scholarly journals Inverted DNA Repeats Channel Repair of Distant Double-Strand Breaks into Chromatid Fusions and Chromosomal Rearrangements

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 2601-2614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly VanHulle ◽  
Francene J. Lemoine ◽  
Vidhya Narayanan ◽  
Brandon Downing ◽  
Krista Hull ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosomal Rearrangements ◽  
Inverted Repeats ◽  
Dna Repeats ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Gross Chromosomal Rearrangements ◽  
Double Strand Dna Breaks ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Strand Annealing ◽  
Break Induced Replication

ABSTRACT Inverted DNA repeats are known to cause genomic instabilities. Here we demonstrate that double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) introduced a large distance from inverted repeats in the yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) chromosome lead to a burst of genomic instability. Inverted repeats located as far as 21 kb from each other caused chromosome rearrangements in response to a single DSB. We demonstrate that the DSB initiates a pairing interaction between inverted repeats, resulting in the formation of large dicentric inverted dimers. Furthermore, we observed that propagation of cells containing inverted dimers led to gross chromosomal rearrangements, including translocations, truncations, and amplifications. Finally, our data suggest that break-induced replication is responsible for the formation of translocations resulting from anaphase breakage of inverted dimers. We propose a model explaining the formation of inverted dicentric dimers by intermolecular single-strand annealing (SSA) between inverted DNA repeats. According to this model, anaphase breakage of inverted dicentric dimers leads to gross chromosomal rearrangements (GCR). This “SSA-GCR” pathway is likely to be important in the repair of isochromatid breaks resulting from collapsed replication forks, certain types of radiation, or telomere aberrations that mimic isochromatid breaks.

scholarly journals Characterization of RAD51-Independent Break-Induced Replication That Acts Preferentially with Short Homologous Sequences

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (18) ◽  
pp. 6384-6392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grzegorz Ira ◽  
James E. Haber
Keyword(s):  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Inverted Repeats ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Sequences ◽  
Recombination Processes ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Strand Invasion ◽  
Strand Annealing ◽  
Break Induced Replication

ABSTRACT Repair of double-strand breaks by gene conversions between homologous sequences located on different Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosomes or plasmids requires RAD51. When repair occurs between inverted repeats of the same plasmid, both RAD51-dependent and RAD51-independent repairs are found. Completion of RAD51-independent plasmid repair events requires RAD52, RAD50, RAD59, TID1 (RDH54), and SRS2 and appears to involve break-induced replication coupled to single-strand annealing. Surprisingly, RAD51-independent recombination requires much less homology (30 bp) for strand invasion than does RAD51-dependent repair (approximately 100 bp); in fact, the presence of Rad51p impairs recombination with short homology. The differences between the RAD51- and RAD50/RAD59-dependent pathways account for the distinct ways that two different recombination processes maintain yeast telomeres in the absence of telomerase.

Yeastspt6-140Mutation, Affecting Chromatin and Transcription, Preferentially Increases Recombination in Which Rad51p-Mediated Strand Exchange Is Dispensable

Genetics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 158 (2) ◽  
pp. 597-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Malagón ◽  
Andrés Aguilera
Keyword(s):  
Strand Exchange ◽  
Micrococcal Nuclease ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Inverted Repeats ◽  
Major Mechanism ◽  
Spontaneous Recombination ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Strand Invasion ◽  
Strand Annealing ◽  
Break Induced Replication

AbstractWe have shown that the spt6-140 and spt4-3 mutations, affecting chromatin structure and transcription, stimulate recombination between inverted repeats by a RAD52-dependent mechanism that is very efficient in the absence of RAD51, RAD54, RAD55, and RAD57. Such a mechanism of recombination is RAD1-RAD59-dependent and yields gene conversions highly associated with the inversion of the repeat. The spt6-140 mutation alters transcription and chromatin in our inverted repeats, as determined by Northern and micrococcal nuclease sensitivity analyses, respectively. Hyper-recombination levels are diminished in the absence of transcription. We believe that the chromatin alteration, together with transcription impairment caused by spt6-140, increases the incidence of spontaneous recombination regardless of whether or not it is mediated by Rad51p-dependent strand exchange. Our results suggest that spt6, as well as spt4, primarily stimulates a mechanism of break-induced replication. We discuss the possibility that the chromatin alteration caused by spt6-140 facilitates a Rad52p-mediated one-ended strand invasion event, possibly inefficient in wild-type chromatin. Our results are consistent with the idea that the major mechanism leading to inversions might not be crossing over but break-induced replication followed by single-strand annealing.

scholarly journals Genetic Steps of Mammalian Homologous Repair with Distinct Mutagenic Consequences

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (21) ◽  
pp. 9305-9316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy M. Stark ◽  
Andrew J. Pierce ◽  
Jin Oh ◽  
Albert Pastink ◽  
Maria Jasin
Keyword(s):  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Atp Hydrolysis ◽  
Chromosomal Rearrangements ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Mutagenic Potential ◽  
Gross Chromosomal Rearrangements ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Chromosomal Breaks ◽  
Strand Annealing

ABSTRACT Repair of chromosomal breaks is essential for cellular viability, but misrepair generates mutations and gross chromosomal rearrangements. We investigated the interrelationship between two homologous-repair pathways, i.e., mutagenic single-strand annealing (SSA) and precise homology-directed repair (HDR). For this, we analyzed the efficiency of repair in mammalian cells in which double-strand break (DSB) repair components were disrupted. We observed an inverse relationship between HDR and SSA when RAD51 or BRCA2 was impaired, i.e., HDR was reduced but SSA was increased. In particular, expression of an ATP-binding mutant of RAD51 led to a >90-fold shift to mutagenic SSA repair. Additionally, we found that expression of an ATP hydrolysis mutant of RAD51 resulted in more extensive gene conversion, which increases genetic loss during HDR. Disruption of two other DSB repair components affected both SSA and HDR, but in opposite directions: SSA and HDR were reduced by mutation of Brca1, which, like Brca2, predisposes to breast cancer, whereas SSA and HDR were increased by Ku70 mutation, which affects nonhomologous end joining. Disruption of the BRCA1-associated protein BARD1 had effects similar to those of mutation of BRCA1. Thus, BRCA1/BARD1 has a role in homologous repair before the branch point of HDR and SSA. Interestingly, we found that Ku70 mutation partially suppresses the homologous-repair defects of BARD1 disruption. We also examined the role of RAD52 in homologous repair. In contrast to yeast, Rad52 − / − mouse cells had no detectable HDR defect, although SSA was decreased. These results imply that the proper genetic interplay of repair factors is essential to limit the mutagenic potential of DSB repair.

scholarly journals DNA replication machinery prevents Rad52-dependent single-strand annealing that leads to gross chromosomal rearrangements at centromeres

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi T. Onaka ◽  
Jie Su ◽  
Yasuhiro Katahira ◽  
Crystal Tang ◽  
Faria Zafar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Chromosomal Rearrangements ◽  
Repetitive Sequences ◽  
Single Strand ◽  
Replication Machinery ◽  
Gross Chromosomal Rearrangements ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Rad52 Protein ◽  
Strand Annealing ◽  
Recombination Pathway

AbstractHomologous recombination between repetitive sequences can lead to gross chromosomal rearrangements (GCRs). At fission yeast centromeres, Rad51-dependent conservative recombination predominantly occurs between inverted repeats, thereby suppressing formation of isochromosomes whose arms are mirror images. However, it is unclear how GCRs occur in the absence of Rad51 and how GCRs are prevented at centromeres. Here, we show that homology-mediated GCRs occur through Rad52-dependent single-strand annealing (SSA). The rad52-R45K mutation, which impairs SSA activity of Rad52 protein, dramatically reduces isochromosome formation in rad51 deletion cells. A ring-like complex Msh2–Msh3 and a structure-specific endonuclease Mus81 function in the Rad52-dependent GCR pathway. Remarkably, mutations in replication fork components, including DNA polymerase α and Swi1/Tof1/Timeless, change the balance between Rad51-dependent recombination and Rad52-dependent SSA at centromeres, increasing Rad52-dependent SSA that forms isochromosomes. Our results uncover a role of DNA replication machinery in the recombination pathway choice that prevents Rad52-dependent GCRs at centromeres.

scholarly journals Mechanisms underlying genome instability mediated by formation of foldback inversions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

eLife ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin-zhong Li ◽  
Christopher D Putnam ◽  
Richard David Kolodner
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Genetic Diseases ◽  
Chromosomal Rearrangements ◽  
Genetic System ◽  
Dna Hairpins ◽  
Large Loop ◽  
Gross Chromosomal Rearrangements ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Strand Annealing

Foldback inversions, also called inverted duplications, have been observed in human genetic diseases and cancers. Here, we used a Saccharomyces cerevisiae genetic system that generates gross chromosomal rearrangements (GCRs) mediated by foldback inversions combined with whole-genome sequencing to study their formation. Foldback inversions were mediated by formation of single-stranded DNA hairpins. Two types of hairpins were identified: small-loop hairpins that were suppressed by MRE11, SAE2, SLX1, and YKU80 and large-loop hairpins that were suppressed by YEN1, TEL1, SWR1, and MRC1. Analysis of CRISPR/Cas9-induced double strand breaks (DSBs) revealed that long-stem hairpin-forming sequences could form foldback inversions when proximal or distal to the DSB, whereas short-stem hairpin-forming sequences formed foldback inversions when proximal to the DSB. Finally, we found that foldback inversion GCRs were stabilized by secondary rearrangements, mostly mediated by different homologous recombination mechanisms including single-strand annealing; however, POL32-dependent break-induced replication did not appear to be involved forming secondary rearrangements.

scholarly journals Rejoining of DNA Double-Strand Breaks as a Function of Overhang Length

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 896-906 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. Daley ◽  
Thomas E. Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Gc Content ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Primary Determinant ◽  
Overhang Length ◽  
Strand Annealing

ABSTRACT The ends of spontaneously occurring double-strand breaks (DSBs) may contain various lengths of single-stranded DNA, blocking lesions, and gaps and flaps generated by end annealing. To investigate the processing of such structures, we developed an assay in which annealed oligonucleotides are ligated onto the ends of a linearized plasmid which is then transformed into Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Reconstitution of a marker occurs only when the oligonucleotides are incorporated and repair is in frame, permitting rapid analysis of complex DSB ends. Here, we created DSBs with compatible overhangs of various lengths and asked which pathways are required for their precise repair. Three mechanisms of rejoining were observed, regardless of overhang polarity: nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), a Rad52-dependent single-strand annealing-like pathway, and a third mechanism independent of the first two mechanisms. DSBs with overhangs of less than 4 bases were mainly repaired by NHEJ. Repair became less dependent on NHEJ when the overhangs were longer or had a higher GC content. Repair of overhangs greater than 8 nucleotides was as much as 150-fold more efficient, impaired 10-fold by rad52 mutation, and highly accurate. Reducing the microhomology extent between long overhangs reduced their repair dramatically, to less than NHEJ of comparable short overhangs. These data support a model in which annealing energy is a primary determinant of the rejoining efficiency and mechanism.

scholarly journals Double-strand DNA breaks recruit the centromeric histone CENP-A

2009 ◽  
Vol 106 (37) ◽  
pp. 15762-15767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha G. Zeitlin ◽  
Norman M. Baker ◽  
Brian R. Chapados ◽  
Evi Soutoglou ◽  
Jean Y. J. Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Cleavage ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Double Strand Dna Breaks ◽  
Histone H3 Variant ◽  
Radiation Induced ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

The histone H3 variant CENP-A is required for epigenetic specification of centromere identity through a loading mechanism independent of DNA sequence. Using multiphoton absorption and DNA cleavage at unique sites by I-SceI endonuclease, we demonstrate that CENP-A is rapidly recruited to double-strand breaks in DNA, along with three components (CENP-N, CENP-T, and CENP-U) associated with CENP-A at centromeres. The centromere-targeting domain of CENP-A is both necessary and sufficient for recruitment to double-strand breaks. CENP-A accumulation at DNA breaks is enhanced by active non-homologous end-joining but does not require DNA-PKcs or Ligase IV, and is independent of H2AX. Thus, induction of a double-strand break is sufficient to recruit CENP-A in human and mouse cells. Finally, since cell survival after radiation-induced DNA damage correlates with CENP-A expression level, we propose that CENP-A may have a function in DNA repair.

scholarly journals Meiosis-specific recombinase Dmc1 is a potent inhibitor of the Srs2 antirecombinase

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (43) ◽  
pp. E10041-E10048 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Brooks Crickard ◽  
Kyle Kaniecki ◽  
Youngho Kwon ◽  
Patrick Sung ◽  
Eric C. Greene
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Atp Hydrolysis ◽  
Potent Inhibitor ◽  
Chromosomal Rearrangements ◽  
Motor Protein ◽  
Product Formation ◽  
Gross Chromosomal Rearrangements ◽  
Strand Annealing ◽  
Hydrolysis Activity

Cross-over recombination products are a hallmark of meiosis because they are necessary for accurate chromosome segregation and they also allow for increased genetic diversity during sexual reproduction. However, cross-overs can also cause gross chromosomal rearrangements and are therefore normally down-regulated during mitotic growth. The mechanisms that enhance cross-over product formation upon entry into meiosis remain poorly understood. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the Superfamily 1 (Sf1) helicase Srs2, which is an ATP hydrolysis-dependent motor protein that actively dismantles recombination intermediates, promotes synthesis-dependent strand annealing, the result of which is a reduction in cross-over recombination products. Here, we show that the meiosis-specific recombinase Dmc1 is a potent inhibitor of Srs2. Biochemical and single-molecule assays demonstrate that Dmc1 acts by inhibiting Srs2 ATP hydrolysis activity, which prevents the motor protein from undergoing ATP hydrolysis-dependent translocation on Dmc1-bound recombination intermediates. We propose a model in which Dmc1 helps contribute to cross-over formation during meiosis by antagonizing the antirecombinase activity of Srs2.

scholarly journals Target-AID-Mediated Multiplex Base Editing in Porcine Fibroblasts

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soo-Young Yum ◽  
Goo Jang ◽  
Okjae Koo
Keyword(s):  
Genome Editing ◽  
Cytidine Deaminase ◽  
Chromosomal Rearrangements ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Base Editing ◽  
Multiple Loci ◽  
Double Strand Dna Breaks ◽  
Protospacer Adjacent Motif ◽  
Motif Site ◽  
Programmable Nucleases

Multiplex genome editing may induce genotoxicity and chromosomal rearrangements due to double-strand DNA breaks at multiple loci simultaneously induced by programmable nucleases, including CRISPR/Cas9. However, recently developed base-editing systems can directly substitute target sequences without double-strand breaks. Thus, the base-editing system is expected to be a safer method for multiplex genome-editing platforms for livestock. Target-AID is a base editing system composed of PmCDA1, a cytidine deaminase from sea lampreys, fused to Cas9 nickase. It can be used to substitute cytosine for thymine in 3-5 base editing windows, 18 bases upstream of the protospacer-adjacent motif site. In the current study, we demonstrated Target-AID-mediated base editing in porcine cells for the first time. We targeted multiple loci in the porcine genome using the Target-AID system and successfully induced target-specific base substitutions with up to 63.15% efficiency. This system can be used for the further production of various genome-engineered pigs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document