scholarly journals How to manage: acute severe colitis

2021 ◽  
pp. flgastro-2020-101710
Author(s):  
Thomas Edward Conley ◽  
Joseph Fiske ◽  
Sreedhar Subramanian

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a medical emergency which is associated with significant morbidity and a mortality rate of 1%. ASUC requires prompt recognition and treatment. Optimal management includes admission to a specialist gastrointestinal unit and joint management with colorectal surgeons. Patients need to be screened for concomitant infections and thromboprophylaxis should be administered to mitigate against the elevated risk of thromboembolism. Corticosteroids are still the preferred initial medical therapy but approximately 30%–40% of patients fail steroid therapy and require rescue medical therapy with either infliximab or cyclosporine. Emergency colectomy is required in a timely manner for patients who fail rescue medical therapy to minimise the risk of adverse post-operative outcomes. We discuss current and emerging evidence in the management of ASUC and outline management approaches for clinicians involved in managing ASUC.

Author(s):  
Carlos Walter SOBRADO ◽  
Lucas Faraco SOBRADO

ABSTRACT Introduction: Acute severe colitis is a potentially lethal medical emergency and, even today, its treatment remains a challenge for clinicians and surgeons. Intravenous corticoid therapy, which was introduced into the therapeutic arsenal in the 1950s, continues to be the first-line treatment and, for patients who are refractory to this, the rescue therapy may consist of clinical measures or emergency colectomy. Objective: To evaluate the indications for and results from drug rescue therapy (cyclosporine, infliximab and tacrolimus), and to suggest a practical guide for clinical approaches. Methods: The literature was reviewed using the Medline/PubMed, Cochrane library and SciELO databases, and additional information from institutional websites of interest, by cross-correlating the following keywords: acute severe colitis, fulminating colitis and treatment. Results: Treatments for acute severe colitis have avoided colectomy in 60-70% of the cases, provided that they have been started early on, with multidisciplinary follow-up. Despite the adverse effects of intravenous cyclosporine, this drug has been indicated in cases of greater severity with an imminent risk of colectomy, because of its fast action, short half-life and absence of increased risk of surgical complications. Therapy using infliximab has been reserved for less severe cases and those in which immunosuppressants are being or have been used (AZA/6-MP). Indication of biological agents has recently been favored because of their ease of therapeutic use, their good short and medium-term results, the possibility of maintenance therapy and also their action as a "bridge" for immunosuppressant action (AZA/6-MP). Colectomy has been reserved for cases in which there is still no response five to seven days after rescue therapy and in cases of complications (toxic megacolon, profuse hemorrhage and perforation). Conclusion: Patients with a good response to rescue therapy who do not undergo emergency operations should be considered for maintenance therapy using azathioprine. A surgical procedure is indicated for selected cases.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S407-S407
Author(s):  
R CAMPBELL ◽  
R Haddock ◽  
K Parman ◽  
J MacDonald ◽  
J P Seenan

Abstract Background Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a medical emergency. Rescue medical therapy is increasingly used in steroid-refractory patients but has historically been considered to delay rather than prevent colectomy. We have previously described short-term outcomes from our unit of cases of ASUC, as defined by Truelove and Witt’s criteria, over a 1 year period (July 2016 to June 2017). Data on longer-term outcomes is now available. Methods Electronic patient records (EPRs) of cases included in the original study were reviewed. Outcomes including readmission rates, need for colectomy, steroid use, medical escalation and rates of biochemical remission (as defined by faecal Calprotectin (FC) <250μg/l) were recorded. Results In total, 58 cases (51 patients) were included in original cohort. 19 failed initial medical therapy with steroids with 10 successfully treated using rescue medical therapy thus avoiding colectomy. Only 1/10 required subsequent colectomy during our median follow-up period of 32 months. 29/51 (56.9%) patients settled with steroids alone. 3 died of unrelated causes so were excluded from further analysis. Further oral steroids were prescribed in 53.8% (14/26). 6 patients were already receiving an immunomodulator (azathioprine or mercaptopurine) prior to initial presentation. 75% of the remainder (15/20) were discharged on aminosalicylates as their only maintenance therapy but the majority (60%, 9/15) subsequently required medical escalation with only 30% (6/20) continuing aminosalicylate monotherapy. 1 colectomy also occurred in this group. 17 readmissions occurred in 12 patients with the majority (52.9%, 9/17) within 1 year. At the end of follow-up two out of three patients (66.7%, 12/18) were considered to be in biochemical remission (FC <250 μg/l). Conclusion Rescue medical therapy for ASUC provides sustained benefit with the vast majority avoiding delayed colectomy. Patients admitted with ASUC have significant readmission rates, particularly within 1 year with frequent need for further steroids and/or escalation of medical therapy. Long-term remission rates are high but aminosalicylate monotherapy is rarely adequate to achieve this. All patients with an adequate response to treatment for ASUC should be considered for initiation of immunomodulator and/or biologic Rx prior to discharge. ASUC patients should be considered for more intensive follow-up and early, aggressive medical escalation. An enhanced inpatient liaison service and early review clinic is planned to support this.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 2169
Author(s):  
Christine Verdon ◽  
Talat Bessissow ◽  
Peter L. Lakatos

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a medical emergency which occurs in about 20%–30% of patients with ulcerative colitis during their lifetime, and does carry a mortality risk of 1%. The management of inflammatory bowel diseases has evolved with changes in objective patient monitoring, as well as the availability of new treatment options with the development of new biological and small molecules; however, data is limited regarding their use in the context of ASUC. This review aims to discuss the emerging data regarding biologicals and small molecules therapies in the context of ASUC.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S516-S517
Author(s):  
M GHRIBI ◽  
G Mohamed ◽  
S Bizid ◽  
B Ben Sliman ◽  
K Boughoula ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Since 2005, infliximab (IFX), an anti-tumour necrosis factor-α agent, has proven to be efficient as salvage and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. In 2011, a randomised controlled comparative trial has demonstrated the short-term efficacy as a second-line treatment for acute severe colitis (ASC). Since then, few studies had evaluated the probability of first IFX use after a first flare of ASC. The aim of this study was to assess the cumulative incidence of IFX use after a first flare of ASC occurring after 2011. Methods Between June 2018 and January 2011, all inpatients with a first non-complicated flare of ASC were retrospectively randomised. Steroid resistance was concluded in patients undergoing colectomy or put into second-line medical therapy. Cumulative incidence of IFX use was evaluated by Fine and Gray model, considering colectomy and death as competing events. Results Twenty-five patients were reviewed (median age: 35y. (14-58y.); 11 females and 14 males). Thirty per cent of patients were active smokers. Only one patient had severe comorbidities. Half of the patients were admitted for an inaugural flare. A family history of an inflammatory bowel disease was noted in 12% of cases. sixteen per cent of patients had extraintestinal manifestations. At the moment of presentation, three-quarters of patients were not receiving any immunosuppressive therapy. Truelove and Witts criteria were present in 70% of cases. The average rates of CRP, plasmatic albumin and haemoglobin were respectively 131 mg/dl(43–260), 28 g/l (19–40), and 11g/dl (6,5-14). Sixty-four per cent of the patients responded to first-line medical therapy. Among patients with steroid-refractory colitis (9 patients), timely colectomy was performed in 1 case, 1 patient received cyclosporin (2mg/Kg per day) and 7 patients received infliximab (5mg/Kg on days 0, 14 and 42). Clinical response to second-line medical therapy was observed in 87% of patients. After a median follow- up period of 26 mo. (0,26-81 mo), 4 patients underwent colectomy: 2 urgent colectomies at the same hospitalisation and 2 subsequent colectomies for chronic active disease. Colectomy free survival rate at 5 years was 82%. Cumulative incidence of first infliximab use at 1 and 5 years was, respectively, 40% and 70%. In multivariate analysis, resistance to steroids (p = 0.0005) and history of thiopurines intake (p = 0.002) were significantly associated with subsequent use of IFX. No death was observed during the analysis period. Conclusion During follow-up, the vast majority of patients needed subsequent IFX use after their first flare of ASC.


2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (8) ◽  
pp. 989-989 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Croft ◽  
A. Walsh ◽  
J. Doecke ◽  
G. Radford-Smith

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 427-429
Author(s):  
Joseph Fiske ◽  
Thomas Conley ◽  
Shaji Sebastian ◽  
Sreedhar Subramanian

Acute severe colitis is a medical emergency and requires prompt treatment with intravenous steroids. Infliximab is typically used as rescue therapy in those who fail to respond to corticosteroids. This article outlines the altered pharmacokinetics of infliximab in acute severe UC and summarised the latest published data surrounding accelerated infliximab dosing.


Author(s):  
Vipin Gupta ◽  
Waled Mohsen ◽  
Thomas P Chapman ◽  
Jack Satsangi

Abstract Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) remains a common medical emergency, with 25% of patients with ulcerative colitis experiencing at least one event in their disease course. Despite advances in medical therapy, ASUC continues to be associated with considerable morbidity and mortality, with up to 30% of patients requiring colectomy during initial admission. Our aim was to review the current controversies and recent progress in risk stratification, prediction of outcome, and personalisation of care in ASUC. We re-assess the use of Truelove and Witts’ criteria, serum biomarkers and the use of composite clinical indices in current clinical practice. We explore the potential for endoscopic prediction using defined validated indices for accurate and early prognostication, and the need to define outcome. We also consider the impact of the current COVID-19 pandemic. Finally, we discuss the current research agenda including the application of new and emerging biomarkers coupled with multi-omics and the implications in management and optimisation of outcome.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Adams ◽  
Vipin Gupta ◽  
Waled Mohsen ◽  
Thomas P Chapman ◽  
Deloshaan Subhaharan ◽  
...  

Background & aims: We aimed to determine whether changes in ulcerative colitis management have translated to improved outcomes, in order to develop a simple model to predict steroid non-response on admission. Methods: Outcomes of 131 adult ASC admissions (117 patients) in Oxford, UK between 2015-19 were compared with prospectively collected data from 1992-3. All patients received standard treatment with intravenous corticosteroids and endoscopic disease activity scoring (UCEIS). Steroid non-response was defined as receiving rescue medical therapy or surgery. A predictive model created in the Oxford cohort was validated in Australia and India (110 hospitalised patients Gold Coast University Hospital 2015-20; 62 hospitalised patients AIIMS, New Delhi 2018-20). Results: In the 2015-19 Oxford cohort, 71 (54%) patients received medical rescue therapy (27% ciclosporin, 27% anti-TNF), compared to 27% ciclosporin in 1992-3, p=0.0015. Only 15% required colectomy during admission vs 29% in 1992-3 (p=0.033). Admission CRP, albumin, and UCEIS scores predicted steroid non-response (FDR p=0.00066, 0.0066 and 0.015). A four-point model was developed involving CRP ≥ 100mg/L (1 point), albumin ≤ 25g/L (1 point), UCEIS ≥ 4 (1 point) or ≥ 7 (2 points). Scoring 0 or 4 was 100% predictive of steroid response and non-response, respectively, in all three cohorts. Patients scoring 3-4 had 83% risk of steroid non-response in Oxford and 84% (0.70-0.98) in the validation cohorts -- OR 11.9 (10.8-13). Conclusion: Colectomy rates for ASC have halved in 25 years, while use of rescue medical therapy has doubled. Patients who are highly unlikely to respond to parenteral steroid treatment alone may be readily identified on admission, to be prioritised for early intensification of therapy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 777-778
Author(s):  
Dorra Trad ◽  
Bibani Norsaf ◽  
Sabbah Meriam ◽  
Jouini Raja ◽  
Ben Brahim Ehsen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document