scholarly journals Type-Specific Identification of Anogenital Herpes Simplex Virus Infections by Use of a Commercially Available Nucleic Acid Amplification Test

2012 ◽  
Vol 50 (11) ◽  
pp. 3466-3471 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Van Der Pol ◽  
T. Warren ◽  
S. N. Taylor ◽  
M. Martens ◽  
K. R. Jerome ◽  
...  
2003 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lottie Schloss ◽  
Anton M van Loon ◽  
Paola Cinque ◽  
Graham Cleator ◽  
José-Manuel Echevarria ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 518-539
Author(s):  
Peuli Nath ◽  
Md Alamgir Kabir ◽  
Somaiyeh Khoubafarin Doust ◽  
Aniruddha Ray

Herpes is a widespread viral infection caused by the herpes simplex virus (HSV) that has no permanent cure to date. There are two subtypes, HSV-1 and HSV-2, that are known to cause a variety of symptoms, ranging from acute to chronic. HSV is highly contagious and can be transmitted via any type of physical contact. Additionally, viral shedding can also happen from asymptomatic infections. Thus, early and accurate detection of HSV is needed to prevent the transmission of this infection. Herpes can be diagnosed in two ways, by either detecting the presence of the virus in lesions or the antibodies in the blood. Different detection techniques are available based on both laboratory and point of care (POC) devices. Laboratory techniques include different biochemical assays, microscopy, and nucleic acid amplification. In contrast, POC techniques include microfluidics-based tests that enable on-spot testing. Here, we aim to review the different diagnostic techniques, both laboratory-based and POC, their limits of detection, sensitivity, and specificity, as well as their advantages and disadvantages.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document