scholarly journals Phase IIa, placebo-controlled, randomised study of lutikizumab, an anti-interleukin-1α and anti-interleukin-1β dual variable domain immunoglobulin, in patients with erosive hand osteoarthritis

2018 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 413-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margreet Kloppenburg ◽  
Charles Peterfy ◽  
Ida K Haugen ◽  
Féline Kroon ◽  
Su Chen ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the anti-interleukin (IL)-1α/β dual variable domain immunoglobulin lutikizumab (ABT-981) in erosive hand osteoarthritis (HOA).MethodsPatients with ≥1 erosive and ≥3 tender and/or swollen hand joints were randomised to placebo or lutikizumab 200 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in Australian/Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN) pain subdomain score from baseline to 16 weeks. At baseline and week 26, subjects had bilateral hand radiographs and MRI of the hand with the greatest number of baseline tender and/or swollen joints. Continuous endpoints were assessed using analysis of covariance models, with treatment and country as main factors and baseline measurements as covariates.ResultsOf 132 randomised subjects, 1 received no study drug and 110 completed the study (placebo, 61/67 (91%); lutikizumab, 49/64 (77%)). AUSCAN pain was not different among subjects treated with lutikizumab versus placebo at week 16 (least squares mean difference, 1.5 (95% CI –1.9 to 5.0)). Other clinical and imaging endpoints were not different between lutikizumab and placebo. Lutikizumab significantly decreased serum high-sensitivity C reactive protein levels, IL-1α and IL-1β levels, and blood neutrophils. Lutikizumab pharmacokinetics were consistent with phase I studies and not affected by antidrug antibodies. Injection site reactions and neutropaenia were more common in the lutikizumab group; discontinuations because of adverse events occurred more frequently with lutikizumab (4/64) versus placebo (1/67).ConclusionDespite adequate blockade of IL-1, lutikizumab did not improve pain or imaging outcomes in erosive HOA compared with placebo.

Cartilage ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 194760352110258
Author(s):  
Kazuya Nigoro ◽  
Hiromu Ito ◽  
Tomotoshi Kawata ◽  
Shinichiro Ishie ◽  
Yugo Morita ◽  
...  

Objective: This cross-sectional study aimed to explore the differences of the medial and lateral sides of the knee joint and precise radiographic abnormalities in contribution to the knee pain and clinical outcomes. Design: Participants 60 years or older who underwent radiographic evaluation were included. Knee radiography was assessed using grading systems of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) atlas. The Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure (JKOM) was evaluated as clinical outcomes. Serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was used to evaluate systemic inflammation. We divided the participants into normal, medial-, lateral-, and medial & lateral-OA types and compared their JKOM using an analysis of covariance. Furthermore, we analyzed the relationship between the knee pain and stiffness of JKOM and the grading of each radiographic feature using a multiple regression model. Results: Lateral- and medial & lateral-OA groups had a significantly worse symptoms in the total and the pain score, especially in movement subscales, in JKOM score. Lateral-OA groups had higher hsCRP than medial-OA group. Multivariate analysis showed that medial joint space narrowing (JSN), and lateral femoral and tibial osteophytes significantly affected knee pain (adjusted odds ratios: 1.73, 1.28, and 1.55, respectively). The radiographic changes are associated with pain more in JSN in the medial side and osteophytes in the lateral side. Conclusion: Lateral- and medial & lateral-OA groups showed worth symptom. In addition, medial JSN and lateral osteophytes have potent effects on the knee pain.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document