scholarly journals Impact of anticoagulation therapy on valve haemodynamic deterioration following transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Heart ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 104 (10) ◽  
pp. 814-820 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Del Trigo ◽  
Antonio J Muñoz-García ◽  
Azeem Latib ◽  
Vincent Auffret ◽  
Harindra C Wijeysundera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Mean

ObjectiveTo evaluate the changes in transvalvular gradients and the incidence of valve haemodynamic deterioration (VHD) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), according to use of anticoagulation therapy.Methods and resultsThis multicentre study included 2466 patients (46% men; mean age 81±7 years) who underwent TAVR with echocardiography performed at 12-month follow-up. Anticoagulation therapy was used in 707 patients (28.7%) following TAVR (AC group). A total of 663 patients received vitamin K antagonists, and 44 patients received direct oral anticoagulants. A propensity score matching analysis was performed to adjust for intergroup (AC vs non-AC post-TAVR) differences. A total of 622 patients per group were included in the propensity-matched analysis. VHD was defined as a ≥10 mm Hg increase in the mean transprosthetic gradient at follow-up (vs hospital discharge). The mean clinical follow-up was 29±18 months. The mean transvalvular gradient significantly increased at follow-up in the non-AC group within the global cohort (P=0.003), whereas it remained stable over time in the AC group (P=0.323). The incidence of VHD was significantly lower in the AC group (0.6%) compared with the non-AC group (3.7%, P<0.001), and these significant differences remained within the propensity-matched populations (0.6% vs 3.9% in the AC and non-AC groups, respectively, P<0.001). The occurrence of VHD did not associate with an increased risk of all-cause death (P=0.468), cardiovascular death (P=0.539) or stroke (P=0.170) at follow-up.ConclusionsThe lack of anticoagulation therapy post-TAVR was associated with significant increments in transvalvular gradients and a greater risk of VHD. VHD was subclinical in most cases and did not associate with major adverse clinical events. Future randomised trials are needed to determine if systematic anticoagulation therapy post-TAVR would reduce the incidence of VHD.

scholarly journals Preprocedural circulating galectin-3 and the risk of mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong-liang Zhang ◽  
Guang-yuan Song ◽  
Jie Zhao ◽  
Yu-bin Wang ◽  
Mo-yang Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Galectin 3

Abstract Background: Galectin-3 may predict mortality for patients with aortic stenosis (AS) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, the results were inconsistent. We aimed to evaluate the association between baseline galectin and mortality after TAVR in a meta-analysis. Methods: Related follow-up studies were obtained by systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane’s Library, and Embase databases. Both the fixed- and the random-effect models were used for the meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the influences of study characteristics on the outcome. Results: Five prospective cohort studies with 854 patients were included, with a follow-up period between 1 and 1.9 years. Patients with higher baseline circulating galectin-3 had an increased risk of all-cause mortality after TAVR (random-effects model: risk ratio [RR]: 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19–2.23, P=0.002; fixed-effects model: RR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.19–2.20, P=0.002; I2 = 4%). Adjustment of estimated glomerular filtration rate (RR: 1.73, P=0.02) or B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal pro-BNP (RR: 1.83, P=0.02) did not significantly affect the result. A trend of stronger association between higher baseline circulating galectin-3 and increased risk of all-cause mortality after TAVR was observed in studies with an enzyme-linked fluorescent assay (ELFA) (RR: 3.04, P=0.003) compared with those with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (RR: 1.42, P=0.04; P for subgroup difference =0.06). Conclusion: Higher circulating galectin-3 before the procedure may predict all-cause mortality of AS patients after TAVR.

Abstract 15741: Long Term Survival Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From a Single US High Volume Center

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo O Escarcega ◽  
Rebecca Torguson ◽  
Marco A Magalhaes ◽  
Nevin C Baker ◽  
Sa’ar Minha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Long Term Mortality

Introduction: Mortality following Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been reported up to 5 years. However, mortality after 5 years remains unclear. Hypothesis: We aim to determine the mortality in patients undergoing TAVR >5 years follow up. Methods: From our institution’s prospectively collected TAVR database we analyzed all patients undergoing TAVR to a maximum follow up of 8 years. We divided our population into transapical TAVR (TA-TAVR) and transfemoral TAVR (TF-TAVR) groups. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was conducted. Results: A total of 511 patients who underwent TAVR were included in the analysis. Patients undergoing TA-TAVR had higher rates of peripheral vascular disease compared with TF-TAVR (56% vs 29%, p<0.001) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score (10.9 ± 4 vs 9.2 ± 4, p<0.001). TA-TAVR was associated with higher mortality at 1 year (32% vs 21%, p=0.01). However, there was no significant difference in very-long term mortality of patients undergoing TA-TAVR vs TF-TAVR (Figure). Conclusions: Long-term mortality following TAVR surpasses 50%. While in the first 2 years TA-TAVR is associated with higher mortality rates after three years the survival rates are similar in both approaches.

Utility of Suprasternal Transinnominate Artery for Alternate Access in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

2020 ◽  
pp. 155698452096765
Author(s):  
James H. Wudel ◽  
Sagar Damle ◽  
Joseph V. Petty ◽  
Anuradha Tunuguntla ◽  
Steven L. Martin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Access Site ◽  
Access Site Complication ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Transcatheter Heart Valve ◽  
The Mean

Objective Despite advancements in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) technology, alternate access strategies are still required when transfemoral access is unsuitable. In these often anatomically complex group of patients, we sought to evaluate the safety and feasibility of suprasternal transinnominate (TI) artery access for TAVR. Methods At our institution, 652 patients underwent TAVR from November 2011 through February 2020. Of these, 23 patients underwent TI TAVR via a 5-cm suprasternal incision without special instrumentation. Outcomes of interest were technical considerations, postoperative complications, and perioperative recovery in relation to established access strategies. Results The mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score was 8.6 ± 4.2 and the average age was 75 ± 8. All patients underwent TI TAVR using a self-expanding (12), or balloon-expandable (11) transcatheter heart valve. Average postoperative stay was 2 ± 0.7 days (range 2 to 4) with most 20/23 (87%) being discharged to home. There was no 30-day mortality or readmission. There was 1 access-site complication and 1 cerebrovascular accident within 30 days, both intraoperative, with excellent recovery. All patients had either trivial (19) or mild (4) aortic regurgitation on 30-day echocardiography. Conclusions TAVR via suprasternal TI access is feasible, safe, provides satisfactory perioperative recovery and adds to the options when patients require alternate access. Further data would be optimal to validate this single-center experience.

P6485Incremental prognostic value of electrocardiographic strain after transcatheter aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Heger ◽  
B Marchandot ◽  
M Kibler ◽  
M Peillex ◽  
A Trimaille ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Adverse Outcome ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Strain Pattern ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve

Abstract Background Electrocardiographic (ECG) strain pattern has recently been associated with increased adverse outcome in aortic stenosis (AS) and after surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). However, the relation linking ECG strain and cardiovascular MACE in patients with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has not been yet described. Objectives The aim of our study was to determine the impact and incremental value of ECG Strain pattern in predicting adverse outcome after TAVR. Methods 585 patients with severe AS (mean age: 83±7 male 39.8%) were enrolled from November 2012 to May 2018. ECG strain pattern was defined as ≥1 mm concave down-sloping ST-segment depression and asymmetrical T-wave inversion in the lateral leads. Patients with baseline left bundle branch block (LBBB), right bundle branch block (RBBB) or ventricular paced rhythm were excluded. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) before TAVR and at 30 days follow up. The primary endpoints of the study were the overall all-cause mortality after TAVR, rehospitalization for Hearth failure (HF), myocardial infarction and stroke. Results 178 (30.4%) patients were excluded from analyses owing to the presence of either LBBB (n=103) or RBBB (n=75). Among the 407 remaining patients, 106 had ECG strain pattern (26.04%). Patients with ECG strain were significantly younger (81.6±8 years vs 83.5±6.8 years; p=0.022), had lower BMI (23±4.5 kg.m2 vs 27.9±6.8 kg.m2; p=0.02) more severe AS (mean gradient 52.3±15.2 mmHg vs 47.9±11.8 mmHg; p=0.003), significant lower LVEF (51.8±15% vs 58.4±10.7%; p<0.001). Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) was more frequent in patients with ECG Strain (indexed left ventricular mass (135.9±33.4 g.m2 vs 123.6±31.9 g.m2; p=0.002)). Death from any cause (22 (20.8%) vs 61 (20.3%); p=0.508) did not differ significantly between groups. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including death, stroke and heart failure at 1 month showed similar incidence (7 (6.6%) vs 17 (5.6%), p=0.439). Rehospitalization for hearth failure (HF) was significantly higher (33 (31.1%) vs 33 (11%); p<0.001) in patients with ECG strain pattern. In univariate model, ECG Strain was a strong predictor of rehospitalization for HF (HR 2.621 95% CI (1.607–4.277), p=0.001), independently of LVH assessed either by ECG criteria (HR 1.181 95% CI (0.698–1.997; p=0.536) or TTE (HR 1.557 95% (CI 0.701–3.458; p=0.277). ECG Strain remained associated with a higher risk of rehospitalization for hearth failure in multivariate analyses (HR 2.747 95% (CI 1.614- 4.674); p<0.001) Conclusion In patients with AS eligible for TAVR, ECG Strain Pattern is frequent and associated with an increased risk of post interventional heart failure regardless of preoperative LVH. ECG Strain pattern represents an easy, objective, reliable and low-cost tool to identify patients who may benefit from an extend and intensified post-interventional follow-up.

scholarly journals Comparative efficacy and safety of antithrombotic therapy for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 965-976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuexin Zhu ◽  
Ziyuan Zou ◽  
Yusi Huang ◽  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Huiting Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Antithrombotic Therapy ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Transcatheter Aortic Valve ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract OBJECTIVES We sought to determine the optimal antithrombotic therapy after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. METHODS Related scientific databases were searched until December 2018. We conducted a pairwise and a network meta-analysis within a frequentist framework, measuring 30-day bleeding, stroke and all-cause mortality. The surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curve was estimated to rank the therapies. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was performed. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018111163). RESULTS Eight studies comprising 2173 patients were analysed. The risk of 30-day bleeding was higher for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) than single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) [odds ratio (OR) 1.90 (1.10–3.28); P = 0.02], whereas there was no difference in the risk of 30-day stroke [OR 1.27 (0.38–4.20); P = 0.69] and mortality [OR 1.46 (0.67–3.22); P = 0.34] between DAPT and SAPT. In the network meta-analysis, DAPT + oral anticoagulant (OAC) increased the risk of 30-day bleeding compared with SAPT [OR 6.21 (1.74–22.17); P = 0.005], DAPT [OR 3.27 (1.04–10.32); P = 0.043], SAPT + OAC [OR 4.87 (2.51–9.45); P &lt; 0.001] and OAC [OR 14.4 (1.3–154.7); P = 0.028]. Additionally, patients receiving DAPT + OAC had the highest risks for 30-day bleeding (SUCRA 1.0%). OAC seemed to be superior to SAPT and DAPT in terms of 30-day bleeding (SUCRA OAC: 86.3%, SAPT: 72.3%, DAPT: 32.3%) and stroke (SUCRA 54.2%, 47.4%, 40.5%), but not mortality (SUCRA 69.6%, 74.1%, 43.4%). CONCLUSIONS There is a trend towards less bleeding with the application of SAPT, but no mortality benefit with the application of DAPT is shown. The comparison of SAPT, DAPT and OAC shows that OAC may improve the balance between stroke and bleeding, which can reduce the risk of mortality. In addition, the application of DAPT + OAC was ranked the worst amongst all treatment modalities and should be avoided due to an increased risk of bleeding. Clinical trial registration number PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, CRD42018111163).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document