Privacy, autonomy and direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a response to Vayena

2022 ◽  
pp. medethics-2021-107999
Author(s):  
Kyle van Oosterum
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Genetic Privacy ◽  
Direct To Consumer ◽  
Related Harm

In Vayena’s article, ‘direct-to-consumer (DTC) genomics on the scales of autonomy’, she claims that there may be a strong autonomy-based argument for permitting DTC genomic services. In this response, I point out how the diminishment of one’s genetic privacy can cause a relevant autonomy-related harm which must be balanced against the autonomy-related gains DTC services provide. By drawing on conceptual connections between privacy and the Razian conception of autonomy, I show that DTC genetic testing may decrease the range of valuable options individuals possess, which impacts the extent to which would-be consumers can exercise their autonomy.

Direct to consumer genetic testing and the libertarian right to test

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (11) ◽  
pp. 787-789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wendy Elizabeth Bonython ◽  
Bruce Baer Arnold
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Physical Properties ◽  
Prima Facie ◽  
Genetic Privacy ◽  
Physical Body ◽  
Direct To Consumer ◽  
Rights And Interests ◽  
Privacy Violation ◽  
The Right ◽  
Regulatory Intervention

Loi recently proposed a libertarian right to direct to consumer genetic testing (DTCGT)— independent of autonomy or utility—reflecting Cohen’s work on self-ownership and Hohfeld’s model of jural relations. Cohen’s model of libertarianism dealt principally with self-ownership of the physical body. Although Loi adequately accounts for the physical properties of DNA, DNA is also an informational substrate, highly conserved within families. Information about the genome of relatives of the person undergoing testing may be extrapolated without requiring direct engagement with their personal physical copy of the genome, triggering rights and interests of relatives that may differ from the rights and interests of others, that is, individual consumers, testing providers and regulators. Loi argued that regulatory interference with exercise of the right required justification, whereas prima facie exercise of the right did not. Justification of regulatory interference could include ‘conflict with other people’s rights’, ‘aggressive’ use of the genome and ‘harming others’. Harms potentially experienced by relatives as a result of the individual’s exercise of a right to test include breach of genetic privacy, violation of their right to determine when, and if, they undertake genetic testing and discrimination. Such harms may justify regulatory intervention, in the event they are recognised; motives driving ‘aggressive’ use of the genome may also be relevant. Each of the above criteria requires clarification, as potential redundancies and tensions exist between them, with different implications affecting different groups of rights holders.

scholarly journals Time to Get Serious about Privacy Policies: The Special Case of Genetic Privacy

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-32
Author(s):  
Dianne Nicol ◽  
Meredith Hagger ◽  
Nola Ries ◽  
Johnathon Liddicoat
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Genetic Information ◽  
Personal Information ◽  
Genetic Privacy ◽  
Privacy Policies ◽  
Her Family ◽  
Current Regime ◽  
Direct To Consumer ◽  
Privacy Act ◽  
Special Case

Genetic information is widely recognised as being particularly sensitive personal information about an individual and his or her family. This article presents an analysis of the privacy policies of Australian companies that were offering direct-to-consumer genetic testing services in 2012–13. The results of this analysis indicate that many of these companies do not comply with the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth), and will need to significantly reassess their privacy policies now that significant new amendments to the Act have come into force. Whilst the Privacy Commissioner has increased powers under the new amendments, the extent to which these will mitigate the deficiencies of the current regime in relation to privacy practices of direct–to-consumer genetic testing companies remains unclear. Accordingly, it may be argued that a privacy code for the direct-to-consumer genetic testing industry would provide clearer standards. Alternatively it may be time to rethink whether a sui generis approach to protecting genetic information is warranted.

9. Genetic Information

Medical Law ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 470-505
Author(s):  
Emily Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Genetic Information ◽  
Genetic Discrimination ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Genetic Privacy ◽  
Direct To Consumer ◽  
Genetic Test Results ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Dna Profiles

All books in this flagship series contain carefully selected substantial extracts from key cases, legislation, and academic debate, providing students with a stand-alone resource. This chapter examines the regulation of access to genetic information. It first discusses various third parties’ interests in genetic test results and DNA profiles, and the extent to which genetic privacy is protected by the law. The chapter then considers the issue of whether genetic discrimination should be treated in the same way as other illegitimate discriminatory practices and also discusses recent developments in the field of genetics, namely direct-to-consumer genetic testing and pharmacogenetics.

Experiences of individuals receiving “Not Parent Expected” (NPE) results through direct-to-consumer genetic testing

2021 ◽  
Vol 132 ◽  
pp. S289
Author(s):  
Julia Becker ◽  
Janey Youngblom ◽  
Brianne Kirkpatrick ◽  
Liane Abrams
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Direct To Consumer

scholarly journals An exploratory assessment of the applicability of direct-to-consumer genetic testing to translational research in Japan

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Inoue ◽  
Shota Arichi ◽  
Tsuyoshi Hachiya ◽  
Anna Ohtera ◽  
Seok-Won Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Translational Research ◽  
Drug Target ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Healthy Individuals ◽  
Alcohol Sensitivity ◽  
Direct To Consumer ◽  
Disease States ◽  
Multiple Phenotypes ◽  
Related Phenotype

Abstract Objective In order to assess the applicability of a direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing to translational research for obtaining new knowledge on relationships between drug target genes and diseases, we examined possibility of these data by associating SNPs and disease related phenotype information collected from healthy individuals. Results A total of 12,598 saliva samples were collected from the customers of commercial service for SNPs analysis and web survey were conducted to collect phenotype information. The collected dataset revealed similarity to the Japanese data but distinguished differences to other populations of all dataset of the 1000 Genomes Project. After confirmation of a well-known relationship between ALDH2 and alcohol-sensitivity, Phenome-Wide Association Study (PheWAS) was performed to find association between pre-selected drug target genes and all the phenotypes. Association was found between GRIN2B and multiple phenotypes related to depression, which is considered reliable based on previous reports on the biological function of GRIN2B protein and its relationship with depression. These results suggest possibility of using SNPs and phenotype information collected from healthy individuals as a translational research tool for drug discovery to find relationship between a gene and a disease if it is possible to extract individuals in pre-disease states by properly designed questionnaire.

scholarly journals Feasibility and Assessment of a Cascade Traceback Screening Program (FACTS): Protocol for a Multisite Study to Implement and Assess an Ovarian Cancer Traceback Cascade Testing Program

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 543
Author(s):  
Anna DiNucci ◽  
Nora B. Henrikson ◽  
M. Cabell Jonas ◽  
Sundeep Basra ◽  
Paula Blasi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Genetic Privacy ◽  
Program Outcomes ◽  
Cascade Testing ◽  
Program Costs

Ovarian cancer (OVCA) patients may carry genes conferring cancer risk to biological family; however, fewer than one-quarter of patients receive genetic testing. “Traceback” cascade testing —outreach to potential probands and relatives—is a possible solution. This paper outlines a funded study (U01 CA240747-01A1) seeking to determine a Traceback program’s feasibility, acceptability, effectiveness, and costs. This is a multisite prospective observational feasibility study across three integrated health systems. Informed by the Conceptual Model for Implementation Research, we will outline, implement, and evaluate the outcomes of an OVCA Traceback program. We will use standard legal research methodology to review genetic privacy statutes; engage key stakeholders in qualitative interviews to design communication strategies; employ descriptive statistics and regression analyses to evaluate the site differences in genetic testing and the OVCA Traceback testing; and assess program outcomes at the proband, family member, provider, system, and population levels. This study aims to determine a Traceback program’s feasibility and acceptability in a real-world context. It will account for the myriad factors affecting implementation, including legal issues, organizational- and individual-level barriers and facilitators, communication issues, and program costs. Project results will inform how health care providers and systems can develop effective, practical, and sustainable Traceback programs.

scholarly journals Secondary Data Usage in Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: To What Extent Are Customers Aware and Concerned?

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Janessa Mladucky ◽  
Bonnie Baty ◽  
Jeffrey Botkin ◽  
Rebecca Anderson
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Customer Data ◽  
Secondary Use ◽  
Data Usage ◽  
Direct To Consumer ◽  
New Information ◽  
Opt Out ◽  
Potential Risks

Introduction: Customer data from direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC GT) are often used for secondary purposes beyond providing the customer with test results. Objective: The goals of this study were to determine customer knowledge of secondary uses of data, to understand their perception of risks associated with these uses, and to determine the extent of customer concerns about privacy. Methods: Twenty DTC GT customers were interviewed about their experiences. The semi-structured interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed for common themes. Results: Most participants were aware of some secondary uses of data. All participants felt that data usage for research was acceptable, but acceptability for non-research purposes varied across participants. The majority of participants were aware of the existence of a privacy policy, but few read the majority of the privacy statement. When previously unconsidered uses of data were discussed, some participants expressed concern over privacy protections for their data. Conclusion: When exposed to new information on secondary uses of data, customers express concerns and a desire to improve consent with transparency, more opt-out options, improved readability, and more information on future uses and potential risks from direct-to-consumer companies. Effective ways to improve readership about the secondary use, risk of use, and protection of customer data should be investigated and the findings implemented by DTC companies to protect public trust in these practices.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document