scholarly journals Telavancin versus Standard Therapy for Treatment of Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections Caused by Gram-Positive Bacteria: FAST 2 Study

2006 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 862-867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin E. Stryjewski ◽  
Vivian H. Chu ◽  
William D. O'Riordan ◽  
Brian L. Warren ◽  
Lala M. Dunbar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Therapy ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Therapy Group ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Standard Therapy Group ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Skin Structure ◽  
Complicated Skin ◽  
Cure Rates

ABSTRACT Telavancin is a bactericidal lipoglycopeptide with a multifunctional mechanism of action. We conducted a randomized, double blind, active-control phase II trial. Patients ≥18 years of age with complicated skin and skin structure infections caused by suspected or confirmed gram-positive organisms were randomized to receive either telavancin at 10 mg/kg intravenously every 24 h (q24h) or standard therapy (antistaphylococcal penicillin at 2 g q6h or vancomycin at 1 g q12h). A total of 195 patients were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication. Clinical success rates were similar in all analysis populations at test of cure. In microbiologically evaluable patients with Staphylococcus aureus at baseline (n = 91), 96% of the telavancin group and 90% of the standard-therapy group were cured. Among patients with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) at baseline (n = 45), clinical cure rates were also 96% for telavancin and 90% for standard therapy. Microbiologic eradication in patients with S. aureus infection was better with telavancin compared to standard therapy (92% versus 78%, P = 0.07) and significantly better in patients with MRSA (92% versus 68%; P = 0.04). Therapy was discontinued for an adverse event (AE) in 6% and 3% of the patients receiving telavancin and standard therapy, respectively. Except for two cases of rash in the telavancin group, these AEs were similar in type and severity in the two groups. The overall incidences and severities of AEs and laboratory abnormalities were similar between the two groups. These data support the ongoing studies assessing the efficacy and safety of telavancin in the treatment of serious gram-positive infections, particularly involving MRSA.

scholarly journals TD-1792 versus Vancomycin for Treatment of Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections

2012 ◽  
Vol 56 (11) ◽  
pp. 5476-5483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin E. Stryjewski ◽  
Peter D. Potgieter ◽  
Yu-Ping Li ◽  
Steven L. Barriere ◽  
Allan Churukian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Success ◽  
Study Medication ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Skin Structure ◽  
Complicated Skin ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Vancomycin Group ◽  
Cure Rates

ABSTRACTTD-1792 is a first-in-class glycopeptide-cephalosporin heterodimer that exhibits bactericidal activity against Gram-positive pathogens. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, active-control, phase II trial in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections caused by suspected or confirmed Gram-positive organisms. Patients 18 to 65 years old were randomized to receive 7 to 14 days of either TD-1792 (2 mg/kg of body weight intravenously [i.v.] every 24 h [q24h]) or vancomycin (1 g i.v. q12h, with dosage regimens adjusted per site-specific procedures). A total of 197 patients were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication. Rates of clinical success at the test-of-cure evaluation were similar in all analysis populations. Among 170 clinically evaluable patients, cure rates were 91.7% and 90.7% in the TD-1792 and vancomycin groups, respectively (95% confidence interval [CI] of −7.9 to 9.7 for the difference). In microbiologically evaluable patients with methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureusat baseline (n= 75), cure rates were 94.7% in the TD-1792 group and 91.9% in the vancomycin group. Microbiological eradication of Gram-positive pathogens (n= 126) was achieved in 93.7% and 92.1% of patients in the TD-1792 and vancomycin groups, respectively. Seven patients were discontinued from study medication due to an adverse event (AE): 2 and 5 in the TD-1792 and vancomycin groups, respectively. AEs were of similar types and severities between the two groups, other than pruritus, which was more common in patients who received vancomycin. No patients in the TD-1792 group experienced a serious AE. This study supports further clinical development of TD-1792 in patients with Gram-positive infection.

scholarly journals Ceftobiprole Compared With Vancomycin Plus Aztreonam in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: Results of a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind Trial (TARGET)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Scott Overcash ◽  
Charles Kim ◽  
Richard Keech ◽  
Illia Gumenchuk ◽  
Borislav Ninov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Response ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
European Medicines Agency ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Skin Structure

Abstract Background The development of novel broad-spectrum antibiotics, with efficacy against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, has the potential to enhance treatment options for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs). Ceftobiprole is an advanced-generation intravenous cephalosporin with broad in vitro activity against gram-positive (including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) and gram-negative pathogens. Methods TARGET was a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, phase 3 noninferiority study that compared ceftobiprole with vancomycin plus aztreonam. The Food and Drug Administration-defined primary efficacy endpoint was early clinical response 48–72 hours after treatment initiation in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and the European Medicines Agency-defined primary endpoint was investigator-assessed clinical success at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit. Noninferiority was defined as the lower limit of the 95% CI for the difference in success rates (ceftobiprole minus vancomycin/aztreonam) >−10%. Safety was assessed through adverse event and laboratory data collection. Results In total, 679 patients were randomized to ceftobiprole (n = 335) or vancomycin/aztreonam (n = 344). Early clinical success rates were 91.3% and 88.1% in the ceftobiprole and vancomycin/aztreonam groups, respectively, and noninferiority was demonstrated (adjusted difference: 3.3%; 95% CI: −1.2, 7.8). Investigator-assessed clinical success at the TOC visit was similar between the 2 groups, and noninferiority was demonstrated for both the ITT (90.1% vs 89.0%) and clinically evaluable (97.9% vs 95.2%) populations. Both treatment groups displayed similar microbiological success and safety profiles. Conclusions TARGET demonstrated that ceftobiprole is noninferior to vancomycin/aztreonam in the treatment of ABSSSIs, in terms of early clinical response and investigator-assessed clinical success at the TOC visit. Clinical Trials Registration NCT03137173.

scholarly journals Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized Trial of Ceftobiprole Treatment of Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections Caused by Gram-Positive Bacteria

2007 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary J. Noel ◽  
Richard S. Strauss ◽  
Karen Amsler ◽  
Markus Heep ◽  
Rienk Pypstra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Taste Disturbance ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Skin Structure ◽  
Gram Positive Bacteria ◽  
Complicated Skin ◽  
Cure Rates

ABSTRACT Ceftobiprole is the first broad-spectrum cephalosporin with activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) to be assessed in late-stage clinical trials. As a pivotal step in the clinical development of ceftobiprole, a multicenter, global, randomized, double-blind trial was conducted to compare the efficacy of ceftobiprole to that of vancomycin in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs) caused by gram-positive bacteria. The primary objective was to assess noninferiority on the basis of the cure rates 7 to 14 days after the completion of therapy in patients administered ceftobiprole 500 mg every 12 h or vancomycin 1 g every 12 h. Of 784 patients randomized, 282 receiving ceftobiprole and 277 receiving vancomycin were clinically evaluable. Of these patients, 93.3% treated with ceftobiprole and 93.5% treated with vancomycin were cured (95% confidence interval of difference, −4.4%, 3.9%). The cure rates for patients with MRSA infections were 91.8% (56/61) with ceftobiprole treatment and 90.0% (54/60) with vancomycin treatment (95% confidence interval of difference, −8.4%, 12.1%). At least one adverse event (AE) was reported by 52% of the ceftobiprole-treated patients and 51% of the vancomycin-treated patients. The most common AEs reported by the ceftobiprole-treated patients were nausea (14%) and taste disturbance (8%). Discontinuation of the study drug because of treatment-emergent AEs occurred in 4% (n = 17) of the ceftobiprole-treated patients and 6% (n = 22) of the vancomycin-treated patients. The results of this trial support the use of ceftobiprole as an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for patients with cSSSIs caused by a spectrum of gram-positive bacteria.

scholarly journals Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Dose-Ranging Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Population Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of Oral Torezolid Phosphate in Patients with Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections

2010 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 583-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Prokocimer ◽  
P. Bien ◽  
J. Surber ◽  
P. Mehra ◽  
C. DeAnda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Peripheral Compartment ◽  
Population Pharmacokinetic ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Skin Structure ◽  
Complicated Skin ◽  
Cure Rates ◽  
Dose Levels

ABSTRACTTorezolid (TR-700) is the active moiety of the prodrug torezolid phosphate ([TP] TR-701), a second-generation oxazolidinone with 4- to 16-fold greater potency than linezolid against Gram-positive species including methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA). A double-blind phase 2 study evaluated three levels (200, 300, or 400 mg) of oral, once-daily TP over 5 to 7 days for complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI). Patients 18 to 75 years old with cSSSI caused by suspected or confirmed Gram-positive pathogens were randomized 1:1:1. Of 188 treated patients, 76.6% had abscesses, 17.6% had extensive cellulitis, and 5.9% had wound infections.S. aureus, the most common pathogen, was isolated in 90.3% of patients (139/154) with a baseline pathogen; 80.6% were MRSA. Cure rates in clinically evaluable patients were 98.2% at 200 mg, 94.4% at 300 mg, and 94.4% at 400 mg. Cure rates were consistent across diagnoses, regardless of lesion size or the presence of systemic signs of infection. Clinical cure rates in patients withS. aureusisolated at baseline were 96.6% overall and 96.8% for MRSA. TP was safe and well tolerated at all dose levels. No patients discontinued treatment due to an adverse event. Three-stage hierarchical population pharmacokinetic modeling yielded a geometric mean clearance of 8.28 liters/h (between-patient variability, 32.3%), a volume of the central compartment of 71.4 liters (24.0%), and a volume of the peripheral compartment of 27.9 liters (35.7%). Results of this study show a high degree of efficacy at all three dose levels without significant differences in the safety profile and support the continued evaluation of TP for the treatment of cSSSI in phase 3 trials.

Efficacy and Safety of a Novel, Single-dose Azithromycin Microsphere Formulation Versus 10 Days of Levofloxacin for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Sinusitis in Adults

2005 ◽  
Vol 133 (2) ◽  
pp. 194-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
John J. Murray ◽  
Paz Emparanza ◽  
Eugenijus Lesinskas ◽  
Margaret Tawadrous ◽  
Jeanne D. Breen
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Maxillary Sinusitis ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Radiographic Evidence ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Acute Bacterial Sinusitis ◽  
Cure Rates ◽  
International Multicenter

Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of a single 2.0-g dose of a novel azithromycin microsphere formulation with that of 10 days of levofloxacin, 500 mg/d, when used to treat adults with uncomplicated acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis (ABS). Study Design and Setting An international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial. Eligible outpatients ≥18 years of age with clinical and radiographic evidence of ABS underwent maxillary sinus aspiration before randomization. Primary endpoint was clinical efficacy at the test-of-cure visit (day 17-24). Results Clinical success rates were 94.5% (242/256) in azithromycin-microspheres-treated patients and 92.8% (233/251) in the levofloxacin group. In patients with documented Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, or Moraxella catarrhalis, clinical cure rates were 97.3% (36/37), 96.3% (26/27), and 100% (8/8), respectively, for the azithromycin group and 92.3% (36/39), 100% (30/30), and 90.9% (10/11), respectively, for the levofloxacin group. Conclusions Single-dose azithromycin microspheres provided clinical and bacteriologic efficacy and safety comparable to 10 days of levofloxacin. Significance A novel microsphere formulation of azithromycin given as a single dose was safe and effective for the treatment of ABS.

scholarly journals In VitroActivity and Microbiological Efficacy of Tedizolid (TR-700) against Gram-Positive Clinical Isolates from a Phase 2 Study of Oral Tedizolid Phosphate (TR-701) in Patients with Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections

2012 ◽  
Vol 56 (9) ◽  
pp. 4608-4613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Prokocimer ◽  
Paul Bien ◽  
Carisa DeAnda ◽  
Chris M. Pillar ◽  
Ken Bartizal
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Coagulase Negative Staphylococci ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Skin Structure ◽  
Phase 2 Trial ◽  
Complicated Skin

ABSTRACTTedizolid (TR-700, formerly torezolid) is the active moiety of the prodrug tedizolid phosphate (TR-701), a next-generation oxazolidinone, with high potency against Gram-positive species, including methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA). A recently completed randomized, double-blind phase 2 trial evaluated 200, 300, or 400 mg of oral tedizolid phosphate once daily for 5 to 7 days in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections. This report examines thein vitroactivity of tedizolid and Zyvox (linezolid) against Gram-positive pathogens isolated at baseline and describes the microbiological and clinical efficacy of tedizolid. Of 196 isolates tested, 81.6% wereS. aureus, and of these, 76% were MRSA. The MIC50and MIC90of tedizolid against both methicillin-susceptibleS. aureus(MSSA) and MRSA were 0.25 μg/ml, compared with a MIC50of 1 μg/ml and MIC90of 2 μg/ml for linezolid. For coagulase-negative staphylococci (n= 7), viridans group streptococci (n= 15), and beta-hemolytic streptococci (n= 3), the MICs ranged from 0.03 to 0.25 μg/ml for tedizolid and from 0.12 to 1 μg/ml for linezolid. The microbiological eradication rates at the test-of-cure visit (7 to 14 days posttreatment) in the microbiologically evaluable population (n= 133) were similar in all treatment groups, with overall eradication rates of 97.7% for all pathogens, 97.9% for MRSA, and 95.7% for MSSA. The clinical cure rates for MRSA and MSSA infections were 96.9% and 95.7%, respectively, across all dose groups. This study confirms the potentin vitroactivity of tedizolid against pathogenic Gram-positive cocci, including MRSA, and its 4-fold-greater potency in comparison with linezolid. All dosages of tedizolid phosphate showed excellent microbiological and clinical efficacy against MRSA and MSSA.

scholarly journals Multicenter, Randomized Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Iclaprim in Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections

2009 ◽  
Vol 53 (7) ◽  
pp. 2834-2840 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Krievins ◽  
R. Brandt ◽  
S. Hawser ◽  
P. Hadvary ◽  
K. Islam
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Study ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Skin Structure ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Folate Pathway ◽  
Complicated Skin ◽  
Cure Rates ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Vancomycin Treatment

ABSTRACT Iclaprim is a novel antibacterial agent that is currently in development for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI). Iclaprim specifically and selectively inhibits bacterial dihydrofolate reductase, a critical enzyme in the bacterial folate pathway, and exhibits an extended spectrum of activity against various resistant pathogens, including methicillin (meticillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The objective of this randomized, double-blind phase II study was to compare the efficacy and safety of iclaprim to those of vancomycin in patients with cSSSI. Patients were randomized to receive 0.8 mg iclaprim/kg of body weight, 1.6 mg/kg iclaprim, or 1 g vancomycin twice a day for 10 days. Clinical cure rates for the 0.8- and 1.6-mg/kg-iclaprim treatment groups were comparable to that for the vancomycin treatment group (26/28 patients [92.9%], 28/31 patients [90.3%], and 26/28 patients [92.9%], respectively). Iclaprim also showed high microbiological eradication rates. Iclaprim exhibited an eradication rate of 80% and 72% versus 59% observed with vancomycin for S. aureus, the pathogen most frequently isolated at baseline. Five MRSA cases were observed, four in the 0.8-mg/kg-iclaprim arm and one in the vancomycin arm, and all were both clinically and microbiologically cured. Iclaprim exhibited a safety profile similar to that of vancomycin, an established drug for the treatment of cSSSI. Results from this study indicate that iclaprim is a promising new therapy for the treatment of cSSSI, in particular those caused by S. aureus, including MRSA.

scholarly journals Phase II Clinical Study of BC-3781, a Pleuromutilin Antibiotic, in Treatment of Patients with Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections

2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 2087-2094 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. T. Prince ◽  
Z. Ivezic-Schoenfeld ◽  
C. Lell ◽  
K. J. Tack ◽  
R. Novak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Success ◽  
Clinical Success Rate ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Clinical Response Rate ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Skin Structure ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Vancomycin Group

ABSTRACTThis study investigated the potential of the novel systemic pleuromutilin antibiotic BC-3781 to treat patients with an acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) caused by a Gram-positive pathogen. Patients were randomized to intravenous BC-3781 100 mg, BC-3781 150 mg, or vancomycin 1 g every 12 h. Response to treatment was assessed daily and at test of cure (TOC). The primary endpoint was the clinical success rate at TOC in the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) and clinically evaluable (CE) analysis populations. Baseline characteristics, including the frequency of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA), were comparable between the different treatment groups. Of 210 patients randomized, 186 (88.6%) patients completed the study. Clinical success at TOC in the CE population occurred in 54 (90.0%) patients in the BC-3781 100-mg group, 48 (88.9%) in the BC-3781 150-mg group, and 47 (92.2%) in the vancomycin group. At day 3, the clinical response rate was similar across the three treatment groups. Six patients discontinued study medication following an adverse event. The incidence rate for drug-related adverse events was lower for patients receiving BC-3781 (34.3% and 39.4% in the 100-mg and 150-mg groups, respectively) than those receiving vancomycin (53.0%). When BC-3781 was used to treat ABSSSIs caused by a Gram-positive pathogen, including MRSA, clinical success rates were comparable to those of the comparator, vancomycin. BC-3781 was generally well tolerated. These results provide the first proof of concept for the systemic use of a pleuromutilin antibiotic for the treatment of ABSSSIs.

scholarly journals Ofloxacin versus standard therapy in treatment of community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization. Pneumonia Study Group.

1996 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 1175-1179 ◽  
Author(s):  
J F Plouffe ◽  
M T Herbert ◽  
T M File ◽  
I Baird ◽  
J N Parsons ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Therapy ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Therapy Group ◽  
The United States ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Oral Antibiotic ◽  
Respiratory Pathogens ◽  
Standard Therapy Group ◽  
Empiric Treatment ◽  
The Mean

Community-acquired pneumonia occurs 3 to 4 million times per year in the United States, accounting for about 500,000 hospitalizations annually. Empiric treatment is usually instituted because of a lack of early organism-specific diagnostic tests. This study compared empiric therapy with ofloxacin to standard antibiotic regimens (usually a beta-lactam with or without a macrolide) for patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia. Therapy was administered to 298 patients (146 receiving ofloxacin and 152 receiving standard therapy); 227 patients (ofloxacin, 109; standard treatment, 118) were evaluable for treatment efficacy. The most common pyogenic respiratory pathogens were Haemophilus influenzae (30 isolates) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (24 isolates). There was evidence of infection with either Mycoplasma pneumoniae (38 patients), Chlamydia pneumoniae (40 patients), or a Legionella sp. (8 patients) in a total of 79 patients (35%). The clinical success rates were similar in both groups among evaluable patients (92%, ofloxacin; 87%, standard therapy) and among patients with atypical respiratory pathogens (88%, ofloxacin; 81%, standard therapy). The mean numbers (+/- the standard deviations) of intravenous doses of antibiotics were 7.5 +/- 8.0 in the ofloxacin group and 18.4 +/- 18.5 in the standard therapy group (P < 0.001); the mean number of oral doses of ofloxacin per patient was 19.7 +/- 11.2, compared with 30.2 +/- 16.0 oral antibiotic doses in the standard therapy group (P < 0.001). All treatments were well tolerated and associated with no significant clinical or laboratory abnormalities. The findings of this study indicate that ofloxacin is active against traditional bacterial pathogens as well as the major atypical respiratory pathogens. When given as monotherapy for the empiric treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, ofloxacin is as effective as standard antimicrobial therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document