Polarizability of Metal Nanoparticles in the Telecommunication Wavelength Range

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 548-550
Author(s):  
A. I. Sidorov ◽  
A. I. Sivak ◽  
N. V. Vakula
2005 ◽  
Vol 86 (24) ◽  
pp. 241104 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Roither ◽  
M. V. Kovalenko ◽  
S. Pichler ◽  
T. Schwarzl ◽  
W. Heiss

2004 ◽  
Vol 84 (9) ◽  
pp. 1450-1452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Tatsuura ◽  
Minquan Tian ◽  
Makoto Furuki ◽  
Yasuhiro Sato ◽  
Izumi Iwasa ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Estiak Ahmad ◽  
Md Rezaul Karim ◽  
Shihab Bin Hafiz ◽  
C Lewis Reynolds ◽  
Yang Liu ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 123 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Leo ◽  
Simon-Pierre Gorza ◽  
Stéphane Coen ◽  
Bart Kuyken ◽  
Gunther Roelkens

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 4650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Utsav D. Dave ◽  
Bart Kuyken ◽  
François Leo ◽  
Simon-Pierre Gorza ◽  
Sylvain Combrie ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 394-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunther Roelkens ◽  
Utsav Dave ◽  
Alban Gassenq ◽  
Nannicha Hattasan ◽  
Chen Hu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 9-13
Author(s):  
V.Ya. Mendeleyev ◽  
V.A. Petrov ◽  
A.V. Yashin ◽  
A.I. Vangonen ◽  
O.K. Taganov

Determining the surface temperature of materials with unknown emissivity is studied. A method for determining the surface temperature using a standard sample of average spectral normal emissivity in the wavelength range of 1,65–1,80 μm and an industrially produced Metis M322 pyrometer operating in the same wavelength range. The surface temperature of studied samples of the composite material and platinum was determined experimentally from the temperature of a standard sample located on the studied surfaces. The relative error in determining the surface temperature of the studied materials, introduced by the proposed method, was calculated taking into account the temperatures of the platinum and the composite material, determined from the temperature of the standard sample located on the studied surfaces, and from the temperature of the studied surfaces in the absence of the standard sample. The relative errors thus obtained did not exceed 1,7 % for the composite material and 0,5% for the platinum at surface temperatures of about 973 K. It was also found that: the inaccuracy of a priori data on the emissivity of the standard sample in the range (–0,01; 0,01) relative to the average emissivity increases the relative error in determining the temperature of the composite material by 0,68 %, and the installation of a standard sample on the studied materials leads to temperature changes on the periphery of the surface not exceeding 0,47 % for composite material and 0,05 % for platinum.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document