scholarly journals E-124 Persistent TICI 0 after mechanical thrombectomy: incidence and insights at a high-volume comprehensive stroke center

Author(s):  
R Mattay ◽  
M Cox ◽  
M McCabe ◽  
J Schmitt ◽  
D Kung ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 519-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denis Sablot ◽  
Nicolas Gaillard ◽  
Philippe Smadja ◽  
Jean-Marie Bonnec ◽  
Alain Bonafe

Background No comprehensive study exists about mechanical thrombectomy accessibility for patients admitted to a primary stroke center without onsite interventional neuroradiology service. Aims To evaluate mechanical thrombectomy accessibility within 6 h after transfer from a primary stroke center to a distant (156 km apart; 1.5 h by car) comprehensive stroke center. Methods Analysis of data collected in a three-year prospective registry on patients admitted to a primary stroke center within 4.5 h after symptom onset and selected for transfer to a comprehensive stroke center for mechanical thrombectomy. Eligible patients had confirmed proximal arterial occlusion and no large cerebral infarction on MRI images (DWI-ASPECTS ≥ 5). The rate of transfer, transfer without mechanical thrombectomy, mechanical thrombectomy, reperfusion (TICI score ≥ 2b-3), and the main relevant time measures were determined. Results Among the 385 patients selected for intravenous thrombolysis and/or potential mechanical thrombectomy, 211 were considered as transferrable for mechanical thrombectomy. The rate of transfer was 56.4% (n = 119/211), transfer without mechanical thrombectomy 56.3% (n = 67/119), mechanical thrombectomy 24.6% (n = 52/211), and reperfusion by MT (TICI score 2b/3) 18% (n = 38/211). The relevant median times (interquartile range) were: 130 min (62) for intravenous thrombolysis start to comprehensive stroke center door, 95 minutes (39) for primary stroke center door-out to comprehensive stroke center door-in, 191 min (44) for intravenous thrombolysis start to mechanical thrombectomy puncture, 354 min (107) for symptom onset to mechanical thrombectomy puncture and 417 min (124) for symptom onset to recanalization. Conclusions Our study suggests that transfer to a distant comprehensive stroke center is associated with reduced access to early mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke and large artery occlusion. These results could be translated to other high volume distant primary stroke center.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 417-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denis Sablot ◽  
Geoffroy Farouil ◽  
Alexandre Laverdure ◽  
Caroline Arquizan ◽  
Alain Bonafe

BackgroundThis study assessed whether a quality improvement (QI) process to streamline transfer from a primary stroke center (PSC) to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) could reduce the delay of reperfusion by mechanical thrombectomy (MT).MethodsFrom 2015 to 2017, a QI process was implemented with specific interventions to reduce door-in-to-door-out (DIDO) time in a high volume PSC, and speed up interhospital transfer and inhospital processes at the CSC. Clinical characteristics and time metrics were compared in the QI (2015–2017; n = 157) and pre-QI cohorts (2012–2014; n = 121).ResultsDuring the QI process, the median symptom onset to reperfusion time was reduced by 50 minutes (367 vs 417 minutes in the pre-QI cohort, p < 0.04), with a substantial 40-minute DIDO reduction (78 vs 118 minutes, p < 0.01), related to the faster administration of IV thrombolysis (median door-to-needle time: 49 vs 82 minutes, p = 0.0001). The door-to-door time was shortened (170 vs 205 minutes, p = 0.002), but not the transfer time (92 vs 87 minutes, p = 0.5). The QI process had no effect on the prehospital phase (77 vs 76 minutes, p = 0.83) and on the time from MRI imaging at the PSC to reperfusion (252 vs 288 minutes, p = 0.12). The rate of modified Rankin Scale score 0–2 at 90 days was comparable in the pre-QI and QI cohorts.ConclusionsA QI process can reduce the reperfusion therapy delay in a distant CSC; however, we could not demonstrate that it can also improve the outcome of patients who undergo MT.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-82
Author(s):  
Mohammad El-Ghanem ◽  
Francisco E. Gomez ◽  
Prateeka Koul ◽  
Rolla Nuoman ◽  
Justin G. Santarelli ◽  
...  

Background: Traditionally, patients undergoing acute ischemic strokes were candidates for mechanical thrombectomy if they were within the 6-h window from onset of symptoms. This timeframe would exclude many patient populations, such as wake-up strokes. However, the most recent clinical trials, DAWN and DEFUSE3, have expanded the window of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke patients to within 24 h from symptom onset. This expanded window increases the number of potential candidates for endovascular intervention for emergent large vessel occlusions and raises the question of how to efficiently screen and triage this increase of patients. Summary: Abbreviated pre-hospital stroke scales can be used to guide EMS personnel in quickly deciding if a patient is undergoing a stroke. Telestroke networks connect remote hospitals to stroke specialists to improve the transportation time of the patient to a comprehensive stroke center for the appropriate level of care. Mobile stroke units, mobile interventional units, and helistroke reverse the traditional hub-and-spoke model by bringing imaging, tPA, and expertise to the patient. Smartphone applications and social media aid in educating patients and the public regarding acute and long-term stroke care. Key Messages: The DAWN and DEFUSE3 trials have expanded the treatment window for certain acute ischemic stroke patients with mechanical thrombectomy and subsequently have increased the number of potential candidates for endovascular intervention. This expansion brings patient screening and triaging to greater importance, as reducing the time from symptom onset to decision-to-treat and groin puncture can better stroke patient outcomes. Several strategies have been employed to address this issue by reducing the time of symptom onset to decision-to-treat time.


Stroke ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey C Wagner ◽  
Alessandro Orlando ◽  
Christopher V Fanale ◽  
Michelle Whaley ◽  
Kathryn L McCarthy ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE: To describe the 4-year symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) rate at a high-volume comprehensive stroke center. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational cohort study. All admitted adult (≥18 years) patients presenting with an ischemic stroke (IS) from 2010 to 2013 were included in this study. Chi-square, Wilcoxon rank-sum, Student’s t-tests and Cochran-Armitage trend tests were used to compare groups and analyze data. sICHs were defined by a 4-point increase in NIHSS within 36h with new ICH seen on CT; sICHs were included only if they were directly related to IV-tPA treatment. Favorable mRS outcome was defined as a score ≤2. In-patient stroke alerts were excluded from door-to-needle (DTN) times. RESULTS: 2673 patients were admitted with IS. Of these, 627 (23%) were treated with IV-tPA (90% <3h from symptom onset, 69% at an outside facility). There was a significant increase in the percentage of IS patients treated with IV-tPA over the four years (p-trend=0.02). Compared to patients not receiving IV/IA therapy, patients receiving IV-tPA had significantly higher NIHSS scores, higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation, hyperlipidemia, and cardioembolic etiology, and lower proportion of small vessel occlusive IS. The median (IQR) DTN was 41m (32-53). In the 627 IS patients treated with IV-tPA, 11 (1.8%) developed a sICH; in 2013, the sICH rate was 0.6% (1/158). IV-tPA patients who developed a sICH were similar to those who were sICH-free; however, sICH patients had a significantly higher proportion of coronary artery disease (p=0.04) and severe strokes (p=0.19), and higher median symptom to arrival times (237m vs 187m, p=0.19), but similar median DTN (40m vs 41m, p=0.84). The in-hospital mortality rate for the IV-tPA group was 11% (n=71), and 37% had favorable mRS discharge scores. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that expeditious care and careful selection of patients for IV-tPA treatment can lead to very low rates of sICHs. The few sICHs subsequent to IV-tPA are likely to be a consequence of long symptom-to-arrival times and stroke severity.


Author(s):  
Anqi Luo ◽  
Agnelio Cardenas ◽  
Lee A Birnbaum

Introduction : Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has become the current standard of care for large vessel occlusion stroke but is associated with an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Although several studies have investigated the risk factors, there is still limited, not well‐established data. This study aims to evaluate the risk factors of HT after MT. Methods : We retrospectively reviewed all MT patients who were treated at a single comprehensive stroke center from 12/2016 to 7/2019. Variables included initial NIHSS, blood glucose, initial systolic blood pressure, age, gender, IV tPA, time from door to recanalization, and TICI score. Outcome measures were HT on post‐procedure or 24‐hour post‐tPA head CT/MRI as well as modified Rankin scale (mRS) upon discharge. Results : Among 74 patients (68.8 ± 14 years, men 47.3%), 9 (12.2%) experienced hemorrhagic transformation after thrombectomy. Average admitting NIHSS was significantly higher in the HT group (22 vs 16.8, p = 0.041). TICI 3 after MT was protective for HT (OR 0.078, 95% CI 0.009‐0.663). IV tPA (OR 3.86, 95% CI 1.448‐10.326) was associated with good neurological outcome at discharge (mRS < = 2), but HT was not (OR 0.114, 95% CI 0.013‐0.964). Patients with mRS < = 2 upon discharge were younger (65.2±12 vs 71.9±15, p = 0.04) and had lower initial BG (124±45.8 vs 157±69.6, P = 0.02). Conclusions : TICI 3 score, decreased NIHSS, and lower BG were associated with less HT and better outcomes in our MT cohort. Admitting NIHSS > = 20 may be a reasonable threshold to predict HT after MT. Our findings are consistent with the TICI‐ASPECTS‐glucose (TAG) score to predict sICH; however, we used initial NIHSS as a surrogate for ASPECTS. Further studies may utilize additional quantitative measures such as CTP data to predict HT.


Author(s):  
Taha Nisar ◽  
Jimmy Patel ◽  
Amit Singla ◽  
Priyank Khandelwal

Introduction : The transradial approach (TRA) is being increasingly adopted by neuro‐interventionists and has emerged as an alternative to the traditional transfemoral approach (TFA) for mechanical thrombectomy (MT). We aim to compare various time, technical and outcome parameters in patients who undergo MT via TRF vs. TRA approach. Methods : We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent MT at a comprehensive stroke center from 7/2016 to 12/2020. We compared patients who underwent MT via TRA vs. TRF with respect to time from angio suite arrival to puncture, first pass, second pass and recanalization; time from puncture to first pass, second pass and recanalization; time from arrival to the emergency department (ED) to puncture, first pass, second pass and recanalization; the number of passes, rate of switching, achievement of TICI≥2b score, functional independence (3‐month mRS≤2), 3‐month mortality and neurological improvement (improvement in NIHSS by ≥4 points) on day 1 and 3. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed, controlling for age, sex, NIHSS, type of anesthesia (general vs. moderate), laterality, and location of clot (internal carotid or middle cerebral artery), ASPECTS≥6, presenting mean arterial pressure, blood glucose, Hb A1C, LDL, intravenous alteplase. Results : 217 patients met our inclusion criteria. The mean age was 64.09±14.4 years. 42 (19.35%) patients underwent MT through the TRA approach. There was a significantly higher rate of conversion from TRA approach to TRF approach (11.90% vs.2.28%; OR, 105.59; 95% CI,5.71‐1954.67; P 0.002), but no difference in various time, technical and outcome parameters, as shown in the table. Conclusions : Our study demonstrates no significant difference between TRA and TRF approaches with respect to various time, technical and outcome parameters, with a notable exception of a significantly higher rate of conversion from TRA to TRF approach.


Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nura Salhadar ◽  
WONDWOSSEN TEKLE ◽  
Amrou Sarraj ◽  
Ameer E Hassan

Background and objective: Elderly patients were underrepresented in RCTs that proved the efficacy and safety of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in acute ischemic strokes (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). Additionally, the impact of race and socio-economics in AIS outcomes is well-reported. We sought to assess MT clinical outcomes in Hispanic Octogenarians and Nonagenarians that reside in underserved border communities. Methods: A retrospective cohort study from a prospectively collected comprehensive stroke center database was conducted. The primary outcome was discharge (mRS 0-2). Secondary outcomes were NIHSS improvement ≥4 points at discharge, sICH, mortality and length of stay (LOS). A two-tailed t-test assessed statistical significance between the two groups. Results: Of 202 included patients, 172 (85%) were octogenarians and 30 nonagenarians (17%). Nonagenarians had higher rates of females (80% vs 59%; p<0.05), similar rates of Hispanics (57% vs. 63%, p-xx) and a trend towards higher NIHS (20 vs. 17, P=0.09). Other baseline characteristics were similar (Table 1). Time last known well to arrival to MT center and to recanalization were longer in octogenarians, all other time metrics did not differ. Nonagenarians had numerically lower favorable outcomes at discharge (7% vs. 16%, p=0.11) as compared to octogenarians. Rates of clinical improvement on NIHSS were similar (27% vs. 23%, p=0.74). Mortality (23% vs. 28%, p=0.63) and sICH (7% vs 4%, p=0.46), octogenarians and nonagenarians, respectively. Octogenarians trended towards longer LOS (10 vs 6 days, p=0.05). Conclusions: Both groups had lower favorable good outcome rates than MT outcomes reported in RCTs. Nonagenarians had numerically lower favorable outcomes but mortality and sICH were similar. Further studies are warranted to further assess the impact of age and socioeconomics on MT outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document