scholarly journals Developing implementation strategies for firearm safety promotion in paediatric primary care for suicide prevention in two large US health systems: a study protocol for a mixed-methods implementation study

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. e014407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtney Benjamin Wolk ◽  
Shari Jager-Hyman ◽  
Steven C Marcus ◽  
Brian K Ahmedani ◽  
John E Zeber ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rinad S. Beidas ◽  
Brian K. Ahmedani ◽  
Kristin A. Linn ◽  
Steven C. Marcus ◽  
Christina Johnson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Insights from behavioral economics, or how individuals’ decisions and behaviors are shaped by finite cognitive resources (e.g., time, attention) and mental heuristics, have been underutilized in efforts to increase the use of evidence-based practices in implementation science. Using the example of firearm safety promotion in pediatric primary care, which addresses an evidence-to-practice gap in universal suicide prevention, we aim to determine: is a less costly and more scalable behavioral economic-informed implementation strategy (i.e., “Nudge”) powerful enough to change clinician behavior or is a more intensive and expensive facilitation strategy needed to overcome implementation barriers? Methods The Adolescent and child Suicide Prevention in Routine clinical Encounters (ASPIRE) hybrid type III effectiveness-implementation trial uses a longitudinal cluster randomized design. We will test the comparative effectiveness of two implementation strategies to support clinicians’ use of an evidence-based firearm safety practice, S.A.F.E. Firearm, in 32 pediatric practices across two health systems. All pediatric practices in the two health systems will receive S.A.F.E. Firearm materials, including training and cable locks. Half of the practices (k = 16) will be randomized to receive Nudge; the other half (k = 16) will be randomized to receive Nudge plus 1 year of facilitation to target additional practice and clinician implementation barriers (Nudge+). The primary implementation outcome is parent-reported clinician fidelity to the S.A.F.E Firearm program. Secondary implementation outcomes include reach and cost. To understand how the implementation strategies work, the primary mechanism to be tested is practice adaptive reserve, a self-report practice-level measure that includes relationship infrastructure, facilitative leadership, sense-making, teamwork, work environment, and culture of learning. Discussion The ASPIRE trial will integrate implementation science and behavioral economic approaches to advance our understanding of methods for implementing evidence-based firearm safety promotion practices in pediatric primary care. The study answers a question at the heart of many practice change efforts: which strategies are sufficient to support change, and why? Results of the trial will offer valuable insights into how best to implement evidence-based practices that address sensitive health matters in pediatric primary care. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04844021. Registered 14 April 2021.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 691-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shari Jager-Hyman ◽  
Courtney Benjamin Wolk ◽  
Brian K. Ahmedani ◽  
John E. Zeber ◽  
Joel A. Fein ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (7) ◽  
pp. e185309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtney Benjamin Wolk ◽  
Amelia E. Van Pelt ◽  
Shari Jager-Hyman ◽  
Brian K. Ahmedani ◽  
John E. Zeber ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-117
Author(s):  
Jennifer S. Funderburk ◽  
Brooke A. Levandowski ◽  
Marsha N. Wittink ◽  
Wilfred R. Pigeon

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. e172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander G Fiks ◽  
Nathalie DuRivage ◽  
Stephanie L Mayne ◽  
Stacia Finch ◽  
Michelle E Ross ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. e024558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Johnson ◽  
Liz Cross ◽  
Nick Sandison ◽  
Jamie Stevenson ◽  
Thomas Monks ◽  
...  

ObjectivesUtilisation of point-of-care C-reactive protein testing for lower respiratory tract infection has been limited in UK primary care, with costs and funding suggested as important barriers. We aimed to use existing National Health Service funding and policy mechanisms to alleviate these barriers and engage with clinicians and healthcare commissioners to encourage implementation.DesignA mixed-methods study design was adopted, including a qualitative survey to identify clinicians’ and commissioners’ perceived benefits, barriers and enablers post-implementation, and quantitative analysis of results from a real-world implementation study.InterventionsWe developed a funding specification to underpin local reimbursement of general practices for test delivery based on an item of service payment. We also created training and administrative materials to facilitate implementation by reducing organisational burden. The implementation study provided intervention sites with a testing device and supplies, training and practical assistance.ResultsDespite engagement with several groups, implementation and uptake of our funding specification were limited. Survey respondents confirmed costs and funding as important barriers in addition to physical and operational constraints and cited training and the value of a local champion as enablers.ConclusionsAlthough survey respondents highlighted the clinical benefits, funding remains a barrier to implementation in UK primary care and appears not to be alleviated by the existing financial incentives available to commissioners. The potential to meet incentive targets using lower cost methods, a lack of policy consistency or competing financial pressures and commissioning programmes may be important determinants of local priorities. An implementation champion could help to catalyse support and overcome operational barriers at the local level, but widespread implementation is likely to require national policy change. Successful implementation may reproduce antibiotic prescribing reductions observed in research studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document