‘Palliative care equals end-of-life care’: barriers to referral in a paediatric tertiary care centre

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A20.2-A20
Author(s):  
Katherine Twamley ◽  
Paula Kelly ◽  
Finella Craig ◽  
Delia Rizpah Hollowell ◽  
Patricia Mendoza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Care Centre ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre

scholarly journals Palliative care referral patterns and measures of aggressive care at the end of life in patients with cervical cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-72
Author(s):  
Alexandra S Bercow ◽  
Roni Nitecki ◽  
Hilary Haber ◽  
Allison A Gockley ◽  
Emily Hinchcliff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Parametric Testing ◽  
Tertiary Care Centers ◽  
The Impact

IntroductionFifteen per cent of women with cervical cancer are diagnosed with advanced disease and carry a 5 year survival rate of only 17%. Cervical cancer may lead to particularly severe symptoms that interfere with quality of life, yet few studies have examined the rate of palliative care referral in this population. This study aims to examine the impact of palliative care referral on women who have died from cervical cancer in two tertiary care centers.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of cervical cancer decedents at two tertiary institutions from January 2000 to February 2017. We examined how aggressive measures of care at the end of life, metrics defined by the National Quality Forum, interacted with clinical variables to understand if end-of-life care was affected. Univariate and multivariate parametric and non-parametric testing was used, and linear regression models were generated to determine unadjusted and adjusted associations between aggressive measures of care at the end of life with receipt of palliative care as the main exposure.ResultsOf 153 cervical cancer decedents, 73 (47%) received a palliative care referral and the majority (57%) of referrals occurred during an inpatient admission. The median time from palliative care consultation to death was 2.3 months and 34% were referred to palliative care in the last 30 days of life. Palliative care referral was associated with fewer emergency department visits (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.56), inpatient stays (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.61), and intensive care unit admissions (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.93) in the last 30 days of life. Palliative care did not affect chemotherapy or radiation administration within 14 days of death (p=0.36). Women evaluated by palliative care providers were less likely to die in the acute care setting (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.51).DiscussionIn two tertiary care centers, less than half of cervical cancer decedents received palliative care consultations, and those referred to palliative care were often evaluated late in their disease course. Palliative care utilization was also associated with a lower incidence of poor-quality end-of-life care.

scholarly journals Medication use during end-of-life care in a palliative care centre

2015 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 767-775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anniek D. Masman ◽  
Monique van Dijk ◽  
Dick Tibboel ◽  
Frans P. M. Baar ◽  
Ron A. A. Mathôt
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Medication Use ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Care Centre

scholarly journals Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and End-of-Life Care Between COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Muslim Patients During the 2020 Pandemic

2021 ◽  
pp. 104990912110186
Author(s):  
Imran Khalid ◽  
Maryam Imran ◽  
Romaysaa M Yamani ◽  
Manahil Imran ◽  
Muhammad Ali Akhtar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Icu Stay

Background: Little is known about end-of-life care among Muslim patients, particularly during Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID) pandemic, which we report here. Methods: The clinical characteristics, end-of-life care and resuscitation status of Muslim patients who died in the ICU of our tertiary care hospital in year 2020 from COVID were compared to Non-COVID patients. Results: There were 32 patients in COVID and 64 in the Non-COVID group. A major proportion, mainly of Non-COVID patients, already had a hospice eligible terminal disease at baseline (p=.002). COVID patients were admitted to the ICU sooner after hospitalization (2.2 vs. 17 days), had prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation (18.5 vs. 6 days) and longer ICU stay (24 vs. 8 days) than non-COVID patients, respectively (p<.001). Almost all patients were “Full Code” initially. However, status was eventually changed to ‘do-not-attempt resuscitation’ (DNAR) in about 60% of the cohort. COVID patients were made DNAR late in their ICU stay, predominantly in the last 24 hours of life (p=.04). Until the very end, patients in both groups were on tube feeds, underwent blood draws and imaging, required high dose vasopressors, with few limitations or withdrawal of therapies. Family members were usually not present at bedside at time of death. There was minimal involvement of chaplain and palliative care services. Conclusions: Muslim COVID-19 patients had prolonged mechanical ventilation and ICU stay and a delayed decision to DNAR status than non-COVID Muslim patients. Limitation or withdrawal of therapy occurred infrequently. The utilization of chaplain and palliative care service needs improvement.

scholarly journals Honoring Preferences—The Consistency Between End-of-Life Care and a Veteran’s Goal for Comfort Care

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 752-752
Author(s):  
Joan Carpenter ◽  
Winifred Scott ◽  
Mary Ersek ◽  
Cari Levy ◽  
Jennifer Cohen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression ◽  
Comfort Care ◽  
Lower Odds ◽  
Medicare Data ◽  
Life Sustaining Treatment

Abstract This study examined the alignment between Veterans’ end-of-life care and a Life-Sustaining Treatment (LST) goal “to be comfortable.” It includes Veterans with VA inpatient or community living center stays overlapping July 2018--January 2019, with a LST template documented by January 31, 2019, and who died by April 30, 2019 (N = 18,163). Using VA and Medicare data, we found 80% of decedents with a comfort care goal received hospice and 57% a palliative care consult (compared to 57% and 46%, respectively, of decedents without a comfort care goal). Using multivariate logistic regression, a comfort care goal was associated with significantly lower odds of EOL hospital or ICU use. In the last 30 days of life, Veterans with a comfort care goal had 43% lower odds (AOR 0.57; 95% CI: 0.51, 0.64) of hospitalization and 46% lower odds of ICU use (AOR 0.54; 95% CI: 0.48, 0.61).

Help Me Understand: Providing Palliative Care to Individuals With Serious Mental Illness

2021 ◽  
pp. 104990912110107
Author(s):  
Kate L. M. Hinrichs ◽  
Cindy B. Woolverton ◽  
Jordana L. Meyerson
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Serious Mental Illness ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Psychosocial Support ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Case Examples ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Palliative Care Teams

Individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) have shortened life expectancy with increased risk of developing comorbid medical illnesses. They might have difficulty accessing care and can be lost to follow-up due to complex socioeconomic factors, placing them at greater risk of dying from chronic or undiagnosed conditions. This, in combination with stigma associated with SMI, can result in lower quality end-of-life care. Interdisciplinary palliative care teams are in a unique position to lend assistance to those with SMI given their expertise in serious illness communication, values-based care, and psychosocial support. However, palliative care teams might be unfamiliar with the hallmark features of the various SMI diagnoses. Consequently, recognizing and managing exacerbations of SMI while delivering concurrent palliative or end-of-life care can feel challenging. The goal of this narrative review is to describe the benefits of providing palliative care to individuals with SMI with concrete suggestions for communication and use of recovery-oriented language in the treatment of individuals with SMI. The salient features of 3 SMI diagnoses—Bipolar Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder, and Schizophrenia—are outlined through case examples. Recommendations for working with individuals who have SMI and other life-limiting illness are provided, including strategies to effectively manage SMI exacerbations.

scholarly journals Association between high cost user status and end-of-life care in hospitalized patients: A national cohort study of patients who die in hospital

2021 ◽  
pp. 026921632110020
Author(s):  
Kieran L Quinn ◽  
Amy T Hsu ◽  
Christopher Meaney ◽  
Danial Qureshi ◽  
Peter Tanuseputro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Major Surgery ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Healthcare Use ◽  
National Cohort ◽  
Acute Healthcare ◽  
Invasive Intervention

Background: Studies comparing end-of-life care between patients who are high cost users of the healthcare system compared to those who are not are lacking. Aim: The objective of this study was to describe and measure the association between high cost user status and several health services outcomes for all adults in Canada who died in acute care, compared to non-high cost users and those without prior healthcare use. Settings and participants: We used administrative data for all adults who died in hospital in Canada between 2011 and 2015 to measure the odds of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), receipt of invasive interventions, major surgery, and receipt of palliative care during the hospitalization in which the patient died. High cost users were defined as those in the top 10% of acute healthcare costs in the year prior to a person’s hospitalization in which they died. Results: Among 252,648 people who died in hospital, 25,264 were high cost users (10%), 112,506 were non-high cost users (44.5%) and 114,878 had no prior acute care use (45.5%). After adjustment for age and sex, high cost user status was associated with a 14% increased odds of receiving an invasive intervention, a 15% increased odds of having major surgery, and an 8% lower odds of receiving palliative care compared to non-high cost users, but opposite when compared to patients without prior healthcare use. Conclusions: Many patients receive aggressive elements of end-of-life care during the hospitalization in which they die and a substantial number do not receive palliative care. Understanding how this care differs between those who were previously high- and non-high cost users may provide an opportunity to improve end of life care for whom better care planning and provision ought to be an equal priority.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document