An evaluation of the water balance technique for the estimation of evapotranspiration for a mixed forest

1991 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 1622-1631 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. N. Papakyriakou ◽  
J. H. McCaughey

In the summer of 1987 a detailed field experiment was conducted at the Petawawa National Forestry Institute at Chalk River, Ontario, to evaluate the performance of the water balance technique for the estimation of evapotranspiration. Bowen ratio – energy balance estimates of evapotranspiration, available over a portion of an intensive measurement period, provided an independent check on the water balance estimates. The daily totals of evapotranspiration were on average 1% less than the Bowen ratio – energy balance estimate. The length of time required to maintain the evapotranspiration estimates below a 10% level of uncertainty using the water balance technique is 13 days. The lowest average daily percent probable error is obtained for an integration period with (i) a minimum number of precipitation events, (ii) a large number of days, and (iii) a high evapotranspiration rate.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suelen da Costa Faria Martins ◽  
Marcos Alex dos Santos ◽  
Gustavo Bastos Lyra ◽  
José Leonaldo Souza ◽  
Guilherme Bastos Lyra ◽  
...  

Abstract Evapotranspiration is an important parameter to evaluate soil water deficit and water use efficiency, especially at places with irregularly distributed precipitation.The aim of this study was to assess the daily actual evapotranspiration (ETa) estimated by the Thornthwaite and Mather soil water balance method adapted for crops (ThM) and by the dual Kc approach with the crop coefficients optimized from inversing modeling and by the adjustment procedure suggested in FAO-56. The models comparison and optimization were performed with actual evapotranspiration determined by the Bowen ratio – energy balance method (ETβ) for sugarcane at full canopy closure grown in Alagoas State, Northeastern Brazil. The objective function of the inverse problem was defined in terms of ETβ and ETa estimated by the ThM and dual Kc method by optimizing single crop coefficient (Kc) and the basal coefficient Kcb, respectively. Both optimized Kcand Kcbwere lower than the adjusted KcFAO56, with optimized Kconly 3% less than the Kc obtained experimentally. ETa estimated by ThM and dual Kc models with optimized crop coefficients (Kc = 1.05 or Kcb = 1.00) had similar high precision (r² >0.79) and accuracy (dm>0.93 and RMSE < 0.30 mm d-1), whereas using the coefficients derived from FAO 56 overestimated ETa in both models.


1996 ◽  
pp. 121-126
Author(s):  
A.M.R. Abdel-Mawgoud ◽  
S.O. El-Abd ◽  
A.F. Abou-Hadid ◽  
T.C. Hsiao

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Monteiro Soares ◽  
Pedro Vieira De Azevedo ◽  
Bernado Barbosa Da Silva

This study was conducted at the Bebedouro Experimental Station in Petrolina-PE, Brazil, to evaluate the errors associated to the application of the Bowen ratio-energy balance in a 3-years old vineyard (Vitis vinifera, L), grown in a trellis system, irrigated by dripping. The field measurements were taken during fruiting cycle (July to November, 2001), which was divided into eigth phenological stages. A micrometeorological tower was mounted in a grape-plants row in which sensors of net radiation, global solar radiation and wind speed were installed at about 1.0 m above the canopy. Also in the tower, two psicometers were installed at two levels (0.5 and 1.8 m) above the vineyard canopy. Two soil heat flux plates were buried at 0.02 m beneath the soil surface. All these sensors were connected to a Data logger 21 X of Campbell Scientific Inc., programmed for collecting data once every 5 seconds and storage averages for every 15 minutes. A comparative analysis were made among four Bowen ratio accepting/rejecting rules, according to the methodology proposed by Spano et al. (2000): betar1 - values of beta calculated by Bowen (1926) equation; betar2 - values of beta as proposed by Verma et al. (1978) equation; betar3 - exclusion of the beta values obtained as recommended by Unland et al. (1996) and betar4 - exclusion of the beta values calculated as proposed by Bowen (1926), out of the interval (-0.7 < beta < 0.7). Constacted that the Unland et al. (1996) and Soares (2003) accepting/rejection rules were better than that of Verma et al. (1978) for attenuating the advective effects on the calculations of the Bowen ratio. The comparison of betar1 with betar2 rules showed that the statistical errors reaching maximum values of 0.015. When comparing betar1 with betar3 e betar4, the beta errors reaching maximum values of 5.80 and 3.15, respectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document