Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a meta-analysis evaluating reproductive and obstetrical outcomes after administration of chemotherapy

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 1021-1031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastasios Tranoulis ◽  
Dimitra Georgiou ◽  
Ahmad Sayasneh ◽  
John Tidy

IntroductionGestational trophoblastic neoplasia represents a rare placental malignancy spectrum that is treated with single- or multi-agent chemotherapy. This disease often impacts women of childbearing age, making post-chemotherapy fertility and obstetrical outcomes an important consideration. We aimed to ascertain the pregnancy rates and obstetric outcomes in women with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia after undergoing treatment with chemotherapy.MethodsA systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies that reported post-chemotherapy fertility and obstetric outcomes among women with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. We performed a single-proportion meta-analysis for the outcomes of conception/pregnancy rate, term live birth rate, first and second trimester spontaneous abortions rate, stillbirth rate, premature delivery rate, and fetal/neonatal malformation rate.ResultsA total of 27 studies were included in the analysis. The median age ranged between 25.5 and 33.1 years. The pregnancy rate among women with a desire to conceive, comprising a total of 1329 women and 1192 pregnancies, was 86.7% (95% CI 80.8% to 91.6%). The term live birth rate in 6752 pregnancies was 75.84% (95% CI 73.4% to 78.2%). The adverse pregnancy outcomes were seemingly comparable to those of the general population apart from a minor increase in the stillbirth rate. The pooled proportion for the outcome of malformation rate was 1.76% (95% CI 1.3% to 2.2%). The repeat mole rate in 6384 pregnancies was 1.28% (95% CI 0.95% to 1.66%). Subsequent sub-group analysis indicated that neither multi-agent chemotherapy nor conception within 12 months post-chemotherapy increased the adverse obstetric events risk or fetal malformations.ConclusionsNearly 90% of patients desiring future fertility after chemotherapy for gestational trophoblastic disease were able to conceive. In addition, adverse pregnancy outcomes were similar to that in the general population. Multi-agent chemotherapy does not seemingly increase the malformation rate.

2019 ◽  
Vol 105 (4) ◽  
pp. 1009-1019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaodong Sun ◽  
Ningning Hou ◽  
Hongsheng Wang ◽  
Lin Ma ◽  
Jinhong Sun ◽  
...  

Abstract Context Thyroid autoimmunity (TAI), the most common cause of (sub)clinical hypothyroidism, is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. The benefits of levothyroxine (LT4) intervention in women with TAI remain controversial. Objective The purpose of this analysis is to determine the effect of LT4 on pregnancy outcomes in euthyroid women with TAI. Data sources Databases were searched up to May 2019. Study selection Randomized controlled trails (RCTs) and retrospective studies that reported effects of LT4 administration on pregnancy outcomes in euthyroid women with TAI were screened. Data extraction Quality assessment and data extraction were conducted independently by 2 researchers. Conflicts were settled by a third researcher. Data synthesis Six trials comprising 2249 women were included. Overall, no beneficial effect on pregnancy outcomes was observed with LT4 supplementation. For women with individualized initial LT4 dosages, the risk of miscarriage decreased (relative risk [RR] 0.62, 95% CI: 0.41-0.93, I2 = 28%); there was no difference among women with fixed LT4 dosages (RR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.74-1.24, I2 = 0%). Women who initiated LT4 treatment in early pregnancy had a significantly lower preterm birth rate (RR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.31-0.92, I2 = 0%) than those who received no treatment or placebo. No improvement was observed among women who initiated treatment before conception (RR 1.14, 95% CI: 0.71-1.84, I2 = 0%). Conclusion No definitive evidence showed improvement of pregnancy outcomes with LT4 supplementation in euthyroid women with TAI. However, therapeutic strategies, especially dosages and initial times of intervention, may be of great importance. Additional large RCTs are needed in the future.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramia BENHAMOU ◽  
Meriem Chettati ◽  
Wafaa Fadili ◽  
Inass Laouad

Abstract Background and Aims Outcomes of pregnancy in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have long been considered to be extremely poor, and the literature concerning pregnancy while on dialysis is rather meagre. We reported our center experience about pregnancy management in patients on hemodialysis: how to deal with hypertension, ultrafiltration rate, dose dialysis in order to improve maternal and fetal outcome. Method We reported pregnancy outcomes of 7 pregnancies in the Tensift Region Pregnancy registry between March 2015 and March. 2019 The primary outcome was the live birth rate and secondary outcomes included gestational age and birth weight. Results We reported 7 pregnant women cases on hemodialysis. Mean age of our patients was 29,5 ±6,57 years. It was the first pregnancy for 3 patients (42,9%). In about half of patients dialysis was initiated during their pregnancy. The mean duration of pregnancy was 35±1,2 weeks and mean fetal weight was 1,950 ±0,353 kg. All patients were dialyzed over 20 hours per week. The mean urea value was 0,46 ±0,04g/L. Two patients needed anti hypertensive drugs (33,3%) mainly nicardipine. The live birth rate of our cohort (71,4%), all vaginal delivery, was significantly higher than the rate in the American cohort (61.4%). In your series we reported one fetal death at 28 SA explained by tocolysis failure for preterm labor. At 9 months all children had good cognitive and psychomotor involvement. Conclusion We conclude that pregnancy may be safe and feasible in women with ESRD receiving intensive hemodialysis. A multidisciplinary medical care with obstetricians is highly recommended. Despite a trend of increasing live birth rate over recent decades, pregnancies on dialysis high risk, with increased rates of adverse of adverse pregnancy outcomes including pregnancy loss.


Rheumatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenhui Xie ◽  
Hong Huang ◽  
Lanlan Ji ◽  
Zhuoli Zhang

Abstract Objective Psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are inflammatory diseases that affect women in their reproductive years. We aimed to investigate whether maternal psoriasis and PsA are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Methods We searched multiple electronic databases from inception to 3 August 2020, and reference lists of selected articles. Observational studies reporting at least one pregnancy outcomes in women with psoriasis or PsA with a comparator of general population or healthy subjects were included. Data were pooled by random-effects models and expressed as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Overall, 16 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled analyses showed pregnant women with psoriatic diseases have significantly higher risk of adverse maternal outcomes compared with general population (caesarean delivery: 1.33 (1.17-1.52); preterm birth: 1.32 (1.15-1.52); (pre)eclampsia: 1.28 (1.14-1.43); gestational diabetes: 1.19 (1.10-1.30); gestational hypertension: 1.30 (1.18-1.44). However, no statistically increased risks of fetal complications were observed in women with psoriatic diseases (small for gestational age: 1.02 (0.93-1.11); low birth weight: 1.15 (0.93-1.42); congenital malformations: 1.03 (0.93-1.14); Apgar score <7: 1.07 (0.81-1.39); neonatal mortality: 1.13 (0.90-1.43); stillbirth: 1.19 (0.95-1.50)). Subgroup analysis found similar results in women with either psoriasis or PsA regarding maternal outcomes and the magnitude of risk estimates seems to be greater in PsA though without statistical difference. Conclusions Pregnant women with psoriasis and PsA have excess risk of adverse maternal events, but not adverse neonatal events. Close monitoring of the mothers’ clinical status before and during pregnancy is decidedly required in daily practice.


Author(s):  
Peng-Sheng Zheng ◽  
Shan Li ◽  
Jing Jing He

Background Parental abnormal chromosomal karyotypes are considered as reasons for recurrent pregnancy loss. Objective This systematic meta-analysis evaluated the current evidence on pregnancy outcomes amongst couples with abnormal versus normal chromosomal karyotypes. Search strategy Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts identified in EMBASE and PubMed from inception to January 2021. Selection criteria Studies were included if they provided a description of pregnancy outcomes of parental chromosomal abnormality. Data collection and analysis Random effects meta-analysis was used to compare odds of pregnancy outcomes associated with noncarriers and carriers. Main results A significantly lower first pregnancy live birth rate (FPLBR) was found in carriers than in noncarriers with RPL (OR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.46-0.65; p<0.00001). Regarding FPLBR between translocation or inversion carriers and noncarriers, a markedly decreased FPLBR was found in translocation (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.31–0.61; p<0.00001) but not inversion carriers. The accumulated live birth rate (ALBR) (OR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.90–1.03; p=0.26) was similar, while the miscarriage rate (MR) of accumulated pregnancies (OR: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.69–2.89; p<0.00001) was significantly higher in the carriers than in noncarriers with RPL. The ALBR was not significant (OR: 1.82; 95% CI: 0.38–8.71; p=0.45) but the MR (OR: 5.75; 95% CI: 2.57–12.86; p<0.0001) was markedly lower for carriers who choose PGD than natural conception. Conclusions Carriers with RPL had higher risk of miscarriage but obtained a satisfying pregnancy outcome through multiple attempts. No sufficient evidence was found PGD could enhance the ALBR but it was an alternative to decrease the MR.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 287.2-287
Author(s):  
W. Xie ◽  
H. Huang ◽  
Z. Zhang

Background:Psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are inflammatory diseases that affect women in their reproductive years. The evidence regarding the pregnancy outcomes in psoriasis and PsA is more limited and conflicting, to a large extent, confusing our knowledge on this topic.Objectives:We aim to investigate whether maternal psoriasis and PsA are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes.Methods:We searched multiple electronic databases from inception to 3 August 2020, and reference lists of selected articles. Observational studies reporting at least one pregnancy outcomes in women with psoriasis or PsA with a comparator of general population or healthy subjects were included. Data were pooled by random-effects models (DerSimonian and Laird method) and expressed as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).Results:Overall, 16 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled analyses showed pregnant women with psoriatic diseases have significantly higher risk of adverse maternal outcomes compared with general population (caesarean delivery: 1.33 (1.17-1.52); preterm birth: 1.32 (1.15-1.52); (pre)eclampsia: 1.28 (1.14-1.43); gestational diabetes: 1.19 (1.10-1.30); gestational hypertension: 1.30 (1.18-1.44) (Figure 1). However, no statistically increased risks of fetal complications were observed in women with psoriatic diseases (small for gestational age: 1.02 (0.93-1.11); low birth weight: 1.15 (0.93-1.42); congenital malformations: 1.03 (0.93-1.14); Apgar score <7: 1.07 (0.81-1.39); neonatal mortality: 1.13 (0.90-1.43); stillbirth: 1.19 (0.95-1.50)). Subgroup analysis found similar results in women with either psoriasis or PsA regarding maternal outcomes, but the magnitude of risk estimates seems to be greater in PsA.Conclusion:Pregnant women with psoriasis and PsA have excess risk of adverse maternal events, with seemingly higher risk in women with PsA, but not adverse neonatal events. Close monitoring of the mothers’ clinical status before and during pregnancy are decidedly required in daily practice.Figure 1.Forest plots of the odds ratio for the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in patients with psoriatic diseases.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  

To date, there is no consensus in embryo developmental stages for cryopreservation. The present study aimed to investigate the impact of embryo developmental stages at cryopreservation on pregnancy outcomes of frozen embryo transfer. Systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant studies identified through MEDLINE literature search was performed. The primary outcome was live birth/delivery rate, and the secondary outcomes included implantation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and multiple pregnancy rate. The protocol of this systematic review has been registered on PROSPERO 2017 (registration number: CRD42017072828). Five studies met the eligibility criteria were included in the present review. The outcomes of embryos frozen at different stages but transferred at the same stage were analyzed and compared. Embryos frozen at non-blastocyst showed a significant higher delivery/live birth rate than those cryopreserved at blastocyst (odds ratio=1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.66) in the setting of frozen embryo transfer with blastocysts. There was only a limited number of studies with analyzable data for comparisons. The literature varied substantially in study design and methodology applied. Although a significant difference was observed toward an improved delivery/live birth rate for blastocyst transfer with embryos frozen at non-blastocyst stage, future studies are required to further corroborate this finding.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Zhang ◽  
Dandan Li ◽  
Heng Guo ◽  
Weina Wang ◽  
Xingang Li ◽  
...  

Background: Conflicting data exist regarding the influence of thiopurines exposure on adverse pregnancy outcomes in female patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Objective: The aim of this study was to provide an up-to-date and comprehensive assessment of the safety of thiopurines in pregnant IBD women. Methods: All relevant articles reporting pregnancy outcomes in women with IBD received thiopurines during pregnancy were identified from the databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov) with the publication data up to April 2020. Data of included studies were extracted to calculate the relative risk (RR) of multiple pregnancy outcomes: congenital malformations, low birth weight (LBW), preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA), and spontaneous abortion. The meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model. Results: Eight studies matched with the inclusion criteria and a total of 1201 pregnant IBD women who used thiopurines and 4189 controls comprised of women with IBD received drugs other than thiopurines during pregnancy were included. Statistical analysis results demonstrated that the risk of preterm birth was significantly increased in the thiopurine-exposed group when compared to IBD controls (RR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.00-1.79; p=0.049; I 2 =41%), while no statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of other adverse pregnancy outcomes. Conclusion: Thiopurines’ use in women with IBD during pregnancy is not associated with congenital malformations, LBW, SGA, or spontaneous abortion, but appears to have an association with an increased risk of preterm birth.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Magnus Bein ◽  
Oriana Hoi Yun Yu ◽  
Sonia Marzia Grandi ◽  
Francesca Y. E. Frati ◽  
Ihab Kandil ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Levothyroxine replacement therapy may decrease the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH). The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the risk of adverse pregnancy, perinatal, and early childhood outcomes among women with SCH treated with levothyroxine. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted using Ovid-Medline, Ovid-EMBASE, Pubmed (non-Medline), Ebsco-CINAHL Plus with full text and Cochrane Library databases. Randomized controlled studies (RCTs) and observational studies examining the association between treatment of SCH during pregnancy and our outcomes of interest were included. Studies that compared levothyroxine treatment versus no treatment were eligible for inclusion. Data from included studies were extracted and quality assessment was performed by two independent reviewers. Results Seven RCTs and six observational studies met our inclusion criteria. A total of 7342 individuals were included in these studies. RCTs demonstrated several sources of bias, with lack of blinding of the participants or research personnel; only one study was fully blinded. In the observational studies, there was moderate to serious risk of bias due to lack of adjustment for certain confounding variables, participant selection, and selective reporting of results. Pooled analyses showed decreased risk of pregnancy loss (RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.67 to 0.93) and neonatal death (RR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.72) associated with levothyroxine treatment during pregnancy among women with SCH. There were no associations between levothyroxine treatment and outcomes during labour and delivery, or cognitive status in children at 3 or 5 years of age. Conclusion Treatment of SCH with levothyroxine during pregnancy is associated with decreased risks of pregnancy loss and neonatal death. Given the paucity of available data and heterogeneity of included studies, additional studies are needed to address the benefits of levothyroxine use among pregnant women with SCH.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document