Full-scale pile tests in sand and development of a computer program for predicting load capacity

2007 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 1222-1236 ◽  
Author(s):  
J K.C Shih ◽  
J R Omer ◽  
R Delpak ◽  
R B Robinson ◽  
C D Jones

An interactive computer program GLAMPILE has been developed for predicting the static load capacity of single piles formed in any soil profile. A variety of well-known prediction methods have been incorporated into the program, including (i) soil mechanics based formulae; (ii) direct and indirect cone penetration test (CPT) based methods with and without accounting for scale effects of the cone on pile base capacity; and (iii) a new CPT-based method that considers the effects of “critical depth” and shaft resistance distribution, although the method has only been calibrated for relatively short piles. GLAMPILE can cope with different pile types installed with or without a permanent casing. The program has been applied to predict the axial capacities of 11 piles that were recently installed in sand and statically loaded to failure. Results from the soil mechanics procedures indicate increases, on the in situ value, of the earth pressure coefficient by up to 37%, which lies within the range 0%–100% recommended in the literature. The best CPT-based prediction method applied yields a mean (µ) and coefficient of variation (COV) of predicted to measured pile head capacity (Puh(p)/Puh(m)) of 0.83 and 0.12, respectively. Scale effects are shown to be nominal for the cases analysed. An improved method is recommended, which yields µ = 1.00 and COV = 0.10, implying higher accuracy and reliability compared with the other methods.Key words: piles, cone penetration test, static and dynamic load test, modular program.

2011 ◽  
Vol 243-249 ◽  
pp. 2435-2438
Author(s):  
Dong Hai Jiang ◽  
Zhang Li ◽  
Nai Jian Ji ◽  
Yuan Yuan Hu

Based on the end bearing capacity and friction capacity obtained from high strain dynamic test, an adjusted equation was provided to calculate the pile load capacity. The equation was corrected again by pile load test results. Therefore, a suggested equation was finally established. Practical experience showed that, the corrected equation of cone penetration test method to estimate the load capacity of single pile performed better than that in the national code.


1985 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 518-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. K. Robertson ◽  
R. G. Campanella ◽  
P. T. Brown ◽  
I. Grof ◽  
J. M. O. Hughes

A 915 mm diameter steel pipe pile was driven and tested by the B.C. Ministry of Transportation and Highways as part of their foundation studies for the proposed Annacis channel crossing of the Fraser River. The pile was driven open ended to a maximum depth of 94 m. The pile was tested axially to failure when the pile tip was at depths of 67, 78, and 94 m below ground surface. Following the final axial load test, the pile was loaded laterally to a total deflection at the ground surface of 150 mm. A slope indicator casing was installed in the pile to monitor the deflected shape during lateral loading.Adjacent to the pile, a piezometer-friction cone penetration test (CPT) and a full-displacement pressuremeter profile were made. Results of the axial and lateral load tests are presented along with the data from the CPT and the full-displacement pressuremeter tests. Results of several analyses using the data from the CPT and pressuremeter tests to predict the axial and lateral performance of the pile are presented. A comparison and discussion is presented between the predicted and measured axial and lateral behaviour of the pile, for which excellent agreement was found. Key words: pile load test, cone penetration test, pressuremeter test.


2005 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yung-Mook Na ◽  
Victor Choa ◽  
Cee-Ing Teh ◽  
Ming-Fang Chang

Sandfill at reclaimed sites is usually formed by more than one placement method. Reclaimed sandfill is often highly variable, and the cone penetration test is most commonly used for site characterization. Correlations among the cone resistance and geotechnical parameters for sand are influenced by the in situ stress level, and it is important to incorporate the stress-level effect. In this study, cone penetration tests were performed at several levels from the top of a 10 m high surcharge, which was later removed step by step, and in situ density was determined layer by layer at the Changi East reclamation site in Singapore. Different ways of normalizing the cone resistance by the corresponding in situ stress were investigated. Specialized in situ tests including the self-boring pressuremeter test, the cone pressure meter test, the seismic cone penetration test, and the plate load test were conducted to provide the reference deformation characteristics of sandfill. Results of the in situ tests indicate that the sand density and the cone resistance profiles vary between areas formed by different sand placement methods. Site-specific correlations developed based on comparison of normalized cone resistance with the reference data obtained from laboratory tests and other in situ tests are found to be suitable for the evaluation of relevant soil parameters.Key words: stress normalization, cone resistance, correlations, geotechnical parameter, in situ characterization, granular soil.


2012 ◽  
Vol 49 (8) ◽  
pp. 961-967 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhihong Hu ◽  
Michael McVay ◽  
David Bloomquist ◽  
David Horhota ◽  
Peter Lai

Our research evaluated current cone penetration test (CPT) pile design methodologies (Schmertmann, Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chaussées (LCPC), etc.), modified one of these methods (Philipponnat method), and proposed a new one to improve future driven pile designs. This was accomplished by evaluating 14 pile-capacity-design methods based on CPT data. Furthermore, load and resistance factor design (LRFD) resistance factors for each method were calculated using 21 cases from Florida and 28 from Louisiana. The resulting resistance factors were not satisfactory for any of these methods. A new design method — the University of Florida (UF) method — was proposed taking into account cementation, soil type, and historical data. The LRFD resistance factor was also assessed for this new method. The proposed UF method provides better LRFD resistance factors for both Florida and Louisiana soils. It could be a promising alternative for improving pile design.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 04020073 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abolfazl Eslami ◽  
Sepide Lotfi ◽  
Julio Angel Infante ◽  
Sara Moshfeghi ◽  
Mohammad M. Eslami

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document