scholarly journals Consensus Sequence-Based Scheme for Epidemiological Typing of Clinical and Environmental Isolates of Legionella pneumophila

2005 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 2047-2052 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Gaia ◽  
N. K. Fry ◽  
B. Afshar ◽  
P. C. Luck ◽  
H. Meugnier ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 306-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise K. Francois Watkins ◽  
Karrie-Ann E. Toews ◽  
Aaron M. Harris ◽  
Sherri Davidson ◽  
Stephanie Ayers-Millsap ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVESTo define the scope of an outbreak of Legionnaires’ disease (LD), to identify the source, and to stop transmission.DESIGN AND SETTINGEpidemiologic investigation of an LD outbreak among patients and a visitor exposed to a newly constructed hematology-oncology unit.METHODSAn LD case was defined as radiographically confirmed pneumonia in a person with positive urinary antigen testing and/or respiratory culture forLegionellaand exposure to the hematology-oncology unit after February 20, 2014. Cases were classified as definitely or probably healthcare-associated based on whether they were exposed to the unit for all or part of the incubation period (2–10 days). We conducted an environmental assessment and collected water samples for culture. Clinical and environmental isolates were compared by monoclonal antibody (MAb) and sequence-based typing.RESULTSOver a 12-week period, 10 cases were identified, including 6 definite and 4 probable cases. Environmental sampling revealedLegionella pneumophilaserogroup 1 (Lp1) in the potable water at 9 of 10 unit sites (90%), including all patient rooms tested. The 3 clinical isolates were identical to environmental isolates from the unit (MAb2-positive, sequence type ST36). No cases occurred with exposure after the implementation of water restrictions followed by point-of-use filters.CONCLUSIONSContamination of the unit’s potable water system with Lp1 strain ST36 was the likely source of this outbreak. Healthcare providers should routinely test patients who develop pneumonia at least 2 days after hospital admission for LD. A single case of LD that is definitely healthcare associated should prompt a full investigation.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol2017;38:306–313


Legionella ◽  
2014 ◽  
pp. 364-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Björn P. Zietz ◽  
Jutta Wiese ◽  
Hartmut Dunkelberg ◽  
P. Christian Lück ◽  
Jürgen Helbig

2006 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 1056-1063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mireia Coscolla ◽  
Maria Jose Gosalbes ◽  
Vicente Catalan ◽  
Fernando Gonzalez-Candelas

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marius Dybwad ◽  
Tone Aarskaug ◽  
Else-Marie Fykse ◽  
Elisabeth Henie Madslien ◽  
Janet Martha Blatny

Here, we report the complete genome sequences of Legionella pneumophila isolates from two collocated outbreaks of Legionnaires’ disease in 2005 and 2008 in Sarpsborg/Fredrikstad, Norway. One clinical and two environmental isolates were sequenced from each outbreak. The genome of all six isolates consisted of a 3.36 Mb-chromosome, while the 2005 genomes featured an additional 68 kb-episome sharing high sequence similarity with the L. pneumophila Lens plasmid. All six genomes contained multiple mobile genetic elements including novel combinations of type-IVA secretion systems. A comparative genomics study will be launched to resolve the genetic relationship between the L. pneumophila isolates.


1994 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 157-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
LE Nicolle ◽  
H Bialkowska-Hobrzanska ◽  
B Dyck ◽  
L Sekla ◽  
S Parker

Objective: To characterize the molecular epidemiology ofLegionellaspecies infection at one Canadian tertiary care centre.Design: Twenty-eight clinical isolates and 12 environmental isolates obtained over a six-year period were analyzed by restriction fragment length polymorphism (rflp) of chromosomaldna. Isolates included 15 from 12 patients with hospital acquired illness and 13 from nine patients with community acquired infection.Results: One nosocomial strain wasLegionella micdadeiand one community strain wasLegionella pneumophilaserotype 6; all others wereL pneumophilaserotype 1.rflptyping revealed one clone for all cases of a 1985 single-ward outbreak and five of six nonoutbreakL pneumophilanosocomial cases. Anrflppattern identical or highly related to that of the nosocomial clonal type was noted among nine of 12L pneumophilaserotype 1 community isolates. The remaining three isolates had two relatedrflppatterns distinct from the institutional strain. The nosocomial and community strains were isolated from multiple institutional water samples in the institution. For the environmental isolates, monoclonal antibody typing was more discriminating thanrflptyping: seven monoclonal antibody subtypes were distinguished among 12 environmental isolates comprising three distinctrflppatterns.Conclusions: Despite multipleL pneumophilaserotype 1 strains isolated in the authors’ institutional water, a single clone ofL pneumophilaproduced most disease. Community acquired disease was caused by a wider variety of strains.


2017 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 344-355
Author(s):  
Sara Quero ◽  
Marian García-Núñez ◽  
Noemí Párraga-Niño ◽  
M. Luisa Pedro-Botet ◽  
Lourdes Mateu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document