scholarly journals Humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 infection among liver transplant recipients

Gut ◽  
2022 ◽  
pp. gutjnl-2021-326609
Author(s):  
Chiara Becchetti ◽  
Annelotte G C Broekhoven ◽  
Géraldine Dahlqvist ◽  
Montserrat Fraga ◽  
Marco Fabrizio Zambelli ◽  
...  

ObjectiveImmunosuppressive agents are known to interfere with T and/or B lymphocytes, which are required to mount an adequate serologic response. Therefore, we aim to investigate the antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 in liver transplant (LT) recipients after COVID-19.DesignProspective multicentre case–control study, analysing antibodies against the nucleocapsid protein, spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2 and their neutralising activity in LT recipients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19-LT) compared with immunocompetent patients (COVID-19-immunocompetent) and LT recipients without COVID-19 symptoms (non-COVID-19-LT).ResultsOverall, 35 LT recipients were included in the COVID-19-LT cohort. 35 and 70 subjects fulfilling the matching criteria were assigned to the COVID-19-immunocompetent and non-COVID-19-LT cohorts, respectively. We showed that LT recipients, despite immunosuppression and less symptoms, mounted a detectable antinucleocapsid antibody titre in 80% of the cases, although significantly lower compared with the COVID-19-immunocompetent cohort (3.73 vs 7.36 index level, p<0.001). When analysing anti-S antibody response, no difference in positivity rate was found between the COVID-19-LT and COVID-19-immunocompetent cohorts (97.1% vs 100%, p=0.314). Functional antibody testing showed neutralising activity in 82.9% of LT recipients (vs 100% in COVID-19-immunocompetent cohort, p=0.024).ConclusionsOur findings suggest that the humoral response of LT recipients is only slightly lower than expected, compared with COVID-19 immunocompetent controls. Testing for anti-S antibodies alone can lead to an overestimation of the neutralising ability in LT recipients. Altogether, routine antibody testing against separate SARS-CoV-2 antigens and functional testing show that the far majority of LT patients are capable of mounting an adequate antibody response with neutralising ability.

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. e13092 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Aniskevich ◽  
Ryan M. Chadha ◽  
Prith Peiris ◽  
Cemal Burcin Taner ◽  
Klaus L. Torp ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 146-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josh Levitsky ◽  
Joshua Miller ◽  
Edward Wang ◽  
Anne Rosen ◽  
Cathy Flaa ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 491-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iva Hojsak ◽  
Yaron Avitzur ◽  
Eitan Mor ◽  
Raanan Shamir ◽  
Yishay Haimi-Cohen ◽  
...  

Vox Sanguinis ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 111 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Burin des Roziers ◽  
C. Ibanez ◽  
D. Samuel ◽  
C. Francoz ◽  
S. Idri ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. e230096 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajiv Prakash Heda ◽  
Yolanda Savage ◽  
Satheesh P Nair ◽  
Rajanshu Verma

Liver transplant recipients are immunocompromised by the virtue of being on immunosuppressive agents which put them at risk of having infections from unusual and even multiple concomitant pathogens. We present a case of a 39-year-old man who developed septicaemia with Enterococcus casseliflavus, Streptococcus equinus and Klebsiella oxytoca in the setting of perinephric haematoma which resulted following a kidney biopsy performed to evaluate his nephrotic range proteinuria. E. casseliflavus has been known to cause infections in patients with liver disease/cirrhosis; however, simultaneous infection with S. equinus and K. oxytoca along with E. casseliflavus has never been reported earlier in post-transplant state.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document