WHAT CAN POST-COLLISION PLUTONIC EVENTS TELL US ABOUT THE TECTONIC HISTORY OF THE ALASKA RANGE SUTURE ZONE?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack Foran ◽  
◽  
Sarah Roeske ◽  
Trevor S. Waldien ◽  
Jeffrey A. Benowitz
2019 ◽  
Vol 89 (10) ◽  
pp. 1039-1054 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhicai Zhu ◽  
Qingguo Zhai ◽  
Peiyuan Hu ◽  
Sunlin Chung ◽  
Yue Tang ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The closure of the Bangong–Nujiang Tethyan Ocean (BNTO) and consequent Lhasa–Qiangtang collision is vital to reasonably understanding the early tectonic history of the Tibetan Plateau before the India-Eurasia collision. The timing of the Lhasa–Qiangtang collision was mainly constrained by the ophiolite and magmatic rocks in previous studies, with only limited constraints from the sedimentary rocks within and adjacent to the Bangong–Nujiang suture zone. In the middle segment of the Bangong–Nujiang suture zone, the Duoni Formation, consisting of a fluvial delta sequence with minor andesite interlayers, was originally defined as the Late Cretaceous Jingzhushan Formation and interpreted as the products of the Lhasa–Qiangtang collision during the Late Cretaceous. Our new zircon U-Pb data from two samples of andesite interlayers demonstrate that it was deposited during the latest Early Cretaceous (ca. 113 Ma) rather than Late Cretaceous. Systemic studies on the sandstone detrital model, heavy-mineral assemblage, and clasts of conglomerate demonstrate a mixed source of both Lhasa and Qiangtang terranes and ophiolite complex. Clasts of conglomerate contain abundant angular peridotite, gabbro, basalt, chert, andesite, and granite, and minor quartzite and gneiss clasts also exist. Sandstones of the Duoni Formation are dominated by feldspathic–lithic graywacke (Qt25F14L61 and Qm13F14L73), indicative of a mixture of continental-arc and recycled-orogen source origin. Detrital minerals of chromite, clinopyroxene, epidote, and hornblende in sandstone also indicate an origin of ultramafic and mafic rocks, while garnets indicate a metamorphosed source. Paleocurrent data demonstrate bidirectional (southward and northward) source origins. Thus, we suggest that the deposition of the Duoni Formation took place in the processes of the Lhasa–Qiangtang collision during the latest Early Cretaceous (∼ 113 Ma), and the BNTO had been closed by this time.


2013 ◽  
Vol 345 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 454-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita Catanzariti ◽  
Alessandro Ellero ◽  
Mehmet Cemal Göncüoglu ◽  
Michele Marroni ◽  
Giuseppe Ottria ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 137 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 35-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Tohver ◽  
B.A. van der Pluijm ◽  
K. Mezger ◽  
J.E. Scandolara ◽  
E.J. Essene

Author(s):  
Grant Lowey

Waldien et al. (2021) present new bedrock geologic mapping, U-Pb geochronology, and 40Ar/39Ar thermochronology from the eastern Alaska Range in south-central Alaska to determine the burial and exhumation history of metamorphic rocks associated with the Alaska Range suture zone, interpret the history of faults responsible for the burial and exhumation of the metamorphic rocks, and speculate on the relative importance of the Alaska Range suture zone and related structures during Cenozoic reactivation. They also propose that ultramafic rocks in their Ann Creek map area in south-central Alaska (herein referred to as the “Ann Creek ultramafic complex”) correlate with the Pyroxenite Creek ultramafic complex in southwestern Yukon, and that this correlation is “consistent with other estimates of >400 km” of offset on the Denali fault. However, despite Waldien et al.’s (2021) claim that the purportedly offset ultramafic rocks are “similar” and that characteristics of the Ann Creek ultramafic complex “make a strong case” for a faulted portion of an Alaska-type ultramafic intrusion, their paper gives short shrift in describing the Pyroxenite Creek ultramafic complex and in discussing previous estimates of displacement on the Denali fault. In Addition, Waldien et al. (2021) are either unaware of or ignore several key references of the Pyroxenite Creek ultramafic complex and estimates of displacement on the Denali fault. As a result, Waldien et al.’s (2021) claim of a “correlation” between allegedly offset ultramafic rocks is suspect, and their reference to “other estimates of >400 km” of offset on the Denali fault is incorrect, or at the very least misleading.


Author(s):  
Jeff Benowitz ◽  
◽  
Jeffrey M. Trop ◽  
Ronald B. Cole ◽  
Paul W. Layer ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 155 (2) ◽  
pp. 356-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHIARA FRASSI ◽  
MICHELE MARRONI ◽  
LUCA PANDOLFI ◽  
M. CEMAL GÖNCÜOĞLU ◽  
ALESSANDRO ELLERO ◽  
...  

AbstractIn northern Turkey, the Intra-Pontide suture zone represents one of the first-order tectonic structures located between the Istanbul–Zonguldak and the Sakarya continental terranes. It consists of an E–W-trending assemblage of deformed and variably metamorphosed tectonic units, including sedimentary rocks and ophiolites derived from a Neo-Tethyan oceanic basin, known as the Intra-Pontide oceanic basin. One of these units is represented by the Daday Unit that consists of a block-in-matrix assemblage derived from supra-subduction oceanic crust and related deep-sea sedimentary cover of Middle Jurassic age. This setting was acquired during Late Jurassic time by tectonic underplating at a depth of 35–42 km associated with blueschist-facies metamorphism (D1 phase). The following D2, D3 and D4 phases produced the exhumation of the Daday Unit up to shallower structural levels in a time span running from the Albian to late Paleocene. The high geothermal gradient detected during the D2 phase indicates that the Daday Unit was exhumed during a continent–arc collisional setting. The tectonic structures of the Intra-Pontide suture zone, resulting from the previously described tectonic history, are unconformably sealed by the upper Paleocene – Eocene deposits. This tectonic setting was intensely reworked by the activity of the North Anatolian Fault Zone, producing the present-day geometrical relationships of the Intra-Pontide suture zone of the Central Pontides.


Tectonics ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Glorie ◽  
J. De Grave ◽  
M. M. Buslov ◽  
F. I. Zhimulev ◽  
D. F. Stockli ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2.1) ◽  
pp. 1-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paola Manzotti ◽  
Michel Ballèvrei
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document