scholarly journals SP0059 Cross-cultural validation of perceived health status measures

Author(s):  
F Guillemin
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Ferrarello ◽  
Carmela Iacopino ◽  
Catia Pierinelli

Abstract After the COVID-19 infection, individuals can experience impairment, activity limitation and participation restriction. Little information is available on range and frequency of individual problems arising after COVID-19 and its sequelae and long-term outcomes. In June and July 2020, nineteen individuals previously hospitalized with COVID-19 were referred to our outpatient physiotherapy unit. We monitored their level of independence in activities of daily living, mobility, and perceived health status for 7.4–9.5 months (median, 8.6) after healing. At baseline, our cohort showed substantial independence in activities of daily living, some mobility limitations, and below average perceived health status. Measures improved over time. Limitations of physical functioning were mostly moderate to slight and tending to improve; if present, severe limitations were probably related to pre- COVID-19 conditions. However, individuals in some cases may not have fully recovered their premorbid functioning seven to nine months after healing.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Barnadas ◽  
◽  
M. Muñoz ◽  
M. Margelí ◽  
J. I. Chacón ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Bone metastasis (BM) is the most common site of disease in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. BM impacts health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We tested prospectively the psychometric properties of the Bone Metastasis Quality of Life (BOMET-QoL-10) measure on MBC patients with BM. Methods Patients completed the BOMET-QoL-10 questionnaire, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, and a self-perceived health status item at baseline and at follow-up visits. We performed psychometric tests and calculated the effect size of specific BM treatment on patients´ HRQoL. Results Almost 70% of the 172 patients reported symptoms, 23.3% experienced irruptive pain, and over half were receiving chemotherapy. BOMET-QoL-10 proved to be a quick assessment tool performing well in readability and completion time (about 10 min) with 0–1.2% of missing/invalid data. Although BOMET-QoL-10 scores remained fairly stable during study visits, differences were observed for patient subgroups (e.g., with or without skeletal-related events or adverse effects). Scores were significantly correlated with physician-reported patient status, patient-reported pain, symptoms, and perceived health status. BOMET-QoL-10 scores also varied prospectively according to changes in pain intensity. Conclusions BOMET-QoL-10 performed well as a brief, easy-to-administer, useful, and sensitive HRQoL measure for potential use for clinical practice with MBC patients. Trial registration NCT03847220. Retrospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov (February the 20th 2019).


2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. A251
Author(s):  
W. Agbor Bawa ◽  
N. Rianon ◽  
R. Rasu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document