scholarly journals Regulation of Geminin Functions by Cell Cycle-Dependent Nuclear-Cytoplasmic Shuttling

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (13) ◽  
pp. 4737-4744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lingfei Luo ◽  
Yvonne Uerlings ◽  
Nicole Happel ◽  
Naisana S. Asli ◽  
Hendrik Knoetgen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Protein Degradation ◽  
Gene Transcription ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Minichromosome Maintenance ◽  
Protein Functions ◽  
Mcm Complex ◽  
Cycle Dependent ◽  
Dna Rereplication

ABSTRACT The geminin protein functions both as a DNA rereplication inhibitor through association with Cdt1 and as a repressor of Hox gene transcription through the polycomb pathway. Here, we report that the functions of avian geminin are coordinated with and regulated by cell cycle-dependent nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling. In S phase, geminin enters nuclei and inhibits both loading of the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) complex onto chromatin and Hox gene transcription. At the end of mitosis, geminin is exported from nuclei by the exportin protein Crm1 and is unavailable in the nucleus during the next G1 phase, thus ensuring proper chromatin loading of the MCM complex and Hox gene transcription. This mechanism for regulating the functions of geminin adds to distinct mechanisms, such as protein degradation and ubiquitination, applied in other vertebrates.

scholarly journals Nascent Transcription of MCM2-7 Is Important for Nuclear Localization of the Minichromosome Maintenance Complex in G1

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 1447-1456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine A. Braun ◽  
Linda L. Breeden
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Nuclear Localization ◽  
Nuclear Import ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Minichromosome Maintenance ◽  
Mcm Complex ◽  
Mcm Proteins ◽  
Constitutive Production ◽  
New Protein

The minichromosome maintenance genes (MCM2-7) are transcribed at M/G1 just as the Mcm complex is imported into the nucleus to be assembled into prereplication complexes, during a period of low cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) activity. The CDKs trigger DNA replication and prevent rereplication in part by exporting Mcm2-7 from the nucleus during S phase. We have found that repression of MCM2-7 transcription in a single cell cycle interferes with the nuclear import of Mcms in the subsequent M/G1 phase. This suggests that nascent Mcm proteins are preferentially imported into the nucleus. Consistent with this, we find that loss of CDK activity in G2/M is not sufficient for nuclear import, there is also a requirement for new protein synthesis. This requirement is not met by constitutive production of Cdc6 and does not involve synthesis of new transport machinery. The Mcm proteins generated in the previous cell cycle, which are unable to reaccumulate in the nucleus, are predominantly turned over by ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis in late mitosis/early G1. Therefore, the nuclear localization of Mcm2-7 is dependent on nascent transcription and translation of Mcm2-7 and the elimination of CDK activity which occurs simultaneously as cells enter G1.

scholarly journals Cell cycle–dependent localization of macroH2A in chromatin of the inactive X chromosome

2002 ◽  
Vol 157 (7) ◽  
pp. 1113-1123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian P. Chadwick ◽  
Huntington F. Willard
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
X Chromosome ◽  
Degradation Pathway ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Histone H2a ◽  
The Core ◽  
Inactive X Chromosome ◽  
Inactivation Center ◽  
Chromatin Proteins ◽  
Cycle Dependent

One of several features acquired by chromatin of the inactive X chromosome (Xi) is enrichment for the core histone H2A variant macroH2A within a distinct nuclear structure referred to as a macrochromatin body (MCB). In addition to localizing to the MCB, macroH2A accumulates at a perinuclear structure centered at the centrosome. To better understand the association of macroH2A1 with the centrosome and the formation of an MCB, we investigated the distribution of macroH2A1 throughout the somatic cell cycle. Unlike Xi-specific RNA, which associates with the Xi throughout interphase, the appearance of an MCB is predominantly a feature of S phase. Although the MCB dissipates during late S phase and G2 before reforming in late G1, macroH2A1 remains associated during mitosis with specific regions of the Xi, including at the X inactivation center. This association yields a distinct macroH2A banding pattern that overlaps with the site of histone H3 lysine-4 methylation centered at the DXZ4 locus in Xq24. The centrosomal pool of macroH2A1 accumulates in the presence of an inhibitor of the 20S proteasome. Therefore, targeting of macroH2A1 to the centrosome is likely part of a degradation pathway, a mechanism common to a variety of other chromatin proteins.

scholarly journals Drosophila Minichromosome Maintenance 6 Is Required for Chorion Gene Amplification and Genomic Replication

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 607-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gina Schwed ◽  
Noah May ◽  
Yana Pechersky ◽  
Brian R. Calvi
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Genetic Dissection ◽  
Minichromosome Maintenance ◽  
Multiple Origins ◽  
Origin Licensing ◽  
Mcm Complex ◽  
Mcm Proteins ◽  
Prereplicative Complex ◽  
Cycle Regulation

Duplication of the eukaryotic genome initiates from multiple origins of DNA replication whose activity is coordinated with the cell cycle. We have been studying the origins of DNA replication that control amplification of eggshell (chorion) genes duringDrosophila oogenesis. Mutation of genes required for amplification results in a thin eggshell phenotype, allowing a genetic dissection of origin regulation. Herein, we show that one mutation corresponds to a subunit of the minichromosome maintenance (MCM) complex of proteins, MCM6. The binding of the MCM complex to origins in G1 as part of a prereplicative complex is critical for the cell cycle regulation of origin licensing. We find that MCM6 associates with other MCM subunits during amplification. These results suggest that chorion origins are bound by an amplification complex that contains MCM proteins and therefore resembles the prereplicative complex. Lethal alleles of MCM6 reveal it is essential for mitotic cycles and endocycles, and suggest that its function is mediated by ATP. We discuss the implications of these findings for the role of MCMs in the coordination of DNA replication during the cell cycle.

scholarly journals Hect E3 ubiquitin ligase Tom1 controls Dia2 degradation during the cell cycle

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (21) ◽  
pp. 4203-4211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong-Hwan Kim ◽  
Deanna M. Koepp
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Protein Degradation ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
E3 Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Charged Residues ◽  
Phase Progression ◽  
Positively Charged

The ubiquitin proteasome system plays a pivotal role in controlling the cell cycle. The budding yeast F-box protein Dia2 is required for genomic stability and is targeted for ubiquitin-dependent degradation in a cell cycle–dependent manner, but the identity of the ubiquitination pathway is unknown. We demonstrate that the Hect domain E3 ubiquitin ligase Tom1 is required for Dia2 protein degradation. Deletion of DIA2 partially suppresses the temperature-sensitive phenotype of tom1 mutants. Tom1 is required for Dia2 ubiquitination and degradation during G1 and G2/M phases of the cell cycle, whereas the Dia2 protein is stabilized during S phase. We find that Tom1 binding to Dia2 is enhanced in G1 and reduced in S phase, suggesting a mechanism for this proteolytic switch. Tom1 recognizes specific, positively charged residues in a Dia2 degradation/NLS domain. Loss of these residues blocks Tom1-mediated turnover of Dia2 and causes a delay in G1–to–S phase progression. Deletion of DIA2 rescues a delay in the G1–to–S phase transition in the tom1Δ mutant. Together our results suggest that Tom1 targets Dia2 for degradation during the cell cycle by recognizing positively charged residues in the Dia2 degradation/NLS domain and that Dia2 protein degradation contributes to G1–to–S phase progression.

scholarly journals Structural Changes in Mcm5 Protein Bypass Cdc7-Dbf4 Function and Reduce Replication Origin Efficiency in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (21) ◽  
pp. 7594-7602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret L. Hoang ◽  
Ronald P. Leon ◽  
Luis Pessoa-Brandao ◽  
Sonia Hunt ◽  
M. K. Raghuraman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Structural Changes ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Minichromosome Maintenance ◽  
Chromosomal Replication ◽  
Origin Firing ◽  
Highly Active ◽  
Mcm Complex ◽  
Alternate States ◽  
Firing Efficiency ◽  
Intrinsic Firing

ABSTRACT Eukaryotic chromosomal replication is a complicated process with many origins firing at different efficiencies and times during S phase. Prereplication complexes are assembled on all origins in G1 phase, and yet only a subset of complexes is activated during S phase by DDK (for Dbf4-dependent kinase) (Cdc7-Dbf4). The yeast mcm5-bob1 (P83L) mutation bypasses DDK but results in reduced intrinsic firing efficiency at 11 endogenous origins and at origins located on minichromosomes. Origin efficiency may result from Mcm5 protein assuming an altered conformation, as predicted from the atomic structure of an archaeal MCM (for minichromosome maintenance) homologue. Similarly, an intragenic mutation in a residue predicted to interact with P83L suppresses the mcm5-bob1 bypass phenotype. We propose DDK phosphorylation of the MCM complex normally results in a single, highly active conformation of Mcm5, whereas the mcm5-bob1 mutation produces a number of conformations, only one of which is permissive for origin activation. Random adoption of these alternate states by the mcm5-bob1 protein can explain both how origin firing occurs independently of DDK and why origin efficiency is reduced. Because similar mutations in mcm2 and mcm4 cannot bypass DDK, Mcm5 protein may be a unique Mcm protein that is the final target of DDK regulation.

scholarly journals Enhancement of DNA-mediated gene transfer by high-Mr carrier DNA in synchronized CV-1 cells

1985 ◽  
Vol 225 (2) ◽  
pp. 529-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
A J Strain ◽  
W A H Wallace ◽  
A H Wyllie
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Gene Transfer ◽  
Transfection Efficiency ◽  
Simian Virus 40 ◽  
Simian Virus ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Sv40 Virus ◽  
G2 Phase ◽  
Cycle Dependent ◽  
Sv40 Dna

Synchronized CV-1 cells were transfected with SV40 (simian virus 40) DNA-calcium phosphate co-precipitates. In the presence of carrier DNA, the transfection efficiency of SV40 DNA was decreased 5-fold in S-phase cells and was increased 4-fold in preparations of mitotically enriched cells as compared with asynchronous controls. No difference was observed when carrier DNA was omitted, when cells had progressed through S-phase and into G2-phase, or when the infectivity of cells to intact SV40 virus was tested. These results highlight the importance of cell-cycle-dependent factors on DNA-mediated gene transfer.

scholarly journals Maximal binding levels of an H1 histone gene-specific factor in S-phase correlate with maximal H1 gene transcription.

1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 4576-4578 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Dalton ◽  
J R Wells
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Nucleic Acids ◽  
Gene Transcription ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Histone Gene ◽  
Specific Factor ◽  
Synchronized Cells ◽  
Phase Regulation ◽  
G2 Phase ◽  
Binding Component

Levels of trans-acting factor (H1-SF) binding to the histone H1 gene-specific motif (5'-AAACACA-3' [L. S. Coles and J. R. E. Wells, Nucleic Acids Res. 13:585-594, 1985]) increase 12-fold from G1 to S-phase in synchronized cells and decrease again in G2 phase of the cell cycle. Since the H1 element is required for S-phase expression of H1 genes (S. Dalton and J. R. E. Wells, EMBO J. 7:49-56, 1988), it is likely that the increased levels of H1-SF binding component play an important role in S-phase regulation of H1 gene transcription.

The SIT4 protein phosphatase functions in late G1 for progression into S phase

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 2133-2148
Author(s):  
A Sutton ◽  
D Immanuel ◽  
K T Arndt
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Protein Phosphatase ◽  
Catalytic Domain ◽  
Function Analysis ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Growth Defect ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Amino Terminal ◽  
Polymorphic Gene ◽  
Cycle Dependent

Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains containing temperature-sensitive mutations in the SIT4 protein phosphatase arrest in late G1 at the nonpermissive temperature. Order-of-function analysis shows that SIT4 is required in late G1 for progression into S phase. While the levels of SIT4 do not change in the cell cycle, SIT4 associates with two high-molecular-weight phosphoproteins in a cell-cycle-dependent fashion. In addition, we have identified a polymorphic gene, SSD1, that in some versions can suppress the lethality due to a deletion of SIT4 and can also partially suppress the phenotypic defects due to a null mutation in BCY1. The SSD1 protein is implicated in G1 control and has a region of similarity to the dis3 protein of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. We have also identified a gene, PPH2alpha, that in high copy number can partially suppress the growth defect of sit4 strains. The PPH2 alpha gene encodes a predicted protein that is 80% identical to the catalytic domain of mammalian type 2A protein phosphatases but also has an acidic amino-terminal extension not present in other phosphatases.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document