Possible contributions of CPG activity to the control of rhythmic human arm movement

2004 ◽  
Vol 82 (8-9) ◽  
pp. 556-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Paul Zehr ◽  
Timothy J Carroll ◽  
Romeo Chua ◽  
David F Collins ◽  
Alain Frigon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Control ◽  
Neural Control ◽  
Arm Movement ◽  
Rhythmic Movement ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Reflex Modulation ◽  
Arm Cycling ◽  
Reflex Reversal ◽  
Arm Muscles ◽  
Leg Movement

There is extensive modulation of cutaneous and H-reflexes during rhythmic leg movement in humans. Mechanisms controlling reflex modulation (e.g., phase- and task-dependent modulation, and reflex reversal) during leg movements have been ascribed to the activity of spinal central pattern generating (CPG) networks and peripheral feedback. Our working hypothesis has been that neural mechanisms (i.e., CPGs) controlling rhythmic movement are conserved between the human lumbar and cervical spinal cord. Thus reflex modulation during rhythmic arm movement should be similar to that for rhythmic leg movement. This hypothesis has been tested by studying the regulation of reflexes in arm muscles during rhythmic arm cycling and treadmill walking. This paper reviews recent studies that have revealed that reflexes in arm muscles show modulation within the movement cycle (e.g., phase-dependency and reflex reversal) and between static and rhythmic motor tasks (e.g., task-dependency). It is concluded that reflexes are modulated similarly during rhythmic movement of the upper and lower limbs, suggesting similar motor control mechanisms. One notable exception to this pattern is a failure of contralateral arm movement to modulate reflex amplitude, which contrasts directly with observations from the leg. Overall, the data support the hypothesis that CPG activity contributes to the neural control of rhythmic arm movement.Key words: central pattern generator, locomotion, motor control, neural control.

scholarly journals Neural control of rhythmic arm cycling after stroke

2012 ◽  
Vol 108 (3) ◽  
pp. 891-905 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Paul Zehr ◽  
Pamela M. Loadman ◽  
Sandra R. Hundza
Keyword(s):  
Neural Control ◽  
Arm Movement ◽  
Constant Current ◽  
Cycle Phase ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Reflex Modulation ◽  
Cutaneous Reflexes ◽  
Cutaneous Reflex ◽  
Arm Cycling ◽  
Modulation Pattern

Disordered reflex activity and alterations in the neural control of walking have been observed after stroke. In addition to impairments in leg movement that affect locomotor ability after stroke, significant impairments are also seen in the arms. Altered neural control in the upper limb can often lead to altered tone and spasticity resulting in impaired coordination and flexion contractures. We sought to address the extent to which the neural control of movement is disordered after stroke by examining the modulation pattern of cutaneous reflexes in arm muscles during arm cycling. Twenty-five stroke participants who were at least 6 mo postinfarction and clinically stable, performed rhythmic arm cycling while cutaneous reflexes were evoked with trains (5 × 1.0-ms pulses at 300 Hz) of constant-current electrical stimulation to the superficial radial (SR) nerve at the wrist. Both the more (MA) and less affected (LA) arms were stimulated in separate trials. Bilateral electromyography (EMG) activity was recorded from muscles acting at the shoulder, elbow, and wrist. Analysis was conducted on averaged reflexes in 12 equidistant phases of the movement cycle. Phase-modulated cutaneous reflexes were present, but altered, in both MA and LA arms after stroke. Notably, the pattern was “blunted” in the MA arm in stroke compared with control participants. Differences between stroke and control were progressively more evident moving from shoulder to wrist. The results suggest that a reduced pattern of cutaneous reflex modulation persists during rhythmic arm movement after stroke. The overall implication of this result is that the putative spinal contributions to rhythmic human arm movement remain accessible after stroke, which has translational implications for rehabilitation.

Forward and Backward Arm Cycling Are Regulated by Equivalent Neural Mechanisms

2005 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 633-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Paul Zehr ◽  
Sandra R. Hundza
Keyword(s):  
Neural Control ◽  
Arm Movement ◽  
Movement Direction ◽  
Reflex Modulation ◽  
Neural Activation ◽  
Cutaneous Reflexes ◽  
Leg Muscles ◽  
Cutaneous Reflex ◽  
Arm Cycling ◽  
Walking Activity

It was shown some time ago that cutaneous reflexes were phase-reversed when comparing forward and backward treadmill walking. Activity of central-pattern-generating networks (CPG) regulating neural activity for locomotion was suggested as a mechanism involved in this “program reversal.” We have been investigating the neural control of arm movements and the role for CPG mechanisms in regulating rhythmic arm cycling. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pattern of muscle activity and reflex modulation when comparing forward and backward arm cycling. During rhythmic arm cycling (forward and backward), cutaneous reflexes were evoked with trains (5 × 1.0 ms pulses at 300 Hz) of electrical stimulation delivered to the superficial radial (SR) nerve at the wrist. Electromyographic (EMG) recordings were made bilaterally from muscles acting at the shoulder, elbow, and wrist. Analysis was conducted on specific sections of the movement cycle after phase-averaging contingent on the timing of stimulation in the movement cycle. EMG patterns for rhythmic arm cycling are similar during both forward and backward motion. Cutaneous reflex amplitudes were similarly modulated at both early and middle latency irrespective of arm cycling direction. That is, at similar phases in the movement cycle, responses of corresponding sign and amplitude were seen regardless of movement direction. The results are generally parallel to the observations seen in leg muscles after stimulation of cutaneous nerves in the foot during forward and backward walking and provide further evidence for CPG activity contributing to neural activation and reflex modulation during rhythmic arm movement.

scholarly journals A common neural element receiving rhythmic arm and leg activity as assessed by reflex modulation in arm muscles

2016 ◽  
Vol 115 (4) ◽  
pp. 2065-2075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Syusaku Sasada ◽  
Toshiki Tazoe ◽  
Tsuyoshi Nakajima ◽  
Genki Futatsubashi ◽  
Hiroyuki Ohtsuka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Cervical Spinal Cord ◽  
Voluntary Contraction ◽  
Reflex Modulation ◽  
Neural Element ◽  
Single Motor Unit ◽  
Arm Cycling ◽  
Leg Cycling ◽  
Arm Muscles

Neural interactions between regulatory systems for rhythmic arm and leg movements are an intriguing issue in locomotor neuroscience. Amplitudes of early latency cutaneous reflexes (ELCRs) in stationary arm muscles are modulated during rhythmic leg or arm cycling but not during limb positioning or voluntary contraction. This suggests that interneurons mediating ELCRs to arm muscles integrate outputs from neural systems controlling rhythmic limb movements. Alternatively, outputs could be integrated at the motoneuron and/or supraspinal levels. We examined whether a separate effect on the ELCR pathways and cortico-motoneuronal excitability during arm and leg cycling is integrated by neural elements common to the lumbo-sacral and cervical spinal cord. The subjects performed bilateral leg cycling (LEG), contralateral arm cycling (ARM), and simultaneous contralateral arm and bilateral leg cycling (A&L), while ELCRs in the wrist flexor and shoulder flexor muscles were evoked by superficial radial (SR) nerve stimulation. ELCR amplitudes were facilitated by cycling tasks and were larger during A&L than during ARM and LEG. A low stimulus intensity during ARM or LEG generated a larger ELCR during A&L than the sum of ELCRs during ARM and LEG. We confirmed this nonlinear increase in single motor unit firing probability following SR nerve stimulation during A&L. Furthermore, motor-evoked potentials following transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation did not show nonlinear potentiation during A&L. These findings suggest the existence of a common neural element of the ELCR reflex pathway that is active only during rhythmic arm and leg movement and receives convergent input from contralateral arms and legs.

Effect of afferent feedback and central motor commands on soleus H-reflex suppression during arm cycling

2012 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3049-3058 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. R. Hundza ◽  
Geoff C. de Ruiter ◽  
M. Klimstra ◽  
E. Paul Zehr
Keyword(s):  
Primary Source ◽  
Arm Movement ◽  
H Reflex ◽  
Afferent Feedback ◽  
Reflex Modulation ◽  
Muscle Vibration ◽  
Reflex Amplitude ◽  
Motor Commands ◽  
Arm Cycling ◽  
Central Motor Commands

Suppression of soleus H-reflex amplitude in stationary legs is seen during rhythmic arm cycling. We examined the influence of various arm-cycling parameters on this interlimb reflex modulation to determine the origin of the effect. We previously showed the suppression to be graded with the frequency of arm cycling but not largely influenced by changes in peripheral input associated with crank length. Here, we more explicitly explored the contribution of afferent feedback related to arm movement on the soleus H-reflex suppression. We explored the influence of load and rate of muscle stretch by manipulating crank-load and arm-muscle vibration during arm cycling. Furthermore, internally driven (“Active”) and externally driven (“Passive”) arm cycling was compared. Soleus H-reflexes were evoked with tibial nerve stimulation during stationary control and rhythmic arm-cycling conditions, including: 1) six different loads; 2) with and without vibration to arm muscles; and 3) Active and Passive conditions. No significant differences were seen in the level of suppression between the different crank loads or between conditions with and without arm-muscle vibration. Furthermore, in contrast to the clear effect seen during active cycling, passive arm cycling did not significantly suppress the soleus H-reflex amplitude. Current results, in conjunction with previous findings, suggest that the afferent feedback examined in these studies is not the primary source responsible for soleus H-reflex suppression. Instead, it appears that central motor commands (supraspinal or spinal in origin) associated with frequency of arm cycling are relatively more dominant sources.

Corticospinal Excitability Is Lower During Rhythmic Arm Movement Than During Tonic Contraction

2006 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 914-921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy J. Carroll ◽  
Evan R. L. Baldwin ◽  
David F. Collins ◽  
E. Paul Zehr
Keyword(s):  
Motor Cortex ◽  
Neural Control ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Arm Movement ◽  
Voluntary Contraction ◽  
Tonic Contraction ◽  
H Reflex ◽  
Corticospinal Excitability ◽  
Arm Cycling ◽  
Subcortical Regions

Humans perform rhythmic, locomotor movements with the arms and legs every day. Studies using reflexes to probe the functional role of the CNS suggest that spinal circuits are an important part of the neural control system for rhythmic arm cycling and walking. Here, by studying motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex, and H-reflexes induced by electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves, we show a reduction in corticospinal excitability during rhythmic arm movement compared with tonic, voluntary contraction. Responses were compared between arm cycling and tonic contraction at four positions, while participants generated similar levels of muscle activity. Both H-reflexes and MEPs were significantly smaller during arm cycling than during tonic contraction at the midpoint of arm flexion ( F = 13.51, P = 0.006; F = 11.83, P = 0.009). Subthreshold TMS significantly facilitated the FCR H-reflex during tonic contractions, but did not significantly modulate H-reflex amplitude during arm cycling. The data indicate a reduction in the responsiveness of cells constituting the fast, monosynaptic, corticospinal pathway during arm cycling and suggest that the motor cortex may contribute less to motor drive during rhythmic arm movement than during tonic, voluntary contraction. Our results are consistent with the idea that subcortical regions contribute to the control of rhythmic arm movements despite highly developed corticospinal projections to the human upper limb.

Neural Coupling Between the Arms and Legs During Rhythmic Locomotor-Like Cycling Movement

2007 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 1809-1818 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaclyn E. Balter ◽  
E. Paul Zehr
Keyword(s):  
Arm Movement ◽  
Human Locomotion ◽  
Superficial Peroneal Nerve ◽  
Cutaneous Reflexes ◽  
Leg Muscles ◽  
Arm Cycling ◽  
Relative Contribution ◽  
Leg Cycling ◽  
Leg Movement ◽  
Stimulation Of

Neuronal coupling between the arms and legs allowing coordinated rhythmic movement during locomotion is poorly understood. We used the modulation of cutaneous reflexes to probe this neuronal coupling between the arms and legs using a cycling paradigm. Participants performed rhythmic cycling with arms, legs, or arms and legs together. We hypothesized that any contributions from the arms would be functionally linked to locomotion and would thus be phase-dependent. Reflexes were evoked by electrical stimulation of the superficial peroneal nerve at the ankle, and electromyography (EMG) was recorded from muscles in the arms and legs. The main finding was that the relative contribution from the arms and legs was linked to the functional state of the legs. For example, in tibialis anterior, the largest contribution from arm movement [57% variance accounted for (VAF), P < 0.05] was during the leg power phase, whereas the largest from leg movement (71% VAF, P < 0.05) was during leg cycling recovery. Thus the contribution from the arms was functionally gated throughout the locomotor cycle in a manner that appears to support the action of the legs. Additionally, the effect of arm cycling on reflexes in leg muscles when the legs were not moving was relatively minor; full expression of the effect of rhythmic arm movement was only observed when both the arms and legs were moving. Our findings provide experimental support for the interaction of rhythmic arm and leg movement during human locomotion.

Neural Control of Rhythmic Human Arm Movement: Phase Dependence and Task Modulation of Hoffmann Reflexes in Forearm Muscles

2003 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Paul Zehr ◽  
David F. Collins ◽  
Alain Frigon ◽  
Nienke Hoogenboom
Keyword(s):  
Neural Control ◽  
Arm Movement ◽  
H Reflex ◽  
Neural Mechanisms ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Reflex Amplitude ◽  
Forearm Muscles ◽  
Custom Made ◽  
Static Contraction ◽  
Leg Movement

Although we move our arms rhythmically during walking, running, and swimming, we know little about the neural control of such movements. Our working hypothesis is that neural mechanisms controlling rhythmic movements are similar in the human lumbar and cervical spinal cord. Thus reflex modulation during rhythmic arm movement should be similar to that seen during leg movement. Our main experimental hypotheses were that the amplitude of H-reflexes in the forearm muscles would be modulated during arm movement (i.e., phase-dependent) and would be inhibited during cycling compared with static contraction (i.e., task-dependent). Furthermore, to determine the locus of any modulation, we tested the effect that active and passive movement of the ipsilateral (relative to stimulated arm) and contralateral arm had on H-reflex amplitude. Subjects performed rhythmic arm cycling on a custom-made hydraulic ergometer in which the two arms could be constrained to move together (180° out of phase) or could rotate independently. Position of the stimulated limb in the movement cycle is described with respect to the clock face. H-reflexes were evoked at 12, 3, 6, and 9 o'clock positions during static contraction as well as during rhythmic arm movements. Reflex amplitudes were compared between tasks at equal M wave amplitudes and similar levels of electromyographic (EMG) activity in the target muscle. Surface EMG recordings were obtained bilaterally from flexor carpi radialis as well as from other muscles controlling the wrist, elbow, and shoulder. Compared with reflexes evoked during static contractions, movement of the stimulated limb attenuated H-reflexes by 50.8% ( P < 0.005), 65.3% ( P < 0.001), and 52.6% ( P < 0.001) for bilateral, active ipsilateral, and passive ipsilateral movements, respectively. In contrast, movement of the contralateral limb did not significantly alter H-reflex amplitude. H-reflexes were also modulated by limb position ( P < 0.005). Thus task- and phase-dependent modulation were observed in the arm as previously demonstrated in the leg. The data support the hypothesis that neural mechanisms regulating reflex pathways in the moving limb are similar in the human upper and lower limbs. However, the inhibition of H-reflex amplitude induced by contralateral leg movement is absent in the arms. This may reflect the greater extent to which the arms can be used independently.

scholarly journals NEURAL ACTIVITY PROFILES ASSOCIATED WITH ACL INJURY-RISK MECHANICS IN ECOLOGICAL SPORT SPECIFIC VIRTUAL REALITY

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0015
Author(s):  
Dustin R. Grooms ◽  
Jed A. Diekfuss ◽  
Alexis B. Slutsky-Ganesh ◽  
Cody R. Criss ◽  
Manish Anand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Control ◽  
Neural Activity ◽  
Injury Risk ◽  
Neural Control ◽  
Acl Injury ◽  
Initial Contact ◽  
Leg Press ◽  
Visual Spatial ◽  
Peak Knee ◽  
Acl Injury Risk

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is secondary to a multifactorial etiology encompassing anatomical, biological, mechanical, and neurological factors. The nature of the injury being primarily due to non-contact mechanics further implicates neural control as a key injury-risk factor, though it has received considerably less study. Purpose: To determine the contribution of neural activity to injury-risk mechanics in ecological sport-specific VR landing scenarios. Methods: Ten female high-school soccer players (15.5±0.85 years; 165.0±6.09 cm; 59.1±11.84 kg) completed a neuroimaging session to capture neural activity during a bilateral leg press and a 3D biomechanics session performing a header within a VR soccer scenario. The bilateral leg press involved four 30 s blocks of repeated bilateral leg presses paced to a metronome beat of 1.2 Hz with 30 s rest between blocks. The VR soccer scenario simulated a corner-kick, requiring the participant to jump and head a virtual soccer ball into a virtual goal (Figure 1A-E). Initial contact and peak knee flexion and abduction angles were extracted during the landing from the header as injury-risk variables of interest and were correlated with neural activity. Results: Evidenced in Table 1 and Figure 1 (bottom row), increased initial contact abduction, increased peak abduction, and decreased peak flexion were associated with increased sensory, visual-spatial, and cerebellar activity (r2= 0.42-0.57, p corrected < .05, z max > 3.1, table & figure 1). Decreased initial contact flexion was associated with increased frontal cortex activity (r2= 0.68, p corrected < .05, z max > 3.1). Conclusion: Reduced neural efficiency (increased activation) of key regions that integrate proprioceptive, visual-spatial, and neurocognitive activity for motor control may influence injury-risk mechanics in sport. The regions found to increase in activity in relation to higher injury-risk mechanics are typically activated to assist with spatial navigation, environmental interaction, and precise motor control. The requirement for athletes to increase their activity for more basic knee motor control may result in fewer neural resources available to maintain knee joint alignment, allocate environmental attention, and handle increased motor coordination demands. These data indicate that strategies to enhance efficiency of visual-spatial and cognitive-motor control during high demand sporting activities is warranted to improve ACL injury-risk reduction. [Figure: see text][Table: see text]

Development of an Apparatus for Bilateral Rhythmical Training of Arm Movement Via Linear and Elliptical Trajectories of Various Directions

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zlatko Matjačić ◽  
Matjaž Zadravec ◽  
Jakob Oblak
Keyword(s):  
Muscle Activation ◽  
Arm Movement ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Activation Patterns ◽  
Muscle Activation Patterns ◽  
Arm Cycling ◽  
Arm Reaching ◽  
Direction Of Movement ◽  
Muscle Groups ◽  
Neurologically Intact

Clinical rehabilitation of individuals with various neurological disorders requires a significant number of movement repetitions in order to improve coordination and restoration of appropriate muscle activation patterns. Arm reaching movement is frequently practiced via motorized arm cycling ergometers where the trajectory of movement is circular thus providing means for practicing a single and rather nonfunctional set of muscle activation patterns, which is a significant limitation. We have developed a novel mechanism that in the combination with an existing arm ergometer device enables nine different movement modalities/trajectories ranging from purely circular trajectory to four elliptical and four linear trajectories where the direction of movement may be varied. The main objective of this study was to test a hypothesis stating that different movement modalities facilitate differences in muscle activation patterns as a result of varying shape and direction of movement. Muscle activation patterns in all movement modalities were assessed in a group of neurologically intact individuals in the form of recording the electromyographic (EMG) activity of four selected muscle groups of the shoulder and the elbow. Statistical analysis of the root mean square (RMS) values of resulting EMG signals have shown that muscle activation patterns corresponding to each of the nine movement modalities significantly differ in order to accommodate to variation of the trajectories shape and direction. Further, we assessed muscle activation patterns following the same protocol in a selected clinical case of hemiparesis. These results have shown the ability of the selected case subject to produce different muscle activation patterns as a response to different movement modalities which show some resemblance to those assessed in the group of neurologically intact individuals. The results of the study indicate that the developed device may significantly extend the scope of strength and coordination training in stroke rehabilitation which is in current clinical rehabilitation practice done through arm cycling.

Effect of gravity and kinematic constraints on muscle synergies in arm cycling.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilla Botzheim ◽  
Jozsef Laczko ◽  
Diego Torricelli ◽  
Mariann Mravcsik ◽  
José L. Pons ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motor Control ◽  
Muscle Activation ◽  
Biceps Brachii ◽  
Body Position ◽  
Medical Rehabilitation ◽  
Muscle Synergies ◽  
Muscle Coordination ◽  
Arm Cycling ◽  
Custom Made ◽  
Crank Length

Arm cycling is a bi-manual motor task used in medical rehabilitation and in sports training. Understanding how muscle coordination changes across different biomechanical constraints in arm cycling is a step towards improved rehabilitation approaches. This exploratory study aims to get new insights on motor control during arm cycling. To achieve our main goal, we used the muscle synergies analysis to test three hypotheses: 1) body position with respect to gravity (sitting and supine) has an effect on muscle synergies; 2) the movement size (crank length) has an effect on the synergistic behavior; 3) the bimanual cranking mode (asynchronous and synchronous) requires different synergistic control. Thirteen able-bodied volunteers performed arm cranking on a custom-made device with unconnected cranks, which allowed testing three different conditions: body position (sitting versus supine), crank length (10cm versus 15cm) and cranking mode (synchronous versus asynchronous). For each of the eight possible combinations, subjects cycled for 30 seconds while electromyography of 8 muscles (4 from each arm) were recorded: biceps brachii, triceps brachii, anterior deltoid and posterior deltoid. Muscle synergies in this 8-dimensional muscle space were extracted by non-negative matrix factorization. Four synergies accounted for over 90% of muscle activation variances in all conditions. Results showed that synergies were affected by body position and cranking mode but practically unaffected by movement size. These results suggest that the central nervous system may employ different motor control strategies in response to external constraints such as cranking mode and body position during arm cycling.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document