scholarly journals Inter- and intra-rater reliability for classification of medication related events in paediatric inpatients

2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 196-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
D L Kunac
2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Papavero ◽  
Carlos J. Marques ◽  
Jens Lohmann ◽  
Thies Fitting ◽  
Kathrin Schawjinski ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Patients with central lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) have a longer symptom history, more severe stenosis, and worse postoperative outcomes, when redundant nerve roots (RNRs) are evident in the preoperative MRI. The objective was to test the inter- and intra-rater reliability of an MRI-based classification for RNR. Methods This is a retrospective reliability study. A neuroradiologist, an orthopedic surgeon, a neurosurgeon, and three orthopedic surgeons in-training classified RNR on 126 preoperative MRIs of patients with LSS admitted for microsurgical decompression. On sagittal and axial T2-weighted images, the following four categories were classified: allocation (A) of the key stenotic level, shape (S), extension (E), and direction (D) of the RNR. A second read with cases ordered differently was performed 4 weeks later. Fleiss and Cohen’s kappa procedures were used to determine reliability. Results The allocation, shape, extension, and direction (ASED) classification showed moderate to almost perfect inter-rater reliability, with kappa values (95% CI) of 0.86 (0.83, 0.90), 0.62 (0.57, 0.66), 0.56 (0.51, 0.60), and 0.66 (0.63, 0.70) for allocation, shape, extension, and direction, respectively. Intra-rater reliability was almost perfect, with kappa values of 0.90 (0.88, 0.92), 0.86 (0.84, 0.88), and 0.84 (0.81, 0.87) for shape, extension, and direction, respectively. Intra-rater kappa values were similar for junior and senior raters. Kappa values for inter-rater reliability were similar between the first and second reads (p = 0.06) among junior raters and improved among senior raters (p = 0.008). Conclusions The MRI-based classification of RNR showed moderate-to-almost perfect inter-rater and almost perfect intra-rater reliability.


2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-33
Author(s):  
Michael O. Ibadin ◽  
George O. Akpede

Background: Researchers in medicine and related fields in Nigeria have usually made recourse to the instrument developed by Olusanya et al and Oyedeji in the past three-and-a half decades for determination of socioeconomic status (SES). Beside the question of their age, however, these instruments were purposive and might no longer be suitable because of the changes in the parameters on which they were based.Objective: To develop a robust but generic scheme that takes into consideration the changes in the nation’s socioeconomic space in the succeeding three and a half decades.Methods: A detailed and comprehensive review of the extant schemes was undertaken with a view to identifying their inherent weaknesses. The latter were then factored into the design of a new scheme taking into consideration the emergent restructuring of career positions in the civil/public service as well as the place of private and informal sectors of the economy. The new scheme was validated at the University of Beninand Irrua Specialist Teaching Hospitals.Results: The new scheme had a remarkably high Inter-rater reliability (r = 0.947, p<0.001), raterre- rater reliability (r = 0.984, p <0.001) and % agreement (with modified Oyedeji’s tool as standard) of 67% (K coefficient = 0.47, r = 0.71, p<0.001)Conclusion/Recommendation: The new scheme could be a viable tool for the assessment of SES of families and individuals, which not only takes into consideration current realities of the nation’s economy, but also is readily adaptable to meet foreseeable changes.


Digestion ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 101 (5) ◽  
pp. 598-607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsutomu Takeda ◽  
Daisuke Asaoka ◽  
Shuko Nojiri ◽  
Mayu Nishiyama ◽  
Atsushi Ikeda ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 489-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elias J. Pretorius ◽  
Amir D. Zarrabi ◽  
Stephanie Griffith-Richards ◽  
Justin Harvey ◽  
Hilgard M. Ackermann ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
AHT Pang ◽  
GS Ungvari ◽  
CK Wong ◽  
T Leung

SummaryIn an attempt to assess the universal applicability of the International Classification of Disease (ICD-10), two psychiatrists from different socio-cultural backgrounds and training independently performed a chart review of 238 Chinese patients. Inter-rater reliability figures were comparable to those found in the WHO-coordinated ICD-10 field trials. The results suggest that ICD-10 has good ‘universality’ in routine clinical practice.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurie A. Hiemstra ◽  
Brendan Sheehan ◽  
Treny M. Sasyniuk ◽  
Sarah Kerslake
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document