Abstract P562: The Safety Of Mechanical Thrombectomy In Nonagenarians In A Majority Hispanic Population

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nura Salhadar ◽  
WONDWOSSEN TEKLE ◽  
Amrou Sarraj ◽  
Ameer E Hassan

Background and objective: Elderly patients were underrepresented in RCTs that proved the efficacy and safety of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in acute ischemic strokes (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). Additionally, the impact of race and socio-economics in AIS outcomes is well-reported. We sought to assess MT clinical outcomes in Hispanic Octogenarians and Nonagenarians that reside in underserved border communities. Methods: A retrospective cohort study from a prospectively collected comprehensive stroke center database was conducted. The primary outcome was discharge (mRS 0-2). Secondary outcomes were NIHSS improvement ≥4 points at discharge, sICH, mortality and length of stay (LOS). A two-tailed t-test assessed statistical significance between the two groups. Results: Of 202 included patients, 172 (85%) were octogenarians and 30 nonagenarians (17%). Nonagenarians had higher rates of females (80% vs 59%; p<0.05), similar rates of Hispanics (57% vs. 63%, p-xx) and a trend towards higher NIHS (20 vs. 17, P=0.09). Other baseline characteristics were similar (Table 1). Time last known well to arrival to MT center and to recanalization were longer in octogenarians, all other time metrics did not differ. Nonagenarians had numerically lower favorable outcomes at discharge (7% vs. 16%, p=0.11) as compared to octogenarians. Rates of clinical improvement on NIHSS were similar (27% vs. 23%, p=0.74). Mortality (23% vs. 28%, p=0.63) and sICH (7% vs 4%, p=0.46), octogenarians and nonagenarians, respectively. Octogenarians trended towards longer LOS (10 vs 6 days, p=0.05). Conclusions: Both groups had lower favorable good outcome rates than MT outcomes reported in RCTs. Nonagenarians had numerically lower favorable outcomes but mortality and sICH were similar. Further studies are warranted to further assess the impact of age and socioeconomics on MT outcomes.

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ameer E Hassan ◽  
Mahmoud Dibas ◽  
Sherief Ghozy ◽  
Amr Ehab El-Qushayri ◽  
Adam A Dmytriw ◽  
...  

Background and Objective: Prompt and complete reperfusion with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is essential to improve outcome in acute ischemic strokes (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO). Recently, first-pass effect (FPE), defined as achieving complete reperfusion with a single pass, has been emphasized as a potentially important MT target. We aimed to compare outcomes between patients who achieve mTICI 2b with first pass to those with multiple devise passes (MDP) mTICI 3. Methods: From a single comprehensive stroke center database, we retrospectively grouped LVO pts treated with MT into those who achieved mTICI 2b after a single pass and mTICI 3 after MDP. Clinical outcome (discharge and 90-day mRS), discharge NIHSS and safety (sICH, neurological worsening, mortality) were compared between the two groups. Results: Of 186 pts included, 153 (82%) achieved mTICI 3 with MDP, and 33 (18%) had mTICI 2b after a single pass. Mean age (71 vs 69), NIHSS (17 vs 16, p=0.2) were similar between the two groups. Patients with a single pass mTICI 2b had numerically higher IV tPA administration (33% vs 46%, p=.16). There was no difference in other baseline characteristics. There was no significant difference in discharge (21% vs 24.2%, p=0.65) and 90-day mRS 0-2 (24% vs 24%, p=0.5), MDP mTICI 3 and single pass mTICI 2b, respectively. Also, there was no difference in discharge NIHSS score (13.6 vs 16.7, p=0.26), mortality (16.3% vs 18.2%, p=0.8) and sICH rates (7.8% vs 18.2%, p=0.095) or neurological worsening (76.5% vs 69.7%, p=1). Conclusion: Our results did not show a significant difference between mTICI 3 with multiple passes and mTICI 2b after a single pass. Future large studies are warranted to explore the possibility of extending the first pass effect to patients who achieve mTICI 2b with a single pass.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Octavio M Pontes-Neto ◽  
Daniel G Abud ◽  
Luis Castro-Afonso ◽  
Rui Kleber Martins-Filho ◽  
Guilherme Nakiri ◽  
...  

Background: Despite evidence supporting the overall efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) of the anterior circulation, it is unclear whether the treatment effect of MT differs by sex in different populations. We assessed the impact of sex differences in the treatment effect of MT in the RESILIENT trial. Methods: RESILIENT was a prospective, multicenter, randomized phase III trial that was designed to assess the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy as compared to medical treatment alone in patients treated under the less than ideal conditions typically found in the public healthcare system of a developing country. Results: Among 221 patients enrolled in the trial, 104 (47,1%) were female. Baseline characteristics were well balanced between sexes, except for a higher prevalence of hypertension (76% vs. 57.4%; p=0.004) and diabetes (34.3% vs. 21.7%; p=0.039) and a lower frequency of alcohol abuse (4% vs. 28.9%; p=0.001) in females. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, we found a significant interaction (p=0.026) between sex and the effect of MT with a lower efficacy of MT for functional independency at 90 days among women (aOR=1.13;95%CI:0.42-3.02) compared to men (aOR=4.78; 95%CI:1.88-12.15). Conclusions: In our study population of patients with AIS caused by LVO of the anterior circulation, women were less likely to benefit from MT than men. Further studies are necessary to investigate these findings.


Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ameer E Hassan ◽  
Victor M Ringheanu ◽  
Raul G Nogueira ◽  
Laurie Preston ◽  
Adnan I Qureshi ◽  
...  

Introduction: Endovascular treatment (EVT) is a widely proven method to treat patients diagnosed with intracranial large vessel occlusion. In order to ensure patients safety prior to and during EVT, preprocedural intubation has been adopted in many centers as a means for airway protection and immobilization. However, the correlation between site of vessel occlusion, need for intubation, and outcomes, has not yet been established. Methods: Through the utilization of a prospectively collected database at a comprehensive stroke center between 2012-2020, demographics, co-morbid conditions, intracerebral hemorrhage, mortality rate, and functional independence outcomes were examined. The outcomes and sites of occlusion between patients receiving mechanical thrombectomy (MT) treated while intubated versus those treated under conscious sedation (CS) were compared. Results: Out of 625 patients treated with MT, a total of 218 (34.9%) were treated while intubated (average age 70.3 ± 13.7, 37.2% women), and 407 (65.1%) were treated while under CS (average age 70.3 ± 13.7, 47.7% women); see Table 1 for baseline characteristics and outcomes. A higher number of patients requiring intubation had an occlusion in the basilar versus those only requiring CS. No differences were noted in regard to the proportion of patients receiving intubation or CS when treated for RMCA, LMCA, or internal carotid artery occlusions. Conclusion: Intubation + MT was associated with significantly worsened outcomes in regard to recanalization rates, functional outcome, and mortality. In anterior circulation strokes, intubation in RMCA patients were found to have poorer clinical outcome. Higher rates of intubation were also found to be needed in patients with basilar occlusions. Further research is required to determine whether site of occlusion dictates the need for intubation, and whether intubation allows for favorable outcome between R and LMCA occlusions.


Author(s):  
Anqi Luo ◽  
Agnelio Cardenas ◽  
Lee A Birnbaum

Introduction : Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has become the current standard of care for large vessel occlusion stroke but is associated with an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Although several studies have investigated the risk factors, there is still limited, not well‐established data. This study aims to evaluate the risk factors of HT after MT. Methods : We retrospectively reviewed all MT patients who were treated at a single comprehensive stroke center from 12/2016 to 7/2019. Variables included initial NIHSS, blood glucose, initial systolic blood pressure, age, gender, IV tPA, time from door to recanalization, and TICI score. Outcome measures were HT on post‐procedure or 24‐hour post‐tPA head CT/MRI as well as modified Rankin scale (mRS) upon discharge. Results : Among 74 patients (68.8 ± 14 years, men 47.3%), 9 (12.2%) experienced hemorrhagic transformation after thrombectomy. Average admitting NIHSS was significantly higher in the HT group (22 vs 16.8, p = 0.041). TICI 3 after MT was protective for HT (OR 0.078, 95% CI 0.009‐0.663). IV tPA (OR 3.86, 95% CI 1.448‐10.326) was associated with good neurological outcome at discharge (mRS < = 2), but HT was not (OR 0.114, 95% CI 0.013‐0.964). Patients with mRS < = 2 upon discharge were younger (65.2±12 vs 71.9±15, p = 0.04) and had lower initial BG (124±45.8 vs 157±69.6, P = 0.02). Conclusions : TICI 3 score, decreased NIHSS, and lower BG were associated with less HT and better outcomes in our MT cohort. Admitting NIHSS > = 20 may be a reasonable threshold to predict HT after MT. Our findings are consistent with the TICI‐ASPECTS‐glucose (TAG) score to predict sICH; however, we used initial NIHSS as a surrogate for ASPECTS. Further studies may utilize additional quantitative measures such as CTP data to predict HT.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1073-1079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nitin Goyal ◽  
Georgios Tsivgoulis ◽  
Abhi Pandhi ◽  
Konark Malhotra ◽  
Rashi Krishnan ◽  
...  

IntroductionWe sought to evaluate the impact of pretreatment with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) on the rate and speed of successful reperfusion (SR) in patients with emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in a high-volume tertiary care stroke center.MethodsConsecutive patients with ELVO treated with MT were evaluated. Outcomes were compared between patients who underwent combined IVT and MT (IVT+MT) and those treated with direct MT (dMT). The elapsed time between groin puncture to beginning of reperfusion (GPTBRT) and the numbers of device passes required to achieve SR were also documented.ResultsA total of 287 and 132 patients were treated with IVT+MT and dMT, respectively. The IVT+MT group had higher SR (73.8% vs 62.9%; p=0.023) and 3-month functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score 0–2;51.6% vs 38.2%; p=0.008) rates. The median GPTBRT was shorter in the IVT+MT group (48 (IQR 33–70) vs 70 (IQR 44–98) min; p<0.001). Among patients who achieved SR (n=292), the median number of required device passes was lower in the IVT+MT subgroup (1 (IQR 1–1) vs 2 (IQR 1–2); p<0.001), while the rate of patients requiring ≤2 device passes was higher (98% vs 77%; p<0.001). IVT+MT was independently related to higher odds of SR (OR 1.64; 95% CI 1.03 to 2.61; p=0.036) and shorter GPTBRT (unstandardized linear regression coefficient −20.39; 95% CI −27.56 to –13.22; p<0.001) on multivariable analyses adjusting for potential confounders. Among patients with SR, IVT+MT was independently associated with a higher likelihood of ≤2 device passes (OR 14.63; 95% CI 4.46 to 48.00; p<0.001).ConclusionsIVT pretreatment appears to increase the rates of SR and shortens the duration of the endovascular procedure by requiring fewer device passes in patients with ELVO treated with MT.


Author(s):  
Yazan Radaideh

Introduction : Background: A common convention among stroke patients being transferred for mechanical thrombectomy, particularly if intravenous thrombolysis has been given, is to undergo a repeat plain brain CT at the treating stroke center. The most concerning among several concerns is the discovery of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) which would obviate the value of thrombectomy. This practice has been shown in a previous series to result in a median treatment delay of 20 minutes[1]. By determining the actual incidence of any ICH seen on neuroimaging in patients who undergo repeat imaging on arrival to comprehensive stroke center prior to intervention, we can better determine the true value of this convention of repeat imaging. Methods : Retrospective review of all patients transferred to a single academic comprehensive stroke center for mechanical thrombectomy. We evaluated for the frequency of repeat imaging, the rate of ICH and the rate of undergoing mechanical thrombectomy. Results : There were 682 patients transferred directly for mechanical thrombectomy evaluation over the study period. Intravenous Alteplase was administered to 391 patients prior to arrival and 2 had it on arrival to destination hospital. Plain head CT was repeated at the hub hospital in 590/682 patients (86.5%) (348 with thrombolytics and 242 without. A new intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) was detected in 9 patients. In only 3 of the 9 patients was mechanical thrombectomy deferred solely due to the ICH (other 6 had no evidence of LVO (4), low ASPECTS (1) or exam improvement (1)). Conclusions : In patients being transferred for mechanical thrombectomy, the rate of ICH on arrival to site hospital was 1.5%. In only one third of those patients (0.5%) was the decision to not proceed with mechanical thrombectomy related to the new ICH. Given the delays in door to puncture times associated with repeat imaging indicated in literature and the low yield in detecting ICH in transfer patients, repeating neuroimaging at comprehensive stroke center obtained for the purpose of ruling out ICH on patients transferred for MT should be reconsidered. Limitations: Our study reflects a single center experience. Other indications for repeat imaging at comprehensive stroke center such as assessment of infarcted core, and presence of large vessel occlusion might still warrant repeat imaging at comprehensive stroke center.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Darshan G Shah ◽  
Aravi Loganathan ◽  
Dan Truong ◽  
Fiona Chan ◽  
Bruce Campbell ◽  
...  

Background: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) became standard care in 2015 after positive trials in patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion (LVO) 0-6h and in 2018 for selected patients up to 24h from symptom onset. Objective: To evaluate whether patients receiving MT at our center would have comparable outcomes in patients presenting to our comprehensive stroke center (direct) vs transfer patients (drip-and-ship) Methods: This is a retrospective observational study utilising prospectively collected stroke database for patients receiving MT for LVO in anterior and posterior circulation in South Brisbane network of 7 hospitals (6 drip-and-ship centers and 1 MT-capable center), Australia which serves 1.6 million. Day 90 modified Rankin scale (mRS) was used to assess functional outcomes via outpatient follow up at direct or referral center. The association of drip and ship versus mothership treatment with day 90 mRS was tested in ordinal logistic regression adjusted for age, baseline NIHSS and IV thrombolysis. Results: Of 191 patients who underwent Mechanical Thrombectomy from 2015 to June 2018 at our center, 22 patients were excluded from analysis as either their baseline mRS was >1 (13) or follow up data was missing (9). The mean age was 64.4 years. Median (inter-quartile range, IQR) NIHSS was 16 (9-21) on admission and 7 (2-18) on day 1. Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) ≥2b was achieved in 88.9%. At 90 days, 50.9% achieved excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1), 61.4% achieved good functional outcome (mRS 0-2) and 69% achieved favorable outcome (mRS 0-3). Median mRS was 1 (IQR 0-5) in 96 patients presenting directly to the endovascular center and 1 (IQR 1-4) in 73 drip-and-ship patients (common odds ratio 1.07 (95%CI 0.62-1.83), p=0.82) Conclusion: Our 7-center network experience confirms real world reproducibility of trial results, interestingly with no difference in functional outcomes for direct vs drip-and-ship patients.


2021 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2020-017114
Author(s):  
Marlon Carl Monayao ◽  
Ahmed A Malik ◽  
Laurie Preston ◽  
Marlon Carl Monayao Sr ◽  
Wondwossen Tekle ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe incidence of intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) in acute ischemic stroke treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is not well defined, and its description may lead to improved stroke devices and rates of first pass success.MethodsA retrospective study was performed on MT patients from 2012 to 2019 at a comprehensive stroke center using chart review and angiogram analysis. Angiograms at the time of MT were reviewed for ICAD, and location and severity were recorded. Patients with ICAD were divided according to ICAD location relative to the large vessel occlusion (LVO) site. Statistical analyses were performed on baseline demographics, comorbidities, MT procedure variables, outcome variables, and their association with ICAD.ResultsOf the 533 patients (mean age 70.4 (SD 13.20) years, 43.5% women), 131 (24.6%) had ICAD. There was no significant difference in favorable discharge outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score of 0–2; 23.8% ICAD vs 27.0% non-ICAD; p=0.82) or groin puncture to recanalization times (average 43.5 (range 8–181) min for ICAD vs 40.2 (4–204) min for non-ICAD; p=0.42). Patients with ICAD experienced a significantly higher number of passes (average 1.8 (range 1–7) passes for ICAD vs 1.6 (1–5) passes for non-ICAD; p=0.0059). Adjusting for age, ≥3 device passes, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, rates of angioplasty only, rates of concurrent angioplasty and stenting, coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation incidences, and time from emergency department arrival to recanalization, yielded no significant difference in rates of favorable outcomes between the two groups.ConclusionPatients who underwent MT with underlying ICAD had similar rates of favorable outcomes as those without, but required a higher number of device passes.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ameer E Hassan ◽  
Victor M Ringheanu ◽  
Wondwossen G Tekle ◽  
Laurie Preston ◽  
Adnan I Qureshi

Background: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is a proven method of treating patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) from a large vessel occlusion. However, there has been controversy regarding the safety and efficacy of incorporating acute intracranial stenting in addition to standard MT especially after the WEAVE trial results which showed a significant increase in stroke and hemorrhage in patients receiving wingspan stenting within 7 days of index ischemic event. We compared the outcomes of all AIS patients treated with acute intracranial stenting + MT versus MT alone. Methods: Through the utilization of a prospectively collected endovascular database at a comprehensive stroke center between 2012-2019, variables such as demographics, co-morbid conditions, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), mortality rate at discharge, and good/poor outcomes in regard to modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score (TICI) and modified Rankin Scale at discharge (mRS dc) were examined. The outcomes between patients receiving acute intracranial stenting + MT and patients that underwent MT alone were compared. Results: There were a total of 439 AIS patients who met criteria for the study (average age 70.38 ± 13.46 years; 45.6% were women). Analysis of 36 patients from the acute stenting + MT group (average age 66.72 ± 13.17 years; 30.6% were women), and 403 patients from the MT Alone group (average age 70.71 ± 13.45 years; 46.9% were women); see Table 1 for baseline characteristics and outcomes. Three patients (8.3%) in the acute stenting + MT group experienced ICH versus forty-four patients (10.9%) in the MT alone group (P=0.631); no significant increases were noted in length of stay (9.08 days vs 9.84 days; P=0.620) or good mRS scores at dc (P=0.636). Conclusion: Acute intracranial stenting in addition to MT was not associated with an increase in ICH rates, overall length of stay, or poor outcome upon discharge of patients. Prospective studies are recommended.


Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurose Karim ◽  
Harsh Desai ◽  
Nicholas Henkel ◽  
Alicia Castonguay ◽  
Syed F Zaidi

Introduction: Limited data exist about the safety and efficacy of repeat mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with recurrent large vessel occlusion (rLVO). Here, we present a case series examining the outcome of early and delayed rLVO and the safety of repeat MT. Methods: We reviewed our prospectively-collected endovascular database for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with LVO who underwent MT between July 2012 and February 2020. We included patients with recurrent stroke requiring repeat MT after successful first MT, either in the same vessel or in a different vascular territory, within 24 hours up to 924 days and compared it with patients who underwent single MT. Baseline demographics, angiographic, procedural, and outcomes data were compared in AIS patients who underwent recurrent MT (RT) versus single MT (ST). We completed a meta-analysis that evaluated papers from 2015 to 2020 which examined reocclusion after MT. Result: A total of 738 MT patients were included, of which 726 (98.4%) were in the ST group and 12 (1.6%) in the RT group (Table 1). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the cohorts. The most common site of occlusion was in the MCA territory. Last known well (559 ± 982 vs. 267 ± 301 minutes, p = 0.358) was similar between the groups. There was no difference in the median number of passes (2 IQR 1-3, p=0.61) in the ST and RT groups, respectively. In the RT group, the mean time between repeat occlusion was 132.5 ± 275 days. Revascularization success, sICH rates (25% vs. 7.1%, p= 0.306), and mean 90-day mRS (1.3 ± 2.3 vs. 1.8 ± 2.7, p = 0.63) did not differ between the first MT (FT) and RT cohorts. No association between reocclusion and MT device (aspiration or stent-retriever), tPA given, statin, antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy was found in the meta-analysis. Conclusion: Repeat MT in patients with early or delayed reocclusion appears to be safe. Larger, prospective studies are needed to evaluate these findings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document