scholarly journals 280 Clinical outcomes of immunotherapy continued beyond radiographic progression in older adults with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A304-A304
Author(s):  
Eric Singhi ◽  
Frank Mott ◽  
Michelle Worst ◽  
Cheuk Hong Leung ◽  
Jack Lee ◽  
...  

BackgroundWhile the clinical outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) use in older adults with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been described, the role of ICI use continued beyond disease progression (BDP) remains to be well defined for this population. This retrospective single-center study explored the clinical outcomes of continuing ICIs BDP among older adult patients with advanced NSCLC.MethodsUsing MD Anderson’s Gemini Lung Cancer database, we retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcomes of older adults (≥70 years) diagnosed with advanced-stage NSCLC treated with anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy from March 2015 through April 2019 to correlate clinicopathologic features with clinical outcomes. Clinical therapy responses were evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1). Toxicities were assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5. Patients treated BDP were defined as individuals receiving ICIs for ≥8 weeks prior to documentation of progression who subsequently remained on ICIs for ≥6 weeks.ResultsOf the 159 older adults meeting the inclusion criteria, 33 (21%) received ICIs BDP (64% male, median age 74.9 years (70.1–82.0) at the start of ICI treatment, 3 received first-line ICI therapy). Most patients were former (85%) or current (6%) smokers. 79% had adenocarcinoma histology. The median duration of immunotherapy continued BDP was 7.1 months (95% CI: 3.0–8.2). After a follow-up of 30.1 months, the median overall survival (mOS) was 31.5 months (95% CI: 16.5-not reached). Eight (24%) received local consolidative radiotherapy with a median duration of ICI BDP of 8.2 months (95% CI: 1.9–13.3). Twenty-five (76%) did not receive local consolidative therapy and achieved a median duration of ICI BDP of 4.1 months (95% CI: 2.3–7.8). Six (18%) exhibited pseudo-progression (i.e. delayed response to immunotherapy with decreased tumor burden on subsequent radiologic studies), with 4 achieving ”stable disease” as best response and 2 achieving a partial response. The median duration of immunotherapy continued beyond pseudo-progression was 11.7 months (95% CI: 7.1–35.7), and the mOS was 26.2 months (95% CI: 16.5–40.0). Patients treated with ICI BDP most commonly experienced fatigue (18%), pneumonitis (12%), rash (9%), and hypothyroidism (9%). Three patients (9%) experienced grade 3 or higher toxicities (one grade 3 arthralgias and two grade 3 pneumonitis).ConclusionsICI-use BDP in older adults with advanced NSCLC may benefit a subset of patients. Additionally, local consolidative therapy with radiation may offer prolonged duration of ICI treatment.AcknowledgementsSupported by the generous philanthropic contributions to The University of Texas MD Anderson Lung Moon Shot Program and the MD Anderson Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA01667. Special acknowledgment to the GEMINI team.Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved and conducted in accordance with the institutional review board at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; approval number (PA13-0589).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18591-e18591
Author(s):  
Jamie Vraney ◽  
Neda AlRawashdh ◽  
Briana Choi ◽  
Ivo Abraham ◽  
Ali McBride

e18591 Background: Pegfilgrastim is recommended to be administered 24 hours after myelosuppressive chemotherapy (CTX) as prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced (febrile) neutropenia (CIN/FN). Recent studies have yielded equivocal data on same day versus next day administration of pegfilgrastim. There has been limited real world evidence addressing lung cancer (LC) patients and the use of same day pegfilgrastim. We evaluated our own institutional data on the safety of same day pegfilgrastim administration in LC patients. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed by searching electronic health records using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes corresponding with a lung cancer diagnosis between November 1, 2013 and August 31, 2018 at The University of Arizona Cancer Center (UACC). Patients included in the study were 18 years of age or older, diagnosed with biopsy-confirmed lung cancer, treated at UACC, and receiving chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim on the same day. The outcomes of interest included FN incidence after the first cycle and across all cycles of CTX, CIN grade 3/4 and CTX dose delays or hospitalizations due to CIN/FN after first cycle and across all cycles of CTX. Results: 1,181 patient records were reviewed and 114 patients met the inclusion criteria; 87 (76%) patients had non-small cell LC and 27 (24%) patients had small cell LC. The median age was 68 years, 52% of patients had cancer stage of 3 to 4, and 63% of patients had 0-1 ECOG status. The FN risk assessment was mild in 72% of patients. The mean (SD) of baseline absolute neutrophil count was 5.68 (3.09). In total 384 CTX cycles were received. The table shows the results of all intended outcomes. One patient experienced FN after the first cycle of CTX of irinotecan and 5 patients developed 6 FN episodes across all cycles; 2 patients were on carboplatin etoposide; 1 patient on cisplatin etoposide; 1 patient on vinorelbine and 1 patient was on pemetrexed and then on irinotecan CTX when the two FN episodes were developed. Conclusions: This study showing that same day administration of pegfilgrastim was as effective as next day administration in LC patients, without warranting any concerns for febrile neutropenia or delayed engraftment. Utilization of same day pegfilgrastim, in light of biosimilars and COVID, provides a unique opportunity for cancer care without concerns for FN as stated in previous studies.[Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S2-S7
Author(s):  
Devlin V Smith ◽  
Stefani Gautreaux ◽  
Alison M Gulbis ◽  
Jeffrey J Bruno ◽  
Kevin Garey ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To describe the development, design, and implementation of a pilot preceptor development bootcamp and feedback related to its feasibility and impact on operational pharmacy preceptors. Summary The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center designed and implemented a pilot preceptor development bootcamp for operational staff pharmacists serving as residency preceptors for longitudinal weekend staffing experiences. A systematic, multipronged approach was taken to identify preceptor development gaps and design a full-day bootcamp curriculum. The resultant curriculum was comprised of content in major functional areas including using the 4 preceptor roles, documenting performance, giving and receiving feedback, and dealing with difficult situations or learners. The impact of the pilot preceptor development bootcamp was assessed using survey methodology and qualitative feedback from debrief discussions. Conclusion Implementation of a pilot preceptor bootcamp program addressing major areas of precepting skill was well received, resulted in positive feedback from operational pharmacy preceptors, and was feasible to implement at a large academic medical center.


Author(s):  
Lisa Nodzon, PhD, ARNP, AOCNP

Lisa Nodzon, PhD, ARNP, AOCNP®, of Moffitt Cancer Center, highlights new therapies in development for myelofibrosis that were discussed by Srdan Verstovsek, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, at the 2020 SOHO Annual Meeting.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S448-S448
Author(s):  
Bahgat Gerges ◽  
Joel Rosenblatt ◽  
Y-Lan Truong ◽  
Ruth Reitzel ◽  
Ray Y Hachem ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSIs) remain a significant medical problem for critically ill cancer patients who required catheters for extended durations. Minocycline (M) -Rifampin (R) loaded catheters have shown the greatest impact on reducing CLABSIs; however, there is a risk for developing antibiotic resistant organisms when exposed to catheters whose concentration becomes depleted below antimicrobially effective levels due to extended indwells. Chlorhexidine (CH) and M-R combination catheters (MRCH) have been proposed as a next generation catheter with improved performance. Here we studied whether bacteria that were Tetracycline and Rifampin resistant became resistant to MRCH when allowed to form biofilms on MRCH catheters depleted below antimicrobially effective MRCH concentrations. Methods Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of Tetracycline and/or Rifampin resistant stock isolates were measured by standard microbroth dilution methods. MRCH catheters were depleted to below antimicrobially effective concentrations by soaking in serum for 6 weeks. The resistant bacteria were then allowed to form biofilm for 24 hrs on the depleted catheters in broth. Following 24 hour incubation the adherent (breakthrough) bacteria were removed by sonication and MICs were remeasured. The same organisms grown on non-antimicrobial catheters were used as controls. Results MICs (ug/mL) of the organisms against each agent and the combination are tabulated below: MICs (ug/mL) of the organisms against each agent and the combination Conclusion The M and R resistant bacteria did not develop in vitro resistance to the MRCH combination after forming biofilms on MRCH catheters depleted below antimicrobially effective concentrations. Disclosures Joel Rosenblatt, PhD, Cook Medical (Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Inventor of the MRCH catheter technology which is owned by the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and has been licensed to Cook Medical)Novel Anti-Infective Technologies (Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Inventor of the MRCH catheter technology which is owned by the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and has been licensed to Cook Medical) Issam I. Raad, MD, Citius (Other Financial or Material Support, Ownership interest)Cook Medical (Grant/Research Support)Inventive Protocol (Other Financial or Material Support, Ownership interest)Novel Anti-Infective Technologies (Shareholder, Other Financial or Material Support, Ownership interest)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document