scholarly journals A chimeric enhancer-of-split transcriptional activator drives neural development and achaete-scute expression.

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 4355-4362 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Jiménez ◽  
D Ish-Horowicz
Keyword(s):  
Neural Development ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain ◽  
Helix Loop Helix ◽  
Inhibition Process ◽  
Bhlh Proteins ◽  
Enhancer Of Split

Drosophila melanogaster neurogenesis requires the opposing activities of two sets of basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins: proneural proteins, which confer on cells the ability to become neural precursors, and the Enhancer-of-split [E(spl)] proteins, which restrict such potential as part of the lateral inhibition process. Here, we test if E(spl) proteins function as promoter-bound repressors by examining the effects on neurogenesis of an E(spl) derivative containing a heterologous transcriptional activation domain [E(spl) m7Act (m7Act)]. In contrast to the wild-type E(spl) proteins, m7Act efficiently induces neural development, indicating that it binds to and activates target genes normally repressed by E(spl). Mutations in the basic domain disrupt m7Act activity, suggesting that its effects are mediated through direct DNA binding. m7Act causes ectopic transcription of the proneural achaete and scute genes. Our results support a model in which E(spl) proteins normally regulate neurogenesis by direct repression of genes at the top of the neural determination pathway.

scholarly journals Intramolecular Regulation of MyoD Activation Domain Conformation and Function

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 5478-5484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Huang ◽  
Hal Weintraub ◽  
Larry Kedes
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain ◽  
Helix Loop Helix ◽  
Dna Binding Specificity ◽  
E Box ◽  
And Function ◽  
Bhlh Proteins ◽  
Basic Region

ABSTRACT The MyoD family of basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins is required for myogenic determination and differentiation. The basic region carries the myogenic code and DNA binding specificity, while the N terminus contains a potent transcriptional activation domain. Myogenic activation is abolished when the basic region, bound to a myogenic E box, carries a mutation of Ala-114. It has been proposed that DNA binding of the MyoD basic region leads to recruitment of a recognition factor that unmasks the activation domain. Here we demonstrate that an A114N mutant exhibits an altered conformation in the basic region and that this local conformational difference can lead to a more global change affecting the conformation of the activation domain. This suggests that the deleterious effects of this class of mutations may result directly from defective conformation. Thus, the activation domain is unmasked only upon DNA binding by the correct basic region. Such a coupled conformational relationship may have evolved to restrict myogenic specificity to a small number of bHLH proteins among many with diverse functions yet with DNA binding specificities known to be similar.

scholarly journals Extensive mutagenesis of a transcriptional activation domain identifies single hydrophobic and acidic amino acids important for activation in vivo.

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
M B Sainz ◽  
S A Goff ◽  
V L Chandler
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Amino Acid ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Carboxyl Terminus ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Hydrophobic Residues ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain ◽  
Acidic Amino Acids

C1 is a transcriptional activator of genes encoding biosynthetic enzymes of the maize anthocyanin pigment pathway. C1 has an amino terminus homologous to Myb DNA-binding domains and an acidic carboxyl terminus that is a transcriptional activation domain in maize and yeast cells. To identify amino acids critical for transcriptional activation, an extensive random mutagenesis of the C1 carboxyl terminus was done. The C1 activation domain is remarkably tolerant of amino acid substitutions, as changes at 34 residues had little or no effect on transcriptional activity. These changes include introduction of helix-incompatible amino acids throughout the C1 activation domain and alteration of most single acidic amino acids, suggesting that a previously postulated amphipathic alpha-helix is not required for activation. Substitutions at two positions revealed amino acids important for transcriptional activation. Replacement of leucine 253 with a proline or glutamine resulted in approximately 10% of wild-type transcriptional activation. Leucine 253 is in a region of C1 in which several hydrophobic residues align with residues important for transcriptional activation by the herpes simplex virus VP16 protein. However, changes at all other hydrophobic residues in C1 indicate that none are critical for C1 transcriptional activation. The other important amino acid in C1 is aspartate 262, as a change to valine resulted in only 24% of wild-type transcriptional activation. Comparison of our C1 results with those from VP16 reveal substantial differences in which amino acids are required for transcriptional activation in vivo by these two acidic activation domains.

scholarly journals Determination of the consensus DNA-binding sequence and a transcriptional activation domain for ESE-2

2006 ◽  
Vol 398 (3) ◽  
pp. 497-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeon Sook Choi ◽  
Satrajit Sinha
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain ◽  
Ets Proteins ◽  
Flanking Sequences ◽  
Binding Sequence

The ESE (epithelium-specific Ets) subfamily of Ets transcription factors plays an important role in regulating gene expression in a variety of epithelial cell types. Although ESE proteins have been shown to bind to regulatory elements of some epithelial genes, the optimal DNA-binding sequence has not been experimentally ascertained for any member of the ESE subfamily of transcription factors. This has made the identification and validation of their targets difficult. We are studying ESE-2 (Elf5), which is highly expressed in epithelial cells of many tissues including skin keratinocytes. Here, we identify the preferred DNA-binding site of ESE-2 by performing CASTing (cyclic amplification and selection of targets) experiments. Our analysis shows that the optimal ESE-2 consensus motif consists of a GGA core and an AT-rich 5′- and 3′-flanking sequences. Mutational and competition experiments demonstrate that the flanking sequences that confer high DNA-binding affinity for ESE-2 show considerable differences from the known consensus DNA-binding sites of other Ets proteins, thus reinforcing the idea that the flanking sequences may impart recognition specificity for Ets proteins. In addition, we have identified a novel isoform of murine ESE-2, ESE-2L, that is generated by use of a hitherto unreported new exon and an alternate promoter. Interestingly, transient transfection assays with an optimal ESE-2 responsive reporter show that both ESE-2 and ESE-2L are weak transactivators. However, similar studies utilizing GAL4 chimaeras of ESE-2 demonstrate that while the DNA-binding ETS (E twenty-six) domain functions as a repressor, the PNT (pointed domain) of ESE-2 can act as a potent transcriptional activation domain. This novel transactivating property of PNT is also shared by ESE-3, another ESE family member. Identification of the ESE-2 consensus site and characterization of the transcriptional activation properties of ESE-2 shed new light on its potential as a regulator of target genes.

scholarly journals Three new dominant C1 suppressor alleles in Zea mays

1998 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
TATJANA SINGER ◽  
ALFONS GIERL ◽  
PETER A. PETERSON
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Stop Codon ◽  
Suppressive Effect ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Reading Frame ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain ◽  
Imprecise Excision ◽  
Carboxy Terminal

Three new dominant suppressor mutations of the C1 transcription regulator gene in maize – C1-IΔ1, C1-IΔ2 and C1-IΔ3 – are described that suppress anthocyanin colouration in kernels similar to the function of the C1-I standard inhibitor. The C1-IΔ mutations were induced by imprecise excision of an En/Spm transposon in the third exon of the C1 gene. These transposon footprints cause a frameshift in the C1 open reading frame that leads to truncated proteins due to an early stop codon 30 amino acids upstream of the wild-type C1 protein. Therefore, the C1-IΔ gene products lack the carboxy-terminal transcriptional activation domain of C1. The C1-I standard allele also lacks this domain and in addition differs in 17 amino acids from the wild-type C1 allele. The new C1-IΔ alleles provide evidence that deletion of the carboxy-terminal activation domain alone is sufficient to generate a dominant suppressive effect on the function of wild-type C1.

scholarly journals Molecular Distinction between Specification and Differentiation in the Myogenic Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factor Family

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 2404-2412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald A. Bergstrom ◽  
Stephen J. Tapscott
Keyword(s):  
Skeletal Muscle ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Molecular Basis ◽  
Alpha Helix ◽  
Endogenous Gene ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain ◽  
Basic Helix Loop Helix ◽  
Helix Loop Helix ◽  
Muscle Genes ◽  
Bhlh Proteins

ABSTRACT The myogenic basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins regulate both skeletal muscle specification and differentiation: MyoD and Myf5 establish the muscle lineage, whereas myogenin mediates differentiation. Previously, we demonstrated that MyoD was more efficient than myogenin at initiating the expression of skeletal muscle genes, and in this study we present the molecular basis for this difference. A conserved amphipathic alpha-helix in the carboxy terminus of the myogenic bHLH proteins has distinct activities in MyoD and myogenin: the MyoD helix facilitates the initiation of endogenous gene expression, whereas the myogenin helix functions as a general transcriptional activation domain. Thus, the alternate use of a similar motif for gene initiation and activation provides a molecular basis for the distinction between specification and differentiation within the myogenic bHLH gene family.

scholarly journals HEN1 encodes a 20-kilodalton phosphoprotein that binds an extended E-box motif as a homodimer.

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 1245-1255 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Brown ◽  
R Baer
Keyword(s):  
Neural Development ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Consensus Sequence ◽  
Selection Procedure ◽  
Protein Dimerization ◽  
Helix Loop Helix ◽  
E Box ◽  
Self Association ◽  
Bhlh Proteins ◽  
Half Site

HEN1 and HEN2 encode neuron-specific polypeptides that contain the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) motif, a protein dimerization and DNA-binding domain common to several known transcription factors. We now describe characteristics of the HEN1 gene product that are consistent with its postulated role as a transcription factor that functions during development of the mammalian nervous system. Thus, transcription of the HEN1 gene is activated upon the induction of neural differentiation in PC12 cells by nerve growth factor. HEN1 encodes a 20-kDa polypeptide (pp20HEN1) that is phosphorylated exclusively at serine residues and forms dimeric bHLH complexes either by self-association or by heterologous interaction with the E2A gene products (E12 or E47). The resultant HEN1/HEN1 homodimers and HEN1/E2A heterodimers bind DNA in a sequence-specific manner. Moreover, a binding site selection procedure revealed that HEN1-HEN1 homodimers preferentially recognize E-box motifs represented by an 18-bp consensus sequence (GGGNCG CAGCTGCGNCCC). The E-box half-site recognized by HEN1 polypeptides (GGGNCGCAG) is distinct from those of other known bHLH proteins, suggesting that HEN1 binds, an regulates the transcription of, a unique subset of target genes during neural development.

scholarly journals Specificity for the hairy/enhancer of split basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins maps outside the bHLH domain and suggests two separable modes of transcriptional repression.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 6923-6931 ◽  
Author(s):  
S R Dawson ◽  
D L Turner ◽  
H Weintraub ◽  
S M Parkhurst
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Domain Swapping ◽  
Functional Domain ◽  
Transcriptional Repressors ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Basic Helix Loop Helix ◽  
Helix Loop Helix ◽  
Evolutionarily Conserved ◽  
Bhlh Proteins ◽  
Enhancer Of Split

The Hairy/Enhancer of split/Deadpan family of basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) proteins function as transcriptional repressors. We have examined the mechanisms of repression used by the Hairy and E(SPL) proteins by assaying the antagonism between wild-type or altered Hairy/E(SPL) and Scute bHLH proteins during sex determination in Drosophila melanogaster. Domain swapping and mutagenesis of the Hairy and E(SPL) proteins show that three evolutionarily conserved domains are required for their function: the bHLH, Orange, and WRPW domains. However, the suppression of Scute activity by Hairy does not require the WRPW domain. We show that the Orange domain is an important functional domain that confers specificity among members of the Hairy/E(SPL) family. In addition, we show that a Xenopus Hairy homology conserves not only Hairy's structure but also its biological activity in our assays. We propose that transcriptional repression by the Hairy/E(SPL) family of bHLH proteins involves two separable mechanisms: repression of specific transcriptional activators, such as Scute, through the bHLH and Orange domains and repression of other activators via interaction of the C-terminal WRPW motif with corepressors, such as the Groucho protein.

scholarly journals VP16-Dependent Association of Chromatin-Modifying Coactivators and Underrepresentation of Histones at Immediate-Early Gene Promoters during Herpes Simplex Virus Infection

2004 ◽  
Vol 78 (18) ◽  
pp. 9689-9696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco J. Herrera ◽  
Steven J. Triezenberg
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Histone H3 ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain ◽  
General Transcription Factors ◽  
Simplex Virus ◽  
Hsv 1

ABSTRACT During infection by herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), the virion protein VP16 activates the transcription of viral immediate-early (IE) genes. Genetic and biochemical assays have shown that the potent transcriptional activation domain of VP16 can associate with general transcription factors and with chromatin-modifying coactivator proteins of several types. The latter interactions are particularly intriguing because previous reports indicate that HSV-1 DNA does not become nucleosomal during lytic infection. In the present work, chemical cross-linking and immunoprecipitation assays were used to probe the presence of activators, general transcription factors, and chromatin-modifying coactivators at IE gene promoters during infection of HeLa cells by wild-type HSV-1 and by RP5, a viral strain lacking the VP16 transcriptional activation domain. The presence of VP16 and Oct-1 at IE promoters did not depend on the activation domain. In contrast, association of RNA polymerase II, TATA-binding protein, histone acetyltransferases (p300 and CBP), and ATP-dependent remodeling proteins (BRG1 and hBRM) with IE gene promoters was observed in wild-type infections but was absent or reduced in cells infected by RP5. In contrast to the previous evidence for nonnucleosomal HSV-1 DNA, histone H3 was found associated with viral DNA at early times of infection. Interestingly, histone H3 was underrepresented on IE promoters in a manner dependent on the VP16 activation domain. Thus, the VP16 activation domain is responsible for recruiting general transcription factors and coactivators to IE promoters and also for dramatically reducing the association of histones with those promoters.

scholarly journals pXBP1(U) encoded in XBP1 pre-mRNA negatively regulates unfolded protein response activator pXBP1(S) in mammalian ER stress response

2006 ◽  
Vol 172 (4) ◽  
pp. 565-575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiderou Yoshida ◽  
Masaya Oku ◽  
Mie Suzuki ◽  
Kazutoshi Mori
Keyword(s):  
Er Stress ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Recovery Phase ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain ◽  
Unfolded Protein ◽  
Nuclear Exclusion ◽  
Xbp1 Mrna ◽  
Localization Signal

Upon the accumulation of unfolded proteins in the mammalian endoplasmic reticulum (ER), X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1) premessenger RNA (premRNA) is converted to mature mRNA by unconventional splicing that is mediated by the endonuclease inositol-requiring enzyme 1. The transcription factor protein (p) XBP1 spliced (S), which is translated from mature XBP1 mRNA, contains the nuclear localization signal and the transcriptional activation domain and activates the transcription of target genes, including those encoding ER chaperones in the nucleus. We show that pXBP1 unspliced (U) encoded in XBP1 pre-mRNA was constitutively expressed and markedly accumulated at the recovery phase of ER stress. pXBP1(U) contained the nuclear exclusion signal instead of the transcriptional activation domain and shuttled between the nucleus and the cytoplasm. Interestingly, pXBP1(U) formed a complex with pXBP1(S), and the pXBP1(U)–pXBP1(S) complex was sequestered from the nucleus. Moreover, the complex was rapidly degraded by proteasomes because of the degradation motif contained in pXBP1(U). Thus, pXBP1(U) is a negative feedback regulator of pXBP1(S), which shuts off the transcription of target genes during the recovery phase of ER stress.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document