scholarly journals Constitutive phosphorylation of eps8 in tumor cell lines: relevance to malignant transformation.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 3805-3812 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Matoskova ◽  
W T Wong ◽  
A E Salcini ◽  
P G Pelicci ◽  
P P Di Fiore

eps8, a recently identified tyrosine kinase substrate, has been shown to augment epidermal growth factor (EGF) responsiveness, implicating it in EGF receptor (EGFR)-mediated mitogenic signaling. We investigated the status of eps8 phosphorylation in normal and transformed cells and the role of eps8 in transformation. In NIH 3T3 cells overexpressing EGFR (NIH-EGFR), eps8 becomes rapidly phosphorylated upon EGF stimulation. At receptor-saturating doses of EGF, approximately 30% of the eps8 pool is tyrosine phosphorylated. Under physiological conditions of activation (i.e., at low receptor occupancy), corresponding to the 50% effective dose of EGF for mitogenesis, approximately 3 to 4% of the eps8 contains phosphotyrosine. In human tumor cell lines, we detected constitutive tyrosine phosphorylation of eps8, with a stoichiometry (approximately 5%) similar to that associated with potent mitogenic response in NIH-EGFR cells. Overexpression of eps8 was able to transform NIH 3T3 cells under limiting conditions of activation of the EGFR pathway. Concomitant tyrosine phosphorylation of eps8 and shc, but not of rasGAP, phospholipase C-gamma, and eps15, was frequently detected in tumor cells. This suggested that eps8 and shc might be part of a pathway which is preferentially selected in some tumors. Cooperation between these two transducers was further indicated by the finding of their in vivo association. This association was, at least in part, dependent on recognition of shc by the SH3 domain of eps8. Our results indicate that eps8 is physiologically part of the EGFR-activated signaling and that its alterations can contribute to the malignant phenotype.

1987 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 653-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierosandro Tagliaferri ◽  
Kazuyoshi Yanagihara ◽  
Fortunate Ciardiello ◽  
Neil Talbot ◽  
Ursula Flatow ◽  
...  

1985 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 890-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
N H Colburn ◽  
M I Lerman ◽  
G A Hegamyer ◽  
T D Gindhart

Transfection of four different mouse epidermal tumor cell DNAs into NIH 3T3 cells yielded neither morphologically altered foci nor anchorage independence. However, promotion-sensitive, but not promotion-insensitive, JB6 mouse epidermal cell lines were permissive for the expression of anchorage independence after transfection of DNA from three of these tumor cell lines. This transforming activity and the promotion-sensitive activity that confers sensitivity to promotion of transformation show differences in restriction enzyme sensitivity. In view of this difference and the differences in both recipient cells and 12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate dependence of expression, it appears that the transforming activity and the promotion-sensitive activity are specified by different genes. The JB6 promotion-sensitive cell lines may be useful for detecting and cloning transforming genes that escape detection in the NIH 3T3 cell focus assay.


1985 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 890-893
Author(s):  
N H Colburn ◽  
M I Lerman ◽  
G A Hegamyer ◽  
T D Gindhart

Transfection of four different mouse epidermal tumor cell DNAs into NIH 3T3 cells yielded neither morphologically altered foci nor anchorage independence. However, promotion-sensitive, but not promotion-insensitive, JB6 mouse epidermal cell lines were permissive for the expression of anchorage independence after transfection of DNA from three of these tumor cell lines. This transforming activity and the promotion-sensitive activity that confers sensitivity to promotion of transformation show differences in restriction enzyme sensitivity. In view of this difference and the differences in both recipient cells and 12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate dependence of expression, it appears that the transforming activity and the promotion-sensitive activity are specified by different genes. The JB6 promotion-sensitive cell lines may be useful for detecting and cloning transforming genes that escape detection in the NIH 3T3 cell focus assay.


1985 ◽  
Vol 13 (23) ◽  
pp. 8477-8486 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.Richter King ◽  
Matthias H. Kraus ◽  
Lewis T. Williams ◽  
Glenn T. Merlino ◽  
Ira H. Pastan ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 188 (5) ◽  
pp. 431-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Yaromina ◽  
S. Meyer ◽  
C. Fabian ◽  
K. Zaleska ◽  
U.G.A. Sattler ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 60 (11) ◽  
pp. 1639-1645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riccardo Turrini ◽  
Anna Merlo ◽  
Riccardo Dolcetti ◽  
Paola Zanovello ◽  
Antonio Rosato

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18054-18054
Author(s):  
W. J. Petty ◽  
W. R. Voelzke ◽  
V. A. Memoli ◽  
K. H. Dragnev ◽  
J. J. Urbanic ◽  
...  

18054 Background: Transcriptional repression of cyclin D1 occurs during responses to erlotinib (E) both in vitro and in vivo. Cyclin D3 has overlapping function with cyclin D1 but has distinct transcriptional regulation. Methods: The expression of cyclin D3 was compared in E sensitive cell lines (H358, H441) and an E resistant cell line (A549). Cyclins D1, D2, and D3 were independently overexpressed in E sensitive NIH 3T3 cells by plasmid transfection. Biopsy tissues from a proof-of-principal clinical trial of E were assessed for cyclin D3 expression. Results: A549 cells were resistant to E and expressed high levels of cyclin D3 RNA and protein compared to E sensitive cell lines. Overexpression of cyclin D1 and cyclin D3 conferred partial resistance to E in NIH 3T3 cells while cyclin D2 had no significant effect. Comparison of cyclin D3 immunostaining in tumor biopsies from patients before and after treatment with E revealed an increase in the percentage of cyclin D3 expressing cells following treatment with E. Conclusions: Cyclin D3 confers resistance to E in vitro and in vivo. Drugs such as retinoids and rexinoids that target cyclin D3 expression may prove useful for enhancing sensitivity to E. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


1996 ◽  
Vol 106 (5) ◽  
pp. 1114-1118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Slawomir Majewski ◽  
Maria Marczak ◽  
Andrzej Szmurlo ◽  
Stefania Jablonska ◽  
Werner Bollag

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document