Ground motion amplification factors for the proposed 2005 edition of the National Building Code of Canada

2003 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 272-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.D Liam Finn ◽  
Adrian Wightman

Foundation factors are used in seismic codes to capture the amplification effects of local soil conditions on ground motions and, hence, on seismic design forces. Recent developments in categorizing site conditions for seismic codes and assigning intensity- and frequency-dependent amplification factors to the various site classes are presented to provide a basis for understanding the new foundation factors proposed for the 2005 edition of the National Building Code of Canada.Key words: design spectra, site characterization, amplification factors.

Author(s):  
Muhammad Tariq A. Chaudhary

Seismic site amplification factors and seismic design spectra for bridges are influenced by site conditions that include geotechnical properties of soil strata as well as the geological setting. All modern seismic design codes recognize this fact and assign design spectral shapes based on site conditions or specify a 2-parameter model with site amplification factors as a function of site class, seismic intensity and vibration period (short and long). Design codes made a number of assumptions related to the site conditions while specifying the values of short (Fa) and long period (Fv) site amplification factors. Making these assumptions was necessary due to vast variation in site properties and limited availability of actual strong motion records on all site conditions and seismic setting in a region. This paper conducted a sensitivity analysis for site amplification factors for site classes C and D in the AASHTO bridge design code by performing a 1-D site response analysis in which values of site parameters like strata depth, travel-time averaged shear wave velocity in the top 30 m strata (Vs30), plasticity index (PI), impedance contrast ratio (ICR) and intensity of seismic ground motion were varied. The results were analyzed to identify the site parameters that impacted Fa and Fv values for site classes C and D. The computed Fa and Fv values were compared with the corresponding values in the AASHTO bridge design code and it was found that the code-based Fa and Fv values were generally underestimated and overestimated respectively.


1991 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 945-953
Author(s):  
A. M. Chandler

This paper evaluates the earthquake-resistant design provisions of the 1990 edition of the National Building Code of Canada (NBCC 1990) for asymmetric building structures subjected to combined lateral shear and torsional dynamic loadings arising from earthquake base excitation. A detailed parametric study is presented, evaluating the dynamic edge displacement response in the elastic range, for the side of the building which is adversely affected by lateral–torsional coupling. A series of buildings is studied, with realistic ranges of the fundamental natural period, structural eccentricity, and uncoupled frequency ratio. These buildings are evaluated under base loadings arising from a total of 45 strong motion records taken from earthquakes in North America, Mexico, Europe, the Middle East, and Southern Pacific, categorized according to site soil conditions and the ratio a/v of peak ground acceleration to velocity. The latter parameter together with the uncoupled lateral period are found to influence strongly the combined dynamic edge response, with the greatest forces on edge members arising from earthquakes with high a/v ratio in structures with natural periods below 0.8 s. In this case the NBCC 1990 loading provisions significantly underestimate the elastic dynamic response. For buildings with periods longer than 0.8 s, the conservatism of the base shear provisions leads to overestimation of combined dynamic edge response in asymmetric systems, and this is also true in the short-period range for buildings subjected to ground motions with low a/v ratio. The NBCC 1990 provisions are reasonably conservative for short-period systems subjected to ground motions with intermediate a/v ratio. Key words: earthquakes, seismic, design, response, spectra, base, shear, torsional, provisions.


2000 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-162
Author(s):  
S. K. Ghosh

U.S. seismic codes are undergoing profound changes as of this writing. Changes from the 1994 to the 1997 edition of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) (ICBO 1994, 1997) are many and far-reaching in their impact. The 1997 edition of the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings (BSSC 1998) contains further evolutionary changes in seismic design requirements beyond those of the 1997 UBC. The latter document will form the basis of the seismic design provisions of the first edition of the International Building Code (IBC), to be published in the spring of 2000. This paper first discusses the major changes that have been made in the concrete-related provisions from the 1994 to the 1997 edition of the UBC. The paper gives background to these changes, provides essential details on them, and indicates how they have been or how they are going to be incorporated (at times with significant modifications) into the 1997 NEHRP Provisions and the 2000 IBC. The newly published ACI 318-99, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 1999), is going to be adopted by reference into the 2000 IBC. This entails further changes in concrete-related provisions beyond the 1997 UBC. Some of the more important of these changes are discussed here. A small number of amendments and additions to the ACI 318-99 provisions are going to be included in the 2000 IBC. The more important of these are also outlined in this paper.


2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 991-1000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gail M. Atkinson

The seismic design provisions of the 2005 National building code of Canada (NBCC) (NRC 2005) describe earthquake ground motions for which structures are to be designed in terms of a uniform hazard spectrum (UHS) having a 2% chance of being exceeded in 50 years. The “target” UHS depends on location and site condition, where site condition is described by a classification scheme based on the time-averaged shear-wave velocity in the top 30 m of the deposit. For some applications, such as dynamic analysis by time history methods, it is useful to have time histories that represent the types of earthquake motions expected and match the target UHS from the NBCC over some prescribed period range. In this study, the stochastic finite-fault method is used to generate earthquake time histories that may be used to match the 2005 NBCC UHS for a range of Canadian sites. Records are provided for site classes A, C, D, and E. They are freely available at www.seismotoolbox.ca .


1964 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 209-231
Author(s):  
Leonardo Zeevaert

abstract The ground accelerations during the earthquakes of May 11 and 19, 1962 were recorded in Mexico City on a soft clay bed that was formerly the floor of an old lake. Records were obtained from two accelerometers, one instrument was located in the basement of a multistory building and the other was located in a nearby park. Response spectra of the ground motions are presented and analysis is made of the local soil conditions with the view to explaining the characteristics of the spectrums.


2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Hampshire De C. Santos ◽  
Luca Zanaica ◽  
Carmen Bucur ◽  
Silvio De Souza Lima

Abstract This paper presents a comparative evaluation among some international, European and American, seismic design standards. The study considers the criteria for the analysis of conventional (residential and commercial) buildings. The study is focused on some critical topics: definition of the recurrence periods for establishing the seismic input; definition of the seismic zonation and shape of the design response spectra; consideration of local soil conditions; definition of the seismic force-resisting systems and respective response modification coefficients; definition of the allowable procedures for the seismic analysis. A model for a standard reinforced concrete building (“Model Building”) has been developed to permit the comparison among codes. This building has been modelled with two different computer programs, SAP2000 and SOFiSTiK and subjected to seismic input according to the several seismic codes. The obtained results compared are leading to some important conclusions.


Author(s):  
Joel A. Garci´a Vargas ◽  
Roberto Pe´rez Marti´nez

This paper presents the procedure proposed by the ISO code adapted to the local conditions in the Bay of Campeche, Mexico in order to obtain design spectrum for different seismic reserve capacity factors. A probabilistic seismic hazard analyses is used in order to determine the uniform hazard spectrum where the seismic environment, according to previous researches, is influenced by three primary types of earthquake sources: the subduction zone on the western pacific coast of Mexico, the lithospheric slab within the central portion of Mexico and the trans-mexican volcanic belt. This earthquake spatial distribution can be shown trough the historic catalog of earthquake occurrences during the period 1900–2001 used. On the one hand, in the evaluation of the characteristics and the uncertainties associated with the earthquake sources and their effects on the interest sites, are taken into account the characterization of the earthquake sources, the effect of the seismic wave propagation, the local conditions and the soil-structure interaction developed during earthquake ground motions. On the other hand, the uncertainties on the seismic hazard curve and those associated with the platform behavior (mass, stiffness, damping) in which their values are assigned to be consistent with the ISO 19901-2 and ISO 19902 seismic code suggestions. The final result consists in a seismic design spectrum for offshore platforms at the Bay of Campeche, which are consistent with the recommended ISO 19902 seismic reserve capacity factors, modified for local soil conditions, following a detailed seismic-action procedure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document