scholarly journals Increasing identification of foot at risk of complications in patients with diabetes: a quality improvement project in an urban primary health centre in India

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. e000893
Author(s):  
Abha Mehndiratta ◽  
Satish Chandra Mishra ◽  
Prashant Bhandarkar ◽  
Kunal Chhatbar ◽  
Francoise Cluzeau ◽  
...  

The majority of foot amputations are preventable in people with diabetes. Guidelines recommend that people with diabetes should receive a foot examination for risk assessment, at least annually. In an audit at a primary health centre (PHC) in Mumbai, India, no patient with diabetes was offered preventive foot assessment in preceding 12 months. Problem analysis identified a lack of clinic policy, training and equipment for foot assessment. There was no standardised referral pathway for patients identified with foot at risk of diabetes complications. Furthermore, limited data review, high patient volumes and little time available with healthcare providers were important constraints. A quality improvement project was carried out at the PHC from January to September 2017. The project aimed at increasing compliance to standardised foot assessment in patients with diabetes presenting to the PHC from a baseline of 0% to 100% over 6 months. This would help identify patients having a foot at risk of complications due to diabetes. The Quality Standard on foot assessment was adopted from the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Diabetic Foot Guideline. The electronic medical record (EMR) was standardised, health providers were trained, PHC processes and referral pathways were redesigned. Plan-Do-Study-Act was used to address barriers with weekly data review. 88.2% (848) of patients with diabetes visiting the PHC during the study period received a foot examination. Out of these, 11% (95) were identified to have a foot at risk and referred to a specialist foot centre. 57% of referred patients followed with specialised foot protection services. Training of healthcare providers, standardisation of processes and regular data feedback can improve diabetic foot care. Integrating quality indicators in the EMR helps monitor compliance. The inability to use doctor’s time efficiently was the biggest challenge and sustaining the change will require organisational changes with suitable task shifting.

2013 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. S56
Author(s):  
Geetha Mukerji ◽  
Dina Reiss ◽  
Ferhan Siddiqi ◽  
Steven Sovran ◽  
Zoe Lysy ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Michelle L. Allen ◽  
Albertine M.B. Van der Does ◽  
Colette Gunst

Background: Foot screening is an important part of diabetic care as it prevents significant morbidity, loss of function and mortality from diabetic foot complications. However, foot screening is often neglected.Aim: This project was aimed at educating health care workers (HCWs) in a primary health care clinic to increase diabetic foot screening practices. Setting: A primary health care clinic in the Western Cape province of South AfricaMethods: A quality improvement project was conducted. HCWs’ needs were assessed using a questionnaire. This was followed by focus group discussions with the HCWs, which were recorded, transcribed and assessed using a general inductive approach. An intervention was designed based on common themes. Staff members were trained on foot screening and patient information pamphlets and screening tools were made available to all clinic staff. Thirty-two consecutive diabetic patient folders were audited to compare screening in 2013 with that in 2014 after initiation of the quality improvement cycle.Results: HCWs’ confidence in conducting foot screening using the diabetic foot assessment questionnaire improved markedly after training. Diabetic foot screening practices increased from 9% in 2013 to 69% in 2014 after the first quality improvement cycle. A strengths, opportunities, aspirations and results (SOAR) analysis showed promise for continuing quality improvement cycles.Conclusion: The findings showed a significant improvement in the number of diabetic patients screened. Using strategic planning with appreciative intent based on SOAR, proved to be motivational and can be used in the planning of the next cycle.


2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-129
Author(s):  
Lauren C. Mays ◽  
Jennifer W. Drummonds ◽  
Summer Powers ◽  
David R. Buys ◽  
Penni I. Watts

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
Aleah S. Groman ◽  
Xiaodi N. Chen ◽  
Jill E. Lavigne

Due to insufficient communication strategies between healthcare providers and refugees in the United States, this quality improvement project aimed to improve disparity in refugee healthcare. We chose to focus on community pharmacist counseling sessions with refugees in the city of Rochester, New York. The two refugee populations we focused on were the Burmese and Nepali. Due to illiteracy in their native language, the refugees were not receptive to a pamphlet detailing the beneficial roles a pharmacy can have in improving their health and wellbeing. We created a pictorial survey of pharmacies near a refugee center to identify the pharmacies the refugees were utilizing in the area. Once we identified these pharmacies, we created a counseling aid booklet translating common pharmacy language/terms into English, Burmese, and Nepalese languages supported by pictorial diagrams. The counseling aid booklet was evaluated by pharmacists using a satisfaction scale. Overall, the counseling aid booklet was found to be helpful for the pharmacist’s daily interaction with refugee populations. Further plans for the counseling aid booklet include adding more pharmacy counseling terms for common disease states in refugee populations, making the book more inclusive of other languages, and implementation in more community pharmacies and other diverse healthcare settings.   Article Type: Student Project


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Sambhwani ◽  
A Kandiah ◽  
F Rayan ◽  
A Wazir ◽  
N Sheikh

Abstract Introduction A service evaluation audit highlighted significant variation in our practice as regards catheterisation in NOF patients. A pilot protocol was developed with real time data monitoring to see if we could improve our patients’ pathway. Method The protocol focussed on early catheterisation, monitoring the condition of patients’ skin, documentation around catheter care and removal instructions and surveillance for urinary tract infection rates (UTI) Results 150 patients were included in the pilot. There was a reduction by more than 50% of patients assessed as having at risk or broken skin. 94.5% of patients were catheterised out of theatres (previously only 4%) saving an average of 14 minutes of theatre time per case. Delays in catheter removal after documented request reduced by 2 days and our UTI rates were relatively unchanged (3.3% compared to 2.7%). Documentation significantly improved. We also noted that overall length of stay was reduced by 2 days. Conclusions Standardising our care pathway has improved our patient care and documentation. It has benefitted theatre efficiency and also nursing of fragile skin in 'at risk' patients. Prompting early removal and compliance may have also had a positive impact on overall length of stay. This has been a successful quality improvement project in our department.


2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 510
Author(s):  
Rosemary Sedgwick ◽  
Sophie Bates ◽  
Dibendu Betal ◽  
Ayesha Kahn ◽  
Giles Davies ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document