scholarly journals Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mer3 Is a DNA Helicase Involved in Meiotic Crossing Over

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 3281-3291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuro Nakagawa ◽  
Richard D. Kolodner
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Crossing Over ◽  
Helicase Activity ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Rna Helicases ◽  
Conserved Residues ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes

ABSTRACT Crossing over is regulated to occur at least once per each pair of homologous chromosomes during meiotic prophase to ensure proper segregation of chromosomes at the first meiotic division. In a mer3 deletion mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, crossing over is decreased, and the distribution of the crossovers that occur is random. The predicted Mer3 protein contains seven motifs characteristic of the DExH box type of DNA/RNA helicases. The mer3G166D and the mer3K167A mutation, amino acid substitutions of conserved residues in a putative nucleotide-binding domain of the helicase motifs caused a defect in the transition of meiosis-specific double-strand breaks to later intermediates, decreased crossing over, and reduced crossover interference. The purified Mer3 protein was found to have DNA helicase activity. This helicase activity was reduced by the mer3GD mutation to <1% of the wild-type activity, even though binding of the mutant protein to single- and double-strand DNA was unaffected. The mer3KA mutation eliminated the ATPase activity of the wild-type protein. These results demonstrate that Mer3 is a DNA helicase that functions in meiotic crossing over.

Assessment of the roles of SPO11-2 and SPO11-4 in meiosis in rice using CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (22) ◽  
pp. 7046-7058 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Fayos ◽  
Anne Cécile Meunier ◽  
Aurore Vernet ◽  
Sergi Navarro-Sanz ◽  
Murielle Portefaix ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Pollen Mother Cells ◽  
In The Wild ◽  
Bivalent Formation ◽  
Biallelic Mutations ◽  
Mother Cells ◽  
Mutant Lines

Abstract In Arabidopsis, chromosomal double-strand breaks at meiosis are presumably catalyzed by two distinct SPO11 transesterases, AtSPO11-1 and AtSPO11-2, together with M-TOPVIB. To clarify the roles of the SPO11 paralogs in rice, we used CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis to produce null biallelic mutants in OsSPO11-1, OsSPO11-2, and OsSPO11-4. Similar to Osspo11-1, biallelic mutations in the first exon of OsSPO11-2 led to complete panicle sterility. Conversely, all Osspo11-4 biallelic mutants were fertile. To generate segregating Osspo11-2 mutant lines, we developed a strategy based on dual intron targeting. Similar to Osspo11-1, the pollen mother cells of Osspo11-2 progeny plants showed an absence of bivalent formation at metaphase I, aberrant segregation of homologous chromosomes, and formation of non-viable tetrads. In contrast, the chromosome behavior in Osspo11-4 male meiocytes was indistinguishable from that in the wild type. While similar numbers of OsDMC1 foci were revealed by immunostaining in wild-type and Osspo11-4 prophase pollen mother cells (114 and 101, respectively), a surprisingly high number (85) of foci was observed in the sterile Osspo11-2 mutant, indicative of a divergent function between OsSPO11-1 and OsSPO11-2. This study demonstrates that whereas OsSPO11-1 and OsSPO11-2 are the likely orthologs of AtSPO11-1 and AtSPO11-2, OsSPO11-4 has no major role in wild-type rice meiosis.

scholarly journals Homologous, homeologous, and illegitimate repair of double-strand breaks during transformation of a wild-type strain and a rad52 mutant strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 1278-1292 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Mezard ◽  
A Nicolas
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Gene Product ◽  
Type Strain ◽  
Wild Type Strain ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Linear Plasmid ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
In The Wild

Different modes of in vivo repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs) have been described for various organisms: the recombinational DSB repair (DSBR) mode, the single-strand annealing (SSA) mode, and end-to-end joining. To investigate these modes of DSB repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we have examined the fate of in vitro linearized replicative plasmids during transformation with respect to several parameters. We found that (i) the efficiencies of both intramolecular and intermolecular linear plasmid DSB repair are homology dependent (according to the amount of DNA used during transformation [100 ng or less], recombination between similar but not identical [homeologous] P450s sequences sharing 73% identity is 2- to 18-fold lower than recombination between identical sequences); (ii) the RAD52 gene product is not essential for intramolecular recombination between homologous and homeologous direct repeats (as in the wild-type strain, recombination occurs with respect to the overall alignment of the parental sequences); (iii) in contrast, the RAD52 gene product is required for intermolecular interactions (the rare transformants which are obtained contain plasmids resulting from deletion-forming intramolecular events involving little or no sequence homology); (iv) similarly, sequencing data revealed examples of intramolecular joining within the few terminal nucleotides of the transforming DNA upon transformation with a linear plasmid with no repeat in the wild-type strain. The recombinant junctions of the rare illegitimate events obtained with S. cerevisiae are very similar to those observed in the repair of DSB in mammalian cells. Together, these and previous results suggest the existence of alternative modes for DSB repair during transformation which differ in their efficiencies and in the structure of their products. We discuss the implications of these results with respect to the existence of alternative pathways and the role of the RAD52 gene product.

scholarly journals The Yeast Motor Protein, Kar3p, Is Essential for Meiosis I

1997 ◽  
Vol 139 (2) ◽  
pp. 459-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol A. Bascom-Slack ◽  
Dean S. Dawson
Keyword(s):  
Synaptonemal Complex ◽  
Meiotic Recombination ◽  
Molecular Motor ◽  
Motor Protein ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Low Levels ◽  
Meiosis I

The recognition and alignment of homologous chromosomes early in meiosis is essential for their subsequent segregation at anaphase I; however, the mechanism by which this occurs is unknown. We demonstrate here that, in the absence of the molecular motor, Kar3p, meiotic cells are blocked with prophase monopolar microtubule arrays and incomplete synaptonemal complex (SC) formation. kar3 mutants exhibit very low levels of heteroallelic recombination. kar3 mutants do produce double-strand breaks that act as initiation sites for meiotic recombination in yeast, but at levels severalfold reduced from wild-type. These data are consistent with a meiotic role for Kar3p in the events that culminate in synapsis of homologues.

Reciprocal Translocations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Formed by Nonhomologous End Joining

Genetics ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 166 (2) ◽  
pp. 741-751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Yu ◽  
Abram Gabriel
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Chromosomal Rearrangements ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Open Reading Frames ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Reciprocal Translocations ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Reading Frames

Abstract Reciprocal translocations are common in cancer cells, but their creation is poorly understood. We have developed an assay system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to study reciprocal translocation formation in the absence of homology. We induce two specific double-strand breaks (DSBs) simultaneously on separate chromosomes with HO endonuclease and analyze the subsequent chromosomal rearrangements among surviving cells. Under these conditions, reciprocal translocations via nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) occur at frequencies of ∼2-7 × 10-5/cell exposed to the DSBs. Yku80p is a component of the cell’s NHEJ machinery. In its absence, reciprocal translocations still occur, but the junctions are associated with deletions and extended overlapping sequences. After induction of a single DSB, translocations and inversions are recovered in wild-type and rad52 strains. In these rearrangements, a nonrandom assortment of sites have fused to the DSB, and their junctions show typical signs of NHEJ. The sites tend to be between open reading frames or within Ty1 LTRs. In some cases the translocation partner is formed by a break at a cryptic HO recognition site. Our results demonstrate that NHEJ-mediated reciprocal translocations can form in S. cerevisiae as a consequence of DSB repair.

Homologous, homeologous, and illegitimate repair of double-strand breaks during transformation of a wild-type strain and a rad52 mutant strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 1278-1292
Author(s):  
C Mezard ◽  
A Nicolas
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Gene Product ◽  
Type Strain ◽  
Wild Type Strain ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Linear Plasmid ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
In The Wild

Different modes of in vivo repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs) have been described for various organisms: the recombinational DSB repair (DSBR) mode, the single-strand annealing (SSA) mode, and end-to-end joining. To investigate these modes of DSB repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we have examined the fate of in vitro linearized replicative plasmids during transformation with respect to several parameters. We found that (i) the efficiencies of both intramolecular and intermolecular linear plasmid DSB repair are homology dependent (according to the amount of DNA used during transformation [100 ng or less], recombination between similar but not identical [homeologous] P450s sequences sharing 73% identity is 2- to 18-fold lower than recombination between identical sequences); (ii) the RAD52 gene product is not essential for intramolecular recombination between homologous and homeologous direct repeats (as in the wild-type strain, recombination occurs with respect to the overall alignment of the parental sequences); (iii) in contrast, the RAD52 gene product is required for intermolecular interactions (the rare transformants which are obtained contain plasmids resulting from deletion-forming intramolecular events involving little or no sequence homology); (iv) similarly, sequencing data revealed examples of intramolecular joining within the few terminal nucleotides of the transforming DNA upon transformation with a linear plasmid with no repeat in the wild-type strain. The recombinant junctions of the rare illegitimate events obtained with S. cerevisiae are very similar to those observed in the repair of DSB in mammalian cells. Together, these and previous results suggest the existence of alternative modes for DSB repair during transformation which differ in their efficiencies and in the structure of their products. We discuss the implications of these results with respect to the existence of alternative pathways and the role of the RAD52 gene product.

scholarly journals SPO16 binds SHOC1 to promote homologous recombination and crossing-over in meiotic prophase I

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. eaau9780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qianting Zhang ◽  
Shu-Yan Ji ◽  
Kiran Busayavalasa ◽  
Chao Yu
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Meiotic Recombination ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Crossing Over ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Recombination Nodules ◽  
Evolutionarily Conserved

Segregation of homologous chromosomes in meiosis I is tightly regulated by their physical links, or crossovers (COs), generated from DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) through meiotic homologous recombination. In budding yeast, three ZMM (Zip1/2/3/4, Mer3, Msh4/5) proteins, Zip2, Zip4, and Spo16, form a “ZZS” complex, functioning to promote meiotic recombination via a DSB repair pathway. Here, we identified the mammalian ortholog of Spo16, termed SPO16, which interacts with the mammalian ortholog of Zip2 (SHOC1/MZIP2), and whose functions are evolutionarily conserved to promote the formation of COs. SPO16 localizes to the recombination nodules, as SHOC1 and TEX11 do. SPO16 is required for stabilization of SHOC1 and proper localization of other ZMM proteins. The DSBs formed in SPO16-deleted meiocytes were repaired without COs formation, although synapsis is less affected. Therefore, formation of SPO16-SHOC1 complex–associated recombination intermediates is a key step facilitating meiotic recombination that produces COs from yeast to mammals.

scholarly journals Coordination of the Initiation of Recombination and the Reductional Division in Meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Genetics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 152 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Jiao ◽  
Steven A Bullard ◽  
Laura Salem ◽  
Robert E Malone
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Meiotic Recombination ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
The Other ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Proper Timing ◽  
Meiotic Dsbs ◽  
Reductional Division

Abstract Early exchange (EE) genes are required for the initiation of meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cells with mutations in several EE genes undergo an earlier reductional division (MI), which suggests that the initiation of meiotic recombination is involved in determining proper timing of the division. The different effects of null mutations on the timing of reductional division allow EE genes to be assorted into three classes: mutations in RAD50 or REC102 that confer a very early reductional division; mutations in REC104 or REC114 that confer a division earlier than that of wild-type (WT) cells, but later than that of mutants of the first class; and mutations in MEI4 that do not significantly alter the timing of MI. The very early mutations are epistatic to mutations in the other two classes. We propose a model that accounts for the epistatic relationships and the communication between recombination initiation and the first division. Data in this article indicate that double-strand breaks (DSBs) are not the signal for the normal delay of reductional division; these experiments also confirm that MEI4 is required for the formation of meiotic DSBs. Finally, if a DSB is provided by the HO endonuclease, recombination can occur in the absence of MEI4 and REC104.

scholarly journals Coupling crossover and synaptonemal complex in meiosis

2022 ◽  
Vol 36 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 4-6
Author(s):  
Corinne Grey ◽  
Bernard de Massy
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Synaptonemal Complex ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes

During meiosis, a molecular program induces DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and their repair by homologous recombination. DSBs can be repaired with or without crossovers. ZMM proteins promote the repair toward crossover. The sites of DSB repair are also sites where the axes of homologous chromosomes are juxtaposed and stabilized, and where a structure called the synaptonemal complex initiates, providing further regulation of both DSB formation and repair. How crossover formation and synapsis initiation are linked has remained unknown. The study by Pyatnitskaya and colleagues (pp. 53–69) in this issue of Genes & Development highlights the central role of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ZMM protein Zip4 in this process.

scholarly journals Control of meiotic pairing and recombination by chromosomally tethered 26S proteasome

Science ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 355 (6323) ◽  
pp. 408-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jasvinder S. Ahuja ◽  
Rima Sandhu ◽  
Rana Mainpal ◽  
Crystal Lawson ◽  
Hanna Henley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Synaptonemal Complex ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
26S Proteasome ◽  
Strand Exchange ◽  
Crossing Over ◽  
Meiotic Pairing ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Meiotic Chromosomes ◽  
Evolutionarily Conserved

During meiosis, paired homologous chromosomes (homologs) become linked via the synaptonemal complex (SC) and crossovers. Crossovers mediate homolog segregation and arise from self-inflicted double-strand breaks (DSBs). Here, we identified a role for the proteasome, the multisubunit protease that degrades proteins in the nucleus and cytoplasm, in homolog juxtaposition and crossing over. Without proteasome function, homologs failed to pair and instead remained associated with nonhomologous chromosomes. Although dispensable for noncrossover formation, a functional proteasome was required for a coordinated transition that entails SC assembly between longitudinally organized chromosome axes and stable strand exchange of crossover-designated DSBs. Notably, proteolytic core and regulatory proteasome particles were recruited to chromosomes by Zip3, the ortholog of mammalian E3 ligase RNF212, and SC protein Zip1 . We conclude that proteasome functions along meiotic chromosomes are evolutionarily conserved.

scholarly journals Robust designation of meiotic crossover sites by CDK-2 through phosphorylation of the MutSγ complex

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jocelyn Haversat ◽  
Alexander Woglar ◽  
Kayla Klatt ◽  
Chantal C. Akerib ◽  
Victoria Roberts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Positive Feedback ◽  
Feedback Mechanism ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Meiotic Crossover ◽  
Positive Feedback Mechanism

SUMMARYCrossover formation is essential for proper segregation of homologous chromosomes during meiosis. Here we show that C. elegans Cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK-2) forms a complex with cyclin-like protein COSA-1 and supports crossover formation by promoting conversion of meiotic double-strand breaks (DSBs) into crossover-specific recombination intermediates. Further, we identify MutSγ component MSH-5 as a CDK-2 phosphorylation target. MSH-5 has a disordered C-terminal tail that contains 13 potential CDK phosphosites and is required to concentrate crossover-promoting proteins at recombination sites. Phosphorylation of the MSH-5 tail appears dispensable in a wild- type background, but when MutSγ activity is partially compromised, crossover formation and retention of CDK-2/COSA-1 at recombination sites are exquisitely sensitive to phosphosite loss. Our data support a model in which robustness of crossover designation reflects a positive feedback mechanism involving CDK-2-mediated phosphorylation and scaffold-like properties of the MSH-5 C-terminal tail, features that combine to promote full recruitment and activity of crossover-promoting complexes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document