scholarly journals Content validity of Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire-22 revised (SRS-22r) for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: protocol for a qualitative study exploring patient’s and practitioner’s perspectives

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. e053911
Author(s):  
Samia Alamrani ◽  
Adrian Gardner ◽  
Deborah Falla ◽  
Emily Russell ◽  
Alison B Rushton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
Group Discussion ◽  
Research Society ◽  
Research Experience ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Scoliosis Research Society ◽  
Patient Reported

IntroductionContent validity is the most important measurement property for any patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). It being the extent that the PROM measures important concepts that are relevant to the population of interest. Adolescent with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is the most common spinal deformity in paediatric populations, with the Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire-22 revised (SRS-22r) a commonly used PROMof quality of life. In the absence of existing evidence, a content validity study for SRS-22r is needed to confirm its suitability for AIS. Thus, this study aims to investigate the content validity of SRS-22r for AIS. A secondary aim is to explore healthcare professional (HCP) perspectives of the barriers and facilitators to using outcome measures in AIS.Methods and analysisQualitative study reported according to COnsolidated criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies. A purposive sample of AIS (n=10–15, Cobb angle >25°, aged 10–18 years) will be recruited for online semi-structured interviews. A convenience sample (n=10–12) of HCP with clinical and/or research experience in AIS will be recruited for a focus group discussion. Topic guides and age-relevant documents are informed by existing evidence and developed using a framework of concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing. Audio-recordings will be transcribed verbatim, coded, analysed and synthesised using interpretive phenomenology analysis. Themes that generated from the analysis will be used as codes that will then be mapped to the SRS-22r contents.Ethics and disseminationThe Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Wales approval have been granted (IRAS 289888). Study findings will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.

Comparison of Changes in SRS-22 Values with Improvement in Cobb Angles after Posterior Fusion Surgery in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kadir Gem ◽  
Sertan Hancioglu ◽  
Abdulkadir Bilgiç ◽  
Serkan Erkan
Keyword(s):  
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽  
Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Posterior Instrumentation ◽  
Research Society ◽  
Posterior Fusion ◽  
Improvement Rate ◽  
Scoliosis Research Society ◽  
Correction Rate ◽  
Group B

Abstract Introduction The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the correction rate in Cobb angle and the improvement in quality of life profile in terms of Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 values. Patients and Methods Between January 2007 and December 2013, posterior instrumentation and fusion was performed to 30 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Patients were grouped according to their improvement rate in Cobb angles after surgery. Patients with an improvement rate of > 80% were grouped as Group A; those with an improvement rate of > 60% and ≤ 80% as Group B and those with an improvement rate of ≤ 60% were grouped as Group C. The SRS-22 questionnaire of these three groups was calculated and their relationship with the improvement in Cobb angle was evaluated. Results No statistical difference was found among the three groups in terms of pain, appearance, function, spirit, satisfaction, and SRS-22 values (all p > 0.05). Conclusion The results of this study demonstrate that the degree of correction rate does not correlate with the degree of improvement in the SRS-22 questionnaire in patients with AIS that underwent posterior fusion and instrumentation.

scholarly journals Screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an information statement by the scoliosis research society international task force

Scoliosis ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hubert Labelle ◽  
Stephens B Richards ◽  
Marinus De Kleuver ◽  
Theodoros B Grivas ◽  
Keith D K Luk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽  
Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Research Society ◽  
Scoliosis Research Society

What happens to the unfused upper thoracic curve after posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
M. Omar Iqbal ◽  
Amer F. Samdani ◽  
Joshua M. Pahys ◽  
Peter O. Newton ◽  
Suken A. Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽  
Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Posterior Spinal Fusion ◽  
Research Society ◽  
Curve Correction ◽  
Scoliosis Research Society ◽  
Lenke Classification ◽  
Upper Instrumented Vertebra ◽  
Upper Thoracic

OBJECTIVE Spontaneous lumbar curve correction after selective thoracic fusion in surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is well described. However, only a few articles have described the course of the uninstrumented upper thoracic (UT) curve after fusion, and the majority involve a hybrid construct. In this study, the authors sought to determine the outcomes and associated factors of uninstrumented UT curves in patients with AIS. METHODS The authors retrospectively reviewed a prospectively collected multicenter AIS registry for all consecutive patients with Lenke type 1–4 curves with a 2-year minimum follow-up. UT curves were considered uninstrumented if the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) did not extend above 1 level from the lower end vertebra of the UT curve. The authors defined progression as > 5°, and divided patients into two cohorts: those with improvement in the UT curve (IMP) and those without improvement in the UT curve (NO IMP). Radiographic, demographic, and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)–22 survey outcome measures were compared using univariate analysis, and significant factors were compared using a multivariate regression model. RESULTS The study included 450 patients (370 females and 80 males). The UT curve self-corrected in 86% of patients (n = 385), there was no change in 14% (n = 65), and no patients worsened. Preoperatively, patients were similar with respect to Lenke classification (p = 0.44), age (p = 0.31), sex (p = 0.85), and Risser score (p = 0.14). The UT curves in the IMP group self-corrected from 24.7° ± 6.5° to 12.6° ± 5.9°, whereas in the NO IMP group UT curves remained the same, from 20.3° ± 5.8° to 18.5° ± 5.7°. In a multivariate analysis, preoperative main thoracic (MT) curve size (p = 0.004) and MT curve correction (p = 0.001) remained significant predictors of UT curve improvement. Greater correction of the MT curve and larger initial MT curve size were associated with greater likelihood of UT curve improvement. CONCLUSIONS Spontaneous UT curve correction occurred in the majority (86%) of unfused UT curves after MT curve correction in Lenke 1–4 curve types. The magnitude of preoperative MT curve size and postoperative MT curve correction were independent predictors of spontaneous UT curve correction.

scholarly journals Correlation of 2-year SRS-22r and ODI patient-reported outcomes with 5-year patient-reported outcomes after complex spinal fusion: a 5-year single-institution study of 118 patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 422-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Owoicho Adogwa ◽  
Isaac O. Karikari ◽  
Aladine A. Elsamadicy ◽  
Amanda R. Sergesketter ◽  
Diego Galan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Spinal Fusion ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Research Society ◽  
Scoliosis Research Society ◽  
Self Image ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Spinal Arthrodesis

OBJECTIVEPatient-reported outcomes (PROs) are often measured up to 2 years after surgery; however, prospective collection of longitudinal outcomes for 5 years postoperatively can be challenging due to lack of patient follow-up. The aim of this study was to determine whether PROs collected at 2-year follow-up accurately predict long-term PROs 5 years after complex spinal fusion (≥ 5 levels).METHODSThis was an ambispective study of 118 adult patients (≥ 18 years old) undergoing ≥ 5-level spinal arthrodesis to the sacrum with iliac fixation from January 2002 to December 2011. Patient demographics and radiographic parameters as well as intraoperative variables were collected. PRO instruments (Scoliosis Research Society [SRS]-22r function, self-image, mental health, pain, and Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]) were completed before surgery then at 2 and 5 years after surgery. Primary outcome investigated in this study was the correlation between SRS-22r domains and ODI collected at 2- and 5-year follow-up.RESULTSOf the 118 patients, 111 patients had baseline PROs, 105 patients had 2-year follow-up data, and 91 patients had 5-year follow-up PRO data with 72% undergoing revision surgery. The average pre- and postoperative major coronal curve Cobb angles for the cohort were 32.1° ± 23.7° and 19.8° ± 19.3°, respectively. There was a strong correlation between 2- and 5-year ODI (r2 = 0.80, p < 0.001) and between 2- and 5-year SRS-22r domains, including function (r2 = 0.79, p < 0.001), self-image (r2 = 0.82, p < 0.001), mental health (r2 = 0.77, p < 0.001), and pain (r2 = 0.79, p < 0.001). Of the PROs, ODI showed the greatest absolute change from baseline to 2- and 5-year follow-up (2-year Δ 17.6 ± 15.9; 5-year Δ 16.5 ± 19.9) followed by SRS-22r self-image (2-year Δ 1.4 ± 0.96; 5-year Δ 1.3 ± 1.0), pain (2-year Δ 0.94 ± 0.97; 5-year Δ 0.80 ± 1.0), function (2-year Δ 0.60 ± 0.62; 5-year Δ 0.49 ± 0.79), and mental health (2-year Δ 0.49 ± 0.77; 5-year Δ 0.38 ± 0.84).CONCLUSIONSPatient-reported outcomes collected at 2-year follow-up may accurately predict long-term PROs (5-year follow-up).

SCORE DISTRIBUTION OF THE SCOLIOSIS RESEARCH SOCIETY-22 QUESTIONNAIRE IN PATIENTS WITH IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS

Spine ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol &NA; ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Douglas Hedden ◽  
James Mahood ◽  
Marc Moreau ◽  
Douglas Hill ◽  
Edmond Lou
Keyword(s):  
Idiopathic Scoliosis ◽  
Research Society ◽  
Score Distribution ◽  
Scoliosis Research Society
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document