scholarly journals 502 Recommended phase 2 dose, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy of the IL-15 superagonist SO-C101 as monotherapy in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A534-A534
Author(s):  
Aurelien Marabelle ◽  
Stéphane Champiat ◽  
Vladimir Galvao ◽  
Aung Naing ◽  
Filip Janku ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
T Cell Activation ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Cell Activation ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dose Escalation Study

BackgroundSO-C101 is a superagonist fusion protein of IL-15 and the IL-15 receptor α sushi+ domain. SO-C101 was investigated in a multicenter, open-label, dose escalation study as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with selected advanced/metastatic tumors (NCT04234113).MethodsThe SO-C101 monotherapy part of the study followed a classical 3+3 dose escalation design. Study objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D).The evaluation period for dose-limiting toxicities in each dose step was 21 days. The RP2D was defined as MTD or below, also considering pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters.The study is ongoing (data cut-off 21 June 2021).ResultsThirty patients with a median of 3 (range 1–9) lines of previous systemic therapies were treated at doses 0.25, 0.75, 1.5, 3.0, 6.0., 9.0, 12.0, and 15 µg/kg. At 15 µg/kg, 2 of 3 patients had a dose-limiting toxicity (hyperbilirubinaemia grade [G] 4 and transaminase increase G3). The MTD was reached at 12 µg/kg. This dose was determined as the RP2D, supported by a dose-dependent increase in NK- and CD8+ T cell activation, the latter reaching a plateau at 12 µg/kg. SO-C101 plasma concentration increased dose-proportionally (Tmax was 5.5 hours and T1/2 was 4 hours).The most common adverse events (AEs) were G1 or G2 lymphopenia, local injection site reactions, transaminase increase, flu-like syndrome, and CRS-related symptoms such as fever and chills. Study drug-related AEs >G2 that occurred more than once were lymphopenia and transaminase increase. No treatment-related death was reported.One patient with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, who had previously progressed on cemiplimab, showed a partial response at 6.0 µg/kg (duration >4 months, target lesion decrease of 58%). After progression, the patient was put on combination treatment (SO-C101 and pembrolizumab) and again achieved a significant partial response. Two other patients treated with doses below the RP2D had confirmed stable disease for 6 and 15 weeks.At the RP2D, one patient out of 6 discontinued due to progression, while 5 are stable and receiving treatment (range 4–11 weeks).ConclusionsThe RP2D was defined at 12 µg/kg. SO-C101 administration induced a strong activation of peripheral NK and CD8+ T cells reproducible after each dosing. Related AEs were manageable and resolved quickly. Preliminary clinical efficacy signals including stable disease and partial response were observed in this heavily pretreated patient population. SO-C101 monotherapy has the potential to provide additional clinical benefit to patients with solid tumors.Trial RegistrationNCT04234113Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by the FDA (IND 140011) and by the Ethics Boards of participating institutions.

A phase 1, multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation, safety, pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic study of Q702 with a cohort expansion at the RP2D in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS2673-TPS2673
Author(s):  
Angela Tatiana Alistar ◽  
Anthony B. El-Khoueiry ◽  
Devalingam Mahalingam ◽  
Monica M. Mita ◽  
Hwankyu Kang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
T Cell Activation ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Study ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Cell Activation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Innate Immune ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Label Dose

TPS2673 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors directly targeting T cell activation have been successfully used in the treatment of various malignancies, nevertheless, the durable ORRs are low for certain indications. The low ORRs have been attributed to the immune suppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), composed of innate immune suppressive components such as tumor associated macrophages (TAM) and myeloid-derived suppression cells (MDSC). The potential contributions of innate immune modulation to anti-tumor immunity, suggest the need for the novel strategies to elicit a more efficient/robust immune response against the targeted malignant cells. Axl, Mer and CSF1R receptor tyrosine kinases play vital roles in promoting an immune suppressive TME by affecting TAM and MDSC populations and by decreasing antigen presentation on tumor cells. Q702 is a novel Axl/Mer/CSF1R inhibitor, able to modulate the TAM and MDSC population leading to CD8+ T cell activation and to increase antigen presentation of the tumor cells in syngeneic animal models. Q702, as a monotherapy, shows significant tumor growth inhibition in multiple syngeneic tumor models, and demonstrates synergistic effects with anti-PD-1 treatment particularly in high myeloid containing tumor models. Interestingly, intermittent administration of Q702 monotherapy demonstrates a more favorable immune cell population changes, possibly through preventing immune exhaustion secondary to negative feedback with continuous activation. These results suggest that Q702 monotherapy or in combination with existing therapies have a good potential to become a novel treatment strategy for patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: “A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-label, Dose-Escalation, Safety, Pharmacodynamic, Pharmacokinetic Study of Q702 with a Cohort Expansion at the RP2D in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors. (NCT04648254)” is open and recruiting patients at 4 US investigative sites. Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced or metastatic solid tumors, that have progressed following SOC or for which there is no SOC which confers clinical benefit are being enrolled in this study. The study follows a standard dose escalation. The study will enroll up to 78 patients. The primary endpoint is to establish safety, PK profile and define the recommended phase 2 dose. The secondary and exploratory endpoints include establishing pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship, potential biomarkers and preliminary anti-tumor activity. Clinical trial information: NCT04648254.

Phase I study of BPM 31510 in advanced solid tumors: Updated analysis of a novel treatment with promising activity.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3015-3015
Author(s):  
Andrew Eugene Hendifar ◽  
Sant P. Chawla ◽  
Doris Quon ◽  
Victoria S Chua ◽  
Lita Fernandez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Minor Response ◽  
Grade 3

3015 Background: BPM 31510 is a novel small molecule that targets the metabolic machinery of the cancer microenvironment to reverse the aerobic glycolytic phenotype of cancer cells. Effector downstream signaling results in re-capitulation of BCL-2 mediated apoptosis and disruption in tumor vasculature by modulation of VEGF. (NR Narain et al., Proceedings of AACR Meeting Abstracts 2011). Methods: A standard 3+3 phase I, dose-escalation study design was used in patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard treatment. Primary objectives were establishment of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety/pharmacokinetic (PK) correlates. Secondary objectives included exploratory pharmacodynamics (PD) and preliminary efficacy (RECIST-1.1) of BPM 31510 in sequential cohorts of 3 to 6 pts. Results: At time of submission, 34 patients with advanced cancer who had failed multiple chemotherapeutic regimens had been enrolled in 7 dose cohorts (ranging from 5.6 mg/kg to 78.2 mg/kg). Patients received a median of 2 cycles (1-7). 2 patients have had grade 3 elevation in PT/INR, otherwise there have been no grade 3/4 treatment related toxicities to date. The pharmacokinetics of BPM 31510 are linear and there were no sex differences in the parameters normalized by dose and body surface area. Tmax and Cmax are associated with the end of the infusion. The values for t1/2 ranged from 2.18 to 13.3 hr, with little or no dependence of t1/2 on dose. Objective tumor responses have been noted at the dose of 58.6mg/kg with 1 partial response (myxoid liposarcoma) and 1 minor response (pleomorphic sarcoma). Six patients (19%) have had disease stabilization (> 4 months). Conclusions: Interim data from this phase I study indicate that BPM 31510 is well tolerated with no dose limiting toxicities to date. A partial response and minor response were observed and correlates with dose escalation. Taken together, there is strong rationale for further clinical development of this compound as an anti-cancer agent.

A phase I study of Debio 0932, an oral HSP90 inhibitor, in patients with solid tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3026-3026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Isambert ◽  
Antoine Hollebecque ◽  
Yann Berge ◽  
Hein van Ingen ◽  
Silvano Brienza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Hsp90 Inhibitor ◽  
Treatment Withdrawal ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dose Escalation Study

3026 Background: Debio 0932 is an oral second-generation heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitor that has shown extended tumor retention, blood-brain-barrier penetration, and promising anti-tumor activity both as monotherapy and combination against a broad range of tumors in pre-clinical models. Here we report the results of the dose escalation part of a phase I study in patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma (NCT01168752). Methods: This was an open-label, non-randomized, 3 + 3 dose-escalation study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Debio 0932 when given QD or Q2D during the first 30 days of treatment in patients with advanced solid tumours or lymphoma resistant to standard therapy. The starting dose in both treatment groups was 50mg. Doses were increased according to an algorithm based on observed toxicity and dose limiting toxicities (DLT). Tumor assessments were performed every 8 weeks. Results: Patient characteristics and results are summarized below. DLTs occurred at 1600mg in both dose groups. Adverse events (AE) were mostly CTCAE grade 1 or 2, with no apparent dose relationship. No ocular or cardiac toxicity was observed. The main reason for treatment withdrawal was progressive disease. Investigator-reported cases of SD and PR were observed. Conclusions: Debio 0932 mono-therapy was generally well tolerated and showed promising signs of efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors. The recommended phase II dose, established at 1000mg QD, will be tested in an additional 30 patients in an ongoing expansion study. A phase I-II study of Debio 0932 in combination with standard of care in the first- and second-line treatment of NSCLC is planned. [Table: see text]

First-in-human (FIH) phase I study of GST-HG161, a potent and highly selective c-met inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumor.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16126-e16126
Author(s):  
Jin Li ◽  
Ye Guo ◽  
Junli Xue ◽  
Wenqiang Wu ◽  
Shikui Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Dose Cohort ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Met Inhibitor ◽  
Dose Levels

e16126 Background: GST-HG161 is an orally bioavailable novel potent and highly selective c-Met inhibitor, which displayed significant antitumor activity in preclinical models as well as very desirable pharmaceutical properties for oral dosing. Preclinical studies demonstrated that GST-HG161 has the potential to be effective in HCC patients with active c-Met signaling. Methods: This is an open label, first-in-human, single center, dose-escalation study (NCT04228406) utilizing an accelerated dose escalation design using single patient cohorts for the first two dose levels (60 and 150 mg) followed by a conventional 3+3 design at the 3rd dose cohort (300 mg). Dose escalation is expected to continue to the proposed 7th dose cohort (900 mg). The objective of the study is to determine the maximum tolerated dose and/or recommended Phase II dose, dose limiting toxicities (DLT), safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and preliminary signals of anticancer efficacy of GST-HG161 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Eligible patients are adults with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapies with confirmed c-Met positive. The definition of c-Met positive is a) IHC expression of c-Met (positive criteria: 1+ and above) and/or b) FISH amplification of c-Met and/or c) MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping. GST-HG161 is administered orally once-a-day starting on day 1 of each 21 days cycle. Results: To date, 6 patients (CRC 2, Gastric 1, NSCLC 1, HCC 1, Cholangiocarcinoma 1) were enrolled to 3 dose levels (60, 150, and 300 mg). Of these 6 patients, 4 had discontinued GST-HG161 treatment at the data cut-off date of Feb 1, 2020, due to progressive disease (3) and adverse event (1). Two patients at the 300 mg cohort are still on treatment. Overall, 4/6 patients showed no drug-related AEs > Grade 1. One patient reported a DLT: asymptomatic Grade 3 lipase elevation after a single dose of 60mg. To date, no other patients showed elevations of lipase and amylase. Bioanalysis of PK samples from study patients are currently ongoing. PK summary will be reported in the presentation. Conclusions: GST-HG161 has been well tolerated to date in study patients with a manageable safety profile. The dose escalation is expected to continue to the proposed 7th cohort at 900 mg. Clinical trial information: NCT04228406 .

A phase I, first-in-human, open-label, dose-escalation, safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic study of oral TP-1287 administered daily to patients with advanced solid tumors.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3611-3611
Author(s):  
Ben George ◽  
Donald A. Richards ◽  
William Jeffery Edenfield ◽  
Steven L Warner ◽  
Lars Mouritsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Grade 3

3611 Background: TP-1287 is a an orally bioavailable phosphate prodrug of alvocidib, a cyclin dependent kinase 9 (CDK9) inhibitor. TP-1287 exhibits potent inhibition of intracellular kinases including CDK9. Inhibition of CDK9 leads to downregulation of the BCL-2 family member, MCL-1, which in turn inhibits tumor growth in preclinical animal models of prostate, breast, and lung carcinomas. Methods: This is a multicenter, Phase 1, dose escalation study using a standard 3+3 design with a modified Fibonacci scheme to examine the safety and clinical activity of TP-1287 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients will be added at the maximum tolerated dose (i.e. expansion cohort) to test TP-1287 as a single agent in patients with castrate resistant prostate cancer. Results: Twenty-two patients who were enrolled between December 2018 and January 2020 received a range of doses from 1 mg QD to 11 mg BID over 7 cohorts. Data are available for 20 patients as of the data cutoff date. TP-1287 plasma PK Cmax and AUC increased in near linear fashion over cohorts 1 thru 6, reaching 80 ng/mL and 499.3 ng*h/mL in cohort 6 for Cmax and AUC, respectively. TP-1287 treatment resulted in dose-dependent reductions of phospho-RNA Pol II, consistent with CDK9 inhibition, as measured by a flow cytometric assay assessing pharmacodynamic changes in phosphorylation state in PBMCs. The most frequently observed Grade 3 AE was unrelated anemia in 2 patients. All other events of Grade 3 (9 events/7 patients) and Grade 4 (1 event/seizure with new CNS mets) were unlikely related or unrelated. Clinical benefit was seen in one sarcoma patient with PR (15+cycles), one RCC patient with SD (7+cycles) and 2 bladder cancer patients with SD (6 and 8 cycles). Conclusions: These findings suggest that TP-1287 is tolerated as a monotherapy in patients with heavily pretreated, relapsed, refractory solid tumors and further clinical development in selected indications is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT03298984 .

A phase I, open label, multicenter dose escalation study of AZD2811 nanoparticle in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3098-3098
Author(s):  
Melissa Lynne Johnson ◽  
Jan G. C. E. Cosaert ◽  
Gerald Steven Falchook ◽  
Suzanne Fields Jones ◽  
Donald Strickland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Mucosal Inflammation ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Total Blood ◽  
Aurora Kinase B

3098 Background: Aurora kinase B (AURKB) represents a potential target for therapy in solid and hematological malignancies. AURKB inhibitor AZD1152 (barasertib) was previously investigated in solid tumor pts in a phase I setting. AZD2811-nanoparticle (np) is a novel, encapsulated slow release AURKB inhibitor offering several advantages over AZD1152 (Ashton S et al., Sci Transl Med 2016). We report the completed dose-escalation safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), preliminary activity and defined maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of AZD2811-np in pts with advanced solid tumors (NCT02579226). Methods: Adult pts with advanced solid tumors received AZD2811-np IV on Day 1 (D1) and 4 (D4) Q4 week (wk) in six cohorts 15-200 mg/infusion without the use of g-csf in cycle 1. D1 Q4wk and Q3wk schedules were investigated up to 600 mg/infusion (including cohorts with mandatory g-csf prophylaxis on day 8). A standard 3+3 design was used. PK was assessed in cycle 1. Results: 50 pts were recruited into 12 cohorts. D1, D4 Q4wk schedule: 24 pts (15, 25,38, 50, 100 mg/infusion (n=3/cohort), 200 mg/infusion (n=9)). All cohorts were tolerated. Transient grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 7/9 pts at 200 mg/infusion, including 1 DLT (gr4 > 7 days) D1 Q4wk: 200 mg(n=3) was tolerated. D1 Q3wk: 23 pts were evaluated (200/400 mg (n=3,7), and 400/600/500 mg with mandatory g-csf (n=3/5/6)). 400 mg without g-csf was not tolerated (1 gr3 mucosal inflammation & 1 gr4 neutropenia > 7 days). 600 mg with g-csf was not tolerated (gr3 febrile neutropenia & gr3 fatigue). 25/50 pts experienced AE ≥gr 3 (21 considered AZD2811-np-related, 19 neutropenia-related, no deaths within-DLT period). AZD2811-np caused transient gr1/2 fatigue, nausea, diarrhoea and mucosal inflammation. AZD2811 total blood PK appears dose proportional with a t1/2 of 30-50 hours irrespective of schedule. Released AZD2811 concentrations ~1% of total. 14 pts (28%) had disease stabilisation. 1 prostate ca. pt had a confirmed partial response (PR) (continued tx to 451 days). Conclusions: The MTD for AZD2811-np is 500 mg D1 Q3wk. AZD2811-np is now being investigated in a small cell lung cancer expansion. Clinical trial information: NCT02579226.

Safety of AK117, an anti-CD47 monoclonal antibody, in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors in a phase I study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2630-2630
Author(s):  
Hui Kong Gan ◽  
Jermaine Coward ◽  
Anna Rachelle Austria Mislang ◽  
Rasha Cosman ◽  
Adnan Nagrial ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
T Lymphocytes ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Day Treatment ◽  
Dose Range ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Phagocytic Cells ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dose Escalation Study

2630 Background: AK117 is a novel humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting CD47, a macrophage immune checkpoint that allows tumor cells to evade immune destruction by phagocytic cells. CD47 is a target expressed in many cancers. However, the initial dose of anti-CD47 therapy may be limited by severe anemia due to ubiquitous CD47 expression on senescent red blood cells (RBCs). Here, we present encouraging preliminary AK117 safety and receptor occupancy (RO) data from an ongoing dose-escalation study in patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Methods: This is a first-in-human, phase 1a/1b, multicenter, open label, single arm, dose escalation and dose expansion study of AK117 administered intravenously to adult pts with resistant/refractory advanced or metastatic solid tumors or lymphomas. In the dose escalation phase (phase 1a), an accelerated titration followed by a 3+3+3 design was used to assess the safety and tolerability of AK117 monotherapy (dose range 0.3 mg/kg to 45 mg/kg); and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). AK117 was administered QW on a 28-day treatment cycle and dose limiting toxicity (DLT) observation period. Tumor assessments per RECIST v1.1 were performed once every 8 weeks (2 cycles). Results: As of 15 Feb 2021, 15 pts were enrolled in phase 1a with DLT evaluation of the 30 mg/kg cohort currently in progress. There were no DLTs up to 20 mg/kg QW AK117, inclusive. Five treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 4 subjects as shown in the table below. All pts with TRAEs continue to receive AK117, except the pt on 1 mg/kg AK117 who discontinued due to disease progression. G2 anemia and G1 thrombocytopenia occurred after Cycle 1 in a pt (liposarcoma, 10 mg/kg cohort), who had a medical history of anemia (hemoglobin 119 g/L at screening). No hematological TRAEs were seen in other pts, including those who received 20 mg/kg AK117 QW. There were no infusion-related reactions (IRRs) or grade ≥ 3 TRAEs. Target engagement in the periphery was confirmed by measuring CD47 RO of AK117 on RBCs and T lymphocytes. 100% RO on RBCs and T lymphocytes was achieved after the first dose and continued to Day 8 (prior to second dose) in the 10 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg cohorts. Conclusions: AK117 is safe and well-tolerated up to 20 mg/kg QW, inclusive, with no IRRs or severe TRAEs observed. There were no hematological TRAEs, except in a pt with baseline G1 anemia receiving 10 mg/kg AK117. Unlike other anti-CD47 therapies, AK117 does not require a lower ‘priming’ dose to prevent anemia. Safety evaluation of the 30 mg/kg dose level is in progress. Full and durable RO in the periphery was seen at 10 mg/kg and above. Further evaluation of AK117 in combination with AK104, an anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody, shall commence imminently. Clinical trial information: NCT04349969. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals A first-in-human, phase 1 study of the NEDD8 activating enzyme E1 inhibitor TAS4464 in patients with advanced solid tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noboru Yamamoto ◽  
Toshio Shimizu ◽  
Kan Yonemori ◽  
Shigehisa Kitano ◽  
Shunsuke Kondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Function ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitor ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Open Label Phase

SummaryBackground This open-label, phase 1 study investigated TAS4464, a potent NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor, in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors (JapicCTI-173,488; registered 13/01/2017). The primary objective was dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was investigated using an accelerated titration design. Methods The starting 10-mg/m2 dose was followed by an initial accelerated stage (weekly dosing; n = 11). Based on liver function test (LFT) results, a 14-day, 20-mg/m2 dose lead-in period was implemented (weekly dosing with lead-in; n = 6). Results Abnormal LFT changes and gastrointestinal effects were the most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs). DLTs with 56-mg/m2 weekly dosing occurred in 1/5 patients; five patients had grade ≥ 2 abnormal LFT changes at 40- and 56-mg/m2 weekly doses. Further dose escalation ceased because of the possibility of severe abnormal LFT changes occurring. DLTs with weekly dosing with lead-in occurred in 1/5 patients at a 56-mg/m2 dose; MTD could not be determined because discontinuation criteria for additional enrollment at that particular dose level were met. As no further enrollment at lower doses occurred, dose escalation assessment was discontinued. Serious treatment-related AEs, AEs leading to treatment discontinuation, and DLTs were all related to abnormal LFT changes, suggesting that TAS4464 administration could affect liver function. This effect was dose-dependent but considered reversible. Complete or partial responses to TAS4464 were not observed; one patient achieved prolonged stable disease. Conclusions MTD could not be determined due to TAS4464 effects on liver function. Further evaluation of the mechanism of NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor-induced abnormal liver function is required. Trial registration number JapicCTI-173,488 (registered with Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center). Registration date 13 January 2017

A phase I study of an IDO inhibitor (SHR9146) plus camrelizumab and in combination with/without apatinib in patients with advanced solid tumors: Safety and efficacy analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3101-3101
Author(s):  
Ying Cheng ◽  
Ying Liu ◽  
Jinhua Xu ◽  
Jing Zhu ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Renal Cancer ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Angiogenesis Inhibitor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Safety And Efficacy

3101 Background: IDO is an enzyme of interest in immuno-oncology because of the immunosuppressive effects that result from its role in tryptophan catabolism. Clinical trials of IDO inhibitors with immunotherapy are under active investigation. The addition of angiogenesis inhibitor may further enhance the anti-tumor immune responses. Here we report the safety and efficacy results of SHR9146 (IDO inhibitor) plus camrelizumab (PD-1 antibody) with/without apatinib (VEGFR-2 inhibitor) in patients (pts) with advanced solid cancers who failed standard antitumor therapies. Methods: This was an open-label, phase I study. Eligible puts would receive SHR9146 (escalated dose) plus camrelizumab (200 mg IV, q2w) alone (Cohort A) or in combination with apatinib (250 mg p.o. qd) (Cohort B). Each cohort was conducted according to a 3+3 dose escalation design. The starting dose of SHR9146 was 100mg bid, followed by 200, 400, 600 mg bid. The two primary endpoints were Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) and Maximum Tolerated Dose (MDT). The secondary objective was to analysis the incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) and efficacy. Results: As of Oct 31, 2020, 23 pts have been enrolled (Cohort A:14, Cohort B: 9; median age: 54 years; median prior therapies: 2 lines;). Cohort A was escalating at 600mg, and Cohort B was escalating at 400mg. Two pts experienced DLTs: one DLT (G4 hypercalcemia) was observed at 600mg in Cohort A; the other DLT (G3 rash) was observed at 400mg in Cohort B. MDT was not reached and the study was still ongoing. In Cohort A, ORR and DCR in evaluable pts were 21.4% (3/14, all confirmed) and 42.9% (6/14). Partial response was observed in 3 pts with liver cancer (1/3), renal cancer (1/3), and cervix cancer (1/3). In Cohort B, ORR and DCR in evaluable pts were 33.3%(3/9, all confirmed) and 77.8%(7/9). Partial response was observed in 3 pts with SCLC (1/3), prostate cancer (1/3) and renal cancer (1/3). The incidence of pts with TRAEs and grade>=3 TRAEs were 91.3% (21/23) and 39.1% (9/23) respectively. The most common grade>=3 TRAEs were hypercalcemia (26.1%, 6/23), fatigue (17.4%, 4/23) and nausea (13.0%, 3/23). No fatal AEs were observed. G3 nausea, G3 lipase increased and G2 GGT increased resulted in SHR9146 dose reduction in 3 pts (Cohort A). Conclusions: SHR9146 plus camrelizumab in combination with/without apatinib demonstrated promising anti-tumor activity with acceptable safety in pts with advanced solid tumors. Further study is needed to validate the efficacy and safety. Clinical trial information: NCT03491631.

scholarly journals 480 A first-in-human phase I dose-escalation trial of the B7-H6/CD3 T-cell engager BI 765049 ± ezabenlimab (BI 754091) in patients with advanced solid tumors expressing B7-H6

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A510-A510
Author(s):  
Gerald Falchook ◽  
David Spigel ◽  
Manish Patel ◽  
Babar Bashir ◽  
Susanna Ulahannan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
T Cell Activation ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Cell Activation ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
List Type ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Eu Directive ◽  
Dosing Regimens

BackgroundB7-H6 is a member of the B7 family of immune receptors, which is expressed in several solid tumor types but very little expression can be detected in normal tissues.1 2 BI 765049 is a novel IgG-like bispecific T-cell engager designed to bind simultaneously to B7-H6 on tumor cells and CD3 on T cells, resulting in cytolytic synapse formation and tumor lysis. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that BI 765049 monotherapy induced dose-dependent anti-tumor activity in humanized in vivo CRC tumor models. Consistent with the mode of action, the treatment with BI 765049 led to target cell apoptosis, local T-cell activation/proliferation and cytokine production in the tumor tissue, with PD-(L)1 upregulation.3 Activation of the PD-(L)1 provides the rationale for combining BI 765049 with a PD1 inhibitor.MethodsNCT04752215 is a first-in-human, open-label, dose-escalation trial of BI 765049 ± the PD-1 inhibitor, ezabenlimab. Adults with advanced, unresectable and/or metastatic CRC, NSCLC, HNSCC, hepatocellular, gastric or pancreatic carcinoma are eligible. Patients must have failed on, or be ineligible, for standard therapies. B7-H6 positivity must be confirmed at screening by central review (immunohistochemistry assay) in archived tissues/in-study fresh biopsies (except CRC). Patients must have ≥1 evaluable lesion (modified RECIST 1.1) outside of the central nervous system and adequate organ function. The primary objective is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended dose for expansion of BI 765049 ± ezabenlimab, based on dose-limiting toxicities during the MTD evaluation period. Further objectives are to evaluate safety, tolerability, PK/PD and preliminary efficacy of BI 765049 ± ezabenlimab. The trial may assess up to 4 dosing regimens: A (BI 765049 once every 3 weeks [q3w]); B1 (BI 765049 qw); B2 (BI 765049 qw with step-in doses); C (BI 765049 + ezabenlimab [q3w]). Dose escalation will be guided by a Bayesian Logistic Regression Model with overdose control that will be fitted to binary toxicity outcomes using a hierarchical modelling approach to jointly model all dosing regimens. Treatment will be allowed to continue until confirmed progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, other withdrawal criteria or for a maximum duration of 36 months, whichever occurs first. Approximately 150–175 patients will be screened and ~120 patients enrolled. As of July 2021, patients are being recruited in early dose-escalation cohorts.AcknowledgementsMedical writing support for the development of this abstract, under the direction of the authors, was provided by Becky O’Connor, of Ashfield MedComms, an Ashfield Health company, and funded by Boehringer Ingelheim.Trial RegistrationNCT04752215ReferencesBrandt et al. J Exp Med 2009;206:1495–503.Boehringer Ingelheim. Data on file.Hipp et al. AACR Annual Meeting 2021.Ethics ApprovalThe trial will be carried out in compliance with the protocol, the ethical principles laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki, in accordance with the ICH Harmonized Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and the EU directive 2001/20/EC/EU regulation 536/2014.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document