scholarly journals Development of the Prevent for Work questionnaire (P4Wq) for assessment of musculoskeletal risk in the workplace: part 1—literature review and domains selection

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. e043800
Author(s):  
Francesco Langella ◽  
Steffan Wittrup McPhee Christensen ◽  
Thorvaldur Skuli Palsson ◽  
Morten Høgh ◽  
Nicolo Gagni ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThis study aims to define appropriate domains and items for the development of a self-administered questionnaire to assess the risk of developing work-related musculoskeletal disorder (WMSD) and the risk of its progression to chronicity.DesignLiterature review and survey study.Setting and participantsA literature review and a two-round interview with 15 experts in musculoskeletal pain were performed to identify the available domains for WMSD assessment.Interventions and outcomeTo ensure quality, only validated questionnaires were included for the Delphi process. A three-round Delphi method, with three round steps, was used to select the most pertinent and relevant domains and items.ResultsNine questionnaires were identified through the expert discussion and literature review, comprising 38 candidate domains and 504 items. In the first round of the Delphi group, 17 domains reached more than 70% agreement and were selected. In the second round, 10 domains were rejected, while 11 were selected to complete the pool of domains. In the third and final round, 89 items belonging to 28 domains were defined as significant to develop a WMSDs risk assessment questionnaire.ConclusionsNo specific risk assessment questionnaires for WMSDs were identified from the literature. WMSD risk of presence and chronicity can be defined by an assessment tool based on the biopsychosocial model and the fear-avoidance components of chronic pain. The present study provides the formulation and operationalisation of the constructs in domains and items needed for developing and validating the questionnaire.

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Talita Farias Feitosa ◽  
Moelisa Queiroz Dos Santos Dantas ◽  
Cássia Brito Da Silva ◽  
Álvaro Pereira

Aim: To verify, in the scientific production, the degree of reliability of the  Semmens-Weinstein  monofilament  as  a  risk  assessment  tool  for  diabetic  foot. Method:  This  is  an  integrative  literature  review  conducted  from  consultation  of  the electronic  databases  CINAHL,  MEDLINE,  SCOPUS  and  SCIELO.  Results:  Six  articles comprising  five  cross-sectional  studies  and  one  cohort  study  were selected.  The  six articles included in the review were taken from medical journals; no nursing publication was  found  that  met  the  goal.  Conclusion:  The  Semmens-Weinstein  monofilament  is  a reliable tool which has the best performance for assessing the risk for diabetic foot and its applicability is extremely important in consultations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-181
Author(s):  
Paola Agnese Mauri ◽  
Ivan Cortinovis ◽  
Norma Nilde Guerrini Contini ◽  
Marta Soldi

Background: The aim of the study is to create and validate a midwifery preceptor’s evaluation form to be used by midwifery students. The International Confederation of Midwives recommends that clinical placements need to be supervised by a preceptor in order to be efficient for students who, in this way, gain competence and proper practice within the midwifery practical area. Methods: This is an observational multi-center transversal study and leads to the validation of an evaluation questionnaire. Methodically, the following steps were followed: literature review, focus group with midwifery students, meeting between expert midwives, creation of the preceptor’s assessment form, filling in of the forms by midwifery students and expert midwives, and validation of the form. The study was carried out in eight Italian universities and included eighty-eight midwifery students and eight midwives. Results and Conclusion: A midwifery preceptor’s assessment questionnaire was created made up of four attribute areas which, as a total, included 33 items. Cronbach’s alpha score was calculated after examining the forms filled in by students and expert midwives. An alpha score of 0.97–0.85 was obtained. The result was Pearson Correlation Coefficient r = 0.78.


2013 ◽  
Vol 04 (02) ◽  
pp. 251-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Kim ◽  
J. Choi

SummaryBackground: A rule-based system, the Braden Scale based Automated Risk Assessment Tool (BART), was developed to assess risk for pressure ulcer in a previous study. However, the BART illustrated two major areas in need of improvement, which were: 1) the enhancement of decision rules and 2) validation of generalizability to increase performance of BART.Objectives: To enhance decision rules and validate generalizability of the enhanced BART.Method: Two layers of decision rule enhancement were performed: 1) finding additional data items with the experts and 2) validating logics of decision rules utilizing a guideline modeling language. To refine the decision rules of the BART further, a survey study was conducted to ascertain the operational level of patient status description of the Braden Scale.The enhanced BART (BART2) was designed to assess levels of pressure ulcer risk of patients (N = 99) whose data were collected by the nurses. The patients’ level of pressure ulcer risk was assessed by the nurses using a Braden Scale, by an expert using a Braden Scale, and by the automatic BART2 electronic risk assessment. SPSS statistical software version 20 (IBM, 2011) was used to test the agreement between the three different risk assessments performed on each patient.Results: The level of agreement between the BART2 and the expert pressure ulcer assessments was “very good (0.83)”. The sensitivity and the specificity of the BART2 were 86.8% and 90.3% respectively.Conclusion: This study illustrated successful enhancement of decision rules and increased general-izability and performance of the BART2. Although the BART2 showed a “very good” level of agreement (kappa = 0.83) with an expert, the data reveal a need to improve the moisture parameter of the Braden Scale. Once the moisture parameter has been improved, BART2 will improve the quality of care, while accurately identifying the patients at risk for pressure ulcers.Citation: Choi J, Kim H. Enhancement of Decision Rules to Increase Generalizability and Performance of the Rule-Based System Assessing Risk for Pressure Ulcer. Appl Clin Inf 2013; 4: 251–266http://dx.doi.org/10.4338/ACI-2012-12-RA-0056


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 358-363
Author(s):  
Jacqueline Johnstone

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSDs) continue to be a problem in the health and social care setting, despite staff receiving mandatory manual handling training for many decades. The author discusses WRMSDs, with a focus on various nursing roles. The principle of manual handling as solely ‘person moving’ or ‘transferring’ is challenged because a range of activities can cause musculoskeletal problems. The legislation and regulations are explored in relation to practice. The benefits of introducing a specific risk-assessment tool designed for nurses working in neonatal wards is discussed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 320-326
Author(s):  
Kessarawan NILVARANGKUL ◽  
Teerasak PHAJAN ◽  
Wongsa LAOHASIRIWONG ◽  
John F SMITH ◽  
Dariwan SETTHEETHAM

2020 ◽  
pp. 62-63
Author(s):  
Priya Padmanabhan ◽  
Salumon Chandrasekaran

Fall is one of the most commonly reported adverse events from the hospitals and around one-third of them result in injury. A carefully tailored fall reduction program begins with the identification of the “at-risk” population. Commonly used adult fall risk assessment tools do not take into consideration the risk factors of some of the vulnerable patient populations. This paper provides a systemised literature review of the need and availability of population-specific risk assessment tools. One of the most commonly used tools - Morse Fall Scale- does not assess the effect of certain medications and population-specific risk factors. The Cleveland Clinic – Capone- Albert (CC-CA) Fall Risk Score is a tool that is specifically developed for cancer patients. Similarly, Obstetric Fall Risk Assessment Tool (OFRAS) helps in identifying the fall risk factors in perinatal women. Usage of such population-specific tools help in focused identification of risks, distinct implementation of interventions and thus, results in reducing the incidents of falls and injuries thereof.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document