scholarly journals Interleukin-6 blockade with sarilumab in severe COVID-19 pneumonia with systemic hyperinflammation: an open-label cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (10) ◽  
pp. 1277-1285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuel Della-Torre ◽  
Corrado Campochiaro ◽  
Giulio Cavalli ◽  
Giacomo De Luca ◽  
Angela Napolitano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Improvement ◽  
Inflammatory Markers ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Study ◽  
Lung Consolidation ◽  
Predictors Of Response

ObjectivesTo assess the safety and efficacy of interleukin (IL)−6 blockade with sarilumab in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and systemic hyperinflammation.MethodsWe conducted an open-label study of sarilumab in severe COVID-19 pneumonia (PaO2/FiO2 <300 mm Hg) with hyperinflammation (elevated inflammatory markers and serum IL-6 levels). Sarilumab 400 mg was administered intravenously in addition to standard of care and results were compared with contemporary matched patients treated with standard of care alone. Clinical improvement, mortality, safety and predictors of response were assessed at 28 days.ResultsTwenty-eight patients were treated with sarilumab and 28 contemporary patients receiving standard of care alone were used as controls. At day 28 of follow-up, 61% of patients treated with sarilumab experienced clinical improvement and 7% died. These findings were not significantly different from the comparison group (clinical improvement 64%, mortality 18%; p=NS). Baseline PaO2/FiO2 ratio >100 mm Hg and lung consolidation <17% at CT scan predicted clinical improvement in patients treated with sarilumab. Median time to clinical improvement in patients with lung consolidation <17% was shorter after sarilumab (10 days) than after standard treatment (24 days; p=0.01). The rate of infection and pulmonary thrombosis was similar between the two groups.ConclusionsAt day 28, overall clinical improvement and mortality in patients with severe COVID-19 were not significantly different between sarilumab and standard of care. Sarilumab was associated with faster recovery in a subset of patients showing minor lung consolidation at baseline.

scholarly journals CO0001 MAVRILIMUMAB IMPROVES OUTCOMES IN SEVERE COVID-19 PNEUMONIA AND SYSTEMIC HYPER-INFLAMMATION

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 213.4-213
Author(s):  
G. De Luca ◽  
G. Cavalli ◽  
C. Campochiaro ◽  
E. Della Torre ◽  
P. Angelillo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Improvement ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Ct Scanning ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Routine Care ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Discharge From Hospital

Background:Patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and hyperinflammation face increased mortality. There is an urgent need for effective treatments to reduce the burden of the COVID-19 pandemic.Objectives:Our protocol aimed at evaluating the potential improvement in clinical outcomes with mavrilimumab, an anti-Granulocyte/Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Receptor alpha (GM-CSFRα) monoclonal antibody, in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and systemic hyper-inflammation.Methods:Single-center, open-label, single active arm intervention; Adult patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia (as evaluated by CT scanning), hypoxia (PaO2:FiO2 ratio ≤ 300 mmHg), and systemic hyper-inflammation (increased C-reactive protein [CRP] ≥ 100 mg/mL and/or ferritin ≥ 900 μg/L, increased lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]) received a single intravenous dose of mavrilimumab added to standard of care; follow-up 28 days. Main outcomes measure was time to clinical improvement (reduction ≥ 2 categories on the 7-point WHO clinical status scale, 1=discharge, 7=death); others included time to discharge from hospital; % of pts achieving a clinical improvement; survival; mechanical-ventilation free survival; time to fever resolution; CRP; PaO2:FiO2 ratio.Results:A mavrilimumab group (n=13 COVID-19 patients, non-mechanically ventilated, median age 57 [IQR, 52-58], males 12 [92%], febrile 11 [85%]; PaO2:FiO2195.5[166.7–215.0]) was compared to a cohort of 26 contemporaneous patients with similar baseline characteristics. Death occurred in 0% (n=0/13) of mavrilimumab recipients and 27% (n=7/26) of comparison-group patients (log rank p=0.046) during the 28-day follow-up. 100% (n=13) of mavrilimumab recipients and 65% (n=17) of comparison-group patients achieved clinical improvement (p=0.018) at Day 28, with earlier improvement (median 8.0 [IQR, 5.0–11.0] days vs 18.5 [11.0–NE] days) (p<0.001) in mavrilimumab recipients. Fever had resolved in 91% (n=10/11 febrile patients) of mavrilimumab recipients by Day 14, compared to 61% (n=11/18 febrile) of patients in the comparison group (p=0.110); fever resolution was faster in mavrilimumab recipients versus controls (median 1.0 [IQR, 1.0–2.0] day vs 7.0 [3.0 - NE] days, respectively, p=0·009). Mavrilimumab was well tolerated in all patients.Conclusion:Patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and systemic hyper-inflammation who received treatment with mavrilimumab had better clinical outcomes compared to patients receiving routine care. Mavrilimumab was well-tolerated. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm our findings.References:[1]Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020;395:1054-62[2]Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, et al. HLH Across Speciality Collaboration, UK. COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet. 2020;395:1033-4Disclosure of Interests:Giacomo De Luca Speakers bureau: SOBI, Novartis, Celgene, Pfizer, MSD, Giulio Cavalli Speakers bureau: SOBI, Novartis, Pfizer, Corrado Campochiaro Speakers bureau: Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, GSK, SOBI, Emanuel Della Torre: None declared, Piera Angelillo: None declared, Alessandro Tomelleri: None declared, nicola boffini: None declared, Stefano Tentori: None declared, Francesca Mette: None declared, Patrizia Rovere-Querini: None declared, Annalisa Ruggeri: None declared, Teresa D’Aliberti: None declared, Paolo Scarpelllini: None declared, Giovanni Landoni: None declared, Francesco De Cobelli: None declared, John F. Paolini Shareholder of: Kiniksa, Employee of: Kiniksa, Alberto Zangrillo: None declared, Moreno Tresoldi: None declared, Bruce C. Trapnell Consultant of: Kiniksa, Fabio Ciceri: None declared, Lorenzo Dagna Grant/research support from: Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, MSD, Mundipharma Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, SG, SOBI, Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, SG, and SOBI

scholarly journals Prospective, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of IMU-838, in Combination with Oseltamivir, in Adults with Coronavirus Disease 19 The IONIC Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kavi Sharma ◽  
Dr Lisa Berry ◽  
Dr Evangelos Vryonis ◽  
Dr Asad Ali ◽  
Dr Beatriz Lara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Improvement ◽  
Trial Design ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Ordinal Scale ◽  
Therapeutic Effects ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Study ◽  
Label Study ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Discharge From Hospital

Background: Globally there is a scarcity of effective treatments for SARS-CoV-2 infections (causing COVID 19). Repurposing existing medications may offer the best hope for treating COVID 19 patients to curb the pandemic. IMU-838 is a dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) inhibitor, which is an effective mechanism for antiviral effects against respiratory viruses. When used synergistically with Oseltamivir, therapeutic effects have been observed against influenza and SARS-CoV-2 in rodents.(13) The IONIC trial is a randomized control trial that will investigate whether time to clinical improvement in COVID 19 patients is improved following a 14 day course of IMU-838 + Oseltamivir versus Oseltamivir alone. Methods: IONIC trial is an open label study in which participants will be randomised 1:1 in two parallel arms; the intervention arm (IMU-838 + Oseltamivir) and control arm (Oseltamivir only). The primary outcome is time-to-clinical improvement; defined as the time from randomisation to: a 2-point improvement on WHO ordinal scale; discharge from hospital, or death (whichever occurs first). The study is sponsored by UHCW NHS Trust and funded by LifeArc. Discussion: The IONIC Protocol describes an overarching trial design to provide reliable evidence on the efficacy of IMU-838 (vidofludimus calcium) when delivered in combination with an antiviral therapy (Oseltamivir) [IONIC Intervention] for confirmed or suspected COVID-19 infection in adult patients receiving usual standard of care. Trial Registration: The trial was registered with EudraCT (2020-001805-21) on 09.04.2020 and ISRCTN on 23.09.2020 (ISRCTN53038326) and Clinicaltrials.gov on 17.08.2020 (NCT04516915) Strengths and Limitations: This study is the first to recruit participants in the trial exploring the effectiveness of IMU-838 in COVID-19. In addition, we believe it is the only trial exploring the effectiveness of IMU-838 in combination with Oseltamivir (Tamiflu) in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19. However, to make the trial design flexible due to the on-going pandemic the trial is un-blinded.

scholarly journals Successful long-term remission through tapering tocilizumab infusions: a single center prospective study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chayma Ladhari ◽  
Pierre Le Blay ◽  
Thierry Vincent ◽  
Ahmed Larbi ◽  
Emma Rubenstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Sustained Remission ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Study ◽  
Treatment Interval ◽  
Secondary Failure ◽  
Term Maintenance

Abstract Background Strategic drug therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with prolonged remission is not well defined. According to recent guidelines, tapering biological Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs) may be considered. We aimed to evaluate the long-term maintenance of tocilizumab (TCZ) treatment after the progressive tapering of infusions. Methods We conducted an exploratory, prospective, single-center, open label study, on RA patients with sustained remission for at least 3 months and treated with TCZ infusions every 4 weeks. The initial re-treatment interval was 6 weeks for the first 3 months. Thereafter, the spacing between infusions was determined by the clinician. Successful long-term maintenance following the tapering of TCZ infusions was defined by patients still treated after two years by TCZ with a minimum dosing interval of 5 weeks. Results Thirteen patients were enrolled in the study. Eight out of thirteen were still treated by TCZ after two years. Successful long-term maintenance was possible in six patients, with four patients maintaining a re-treatment interval of 8-weeks or more. We observed 5 patients with TCZ withdrawal: one for adverse drug reaction (neutropenia) and four with secondary failure. Patients achieving successful long-term maintenance with TCZ were significantly younger than those with secondary failure (p<0.05). In addition, RA patients with positive rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies, experienced a significantly greater number of flares during our 2-year follow-up (p<0.01). Conclusions A progressive tapering of TCZ infusions seems possible in most of the patients. However, larger studies, including more patients, are needed to confirm this therapeutic option.

Planned survival analysis from KEYNOTE-045: Phase 3, open-label study of pembrolizumab (pembro) versus paclitaxel, docetaxel, or vinflunine in recurrent, advanced urothelial cancer (UC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4501-4501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dean F. Bajorin ◽  
Ronald De Wit ◽  
David J. Vaughn ◽  
Yves Fradet ◽  
Jae-Lyun Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Analysis ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Combined Positive Score ◽  
Ecog Ps

4501 Background: Second-line chemotherapies (chemo) for advanced UC have limited clinical benefit (OS, 7-9 mo). Data from the open-label, phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 study (NCT02256436) showed significantly longer OS with pembro v chemo (median, 10.3 v 7.4 mo; hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; P = 0.002) in recurrent, advanced UC. Data from a planned survival analysis are presented. Methods: Pts had histologically or cytologically confirmed UC, progression after platinum, ECOG PS 0-2, measurable disease (RECIST v1.1), and ≤2 lines of systemic therapy. Pts were randomly assigned 1:1 to pembro 200 mg Q3W or investigator’s choice of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 Q3W, docetaxel 75 mg/m2 Q3W, or vinflunine 320 mg/m2 Q3W. Primary efficacy end points were OS and PFS (RECIST v1.1, blinded central review). ORR (RECIST v1.1, blinded central review) was a secondary end point. Results: 542 pts were enrolled (pembro, 270; chemo, 272). Baseline characteristics were generally similar between arms. As of Jan 18, 2017, median follow-up was 18.5 mo (range, 14.2-26.5). Median OS was significantly longer with pembro v chemo (10.3 v 7.4 mo; HR, 0.70; P < 0.001), and significance was maintained regardless of PD-L1 expression as measured by combined positive score (HR: CPS < 1%, 0.84; CPS ≥1%, 0.59; CPS < 10%, 0.76; CPS ≥10%, 0.57). OS benefit with pembro v chemo was seen regardless of age, ECOG PS, prior therapy, liver metastases, histology, and choice of chemo. The 18-mo OS rate (95% CI) was 36.1% (30.1%-42.0%) with pembro v 20.5% (15.2%-25.8%) with chemo (KM estimate). PFS was not different between arms. ORR was higher with pembro v chemo (21.1% v 11.0%), and median (range) duration of response was longer (not reached [1.6+-20.7+ mo] v 4.4 mo [1.4+-20.3]). 69% (pembro) v 36% (chemo) of responses lasted ≥12 mo. Fewer pts experienced a treatment-related AE with pembro v chemo (any grade, 61.3% v 90.2%; grade ≥3, 16.5% v 49.8%). Conclusions: The OS benefit and superior safety profile of pembro over chemo are maintained with longer follow-up. Combined, these results support the potential of pembro as a new standard of care for patients with UC who previously received platinum. Clinical trial information: NCT02256436.

scholarly journals Long-term follow-up of DYT1 dystonia patients treated by deep brain stimulation: An open-label study

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 289-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Cif ◽  
Xavier Vasques ◽  
Victoria Gonzalez ◽  
Patrice Ravel ◽  
Brigitte Biolsi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Study ◽  
Label Study ◽  
Dyt1 Dystonia ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Deep Brain

scholarly journals THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MEMANTINE ADMINISTRATON IN PATIENTS WITH NON-DEMENTIA COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT. THE RESULTS OF A MULTICENTRE CLINICAL FOLLOW-UP STUDY

2019 ◽  
pp. 37-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. N. Yahno ◽  
I. S. Preobrazhenskaya ◽  
V. V. Zakharov ◽  
E. A. Mkhitaryan
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Comparison Group ◽  
Mmse Score ◽  
Cognitive Disorders ◽  
Emotional Disturbances ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Visual Spatial ◽  
Nmda Receptor Blocker

Memantine is a reversible N-methyl-D-a spartate (NMDA) receptor blocker. The paper reports the results of an investigation aimed at the assessment of memantine effectiveness, safety and tolerability in patients with non-dementia cognitive impairment. Two hundred and forty (240) patients were enrolled in this open-label, comparative, multicentre study. In these subjects cognitive disorders were less severe than dementia (MMSE score made up 22—27). Mean age was 69.2 + 5.7 years old. Among them 148 patients received acatinol memantine at a dosage of 20 mg daily within 6 months and 92 subjects comprised a comparison group. Memantine administration resulted in decreased severity of cognitive impairment, first of all due to the improvement of dysregulatory, mnestic and visual-spatial disorders. Besides, the treatment caused the alleviation of emotional disturbances. The degree of therapeutic effectiveness was independent from the presence or lack of cardiovascular diseases in the examined population. Further double-blind studies aimed at the assessment of memantine effectiveness in patients with non-dementia cognitive impairment are necessary.

scholarly journals Tolerogenic nanoparticles mitigate the formation of anti-drug antibodies against pegylated uricase in patients with hyperuricemia

2022 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Earl Sands ◽  
Alan Kivitz ◽  
Wesley DeHaan ◽  
Sheldon S. Leung ◽  
Lloyd Johnston ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Secondary Endpoint ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Biologic Drugs ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Open Label Study ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Dose Dependent

AbstractBiologic drugs have transformed the standard of care for many diseases. However, many biologics induce the formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), which can compromise their safety and efficacy. Preclinical studies demonstrate that biodegradable nanoparticles-encapsulating rapamycin (ImmTOR), but not free rapamycin, mitigate the immunogenicity of co-administered biologic drugs. Here we report the outcomes from two clinical trials for ImmTOR. In the first ascending dose, open-label study (NCT02464605), pegadricase, an immunogenic, pegylated uricase enzyme derived from Candida utilis, is assessed for safety and tolerability (primary endpoint) as well as activity and immunogenicity (secondary endpoint); in the second single ascending dose Phase 1b trial (NCT02648269) composed of both a double-blind and open-label parts, we evaluate the safety of ImmTOR (primary endpoint) and its ability to prevent the formation of anti-drug antibodies against pegadricase and enhance its pharmacodynamic activity (secondary endpoint) in patients with hyperuricemia. The combination of ImmTOR and pegadricase is well tolerated. ImmTOR inhibits the development of uricase-specific ADAs in a dose-dependent manner, thus enabling sustained enzyme activity and reduction in serum uric acid levels. ImmTOR may thus represent a feasible approach for preventing the formation of ADAs to a broad range of immunogenic biologic therapies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document