cost of illness
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

990
(FIVE YEARS 259)

H-INDEX

63
(FIVE YEARS 7)

Author(s):  
Lajolo C ◽  
Rupe C ◽  
Gioco G ◽  
Giuliani M ◽  
Contaldo M ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To estimate the economic costs of oral lichen planus (OLP) through a multicenter university hospital–based outpatient study conducted in Italy and Finland. Materials and methods A multicenter retrospective study was conducted on patients affected by OLP to evaluate the economic cost of managing the disease. Direct costs concerning diagnostic procedures, therapeutic management, and follow-up visits were obtained from clinical records. Statistics was performed with IBM SPSS Statistics. Results One hundred and eight patients with a confirmed diagnosis of OLP (81 women and 27 men), 58 Italians and 50 Finnish, were enrolled in this study. The mean annual cost was 1087.2 euros per patient. The mean annual cost was higher in Finnish than in Italian cohort (1558.7 euros vs. 680.7 euros—p < 0.05). Within the Italian cohort, the local immunosuppressive therapy group and atrophic and erosive OLP type had a higher cost (p < 0.05). Within the Finnish cohort, the local immunosuppressive therapy group had a higher cost (p < 0.05). Conclusions OLP-related costs are very similar to other chronic oral disorders (i.e., periodontitis) with differences between investigated countries. Moreover, patients with more severe clinical features, who need immunosuppressive therapy, are facing more expensive costs. Clinical relevance. In this multicenter cost of illness study, we estimated the direct health care costs of OLP and we found that patients with more severe clinical features, who therefore need symptomatic therapy, are facing more expensive costs.


2022 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Hecker ◽  
K. Freijer ◽  
M. Hiligsmann ◽  
S. M. A. A. Evers

Abstract Background Little is known about the burden that overweight and obesity impose on Dutch society. The aim of this study is to examine this burden in terms of cost-of-illness and health-related quality of life. Method A bottom-up, prevalence-based burden of disease study from a societal perspective was performed. Cost-of-illness information including healthcare costs, patient and family costs, and other costs was obtained via the Treatment Inventory of Costs in Patients with psychiatric disorders (TiC-P) questionnaire. Health-related quality of life was assessed through the EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L) and the BODY-Q instruments. Non-parametric bootstrapping was applied to test for significant differences in costs. Subgroup analyses were performed on all outcomes. Results A total of 97 people with overweight and obesity completed the survey. Per respondent, mean healthcare costs were €2907, patient and family costs were €4037, and other costs were €4519, leading to a total societal cost of €11,463 per respondent per year. Total costs were significantly higher for respondents with obesity versus overweight and between low & intermediate versus highly educated respondents. The mean utility score of our population was 0.81. A significantly lower utility score was found for respondents with obesity in comparison with respondents with overweight. BODY-Q results show that respondents with obesity scored a significantly lower Rasch-score than did respondents with overweight in three scales. Respondents with a high education level and having paid work scored significantly higher Rasch-scores in two scales than did those with a low education level and without having paid work. The age group 19–29 have significantly higher Rasch-scores in three scales than respondents in the other two age categories. Conclusions Overweight and obesity have a considerable impact on the societal costs and on health-related quality of life. The results show that the impact of overweight and obesity go beyond the healthcare sector, as the other costs have the biggest share of the total costs. Another interesting finding of this study is that obesity leads to significant higher costs and lower health-related quality of life than overweight. These findings draw attention to policy making, as collective prevention and effective treatment are needed to reduce this burden.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (S10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Kruse ◽  
Franziska Maier ◽  
Katharina Bürger ◽  
Richard Dodel ◽  
Andreas Fellgiebel ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-36
Author(s):  
Setiani Setiani ◽  
◽  
Imram Radne Rimba ◽  
Eliza Dwinta ◽  
◽  
...  

Stroke termasuk dalam penyakit katarostropik yang dapat mengancam jiwa, dan memiliki resiko tinggi serta membutuhan pertolongan segera. Stroke dapat menyebabkan penderitanya memiliki faktor resiko morbiditas seusia hidupnya yang dapat menimbulkan Burden disease sehingga menyebabkan kematian, cedera, hilangnya produktifitas dan membutuhkan biaya penanganan yang cukup tinggi. Tujuan utama dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui total biaya perawatan dan selisish biaya perawatan stroke iskemik dan stroke hemoragik pasien rawat inap di RSUD Panembahan Senopati Bantul. Penelitian ini menggunakan rancangan penelitian deskriptif analitik non-eksperimental dengan pendekatan cross sectional study menurut perspektif penyedia layanan kesehatan (provider). Biaya yang diperhitungkan adalah biaya langsung (direct cost) menggunakan pendekatan bottom up. Subyek penelitian adalah semua pasien stroke rawat inap yang terdaftar sebagai pasien umum di rumah sakit yang memenuhi kriteria inklusi. Data dianalisis menggunakan software Excel dan SPSS. Hasil penelitian melibatkan 50 sampel yang terdiri dari 32 pasien stroke iskemik dan 18 pasien stroke hemoragik menunjukan dengan analisis regresi linear variabel bebas berpengaruh terhadap biaya stroke sebesar 49,1%. Lama rawat inap menjadi faktor yang paling berpengaruh terhadap tingginya biaya dengan nilai p 0,00 (<0,05). Total direct health cost perawatan stroke adalah sebesar Rp151.633.600,00 Sedangkan material cost sebesar Rp113.954.918,00. Total rata-rata biaya stroke iskemik Rp4.625.511.006, stroke hemoragik Rp6.531.786.277 dengan selisih Rp1.906.275.271.


Author(s):  
Jalal Dahham ◽  
Rana Rizk ◽  
Mickaël Hiligsmann ◽  
Caroline Daccache ◽  
Samia J. Khoury ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Divya Chaudhary ◽  
Bhargav Bhat ◽  
Gemma E Shields ◽  
Linda M Davies ◽  
Jonathan Green ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The economic burden of autism is substantial and includes a range of costs, including healthcare, education, productivity losses, informal care and respite care, among others. In India, approximately, 2 million children aged 2-9 years have autism. Given the likely substantial burden of illness and the need to identify effective and cost-effective interventions, this research aimed to produce a comprehensive cost of illness inventory (COII) suitable for children with autism in South Asia (India) to support future research. Methods A structured and iterative design process was followed to create the COII, including literature reviews, interviews with caregivers, pilot testing and translation. Across the development of the COII, thirty-two families were involved in the design and piloting of the tool. The COII was forward translated (from English to Hindi) and back translated. Each stage of the process of development of the COII resulted in the further refinement of the tool. Results Domains covered in the final COII include education, childcare, relocation, healthcare contacts (outpatient, inpatient, medical emergencies, investigations and medication), religious retreats and rituals, specialist equipment, workshops and training, special diet, support and care, certification, occupational adjustments and government rebates/schemes. Administration and completion of the COII determined it to be feasible to complete in 35 minutes by qualified and trained researchers. The final COII is hosted by REDCap Cloud and is a bilingual instrument (Hindi and English). Conclusions The COII was developed using experiences gathered from an iterative process in a metropolitan area within the context of one low- and middle-income country (LMIC) setting, India. Compared to COII tools used for children with autism in high-income country settings, additional domains were required, such as complimentary medication (e.g. religious retreats and homeopathy). The COII will allow future research to quantify the cost of illness of autism in India from a broad perspective and will support relevant economic evaluations. Understanding the process of developing the questionnaire will help researchers working in LMICs needing to adapt the current COII or developing similar questionnaires.


Vaccine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoana Ivanova-Markova ◽  
Almudena González-Domínguez ◽  
Alvaro Hidalgo ◽  
Raquel Sánchez ◽  
Nuria García-Agua ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lena Schnitzler ◽  
Louise J. Jackson ◽  
Aggie T. G. Paulus ◽  
Tracy E. Roberts ◽  
Silvia M. A. A. Evers

Abstract Background Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and HIV can generate costs both within and outside the health sector (i.e. intersectoral costs). This systematic review aims (i) to explore the intersectoral costs associated with STIs and HIV considered in cost-of-illness (COI) studies, (ii) to categorise and analyse these costs according to cost sectors, and (iii) to illustrate the impact of intersectoral costs on the total cost burden. Methods Medline (PubMed), EMBASE (Ovid), Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EconLit and NHS EED were searched between 2009 and 2019. Key search terms included terms for cost-of-illness, cost analysis and all terms for STIs including specific infections. Studies were included that assessed intersectoral costs. A standardised data extraction form was adopted. A cost component table was established based on pre-defined sector-specific classification schemes. Cost results for intersectoral costs were recorded. The quality of studies was assessed using a modified version of the CHEC-list. Results 75 COI studies were considered for title/abstract screening. Only six studies were available in full-text and eligible for data extraction and narrative synthesis. Intersectoral costs were captured in the following sectors: Patient & family, Informal care and Productivity (Paid Labour). Patient & family costs were addressed in four studies, including patient out-of-pocket payments/co-payments and travel costs. Informal care costs including unpaid (home) care support by family/friends and other caregiver costs were considered in three studies. All six studies estimated productivity costs for paid labour including costs in terms of absenteeism, disability, cease-to-work, presenteeism and premature death. Intersectoral costs largely contributed to the total economic cost burden of STIs and HIV. The quality assessment revealed methodological differences. Conclusions It is evident that intersectoral costs associated with STIs and HIV are substantial. If relevant intersectoral costs are not included in cost analyses the total cost burden of STIs and HIV to society is severely underestimated. Therefore, intersectoral costs need to be addressed in order to ensure the total economic burden of STIs and HIV on society is assessed, and communicated to policy/decision-makers.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamza Ismaila ◽  
James Avoka Asamani ◽  
Virgil Kuassi Lokossou ◽  
Ebenezer Oduro-Mensah ◽  
Juliet Nabyonga-Orem ◽  
...  

Abstract Background As the global strategies to fight the SARS-COV-2 infection (COVID-19) evolved, response strategies impacted the magnitude and distribution of health-related expenditures. Although the economic consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic has been dire, and its true scale is yet to be ascertained, one key component of the response is the management of infected persons which its cost has not been adequately examined, especially in Africa. Methods To fill gaps in context-specific cost of treating COVID-19 patients, we adopted a health system’s perspective and a bottom-up, point of care resource use data collection approach to estimate the cost of clinical management of COVID-19 infection in Ghana. The analysis was based on the national protocol for management of COVID-19 patients at the time, whether in public or private settings. No patients were enrolled into the study as it was entirely a protocol-based cost of illness analysis. Result We found that resource use and average cost of treatment per COVID-19 case varied significantly by disease severity level and treatment setting. The average cost of treating COVID-19 patient in Ghana was estimated to be US$11,925 (GH¢68,929) from the perspective of the health system; ranging from US$282 (GH¢1629) for patients with mild/asymptomatic disease condition managed at home to about US$23,382 (GH¢135,149) for critically ill patients requiring sophisticated and specialised care in hospitals. The cost of treatment increased by some 20 folds once a patient moved from home management to the treatment centre. Overheard costs accounted for 63–71% of institutionalised care compared to only 6% for home-based care. The main cost drivers in overhead category in the institutionalised care were personal protective equipment (PPEs) and transportation, whilst investigations (COVID-19 testing) and staff time for follow-up were the main cost drivers for home-based care. Conclusion Cost savings could be made by early detection and effective treatment of COVID-19 cases, preferably at home, before any chance of deterioration to the next worst form of the disease state, thereby freeing up more resources for other aspects of the fight against the pandemic. Policy makers in Ghana should thus make it a top priority to intensify the early detection and case management of COVID-19 infections.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document