Compared to unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) have been found to exhibit marked variations in in vitro effects due to variations in molecular weight and structure. Moreover, when the in vitro potency of these agents is equally adjusted bypharmacopeial assay (current and proposed) wide variations in the in vivo responses have been noted. These variations were strongly dependent on the route of administration. Utilizing defined animal models, a systematic comparative study of the in vivo responses of seven commercial LMWHs was undertaken. Choay Fraxiparine (CY 216} Choay CY 222, NovoLHN, Kabi Fragmin, Opocrin 2123 (OP), Hepar RD 11885 (RD), Pharmuka Enoxaparin (PK) and Choay porcine mucosal heparin (PMH) were tested in identical settings at equigravimetric dosages. The graded results are given in the following.Wide variations in the in vivo pharmacologic and toxicity responseswere noted suggesting that different LMWHs are not bioequivalent at equigravimetric levels. When these responses were expressed in anti-factor Xa or pharmacopeial potency, these differences were further magnified. The clinically reported dosimetric and safety problems may be minimized by profiling LMWHs in defined in vivo test systems to optimize their safety/efficacy ratio.
The Effects of Lipophilic and Hydrophilic Statins on Bone Tissue Mineralization in Saos2 Human Bone Cell Line?In vitro Comparative Study