scholarly journals PTH-156 Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A 10 Year Review of the Cost and Demand of this Condition, on a District General Endoscopy Unit

Gut ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A274.3-A275
Author(s):  
M W Johnson ◽  
K Lithgo ◽  
T Prouse ◽  
T Price
1980 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 312-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. N. H. Main ◽  
R. J. Morgan ◽  
M. J. Hall ◽  
R. I. Russell ◽  
A. Shenkin ◽  
...  

A 35-year-old man, who had spent 10[Formula: see text] out of 18 months in hospital, has required repeated courses of intravenous nutrition (IVN) because of nutritional failure due to severe inflammatory bowel disease. He has been maintained on a nocturnal pump-fed liquid diet supplementing his day-time oral diet jar five months, four of which have been at home. The cost of such therapy is less than with an elemental diet and there are other advantages. This regime has been shown to be nutritionally adequate. The need to assess other cheaper liquid diets in patients with intestinal failure is recognised.


2011 ◽  
Vol 140 (5) ◽  
pp. S-735
Author(s):  
Marc Schwartz ◽  
Marwa El Mourabet ◽  
Melissa I. Saul ◽  
Miguel Regueiro ◽  
Leonard Baidoo ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Del Hoyo ◽  
Pilar Nos ◽  
Guillermo Bastida ◽  
Raquel Faubel ◽  
Diana Muñoz ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Although electronic health interventions are considered safe and efficient, evidence regarding the cost-effectiveness of telemonitoring in inflammatory bowel disease is lacking. OBJECTIVE We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of the Telemonitorización de la Enfermedad de Crohn y Colitis Ulcerosa (Telemonitoring of Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis [TECCU]) Web platform (G_TECCU intervention group) for telemonitoring complex inflammatory bowel disease, compared with standard care (G_control) and nurse-assisted telephone care (G_NT intervention group). METHODS We analyzed cost-effectiveness from a societal perspective by comparing the 3 follow-up methods used in a previous 24-week randomized controlled trial, conducted at a tertiary university hospital in Spain. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease who initiated immunosuppressants or biologic agents, or both, to control inflammatory activity were recruited consecutively. Data on the effects on disease activity (using clinical indexes) and quality-adjusted life-years (using the EuroQol 5 dimensions questionnaire) were collected. We calculated the costs of health care, equipment, and patients’ productivity and social activity impairment. We compared the mean costs per patient, utilities, and bootstrapped differences. RESULTS We included 63 patients (21 patients per group). TECCU saved €1005 (US $1100) per additional patient in remission compared with G_control (95% CI €–13,518 to 3137; US $–14,798 to 3434), with a 79.96% probability of being more effective at lower costs. Compared with G_NT, TECCU saved €2250 (US $2463) per additional patient in remission (95% CI €–15,363 to 11,086; US $–16,817 to 12,135), and G_NT saved €538 (US $589) compared with G_control (95% CI €–6475 to 5303; US $–7088 to 5805). G_TECCU and G_NT showed an 84% and 67% probability, respectively, of producing a cost saving per additional quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) compared with G_control, considering those simulations that involved negative incremental QALYs as well. CONCLUSIONS There is a high probability that the TECCU Web platform is more cost-effective than standard and telephone care in the short term. Further research considering larger cohorts and longer time horizons is required. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02943538; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02943538 (http://www. webcitation.org/746CRRtDN)


10.2196/15505 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. e15505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Del Hoyo ◽  
Pilar Nos ◽  
Guillermo Bastida ◽  
Raquel Faubel ◽  
Diana Muñoz ◽  
...  

Background Although electronic health interventions are considered safe and efficient, evidence regarding the cost-effectiveness of telemonitoring in inflammatory bowel disease is lacking. Objective We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of the Telemonitorización de la Enfermedad de Crohn y Colitis Ulcerosa (Telemonitoring of Crohn’s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis [TECCU]) Web platform (G_TECCU intervention group) for telemonitoring complex inflammatory bowel disease, compared with standard care (G_control) and nurse-assisted telephone care (G_NT intervention group). Methods We analyzed cost-effectiveness from a societal perspective by comparing the 3 follow-up methods used in a previous 24-week randomized controlled trial, conducted at a tertiary university hospital in Spain. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease who initiated immunosuppressants or biologic agents, or both, to control inflammatory activity were recruited consecutively. Data on the effects on disease activity (using clinical indexes) and quality-adjusted life-years (using the EuroQol 5 dimensions questionnaire) were collected. We calculated the costs of health care, equipment, and patients’ productivity and social activity impairment. We compared the mean costs per patient, utilities, and bootstrapped differences. Results We included 63 patients (21 patients per group). TECCU saved €1005 (US $1100) per additional patient in remission compared with G_control (95% CI €–13,518 to 3137; US $–14,798 to 3434), with a 79.96% probability of being more effective at lower costs. Compared with G_NT, TECCU saved €2250 (US $2463) per additional patient in remission (95% CI €–15,363 to 11,086; US $–16,817 to 12,135), and G_NT saved €538 (US $589) compared with G_control (95% CI €–6475 to 5303; US $–7088 to 5805). G_TECCU and G_NT showed an 84% and 67% probability, respectively, of producing a cost saving per additional quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) compared with G_control, considering those simulations that involved negative incremental QALYs as well. Conclusions There is a high probability that the TECCU Web platform is more cost-effective than standard and telephone care in the short term. Further research considering larger cohorts and longer time horizons is required. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02943538; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02943538 (http://www. webcitation.org/746CRRtDN)


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dingting Xu ◽  
Hanyun Zhang ◽  
Yan Chen

Abstract Background Recently, decision-making process has become increasingly complex. But there is limited information on Chinese patients’ views of shared decision making (SDM) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This questionnaire investigation aimed to understand Chinese patients’ perspectives and expectations of SDM in IBD and analyze the possible factors that influence their views. Methods An online survey was conducted from July 19th to 24th, 2020. A total of 1118 patients completed the survey. Results One-third of patients were dissatisfied with the current decision-making model, and the satisfaction of inpatients was lower than that of outpatients. 84% of patients preferred to participate in SDM, who were young and had a high education level, high income, commercial insurance, strong learning ability and knowledge of SDM. Most of those who did not want to participate (72%) were worried about the cost. The kind of medicine (948, 84.8%), surgical indications (505, 45.2%) and operation methods (482, 43.1%) were the topics that patients thought most require SDM. Side effects of medicine (837, 74.9%), costs of therapy (675, 60.4%), and surgical risks (563, 50.4%) were considered to be the most influential factors for SDM. 52.7% of all patients hoped experts in different disciplines would participate in SDM. The most desirable amount of time for discussion was 30 to 60 min (562/1118, 50.3%), that were associated with the cost of SDM. Conclusion We can meet the needs of patients by reducing costs and strengthening online patient education and exploring a model suitable for Chinese IBD patients.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabrina Rodrigues de Figueiredo ◽  
Ana Elisa Rabe Caon ◽  
Rogerio Saad Hossne ◽  
Fábio Vieira Teixeira ◽  
Sabine Murakami Winkler ◽  
...  

The treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has changed over time with the increasing use of biologics to achieve therapeutic goals. As a result, the cost of treatment increased considerably, making it necessary to develop strategies that could increase access to biological therapies. In this scenario, the biosimilars were developed with the aim of reducing costs, maintaining safety and efficacy compared to the originator. Initially, its use in IBD was based on the extrapolation of studies in other specialties, such as rheumatology. More recently, studies in inflammatory bowel disease have emerged, with favorable results for its use. It is known that there are still knowledge gaps in the use of biosimilars and more experience is needed to increase clinicians’ confidence in their clinical practice. This chapter proposes a review of what is currently known about biosimilars in IBD. It discusses about aspects such as safety, efficacy, interchangeability, immunogenicity and switches.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S343-S344
Author(s):  
R Van Linschoten ◽  
E Visser ◽  
C Niehot ◽  
J van der Woude ◽  
J Hazelzet ◽  
...  

Abstract Background With increasing incidence of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) in developing countries and increasing prescription rates for biologics globally, knowledge on the cost burden of IBD and cost drivers is essential for health policy makers worldwide. We conducted a systematic review to determine cost-of-illness of IBD and assess time trends and geographical differences. Methods A systematic review of population-based studies that estimated cost-of-illness of IBD and were published in Embase, Medline, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Studies on interventions and those reporting costs for a subset of patients defined by phenotype or treatment were excluded, as these do not give a representative estimate of the cost-of-illness of IBD. Only studies published in English were included. Methodology of all included studies was assessed and costs were adjusted to 2018 US dollars. Results In total, 4,837 unique studies were screened on title and abstract and 4,730 excluded. After full-text screening, 64 of the remaining 107 studies were included in the systematic review. The study methodologies differed considerably, with large differences in perspective, valuation method and source population. Mean annual healthcare costs for prevalent Crohn′s disease (CD) cases in the last 10 years were in Asia $4,463; Europe $12,396 and North America $17,508. Costs for prevalent ulcerative colitis (UC) patients in the same period were $1,654, $7,206 and $13,569 respectively. For CD, the cost drivers moved from inpatient (61% of total costs) in 1995 to medication costs (77%) in 2016. Similar trends were identified for UC (1998: 50% and 36% versus 2016: 9%, and 82% for inpatient and medication costs, respectively). This cost trend is primarily attributable to an increase in medication costs in all four geographical areas, while in- and outpatient costs were relatively stable during the same time period. The annual costs of absenteeism and presenteeism per prevalent case of CD were $5,638 in Asia and $6,485 in Europe. For UC these costs were $4,828 and $6,414 respectively. Annual costs of absenteeism and presenteeism in North America were $20,074 per patient for a combined cohort of UC and CD patients. Conclusion Per patient costs for IBD are increasing worldwide, with highest costs in North America and lowest in Asia. This is primarily due to an increase in medication costs. Productivity costs are substantial and might even exceed healthcare costs. Biologic therapy was expected to decrease inpatient costs by reducing hospitalisations and surgery, but this does not appear to be the case. Continuing growth of these costs can lead to an intolerable burden on healthcare systems worldwide.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document