scholarly journals Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the disease course of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases: results from the Swiss Clinical Quality Management cohort

2020 ◽  
pp. annrheumdis-2020-218705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Ciurea ◽  
Eleftherios Papagiannoulis ◽  
Kristina Bürki ◽  
Isabell von Loga ◽  
Raphael Micheroli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Quality Management ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases ◽  
Disease Course ◽  
Clinical Quality ◽  
Patient Reported

ObjectivesTo investigate whether the transient reduction in rheumatology services imposed by virus containment measures during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with disease worsening in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA).MethodsPatient-reported disease activity assessed during face-to-face visits and/or via a smartphone application were compared between three periods of each 2 months duration (before, during and after the COVID-19-wave) from January to June 2020 in 666 patients with axSpA, RA and PsA in the Swiss Clinical Quality Management cohort.ResultsThe number of consultations dropped by 52%, whereas the number of remote assessments increased by 129%. The proportion of patients with drug non-compliance slightly increased during the pandemic, the difference reaching statistical significance in axSpA (19.9% vs 13.2% before the pandemic, p=0.003). The proportion of patients with disease flares remained stable (<15%). There was no increase in mean values of the Bath Ankylosing Disease Activity Index, the Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index-5 and the Patient Global Assessment in patients with axSpA, RA and PsA, respectively.ConclusionA short interruption of in-person patient–rheumatologist interactions had no major detrimental impact on the disease course of axSpA, RA and PsA as assessed by patient-reported outcomes.

scholarly journals “From Where I Stand”: Using Multiple Anchors Yields Different Benchmarks for Meaningful Improvement and Worsening in the Rheumatoid Arthritis Flare Questionnaire (RA-FQ)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan J. Bartlett ◽  
Vivian P. Bykerk ◽  
Orit Schieir ◽  
Marie-France Valois ◽  
Janet E Pope ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Early Arthritis ◽  
Meaningful Change ◽  
Meaningful Improvement ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
New Evidence

Abstract Purpose The Rheumatoid Arthritis Flare Questionnaire (RA-FQ) is a patient-reported measure of disease activity in RA. We estimated minimal and meaningful change from the perspective of RA patients, physicians, and using a disease activity index. Methods Data were from 3- and 6-month visits of adults with early RA enrolled in the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort. Participants completed the RA-FQ, the Patient Global Assessment of RA, and Patient Global Change Impression at consecutive visits. Rheumatologists recorded joint counts and MD Global. Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) scores were computed. We compared mean RA-FQ change across categories using patients, physicians, and CDAI anchors. Results The 808 adults were mostly white (84%) women (71%) with a mean age of 55 and moderate-high disease activity (85%) at enrollment. At V2, 79% of patients classified their RA as changed; 59% were better and 20% were worse. Patients reporting they were a lot worse had a mean RA-FQ increase of 8.9 points whereas those who were a lot better had a -6.0 decrease. Minimal worsening and improvement were associated with a mean 4.7 and -1.8 change in RA-FQ, respectively, while patients rating their RA unchanged had stable scores. Physician and CDAI classified more patients as worse than patients, and minimal and meaningful RA-FQ thresholds differed by group. Conclusion Thresholds to identify meaningful change vary by anchor used. These data offer new evidence demonstrating robust psychometric properties of the RA-FQ and offer guidance about improvement or worsening, supporting its use in RA care, research and decision-making.

scholarly journals An observational study on Assessment of disease activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis patients using Patient based Disease Activity Score 2 (PDAS 2)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harpreet Singh ◽  
Somdatta Giri ◽  
Hemant Kumar ◽  
Pratibha Yonzone ◽  
Mahima Khatkar
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Disease Activity Score ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Activity Score ◽  
P Value ◽  
Internal Reliability ◽  
Das 28

Abstract Objective To assess the utility of Patient Based Disease Activity Score 2 (PDAS 2) in assessing the disease activity in Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted on 80 patients of RA. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were recorded. They were assessed for disease activity using “Disease Activity Score 28” (DAS 28), “Clinical Disease Activity Index” (CDAI) and PDAS 2 score at baseline (M0), at 2 months (M2) and at 4 months(M4) while they were on treatment. Data was analyzed for correlation of PDAS-2 with other scores and internal reliability. P < 0.05 was considered for statistical significance. Results The mean age was 40.13\(\pm\) 11.74 years with 70 females and 10 males. There was significant reduction in DAS28, CDAI and PDAS 2 score over 4 month follow up (all scores’ p values < 0.001). Internal reliability (as assessed by Cronbach’s Alpha) of PDAS 2 was 0.578. PDAS 2 showed significant correlation with DAS28 at M0, M2 and M4 (r = 0.792, 0.757 and 0.669 respectively, p value < 0.001) and CDAI (r = 0.861, 0.832 and 0.695 respectively, p value < 0.001). Overall there was a significant agreement between DAS 28 and PDAS 2 (K = 0.788,p < 0.001) and between CDAI and PDAS 2 (K = 0.766,p < 0.001). Conclusion PDAS-2 score can be routinely used in the clinical practice owing to its correlation with DAS-28/CDAI and because of the advantage that it assessed the patients’ daily living activities.

scholarly journals Impact of assessing patient-reported outcomes with mobile apps on patient–provider interaction

RMD Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e001566
Author(s):  
Yomei Shaw ◽  
Delphine S Courvoisier ◽  
Almut Scherer ◽  
Adrian Ciurea ◽  
Thomas Lehmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Rheumatic Diseases ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Mobile Apps ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Discussion Group ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Physician Awareness

ObjectiveTo explore the effect of apps measuring patient-reported outcomes (PROs) on patient–provider interaction in the rheumatic diseases in an observational setting.MethodsPatients in the Swiss Clinical Quality Management in Rheumatic Diseases Registry were offered mobile apps (iDialog and COmPASS) to track disease status between rheumatology visits using validated PROs (Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index-5 score, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index score, Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data-3 score and Visual Analogue Scale score for pain, disease activity and skin symptoms). We assessed two aspects of patient–provider interaction: shared decision making (SDM) and physician awareness of disease fluctuations. We used logistic regressions to compare outcomes among patients who (1) used an app and discussed app data with their physician (app+discussion group), (2) used an app without discussing the data (app-only group) or (3) did not use any app (non-app users).Results2111 patients were analysed, including 1799 non-app users, 150 app-only users and 162 app+discussion users (43% male; with 902 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, 766 patients with axial spondyloarthritis and 443 patients with psoriatic arthritis). App users were younger than non-app users (mean age of 47 vs 51 years, p<0.001). Compared with non-app users, the app+discussion group rated their rheumatologist more highly in SDM (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.4) and physician awareness of disease fluctuations (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.3 to 3.1). This improvement was absent in the app-only group.ConclusionApp users who discussed app data with their rheumatologist reported more favourably on patient–provider interactions than app users who did not and non-app users. Apps measuring PROs may contribute little to patient–provider interactions without integration of app data into care processes.

scholarly journals AB0271 EFFECTIVENESS OF DULOXETINE FOR RELIEF OF THE REMNANT PAIN OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENT WHOSE DISEASE ACTIVITY IS REMISSION

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1434.1-1434
Author(s):  
I. Yoshii
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Health Assessment Questionnaire ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Assessment Questionnaire

Background:Pain control in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patient is an important matter. When pain remains even disease activity is remission, it causes deterioration of activity in daily living (ADL) in past research. In other words, pain affects ADL independently from disease activity, namely the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score, a most popular index of ADL for patient with RA[1]. Thus, burden of remnant pain despite clinical remission in RA is serious and pending subject.Duloxetine, a potent reuptake inhibitor of serotonin and norepinephrine, is developed for the treatment of major depressive disorder [2]. It’s effectiveness for pain relief with osteoarthritis is also widely accepted. This drug should be effective not only for chronic pain due to osteoarthritis, but also due to RA. However, effectiveness of duloxetine for remnant pain relief in patient with RA in clinical remission is still unclear.Objectives:In this study, effectiveness of duloxetine for the remnant pain despite clinical remission in patient with RA was statistically evaluated.Methods:RA patients whose pain score with visual analog scale (PS-VAS) >30mm despite Clinical Disease Activity Score (CDAI) is <2.8, were picked up for the study. These patients were divided into groups whether duloxetine was administrated (a group without duloxetine: G-C; a group with duloxetine: G-D).PS-VAS, C-reactive protein, CDAI and simplified disease activity index (SDAI), modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ), and QOL value which is calculated from Euro-QOL 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) were measured at the initiation of duloxetine in the G-D and at the first CDAI remission attained in the G-C, and at week 12 thereafter. Change of these indices were compared with One sample T-test for each group. Patient’s global assessment (PGA) at baseline compared to the other components of CDAI was evaluated for each group statistically with One-tailed T-test. Differences between the two groups at each moment were statistically evaluated with Mann-Whitney U-test. Statistical significance was set less than 1%. All statistical analyses were performed using StatPlus:mac®(AnalystSoft Inc., Walnut, CA, USA).Results:A total of three hundred and six patients were recruited. G-D counted sixty-eight with 18 males and 50 females, while G-C counted 238 with 57 males and 181 females. Average age were 71.3 and 71.5 for G-D and G-C, respectively, with 53.6 months for time span from baseline to initiation in the G-D. 80.8% of the patients in G-D sustained to administrate duloxetine. PGA was 0.6 and 0.5 for G-D and G-C respectively, while the other component of CDAI were below 0.3 in average for both groups and these values were significantly lower than the PGA score in both groups. PS-VAS was 46.4 and 44.0, and significantly decreased to 26.1 and 36.0 in average for G-D and G-C respectively at week 12 when compared to baseline. Reversely, the CDAI score was significantly elevated significantly from 1.16 and 1.19 to 3.25 and 4.34 for G-D and G-C respectively. PGA also significantly increased to 1.5 and 2.4 for G-D and G-C respectively. CRP and the SDAI score also demonstrated same trend significantly as the CDAI score for both groups. mHAQ decreased significantly from 0.430 and 0.495 to 0.393 and 0.487 for G-D and G-C respectively. QOL value increased from 0.800 and 0.817 to 0.811 and 0.840 for G-D and G-C respectively, however no statistical significance demonstrated in both groups.Conclusion:Duloxetine has been suggested to have effectiveness for the pain relief, for improvement of ADL, and for the contribution to QOL maintenance, however, no effect of disease activity control is expected.References:[1]Yoshii I, Chijiwa T, Sawada N. Influence of pain score measured by a visual analog scale (PS-VAS) on the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index and 28-joint Disease Activity Index with C-reactive protein in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Int J Rheum Dis 2018;21:1955-61.[2]Knadler MP, Lobo E, Chappell J, Bergstrom R. Duloxetine. Clin Pharmacokinet 2011;50:281-94.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals Safety and efficacy of switching from adalimumab to sarilumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the ongoing MONARCH open-label extension

RMD Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. e001017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerd R Burmester ◽  
Vibeke Strand ◽  
Andrea Rubbert-Roth ◽  
Howard Amital ◽  
Tatiana Raskina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Normative Values ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Open Label Extension

ObjectiveEvaluate open-label sarilumab monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis switching from adalimumab monotherapy in MONARCH (NCT02332590); assess long-term safety and efficacy in patients continuing sarilumab during open-label extension (OLE).MethodsDuring the 48-week OLE, patients received sarilumab 200 mg subcutaneously once every 2 weeks. Safety (March 2017 cut-off) and efficacy, including patient-reported outcomes, were evaluated.ResultsIn the double-blind phase, patients receiving sarilumab or adalimumab monotherapy showed meaningful improvements in disease activity; sarilumab was superior to adalimumab for improving signs, symptoms and physical function. Overall, 320/369 patients completing the 24-week double-blind phase entered OLE (155 switched from adalimumab; 165 continued sarilumab). Sarilumab safety profile was consistent with previous reports. Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between groups; no unexpected safety signals emerged in the first 10 weeks postswitch. Among switch patients, improvement in disease activity was evident at OLE week 12: 47.1%/34.8% had changes ≥1.2 in Disease Activity Score (28 joints) (DAS28)-erythrocyte sedimentation rate/DAS28-C-reactive protein. In switch patients achieving low disease activity (LDA: Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) ≤10; Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) ≤11) by OLE week 24, 70.7%/69.5% sustained CDAI/SDAI LDA at both OLE weeks 36 and 48. Proportions of switch patients achieving CDAI ≤2.8 and SDAI ≤3.3 by OLE week 24 increased through OLE week 48. Improvements postswitch approached continuation-group values, including scores ≥normative values.ConclusionsDuring this OLE, there were no unexpected safety issues in patients switching from adalimumab to sarilumab monotherapy, and disease activity improved in many patients. Patients continuing sarilumab reported safety consistent with prolonged use and had sustained benefit.

scholarly journals A quarter of patients time their early rheumatoid arthritis onset differently than physicians

RMD Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. e000931 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leah Ellingwood ◽  
Fatima Kudaeva ◽  
Orit Schieir ◽  
Susan J Bartlett ◽  
Louis Bessette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Early Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Symptom Onset ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Symptom Duration ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Antibody Titres

ObjectiveEarly rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment requires timely recognition. This large, multicentre study compared patient-reported vs physician-reported onset of early RA.MethodsPatients from the Canadian Early ArThritis CoHort with early/suspected RA (persistent synovitis <1 year) completed questionnaires asking about the date of symptom onset; and rheumatologists date of onset for persistent synovitis. Groups with similar reported timing (patient and physician) versus differing timing of 30 days or more were compared.ResultsIn 2683 patients, the median patient symptom duration (IQR) was 178 days (163) and physician-reported duration was 166 (138). 1940 (72%) patients had similar patient-reported and physician-reported onset (<30 days), whereas 497 (18%) reported onset 30 or more days preceding physicians, and 246 (9%) 30 or more days after physicians. Patients reporting onset preceding physicians had lower baseline Disease Activity Score based on 28 joint count, swollen joint counts and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p<0.05). Patients reporting onset after physicians were more likely to be rheumatoid factor positive (p<0.001) and had higher anticitrullinated protein antibody titres (p<0.009). Regression showed low income, smoking, fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis and baseline non-methotrexate non-biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug use were predictors for longer patient-reported symptoms. At 12 months, patients reporting longer symptom duration than physicians had lower rates of Simplified Disease Activity Index remission and higher physician global assessments.ConclusionOver one-fourth of patients reported differences of >1 month in symptom onset from their rheumatologist. Patients with longer symptom durations had less improvement at 1 year, which may be reflective of comorbid musculoskeletal conditions.

scholarly journals The efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, methotrexate triple therapy in preventing relapse among patients with rheumatoid arthritis achieving clinical remission or low disease activity: the study protocol of a randomized controlled clinical Trial (ESCoRT study)

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Zhao ◽  
Wei Zhou ◽  
Yangfeng Wu ◽  
Ping Ji ◽  
Li Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Disease Relapse ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Background Tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors (TNFi) is effective for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who fail to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). Because of high cost, the discontinuation is common but often lead to disease relapse. The study aims to investigate, if the combination therapy of csDMARDs is more effective in reducing disease relapse than methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy, and more cost-effective than continuing TNFi and MTX. Methods It will be a two-stage trial. In the first stage, all RA patients who failed to csDMARDs treatment [disease activity score 28 (DAS28)-CRP > 3.2] will receive MTX plus TNFi for no more than 12 weeks. Patients achieving DAS28-CRP < 3.2 during the first stage will be randomized into three groups at 1:1:1 ratio: (A) add hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and sulfasalazine (SSZ) for the first 12 weeks and then remove TNFi but continue other treatments for the next 48 weeks; (B) maintain TNFi + MTX for 60 weeks; and (C) maintain TNFi + MTX for the first 12 weeks and then remove TNFi but continue MTX monotherapy for the next 48 weeks. The primary outcome will be disease relapse (DAS28-CRP increases by at least 0.6 and > 3.2). Secondary outcomes will include the incremental cost per reducing 1 case of relapse; patient reported intolerance to the treatment; adverse events; change of mean disease activity measured by DAS28, clinical disease activity index (CDAI) and simplified disease activity index (SDAI); the proportion of modified Sharp score increase < 0.3; ultrasound-detected remission in hands; Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and health related quality of life [the five-level EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D-5L) and short form-6D (SF-6D)]. Discussion The aim of this trail will be to seek effective treatment options of preventing relapse of RA. The results of the current study may provide an instructive recommendation for more economical application of TNFi treatment in RA. Trial registration NCT, NCT02320630. Registered on 16 December 2014. https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/LoginUser?ts=3&cx=-jg9qo2.

Developing a Construct to Evaluate Flares in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Conceptual Report of the OMERACT RA Flare Definition Working Group: Table 1.

2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (8) ◽  
pp. 1745-1750 ◽  
Author(s):  
RIEKE ALTEN ◽  
CHRISTOF POHL ◽  
ERNEST H. CHOY ◽  
ROBIN CHRISTENSEN ◽  
DANIEL E. FURST ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Conceptual Framework ◽  
Working Group ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Patient Treatment ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Patient Reported

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and healthcare professionals (HCP) recognize that episodic worsening disease activity, often described as a “flare,” is a common feature of RA that can contribute to impaired function and disability. However, there is no standard definition to enable measurement of its intensity and impact. The conceptual framework of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) RA Flare Definition Working Group includes an anchoring statement, developed at OMERACT 9 in 2008: “flare in RA” is defined as worsening of signs and symptoms of sufficient intensity and duration to lead to change in therapy. Subsequently, domains characterizing flare have been identified by comprehensive literature review, patient focus groups, and patient/HCP Delphi exercises. This led to a consensus regarding preliminary domains and a research agenda at OMERACT 10 in May 2010. The conceptual framework of flare takes into account validated approaches to measurement in RA: (1) various disease activity indices (e.g., Disease Activity Score, Clinical Disease Activity Index, Simplified Disease Activity Index); (2) use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO); and (3) characterization of minimally clinically detectable and important differences (MCDD, MCID). The measurement of RA flare is composed of data collection assessing a range of unique domains describing key features of RA worsening at the time of patient self-report of flare, and then periodically for the duration of the flare. The components envisioned are: (1) Patient self-report using a “patient global question” with well characterized and validated anchors; (2) Patient assessment using a flare questionnaire and PRO available at the time of each self-report; (3) Physician/HCP assessment of disease activity status; and (4) Physician’s determination whether to change treatment. In randomized controlled trials and observational studies, such a conceptual approach is intended to lead to a valid measure of this outcome/response, thus expanding an understanding of the true impact of a therapy to limit disease activity. Clinically, this approach is intended to enhance patient-HCP communication. This article describes the conceptual framework being used by the OMERACT RA Flare Definition Working Group in developing a standardized method for description and measurement of “flare in RA” to guide individual patient treatment.

scholarly journals Patient Acceptable Symptom State in Self-Report Questionnaires and Composite Clinical Disease Index for Assessing Rheumatoid Arthritis Activity: Identification of Cut-Off Points for Routine Care

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fausto Salaffi ◽  
Marina Carotti ◽  
Marwin Gutierrez ◽  
Marco Di Carlo ◽  
Rossella De Angelis
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
State Level ◽  
Clinical Disease ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Patient Acceptable Symptom State

Objective. To provide information on the value of Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by the identification of PASS thresholds for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) composite scores.Methods. The characteristics of RA patients with affirmative and negative assignment to PASS were compared. Contributors to physician response were estimated by logistic regression models and PASS thresholds by the 75th percentile and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve methods.Results. 303 RA patients completed the study. All PROs were different between the PASS (+) and PASS (−) groups (p<0.0001). The thresholds with the 75th percentile approach were 2.0 for the RA Impact of Disease (RAID) score, 2.5 for the PRO-CLinical ARthritis Activity (PRO-CLARA) index, and 1.0 for the Recent-Onset Arthritis Disability (ROAD) questionnaire. The cut-off values for Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) were in the moderate range of disease activity. Assessing the size of the logistic regression coefficients, the strongest predictors of PASS were the disease activity (p=0.0007) and functional state level (0.006).Conclusion. PASS thresholds were relatively high and many patients in PASS had moderate disease activity states according to CDAI. Factors such as disease activity and physical function may influence a negative PASS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document