scholarly journals Less frequently mutated genes in colorectal cancer: evidences from next-generation sequencing of 653 routine cases

2016 ◽  
Vol 69 (9) ◽  
pp. 767-771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umberto Malapelle ◽  
Pasquale Pisapia ◽  
Roberta Sgariglia ◽  
Elena Vigliar ◽  
Maria Biglietto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Somatic Mutations ◽  
Gene Mutations ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Genomic Landscape ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing Ngs ◽  
Pcr Targeting ◽  
Diagnostic Setting ◽  
Generation Sequencing

AimsThe incidence of RAS/RAF/PI3KA and TP53 gene mutations in colorectal cancer (CRC) is well established. Less information, however, is available on other components of the CRC genomic landscape, which are potential CRC prognostic/predictive markers.MethodsFollowing a previous validation study, ion-semiconductor next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed to process 653 routine CRC samples by a multiplex PCR targeting 91 hotspot regions in 22 CRC significant genes.ResultsA total of 796 somatic mutations in 499 (76.4%) tumours were detected. Besides RAS/RAF/PI3KA and TP53, other 12 genes showed at least one mutation including FBXW7 (6%), PTEN (2.8%), SMAD4 (2.1%), EGFR (1.2%), CTNNB1 (1.1%), AKT1 (0.9%), STK11 (0.8%), ERBB2 (0.6%), ERBB4 (0.6%), ALK (0.2%), MAP2K1 (0.2%) and NOTCH1 (0.2%).ConclusionsIn a routine diagnostic setting, NGS had the potential to generate robust and comprehensive genetic information also including less frequently mutated genes potentially relevant for prognostic assessments or for actionable treatments.

scholarly journals Prevalence and coexistence of KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, NRAS, TP53, and APC mutations in Indian colorectal cancer patients: Next-generation sequencing–based cohort study

Tumor Biology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 101042831769226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayank Jauhri ◽  
Akanksha Bhatnagar ◽  
Satish Gupta ◽  
Manasa BP ◽  
Sachin Minhas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Gene Mutations ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Kras Mutations ◽  
Pik3ca Mutations ◽  
Potential Biomarker ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients ◽  
Generation Sequencing

Colorectal cancer incidences are on a rise in India. In this study, we have analyzed the mutation frequencies of six potential biomarkers, their coexistence, association with clinicopathological characteristics, and tumor location in Indian colorectal cancer patients. Next-generation sequencing was performed to identify mutations in the six potential biomarker genes using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks of 112 colorectal cancer patients. The mutation frequency observed in KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, NRAS, TP53, and APC was 35.7%, 7.1%, 16.1%, 6.3%, 39.3%, and 29.5%, respectively. The significant associations of mutations were KRAS with age less than 60 years (p = 0.041), PIK3CA with males (p = 0.032), tumor stage I–II (p = 0.013), lack of metastasis in lymph nodes (p = 0.040), NRAS with rectum (p = 0.002), and APC with T2 stage of tumor growth (p = 0.013). No single patient harbored mutations in these six genes or any five genes simultaneously. Significance was noted in coexistence of KRAS with APC (p = 0.024) and mutual exclusion of KRAS with BRAF (p = 0.029). PIK3CA exon 9 was observed to be more frequently associated with KRAS mutations than PIK3CA exon 20 (p = 0.072). NRAS mutations were mutually exclusive with BRAF and PIK3CA mutations. As per our knowledge, this is the first next-generation sequencing–based biomarker study in Indian colorectal cancer patients. Frequent coexistence of gene mutations in pairs and triplets suggests that synergistic effect of overlapping mutations might further trigger the disease. In addition, infrequent coexistence of multiple gene mutations hints toward different signaling pathways for colorectal cancer tumorigenesis.

scholarly journals Comparison of KRAS mutation analysis of colorectal cancer samples by standard testing and next-generation sequencing

2014 ◽  
Vol 67 (9) ◽  
pp. 764-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nishi Kothari ◽  
Michael J Schell ◽  
Jamie K Teer ◽  
Timothy Yeatman ◽  
David Shibata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Illumina Platform ◽  
Kras Mutations ◽  
Standard Testing ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing Ngs ◽  
Generation Sequencing

AimsBased on KRAS testing, the subset of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) that could benefit from anti-EGFR therapy can be better delineated. Though KRAS testing has become significantly more prevalent over the last few years, methods for testing remain heterogeneous and discordance has been reported between methods.MethodsIn this study, we examined a CRC patient population and compared KRAS testing done in Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) approved laboratories as part of standard clinical care and by next-generation sequencing (NGS) using the Illumina platform. Discordances were further evaluated with manual review of the NGS testing.ResultsOut of 468 CRC patient samples, 77 had KRAS testing done by both CLIA assay and NGS. There were concordant results between testing methodologies in 74 out of 77 patients, or 96% (95% CI 89% to 99%). There were three patient samples that showed discordant results between the two methods of testing. Upon further investigation of the NGS results for the three discordant cases, one sample showed a low level of the mutation seen in the standard testing, one sample showed low tumour fraction and a third did not show any evidence of the mutation that was found with the standard assay. Five patients had KRAS mutations not typically tested with standard testing.ConclusionsOverall there was a high concordance rate between NGS and standard testing for KRAS. However, NGS revealed mutations that are not tested for with standard KRAS assays that might have clinical impact with regards to the role for anti-EGFR therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document