scholarly journals Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized Trial of Ceftobiprole Treatment of Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections Caused by Gram-Positive Bacteria

2007 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary J. Noel ◽  
Richard S. Strauss ◽  
Karen Amsler ◽  
Markus Heep ◽  
Rienk Pypstra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Taste Disturbance ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Skin Structure ◽  
Gram Positive Bacteria ◽  
Complicated Skin ◽  
Cure Rates

ABSTRACT Ceftobiprole is the first broad-spectrum cephalosporin with activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) to be assessed in late-stage clinical trials. As a pivotal step in the clinical development of ceftobiprole, a multicenter, global, randomized, double-blind trial was conducted to compare the efficacy of ceftobiprole to that of vancomycin in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs) caused by gram-positive bacteria. The primary objective was to assess noninferiority on the basis of the cure rates 7 to 14 days after the completion of therapy in patients administered ceftobiprole 500 mg every 12 h or vancomycin 1 g every 12 h. Of 784 patients randomized, 282 receiving ceftobiprole and 277 receiving vancomycin were clinically evaluable. Of these patients, 93.3% treated with ceftobiprole and 93.5% treated with vancomycin were cured (95% confidence interval of difference, −4.4%, 3.9%). The cure rates for patients with MRSA infections were 91.8% (56/61) with ceftobiprole treatment and 90.0% (54/60) with vancomycin treatment (95% confidence interval of difference, −8.4%, 12.1%). At least one adverse event (AE) was reported by 52% of the ceftobiprole-treated patients and 51% of the vancomycin-treated patients. The most common AEs reported by the ceftobiprole-treated patients were nausea (14%) and taste disturbance (8%). Discontinuation of the study drug because of treatment-emergent AEs occurred in 4% (n = 17) of the ceftobiprole-treated patients and 6% (n = 22) of the vancomycin-treated patients. The results of this trial support the use of ceftobiprole as an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for patients with cSSSIs caused by a spectrum of gram-positive bacteria.

scholarly journals Telavancin versus Standard Therapy for Treatment of Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections Caused by Gram-Positive Bacteria: FAST 2 Study

2006 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 862-867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin E. Stryjewski ◽  
Vivian H. Chu ◽  
William D. O'Riordan ◽  
Brian L. Warren ◽  
Lala M. Dunbar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Therapy ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Therapy Group ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Standard Therapy Group ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Skin Structure ◽  
Complicated Skin ◽  
Cure Rates

ABSTRACT Telavancin is a bactericidal lipoglycopeptide with a multifunctional mechanism of action. We conducted a randomized, double blind, active-control phase II trial. Patients ≥18 years of age with complicated skin and skin structure infections caused by suspected or confirmed gram-positive organisms were randomized to receive either telavancin at 10 mg/kg intravenously every 24 h (q24h) or standard therapy (antistaphylococcal penicillin at 2 g q6h or vancomycin at 1 g q12h). A total of 195 patients were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication. Clinical success rates were similar in all analysis populations at test of cure. In microbiologically evaluable patients with Staphylococcus aureus at baseline (n = 91), 96% of the telavancin group and 90% of the standard-therapy group were cured. Among patients with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) at baseline (n = 45), clinical cure rates were also 96% for telavancin and 90% for standard therapy. Microbiologic eradication in patients with S. aureus infection was better with telavancin compared to standard therapy (92% versus 78%, P = 0.07) and significantly better in patients with MRSA (92% versus 68%; P = 0.04). Therapy was discontinued for an adverse event (AE) in 6% and 3% of the patients receiving telavancin and standard therapy, respectively. Except for two cases of rash in the telavancin group, these AEs were similar in type and severity in the two groups. The overall incidences and severities of AEs and laboratory abnormalities were similar between the two groups. These data support the ongoing studies assessing the efficacy and safety of telavancin in the treatment of serious gram-positive infections, particularly involving MRSA.

scholarly journals TD-1792 versus Vancomycin for Treatment of Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections

2012 ◽  
Vol 56 (11) ◽  
pp. 5476-5483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin E. Stryjewski ◽  
Peter D. Potgieter ◽  
Yu-Ping Li ◽  
Steven L. Barriere ◽  
Allan Churukian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Success ◽  
Study Medication ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Skin Structure ◽  
Complicated Skin ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Vancomycin Group ◽  
Cure Rates

ABSTRACTTD-1792 is a first-in-class glycopeptide-cephalosporin heterodimer that exhibits bactericidal activity against Gram-positive pathogens. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, active-control, phase II trial in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections caused by suspected or confirmed Gram-positive organisms. Patients 18 to 65 years old were randomized to receive 7 to 14 days of either TD-1792 (2 mg/kg of body weight intravenously [i.v.] every 24 h [q24h]) or vancomycin (1 g i.v. q12h, with dosage regimens adjusted per site-specific procedures). A total of 197 patients were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication. Rates of clinical success at the test-of-cure evaluation were similar in all analysis populations. Among 170 clinically evaluable patients, cure rates were 91.7% and 90.7% in the TD-1792 and vancomycin groups, respectively (95% confidence interval [CI] of −7.9 to 9.7 for the difference). In microbiologically evaluable patients with methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusat baseline (n= 75), cure rates were 94.7% in the TD-1792 group and 91.9% in the vancomycin group. Microbiological eradication of Gram-positive pathogens (n= 126) was achieved in 93.7% and 92.1% of patients in the TD-1792 and vancomycin groups, respectively. Seven patients were discontinued from study medication due to an adverse event (AE): 2 and 5 in the TD-1792 and vancomycin groups, respectively. AEs were of similar types and severities between the two groups, other than pruritus, which was more common in patients who received vancomycin. No patients in the TD-1792 group experienced a serious AE. This study supports further clinical development of TD-1792 in patients with Gram-positive infection.

scholarly journals Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Dose-Ranging Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Population Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of Oral Torezolid Phosphate in Patients with Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections

2010 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 583-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Prokocimer ◽  
P. Bien ◽  
J. Surber ◽  
P. Mehra ◽  
C. DeAnda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Peripheral Compartment ◽  
Population Pharmacokinetic ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Skin Structure ◽  
Complicated Skin ◽  
Cure Rates ◽  
Dose Levels

ABSTRACTTorezolid (TR-700) is the active moiety of the prodrug torezolid phosphate ([TP] TR-701), a second-generation oxazolidinone with 4- to 16-fold greater potency than linezolid against Gram-positive species including methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA). A double-blind phase 2 study evaluated three levels (200, 300, or 400 mg) of oral, once-daily TP over 5 to 7 days for complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI). Patients 18 to 75 years old with cSSSI caused by suspected or confirmed Gram-positive pathogens were randomized 1:1:1. Of 188 treated patients, 76.6% had abscesses, 17.6% had extensive cellulitis, and 5.9% had wound infections.S. aureus, the most common pathogen, was isolated in 90.3% of patients (139/154) with a baseline pathogen; 80.6% were MRSA. Cure rates in clinically evaluable patients were 98.2% at 200 mg, 94.4% at 300 mg, and 94.4% at 400 mg. Cure rates were consistent across diagnoses, regardless of lesion size or the presence of systemic signs of infection. Clinical cure rates in patients withS. aureusisolated at baseline were 96.6% overall and 96.8% for MRSA. TP was safe and well tolerated at all dose levels. No patients discontinued treatment due to an adverse event. Three-stage hierarchical population pharmacokinetic modeling yielded a geometric mean clearance of 8.28 liters/h (between-patient variability, 32.3%), a volume of the central compartment of 71.4 liters (24.0%), and a volume of the peripheral compartment of 27.9 liters (35.7%). Results of this study show a high degree of efficacy at all three dose levels without significant differences in the safety profile and support the continued evaluation of TP for the treatment of cSSSI in phase 3 trials.

scholarly journals Telavancin: a novel semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide agent to counter the challenge of resistant Gram-positive pathogens

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 49-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biswadeep Das ◽  
Chayna Sarkar ◽  
Debasmita Das ◽  
Amit Gupta ◽  
Arnav Kalra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Skin Structure ◽  
Gram Positive Bacteria ◽  
Antibiotic Effect ◽  
Complicated Skin

Telavancin (TD-6424), a semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide vancomycin-derivative, is a novel antimicrobial agent developed by Theravance for overcoming resistant Gram-positive bacterial infections, specifically methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) had approved telavancin in 2009 for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs) caused by Gram-positive bacteria, including MRSA ( S. aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus anginosus group, or Enterococcus faecalis). Telavancin has two proposed mechanisms of action. In vitro, telavancin has a rapid, concentration-dependent bactericidal effect, due to disruption of cell membrane integrity. Telavancin has demonstrable in vitro activity against aerobic and anaerobic Gram-positive bacteria. Telavancin and vancomycin have similar spectra of activity. Gram-negative bacteria are usually non-susceptible to telavancin. Telavancin has been successfully tested in various animal models of bacteremia, endocarditis, meningitis, and pneumonia. Phase II Telavancin versus Standard Therapy for Treatment of Complicated Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections due to Gram-Positive Bacteria (FAST 1 and FAST 2) and phase III [Assessment of Telavancin in Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections 1 (ATLAS 1 and ATLAS 2)] clinical trials have been conducted for evaluating telavancin’s efficacy and safety in cSSSIs. Phase III clinical trials have been carried out for evaluating telavancin’s safety and efficacy in nosocomial pneumonia [Assessment of Telavancin for Treatment of Hospital acquired Pneumonia 1 and 2 (ATTAIN 1 and ATTAIN 2)]. A phase II randomized, double-blind, clinical trial has been carried out for evaluating telavancin’s safety and efficacy in uncomplicated S. aureus bacteremia [Telavancin for Treatment of Uncomplicated S. aureus Bacteremia (ASSURE)]. Pacemaker lead–related infective endocarditis due to a vancomycin intermediate S. aureus (VISA) strain (non-daptomycin susceptible) was successfully treated with parenteral telavancin for 8 weeks. Telavancin extensively binds to serum albumin (~93%) and has a relatively small volume of distribution. Telavancin is not biotransformed by any cytochrome P450 microsomal enzymes and excreted mainly in the urine. Though well-tolerated, worrisome adverse effects, including renal dysfunction and QTc prolongation are of potential concern. Given its extensive binding to plasma proteins, long half-life, and a long post-antibiotic effect, it represents a promising addition to the therapeutic armamentarium in combating infections caused by resistant Gram-positive pathogens, namely, MRSA.

scholarly journals In VitroActivity and Microbiological Efficacy of Tedizolid (TR-700) against Gram-Positive Clinical Isolates from a Phase 2 Study of Oral Tedizolid Phosphate (TR-701) in Patients with Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections

2012 ◽  
Vol 56 (9) ◽  
pp. 4608-4613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Prokocimer ◽  
Paul Bien ◽  
Carisa DeAnda ◽  
Chris M. Pillar ◽  
Ken Bartizal
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Coagulase Negative Staphylococci ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Skin Structure ◽  
Phase 2 Trial ◽  
Complicated Skin

ABSTRACTTedizolid (TR-700, formerly torezolid) is the active moiety of the prodrug tedizolid phosphate (TR-701), a next-generation oxazolidinone, with high potency against Gram-positive species, including methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA). A recently completed randomized, double-blind phase 2 trial evaluated 200, 300, or 400 mg of oral tedizolid phosphate once daily for 5 to 7 days in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections. This report examines thein vitroactivity of tedizolid and Zyvox (linezolid) against Gram-positive pathogens isolated at baseline and describes the microbiological and clinical efficacy of tedizolid. Of 196 isolates tested, 81.6% wereS. aureus, and of these, 76% were MRSA. The MIC50and MIC90of tedizolid against both methicillin-susceptibleS. aureus(MSSA) and MRSA were 0.25 μg/ml, compared with a MIC50of 1 μg/ml and MIC90of 2 μg/ml for linezolid. For coagulase-negative staphylococci (n= 7), viridans group streptococci (n= 15), and beta-hemolytic streptococci (n= 3), the MICs ranged from 0.03 to 0.25 μg/ml for tedizolid and from 0.12 to 1 μg/ml for linezolid. The microbiological eradication rates at the test-of-cure visit (7 to 14 days posttreatment) in the microbiologically evaluable population (n= 133) were similar in all treatment groups, with overall eradication rates of 97.7% for all pathogens, 97.9% for MRSA, and 95.7% for MSSA. The clinical cure rates for MRSA and MSSA infections were 96.9% and 95.7%, respectively, across all dose groups. This study confirms the potentin vitroactivity of tedizolid against pathogenic Gram-positive cocci, including MRSA, and its 4-fold-greater potency in comparison with linezolid. All dosages of tedizolid phosphate showed excellent microbiological and clinical efficacy against MRSA and MSSA.

scholarly journals Multicenter, Randomized Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Iclaprim in Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections

2009 ◽  
Vol 53 (7) ◽  
pp. 2834-2840 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Krievins ◽  
R. Brandt ◽  
S. Hawser ◽  
P. Hadvary ◽  
K. Islam
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Study ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Skin Structure ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Folate Pathway ◽  
Complicated Skin ◽  
Cure Rates ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Vancomycin Treatment

ABSTRACT Iclaprim is a novel antibacterial agent that is currently in development for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI). Iclaprim specifically and selectively inhibits bacterial dihydrofolate reductase, a critical enzyme in the bacterial folate pathway, and exhibits an extended spectrum of activity against various resistant pathogens, including methicillin (meticillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The objective of this randomized, double-blind phase II study was to compare the efficacy and safety of iclaprim to those of vancomycin in patients with cSSSI. Patients were randomized to receive 0.8 mg iclaprim/kg of body weight, 1.6 mg/kg iclaprim, or 1 g vancomycin twice a day for 10 days. Clinical cure rates for the 0.8- and 1.6-mg/kg-iclaprim treatment groups were comparable to that for the vancomycin treatment group (26/28 patients [92.9%], 28/31 patients [90.3%], and 26/28 patients [92.9%], respectively). Iclaprim also showed high microbiological eradication rates. Iclaprim exhibited an eradication rate of 80% and 72% versus 59% observed with vancomycin for S. aureus, the pathogen most frequently isolated at baseline. Five MRSA cases were observed, four in the 0.8-mg/kg-iclaprim arm and one in the vancomycin arm, and all were both clinically and microbiologically cured. Iclaprim exhibited a safety profile similar to that of vancomycin, an established drug for the treatment of cSSSI. Results from this study indicate that iclaprim is a promising new therapy for the treatment of cSSSI, in particular those caused by S. aureus, including MRSA.

scholarly journals A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study To Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Iclaprim versus Vancomycin for Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections Suspected or Confirmed To Be Due to Gram-Positive Pathogens (REVIVE-2 Study)

2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas L. Holland ◽  
William O'Riordan ◽  
Alison McManus ◽  
Elliot Shin ◽  
Ali Borghei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Lesion Size ◽  
Skin Infections ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Skin Structure ◽  
Safe Treatment

ABSTRACTIclaprim is a novel diaminopyrimidine antibiotic that may be an effective and safe treatment for serious skin infections. The safety and effectiveness of iclaprim were assessed in a global phase 3, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled trial. Six hundred thirteen adults with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) suspected or confirmed to be due to Gram-positive pathogens were randomized to iclaprim (80 mg) or vancomycin (15 mg/kg of body weight), both of which were administered intravenously every 12 h for 5 to 14 days. The primary endpoint was a ≥20% reduction in lesion size compared with that at the baseline at 48 to 72 h after the start of administration of study drug in the intent-to-treat population. Among patients randomized to iclaprim, 78.3% (231 of 295) met this primary endpoint, whereas 76.7% (234 of 305) of those receiving vancomycin met this primary endpoint (difference, 1.58%; 95% confidence interval, −5.10% to 8.26%). This met the prespecified 10% noninferiority margin. Iclaprim was well tolerated, with most adverse events being categorized as mild. In conclusion, iclaprim was noninferior to vancomycin in this phase 3 clinical trial for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. On the basis of these results, iclaprim may be an efficacious and safe treatment for skin infections suspected or confirmed to be due to Gram-positive pathogens. (This trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02607618.)

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of Tigecycline in Treatment of Skin and Skin Structure Infections: Results of a Double-Blind Phase 3 Comparison Study with Vancomycin-Aztreonam

2005 ◽  
Vol 49 (11) ◽  
pp. 4658-4666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Breedt ◽  
Jüri Teras ◽  
Janis Gardovskis ◽  
Frans Jacobus Maritz ◽  
Tiit Vaasna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Adverse Event Reporting ◽  
Combination Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Skin Structure ◽  
Mitt Population ◽  
Complicated Skin ◽  
Clinical Responses ◽  
Intent To Treat

ABSTRACT In a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, 546 patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections received tigecycline 100 mg/day (a 100-mg initial dose and then 50 mg intravenously twice daily) or the combination of vancomycin 2 g/day (1 g intravenously twice daily) and aztreonam 4 g/day (2 g intravenously twice daily) for up to 14 days. The primary end point was the clinical response in the clinical modified intent-to-treat (c-mITT) and clinically evaluable (CE) populations at the test-of-cure visit 12 to 92 days after the last dose. The microbiologic response at the test-of-cure visit was also assessed. Safety was assessed by physical examination, laboratory results, and adverse event reporting. Five hundred twenty patients were included in the c-mITT population (tigecycline group, n = 261; combination group, n = 259), and 436 were clinically evaluable (tigecycline group, n = 223; combination group, n = 213). The clinical responses in the tigecycline and the combination vancomycin and aztreonam groups were similar in the c-mITT population (84.3% versus 86.9%; difference, −2.6% [95% confidence interval, −9.0, 3.8]; P = 0.4755) and the CE population (89.7% versus 94.4%; difference, −4.7% [95% confidence interval, −10.2, 0.8]; P = 0.1015). Microbiologic eradication (documented or presumed) occurred in 84.8% of the patients receiving tigecycline and 93.2% of the patients receiving vancomycin and aztreonam (difference, −8.5 [95% confidence interval, −16.0, −1.0]; P = 0.0243). The numbers of patients reporting adverse events were similar in the two groups, with increased nausea and vomiting rates in the tigecycline group and an increased incidence of rash and increases in alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels in the combination vancomycin and aztreonam group. Tigecycline was shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document