scholarly journals Role of Dutch internal policy advisors in a hospital quality improvement programme and their influence on nurses’ role development: a qualitative study

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. e051998
Author(s):  
Jannine van Schothorst - van Roekel ◽  
Anne Marie J W M Weggelaar - Jansen ◽  
Carina C G J M Hilders ◽  
Iris Wallenburg ◽  
Antoinette de Bont

ObjectiveNurses are vital in providing and improving quality of care. To enhance the quality improvement (QI) competencies of nurses, hospitals in the Netherlands run developmental programmes generally led by internal policy advisors (IPAs). In this study, we identify the roles IPAs play during these programmes to enhance the development of nurses’ QI competencies and studied how these roles influenced nurses and management.DesignAn exploratory ethnographical study comprising observations, informal conversations, semistructured interviews, focus groups and a strategy evaluation meeting.SettingA teaching hospital in an urban region in the Netherlands.ParticipantsIPAs (n=7) in collaboration with four teams of nurses (n=131), team managers (n=4), senior managers (n=4) and the hospital director (n=1).ResultsWe identified five distinct advisory roles that IPAs perform in the hospital programme: gatekeeper, connector, converter, reflector and implementer. In describing these roles, we provide insights into how IPAs help nurses to develop QI competencies. The IPA’s professional background was a driving force for nurses’ QI role development. However, QI development was threatened if IPAs lost sight of different stakeholders’ interests and consequently lost their credibility. QI role development among nurses was also threatened if the IPA took on all responsibility instead of delegating it timely to managers and nurses.ConclusionsWe have shown how IPAs’ professional background and advisory knowledge connect organisational, managerial and professional aims and interests to enhance professionalisation of nurses.

Midwifery ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 250-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yvonne Engels ◽  
Nicole Verheijen ◽  
Margot Fleuren ◽  
Henk Mokkink ◽  
Richard Grol

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 777-782 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. L. de Boom van Wonderen ◽  
J. Blok Singerling ◽  
M. Huijzer den Toom ◽  
D. C. Grootendorst ◽  
M. Franken de Koster ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 35 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 440-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nils Duits ◽  
Steven van der Hoorn ◽  
Martin Wiznitzer ◽  
Robert M. Wettstein ◽  
Edwin de Beurs

2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 1821-1829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gea A. Gooiker ◽  
Lydia G. M. van der Geest ◽  
Michel W. J. M. Wouters ◽  
Marieke Vonk ◽  
Tom M. Karsten ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 18-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona Doolan-Noble ◽  
Mataroria Lyndon ◽  
Andrew G Hill ◽  
Jonathon Gray ◽  
Robin Gauld

Background: Measuring performance is now the norm in health systems. System Level Measures (SLMs), implemented at New Zealand’s Counties Manukau Health (CMH) are designed to support quality improvement activities undertaken across the health system using only a small set of measures. While the healthcare and performance measurement literature contains information regarding the facilitators and barriers to quality improvement initiatives, there is an absence of studies into whether these factors are germane to the establishment and implementation of a SLM framework. Methods: A purposive sample of thirteen senior managers and clinicians involved in the construction and implementation of SLMs were invited to participate. Semi-structured telephone interviews were completed and recordings transcribed verbatim. Transcriptions were thematically analysed using a general inductive approach. Findings: In total, ten interviews took place. Six facilitative themes were identified including: dispersed and focused leadership; communication; data; alignment of the measures with organisational strategic data; alignment of the measures with organisational strategic plans and values; stakeholder engagement; and a dedicated project team. Conversely, five themes were identified that hindered the process. These were: reaching consensus; perfection versus pragmatism; duplication and process burden; achieving buy-in and workload. Discussion: The factors that facilitate and hinder establishing and implementing a framework of SLMs are common to other quality improvement approaches. However, this study demonstrated that these factors were also germane to SLMs. These findings are of particular relevance as researchers and policy makers elsewhere increasingly aim to adopt measurement arrangements for health systems that address equity, safety, quality, access and cost. Abbreviations: CMH – Counties Manukau Health; DHB – District Health Board; IHI – Institute for Healthcare Improvement; QI – Quality Improvement; SLM – System Level Measure.


2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 626-632 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Van Duin ◽  
G. Franx ◽  
B. Van Wijngaarden ◽  
M. Van Der Gaag ◽  
J. Van Weeghel ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
pp. 280-280
Author(s):  
Farah Herrera ◽  
Mandy Boes-Rossi ◽  
Amy Furth ◽  
Amy Haverland ◽  
Tracy Hirai-Seaton ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document