CT perfusion: stroke, seizure or both?

An 88-year-old male with a history of hypertension, ischaemic heart disease and Bell’s palsy presented with symptoms and signs of an acute ischaemic stroke. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was 19 at presentation, indicative of potential large vessel occlusion. The initial CT scan revealed evidence of small vessel disease and arterial calcification. As there were no contraindications, he received thrombolytic treatment. CT angiography and CT perfusion imaging were performed in preparation for possible thrombectomy. There was no evidence of a large vessel thrombus, and changes on CT perfusion were suggestive of seizure activity, with relative hyperperfusion on the cerebral hemisphere of interest. Post thrombolysis, his NIHSS was 5. An MR scan revealed evidence of bilateral thalamic infarcts. After a period of rehabilitation, he was discharged home and independently mobile but with cognitive impairment.Acute stroke care increasingly uses multimodal imaging to confirm the clinical diagnosis and help optimise initial emergency management. Such imaging is useful in determining whether the presentation is a vascular event or stroke mimic. Moreover, seizures complicate and mimic acute strokes, which can lead to therapeutic uncertainty. This case highlights the increasingly sophisticated investigation of patients presenting with suspected acute stroke, with the attendant need for accurate interpretation by experienced clinicians.

Download Full-text

Epidemiological Surveillance of the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Stroke Care Using Artificial Intelligence

Stroke ◽

10.1161/strokeaha.120.031960 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Raul G. Nogueira ◽

Jason M. Davies ◽

Rishi Gupta ◽

Ameer E. Hassan ◽

Thomas Devlin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Artificial Intelligence ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Systems Of Care ◽

Ct Perfusion ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Number Of Patients ◽

The Impact

Background and Purpose: The degree to which the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected systems of care, in particular, those for time-sensitive conditions such as stroke, remains poorly quantified. We sought to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 in the overall screening for acute stroke utilizing a commercial clinical artificial intelligence platform. Methods: Data were derived from the Viz Platform, an artificial intelligence application designed to optimize the workflow of patients with acute stroke. Neuroimaging data on suspected patients with stroke across 97 hospitals in 20 US states were collected in real time and retrospectively analyzed with the number of patients undergoing imaging screening serving as a surrogate for the amount of stroke care. The main outcome measures were the number of computed tomography (CT) angiography, CT perfusion, large vessel occlusions (defined according to the automated software detection), and severe strokes on CT perfusion (defined as those with hypoperfusion volumes >70 mL) normalized as number of patients per day per hospital. Data from the prepandemic (November 4, 2019 to February 29, 2020) and pandemic (March 1 to May 10, 2020) periods were compared at national and state levels. Correlations were made between the inter-period changes in imaging screening, stroke hospitalizations, and thrombectomy procedures using state-specific sampling. Results: A total of 23 223 patients were included. The incidence of large vessel occlusion on CT angiography and severe strokes on CT perfusion were 11.2% (n=2602) and 14.7% (n=1229/8328), respectively. There were significant declines in the overall number of CT angiographies (−22.8%; 1.39–1.07 patients/day per hospital, P <0.001) and CT perfusion (−26.1%; 0.50–0.37 patients/day per hospital, P <0.001) as well as in the incidence of large vessel occlusion (−17.1%; 0.15–0.13 patients/day per hospital, P <0.001) and severe strokes on CT perfusion (−16.7%; 0.12–0.10 patients/day per hospital, P <0.005). The sampled cohort showed similar declines in the rates of large vessel occlusions versus thrombectomy (18.8% versus 19.5%, P =0.9) and comprehensive stroke center hospitalizations (18.8% versus 11.0%, P =0.4). Conclusions: A significant decline in stroke imaging screening has occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. This analysis underscores the broader application of artificial intelligence neuroimaging platforms for the real-time monitoring of stroke systems of care.

Download Full-text

Abstract TP259: Accuracy of EMS Identification of Acute Strokes Eligible for tPA Treatment in Kaiser Stroke EXPRESS Program

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.48.suppl_1.tp259 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Jeffrey G Klingman ◽

Sunil Bhopale ◽

Meghan Hatfield ◽

Benjamin Wilson ◽

Lauren Klingman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Work Flow ◽

Initial Assessment ◽

Stroke Therapy ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Kaiser Permanente ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Stroke Mimic

Background: Field-based diversion for potential stroke patients who may qualify for endovascular stroke therapy (EST) has been proposed more widely in 2015. In 2015, Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) redesigned its acute stroke care work flow for all its 21 stroke centers, which included rapid evaluation of all stroke alerts by a stroke neurologist via teleneurology. We investigated the accuracy of EMS-activated stroke alerts. Methods: From 1/1/16 to 7/10/16, all acute strokes presenting to an ED between 7 AM and midnight were assessed upon arrival by a teleneurologist. We reviewed all telestroke cases to determine the frequency of tPA given, cancelled stroke alerts, and the reasons for not treating with IV t-PA, particularly among ambulance arrivals. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess age, gender, race, Kaiser membership, and mode of ED arrival as predictors of stroke alert cancellation. Results: There were 2192 stroke alerts activated. Of these, 1332 (60.7%) arrived by EMS and 860 (39.2%) by non-EMS transport. Of patients arriving by EMS, 651 (48.9%) were cancelled and deemed ineligible for IV t-PA. Most common reasons for cancellation were: last time known well (LTKW) out of range (23%), stroke mimic (33%), symptom resolution (19%), new data regarding goals of care (2%), and other (22.5%). The remaining 681 (51.1%) ambulance arrivals were potential candidates for IV tPA. Subsequently, 334 (50.4%) of them received tPA. Reasons for tPA not given included subsequent resolution of symptoms, concerning CT findings (such as bleed), INR>1.7 in patients on warfarin, further information clarifying time of onset. Among those who arrived by EMS and received IV t-PA, all had CTA and 103 (30.8%) were found to have a large vessel occlusion and 74 (71.8%) underwent EST. In multivariate analysis for all cancelled stroke alerts, arrival by non-EMS transport (OR=1.74, 95% CI 1.44-2.10, p<0.001) was more likely to be cancelled. Conclusions: Close to half of EMS-activated stroke alerts were cancelled upon initial assessment. Only 5% of patients initially identified by EMS as having a potential acute stroke ultimately underwent EST. Better determination of LTKW and stroke symptoms would improve the accuracy of EMS-initiated stroke alerts.

Download Full-text

Abstract TMP8: Predictors of Large Vessel Occlusion in Kaiser Stroke EXPRESS Program

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.48.suppl_1.tmp8 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Jeffrey G Klingman ◽

Anne C Kim ◽

Meghan Hatfield ◽

Benjamin Wilson ◽

Lauren Klingman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Kaiser Permanente ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Stroke Treatment ◽

Improved Outcomes

Background: In 2015, trials showed that rapid endovascular stroke treatment (EST) of qualified patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) resulted in improved outcomes over treatment with IV tPA alone. In 2015, Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) redesigned its acute stroke care work flow for its 21 stroke centers, which included expedited IV t-pa treatment, rapid CTA investigation, expedited transfer of appropriate patients for EST. We assessed for predictors of LVO post-implementation. Methods: The KPNC Stroke EXPRESS program was live in all centers by January 2016. Using clinical data for 1/1/16 - 7/10/16, we evaluated the frequency and locations of LVO, and patient characteristics of those with LVO. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine whether age, gender, race, or an NIHSS ≥ 8 are predictors of LVO. Results: There were 2,204 tele-stroke alert cases from the ED. Among 993 (39.3%) that proceeded as likely acute stroke, 812 (81.8%) were evaluated with CTA. Out of those who had a CTA, 152 (18.7%) were found to have LVO as followed: 27 (17.8%) ICA, 87 (57.2%) M1, 24 (15.8%) M2, 6 (4.0%) basilar, 5 (3.3%) PCA, and 3 (2.0%) vertebral. Of those with LVO, 97 (63.8%) were treated with EST. Patients with LVO had a higher median NIHSS (15 vs. 5 in those without LVO). Neglect (27% vs. 7%) and gaze deviation (16% vs. 1%) were more likely to be seen among those with LVO and treated with EST compared to those without LVO. In multivariate analysis, age (OR=1.02, 95% CI 1.00 - 1.03, p=0.01) and NIHSS ≥8 (OR = 4.99, 95% CI 3.32- 7.49, p < 0.001) were associated with LVO. PPV for NIHSS ≥8 was 75.7%. Conclusions: In our large multi-ethnic population of acute stroke patients, a relatively small percentage (19%) was found to have LVO and only a subset qualified for EST. Predictors of LVO included NIHSS ≥8, increasing age, and presence of neglect and gaze preference. Given the low numbers of patients brought in for acute stroke treatment who ended up with a LVO requiring EST, further research is needed to assess a given system’s ability to rapidly evaluate and transfer as appropriate for EST rather than paramedic based diversion.

Download Full-text

Stroke Intervention: Geographic Disparities in Acute Stroke Care and the Role of Interventional Cardiology

EMJ Interventional Cardiology ◽

10.33590/emjintcardiol/20-00009 ◽

2020 ◽

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Case Series ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Interventional Cardiology ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Geographic Disparities

Stroke is the second-leading cause of death and a major cause of disability worldwide. The majority of strokes are ischaemic, and effective therapy to achieve reperfusion includes intravenous thrombolysis and, for proximal large vessel occlusion strokes, endovascular mechanical thrombectomy (MT). There has been a paradigm shift in acute stroke care, driven by a series of randomised controlled trials demonstrating that timely reperfusion with MT results in superior outcomes compared to intravenous thrombolysis in patients with large vessel occlusion strokes. There are significant geographic disparities in delivering acute stroke care because of the maldistribution of neurointerventional specialists. There are now several case series demonstrating the feasibility and safety of first medical contact MT by carotid stent-capable interventional cardiologists and noninvasive neurologists working on stroke teams, which is a solution to the uneven distribution of neurointerventionalists and allows stroke interventions to be delivered in local communities.

Download Full-text

Bottlenecks in the Acute Stroke Care System during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Catalonia

Cerebrovascular Diseases ◽

10.1159/000516309 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-9

Author(s):

Anna Ramos-Pachón ◽

Álvaro García-Tornel ◽

Mònica Millán ◽

Marc Ribó ◽

Sergi Amaro ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Functional Outcome ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Care Quality ◽

Point Of View ◽

Stroke Severity ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Prehospital Delays ◽

The Impact

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant healthcare reorganizations, potentially striking standard medical care. We investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on acute stroke care quality and clinical outcomes to detect healthcare system’s bottlenecks from a territorial point of view. Methods: Crossed-data analysis between a prospective nation-based mandatory registry of acute stroke, Emergency Medical System (EMS) records, and daily incidence of COVID-19 in Catalonia (Spain). We included all stroke code activations during the pandemic (March 15–May 2, 2020) and an immediate prepandemic period (January 26–March 14, 2020). Primary outcomes were stroke code activations and reperfusion therapies in both periods. Secondary outcomes included clinical characteristics, workflow metrics, differences across types of stroke centers, correlation analysis between weekly EMS alerts, COVID-19 cases, and workflow metrics, and impact on mortality and clinical outcome at 90 days. Results: Stroke code activations decreased by 22% and reperfusion therapies dropped by 29% during the pandemic period, with no differences in age, stroke severity, or large vessel occlusion. Calls to EMS were handled 42 min later, and time from onset to hospital arrival increased by 53 min, with significant correlations between weekly COVID-19 cases and more EMS calls (rho = 0.81), less stroke code activations (rho = −0.37), and longer prehospital delays (rho = 0.25). Telestroke centers were afflicted with higher reductions in stroke code activations, reperfusion treatments, referrals to endovascular centers, and increased delays to thrombolytics. The independent odds of death increased (OR 1.6 [1.05–2.4], p 0.03) and good functional outcome decreased (mRS ≤2 at 90 days: OR 0.6 [0.4–0.9], p 0.015) during the pandemic period. Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Catalonia’s stroke system’s weakest points were the delay to EMS alert and a decline of stroke code activations, reperfusion treatments, and interhospital transfers, mostly at local centers. Patients suffering an acute stroke during the pandemic period had higher odds of poor functional outcome and death. The complete stroke care system’s analysis is crucial to allocate resources appropriately.

Download Full-text

Acute Stroke Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Reduction in the Number of Admissions of Elderly Patients and Increase in Prehospital Delays

Cerebrovascular Diseases ◽

10.1159/000514140 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-7

Author(s):

Gabriel Velilla-Alonso ◽

Andrés García-Pastor ◽

Ángela Rodríguez-López ◽

Ana Gómez-Roldós ◽

Antonio Sánchez-Soblechero ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Elderly Patients ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Time Course ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Group Data ◽

Radiological Data ◽

History Of ◽

Prehospital Delays

Introduction: We analyzed whether the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis affected acute stroke care in our center during the first 2 months of lockdown in Spain. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective study. We collected demographic, clinical, and radiological data; time course; and treatment of patients meeting the stroke unit admission criteria from March 14 to May 14, 2020 (COVID-19 period group). Data were compared with the same period in 2019 (pre-COVID-19 period group). Results: 195 patients were analyzed; 83 in the COVID-19 period group, resulting in a 26% decline of acute strokes and transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) admitted to our center compared with the previous year (p = 0.038). Ten patients (12%) tested positive for PCR SARS-CoV-2. The proportion of patients aged 65 years and over was lower in the COVID-19 period group (53 vs. 68.8%, p = 0.025). During the pandemic period, analyzed patients were more frequently smokers (27.7 vs. 10.7%, p = 0.002) and had less frequently history of prior stroke (13.3 vs. 25%, p = 0.043) or atrial fibrillation (9.6 vs. 25%, p = 0.006). ASPECTS score was lower (9 [7–10] vs. 10 [8–10], p = 0.032), NIHSS score was slightly higher (5 [2–14] vs. 4 [2–8], p = 0.122), onset-to-door time was higher (304 [93–760] vs. 197 [91.25–645] min, p = 0.104), and a lower proportion arrived within 4.5 h from onset of symptoms (43.4 vs. 58%, p = 0.043) during the COVID-19 period. There were no differences between proportion of patients receiving recanalization treatment (intravenous thrombolysis and/or mechanical thrombectomy) and in-hospital delays. Conclusion: We observed a reduction in the number of acute strokes and TIAs admitted during the COVID-19 period. This drop affected especially elderly patients, and despite a delay in their arrival to the emergency department, the proportion of patients treated with recanalization therapies was preserved.

Download Full-text

Global Epidemiology of Stroke and Access to Acute Ischemic Stroke Interventions

Neurology ◽

10.1212/wnl.0000000000012781 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 97 (20 Supplement 2) ◽

pp. S6-S16

Author(s):

Vasu Saini ◽

Luis Guada ◽

Dileep R. Yavagal

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Randomized Clinical Trials ◽

Time Window ◽

Systems Of Care ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Global Epidemiology

Purpose of the ReviewTo provide an up-to-date review of the incidence of stroke and large vessel occlusion (LVO) around the globe, as well as the eligibility and access to IV thrombolysis (IVT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) worldwide.Recent FindingsRandomized clinical trials have established MT with or without IVT as the usual care for patients with LVO stroke for up to 24 hours from symptom onset. Eligibility for IVT has extended beyond 4.5 hours based on permissible imaging criteria. With these advances in the last 5 years, there has been a notable increase in the population of patients eligible for acute stroke interventions. However, access to acute stroke care and utilization of MT or IVT is lagging in these patients.SummaryStroke is the second leading cause of both disability and death worldwide, with the highest burden of the disease shared by low- and middle-income countries. In 2016, there were 13.7 million new incident strokes globally; ≈87% of these were ischemic strokes and by conservative estimation about 10%–20% of these account for LVO. Fewer than 5% of patients with acute ischemic stroke received IVT globally in the eligible therapeutic time window and fewer than 100,000 MTs were performed worldwide in 2016. This highlights the large gap among eligible patients and the low utilization rates of these advances across the globe. Multiple global initiatives are underway to investigate interventions to improve systems of care and bridge this gap.

Download Full-text

Abstract WP273: Evolution of a U.S. County System for Acute Comprehensive Stroke Care

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.48.suppl_1.wp273 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Radoslav I Raychev ◽

Dana Stradling ◽

David M Brown ◽

Joey R Gee ◽

David L Lombardi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Systems Of Care ◽

Early Recognition ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Reperfusion Therapy ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Transfer Rates ◽

Over Time ◽

Iv Tpa

Introduction: In an effort to maximize provision of acute stroke therapies, the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in Orange County, CA (6 th most populous U.S. county) established a system of care whereby patients with suspected acute stroke are taken to hub sites with endovascular treatment (EVT) capability or to spoke hospitals. Patients at spokes with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and suspected large vessel occlusion (LVO) are transferred by EMS to hubs. Here we examined the relationship between stroke features, hospital transfers, and mortality; and their change over time. Methods: All patients during 2013-2015 were included for whom 911 was called within 7 hours of onset, and EMS personnel declared “acute stroke" at end of initial evaluation. Results: A total of 6,188 patients (mean age 72) had suspected stroke, of which 54.9% were AIS and 19.4% hemorrhagic stroke. Across all patients, transfer rates into hub sites increased over time (OR 1.12 per 3-months, p<0.0001) and differed by diagnosis (p<0.0001), with transfer in 12.0% of hemorrhages (n=122) but only 3.5% of AIS (n=101). Among patients with AIS only, transfer rates into a hub site increased over time (OR 1.08, p<0.0001), spiking mid-2015. Acute reperfusion therapy was given to 28.3% (20.9% IV tPA only, 3.6% IA therapy only, 3.8% IV tPA+IA), but its usage was unrelated to transfer status, and only 11% of all transferred AIS patients received EVT. Across all patients, mortality during acute hospitalization was 8.2% and did not differ by transfer status, but did differ by diagnosis (p<0.0001): 23.6% of hemorrhages vs. 5.4% of AIS. Over time, mortality decreased only among patients with AIS (OR 0.95, p=0.03). Conclusions: There were several favorable features of this acute stroke care system, including that 28.3% of AIS patients received reperfusion therapy and that mortality decreased over time. However, while transfer to EVT-ready sites increased, rates of IA therapy were low. Continued efforts to optimize acute stroke systems of care should be tailored toward increasing EVT by early recognition of LVO and timely triage to hub facilities.

Download Full-text

A brief history of acute stroke care

Aging ◽

10.18632/aging.101542 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 10 (8) ◽

pp. 1797-1798 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Rahul Damani

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

History Of

Download Full-text

Support of New Triage Protocol among Acute Stroke Care Providers

Interventional Neurology ◽

10.1159/000486459 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 7 (5) ◽

pp. 241-245

Author(s):

Haitham M. Hussein ◽

David C. Anderson

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Online Survey ◽

Medical Service ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Care Providers ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Triage Protocol ◽

Almost All

Objective: We conducted an online survey to gauge the acceptance of sending acute stroke patients with suspected large vessel occlusion (LVO) directly to an endovascular-capable hospital (ECH) even if that means bypassing a closer alteplase-capable hospital (ACH) without endovascular capability. Methods: The survey was composed of two cases of acute stroke, one with cortical symptoms suggestive of LVO and the other without. In each case, responders were asked to choose between triaging to a closer ACH or an ECH that is further away and to provide an opinion regarding the maximum extra travel time they would tolerate if they chose the ECH. The survey was sent electronically to national groups of neurologists, emergency department (ED) physicians, emergency medical service (EMS) directors, and stroke coordinators. Results: There were 320 responders from 44 states, most of them with 10 years or more of experience. Most of the responders, 72.5%, chose ECH for the LVO case, while 56% chose ACH for the non-LVO case. There were marked differences in responses by specialty: neurology strongly supported ECH for LVO and strongly supported ACH for non-LVO, most ED and EMS chose ECH for both cases, and stroke coordinators were the least supportive of bypassing ACH. Almost all groups agreed on 30 min as the acceptable extra transfer time to ECH. Conclusion: Among the survey responders, there is a broad acceptance of the idea of bypassing ACH and going straight to ECH when LVO is suspected; however, there is less agreement on triaging patients with non-LVO stroke.

Download Full-text