing acyclovir bioavailability three- to fivefold. This provides the opportunity to explore whether high systemic acyclovir concentrations are effective in the treatment of cold sores (herpes labialis). Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies were conducted. Subjects were provided with 2 g of valacyclovir twice daily for 1 day (1-day treatment), 2 g of valacyclovir twice daily for 1 day and then 1 g of valacyclovir twice daily for 1 day (2-day treatment), or a matching placebo and instructed to initiate treatment upon the first symptoms of a cold sore. In study 1, the median duration of the episode (primary endpoint) was reduced by 1.0 day (P = 0.001) with 1-day treatment and 0.5 days (P = 0.009) with 2-day treatment compared to placebo. Similarly, the mean duration of the episode was statistically significantly reduced by 1.1 days with 1-day treatment and 0.7 days with 2-day treatment compared to placebo. The proportion of subjects in whom cold sore lesion development was prevented and/or blocked was increased by 6.4% (P = 0.096) with 1-day treatment and 8.5% (P = 0.061) with 2-day treatment compared to placebo. The time to lesion healing and time to cessation of pain and/or discomfort were statistically significantly reduced with valacyclovir compared to placebo. In study 2, results similar to those in study 1 were obtained. AEs were similar across treatment groups. These studies provide evidence supporting a simple, 1-day valacyclovir treatment regimen for cold sores that is safe and effective. The 1-day valacyclovir regimen offers patients a unique and convenient dosing alternative compared to available topical therapies.

Symptomatic Treatment With Lanreotide Microparticles in Inoperable Bowel Obstruction Resulting From Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Study

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (35) ◽  
pp. 4337-4343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascale Mariani ◽  
Joëlle Blumberg ◽  
Alain Landau ◽  
Daniela Lebrun-Jezekova ◽  
Estelle Botton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis ◽  
Bowel Obstruction ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Symptomatic Treatment ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Parallel Group ◽  
Intent To Treat

Purpose To investigate the somatostatin analog lanreotide as symptomatic treatment for inoperable bowel obstruction due to peritoneal carcinomatosis. Patients and Methods In all, 80 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, inoperable malignant digestive obstruction, and two or more vomiting episodes per day or nasogastric tube (NGT) who were previously treated with intravenous corticosteroids and proton pump inhibitors were randomly assigned to one 30-mg injection of lanreotide microparticles (n = 43) or placebo (n = 37) in a 10-day, double-blind, parallel-group phase. The primary end point was the proportion of patients responding on day 7 (one or fewer episodes of vomiting per day or no vomiting recurrence after NGT removal [for ≥ 3 consecutive days in both cases]). Vomiting frequency/NGT secretion volumes, nausea, abdominal pain, well-being, and safety were also assessed. Patients could then enter an open-label lanreotide-only phase. The study was conducted at 22 European hospitals. Results More patients receiving lanreotide than placebo were responders; this difference was not statistically significant for the intent-to-treat (ITT) population on the basis of diary cards (primary analysis; 41.9% [18 of 43] v 29.7% [11 of 37], respectively; odds ratio, 1.75; 95% CI, 0.68 to 4.49; P = .24) but was statistically significant for the corresponding supportive per protocol analysis (57.7% [15 of 26] v 30.4% [seven of 23]; P < .05) and ITT analysis, on the basis of investigators' assessments (50.0% [19 of 38] v 28.6% [10 of 35]; P < .05). Improvements in well-being were significantly greater with lanreotide on days 3, 6, and 7. No significant differences were observed for other secondary end points. Only two (mild/moderate) treatment-emergent adverse events were considered related to lanreotide. Conclusion These results show that lanreotide has some efficacy and is safe in the symptomatic treatment of patients with inoperable bowel obstruction due to peritoneal carcinomatosis.

scholarly journals Blood Pressure Response to Zofenopril or Irbesartan Each Combined with Hydrochlorothiazide in High-Risk Hypertensives Uncontrolled by Monotherapy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled, Parallel Group, Noninferiority Trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ettore Malacco ◽  
Stefano Omboni ◽  
Gianfranco Parati
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Renal Damage ◽  
Blood Pressure Response ◽  
Target Organ Damage ◽  
Organ Damage ◽  
Target Organ ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Parallel Group ◽  
Plaque Regression

In this randomized, double-blind, controlled, parallel group study (ZENITH), 434 essential hypertensives with additional cardiovascular risk factors, uncontrolled by a previous monotherapy, were treated for 18 weeks with zofenopril 30 or 60 mg plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg or irbesartan 150 or 300 mg plus HCTZ. Rate of office blood pressure (BP) response (zofenopril: 68% versus irbesartan: 70%;p=0.778) and 24-hour BP response (zofenopril: 85% versus irbesartan: 84%;p=0.781) was similar between the two treatment groups. Cardiac and renal damage was equally reduced by both treatments, whereas the rate of carotid plaque regression was significantly larger with zofenopril. In conclusion, uncontrolled monotherapy treated hypertensives effectively respond to a combination of zofenopril or irbesartan plus a thiazide diuretic, in terms of either BP response or target organ damage progression.

scholarly journals Lipoatrophy in GH deficient patients treated with a long-acting pegylated GH

2009 ◽  
Vol 161 (4) ◽  
pp. 533-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Touraine ◽  
Gwyn A D'Souza ◽  
Ione Kourides ◽  
Roger Abs ◽  
Paul Barclay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Injection Site ◽  
Covalent Binding ◽  
Limiting Factor ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Parallel Group ◽  
Adult Gh Deficiency ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Design And Methods ◽  
Group D

ObjectiveChanges observed during adult GH deficiency (GHD) are most often reversed with the administration of recombinant human GH (rhGH). To avoid daily injections, a long-acting GH molecule has been obtained by covalent binding of polyethylene glycol (PEG) with rhGH (PEG–GH), allowing weekly s.c. injections. This study was designed to assess its efficacy and safety, in adult GHD subjects.Design and methodsThis was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose, parallel group study. Subjects were recruited from 34 centers. A total of 105 subjects with GHD were assigned a treatment. They received 6 weekly injections of either PEG–GH or placebo. Subjects were randomized into one out of four treatment groups (Groups A–D) or placebo (Group E). Groups A, B, and C received 1, 3, and 4 mg PEG–GH respectively, for the first 3 weeks followed by 2, 6, and 8 mg PEG–GH respectively, for the remaining 3 weeks. Group D received 4 mg PEG–GH for 6 weeks. Group E received placebo. The study was suspended because of the development of lipoatrophy in certain subjects and restarted with an injection rotation plan, before being terminated due to further subjects developing lipoatrophy.ResultsA total of 13 cases of injection-site lipoatrophy were reported, of which ten were in females and three occurred after the first injection; all cases were independent of PEG–GH dose or IGF1 levels, either basal or under treatment.ConclusionThe unpredictable occurrence of injection-site lipoatrophy with weekly long-acting pegylated GH molecules may be a limiting factor for their development.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document