scholarly journals On a mechanism realizing quark mass hierarchy

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (33) ◽  
pp. 2050274
Author(s):  
Yoshiharu Kawamura

We reconsider a generation of up-type quark mass hierarchy in the standard model and clarify how a mechanism works to realize the hierarchy without severe fine tuning.

Author(s):  
Yoshiharu Kawamura

Abstract We propose a bottom-up approach in which a structure of high-energy physics is explored by accumulating existence proofs and/or no-go theorems in the standard model or its extension. As an illustration, we study fermion mass hierarchies based on an extension of the standard model with vector-like fermions. It is shown that the magnitude of elements of Yukawa coupling matrices can become $O(1)$ and a Yukawa coupling unification can be realized in a theory beyond the extended model, if vector-like fermions mix with three families. In this case, small Yukawa couplings in the standard model can be highly sensitive to a small variation of matrix elements, and it seems that the mass hierarchy occurs as a result of fine tuning.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vitaly Kuyukov

This paper analyses a method of producing the Higgs mass via the gravitational field. This approach has become very popular in recent years, as the consideration of other forces do not help in solving the problem of mass hierarchy. Not understand the difference between scales of the standard model and Grand unification theory. Here, we present a heuristic mechanism which eliminated this difference. The idea is that the density of the condensate of the Higgs is increased so that it is necessary to take into account self gravitational potential energy of the Higgs boson. The result is as follows. The mass of the Higgs is directly proportional to the cell density of the Higgs bosons. Or else the mass of the Higgs is inversely proportional to the cell volume, which is the Higgs boson in the condensate. The most interesting dimension of this cell condensation is equal to the scale of Grand unification. This formula naturally combines the scale of the standard model and Grand unification through gravitational condensation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoo-Jin Kang ◽  
Soonbin Kim ◽  
Hyun Min Lee

Abstract We consider various bulk fields with general dilaton couplings in the linear dilaton background in five dimensions as the continuum limit of clockwork models. We show that the localization of the zero modes of bulk fields and the mass gap in the KK spectrum depend not only on the bulk dilaton coupling, but also on the bulk mass parameter in the case of a bulk fermion. The consistency from universality and perturbativity of gauge couplings constrain the dilaton couplings to the brane-localized matter fields as well as the bulk gauge bosons. Constructing the Clockwork Standard Model (SM) in the linear dilaton background, we provide the necessary conditions for the bulk mass parameters for explaining the mass hierarchy and mixing for the SM fermions. We can introduce a sizable expansion parameter ε = $$ {e}^{-\frac{2}{3}{kz}_c} $$ e − 2 3 kz c for the realistic flavor structure in the quark sector without a fine-tuning in the bulk mass parameters, but at the expense of a large 5D Planck scale. On the other hand, we can use a smaller expansion parameter for lepton masses, in favor of the solution to the hierarchy problem of the Higgs mass parameter. We found that massive Kaluza-Klein (KK) gauge bosons and massive KK gravitons couple more strongly to light and heavy fermions, respectively, so there is a complementarity in the resonance researches for those KK modes at the LHC.


2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (13) ◽  
pp. 1350046 ◽  
Author(s):  
ILIA GOGOLADZE ◽  
FARIHA NASIR ◽  
QAISAR SHAFI

We demonstrate that natural supersymmetry is readily realized in the framework of SU(4)c×SU(2)L×SU(2)Rwith nonuniversal gaugino masses. Focusing on ameliorating the little hierarchy problem, we explore the parameter space of this model which yields small fine-tuning measuring parameters (natural supersymmetry) at the electroweak scale (ΔEW) as well as at high scale (ΔHS). It is possible to have both ΔEWand ΔHSless than 100 in these models, (2% or better fine-tuning), while keeping the light CP-even (Standard Model-like) Higgs mass in the 123–127 GeV range. The light stop quark mass lies in the range [Formula: see text], and the range for the light stau lepton mass is [Formula: see text]. The first two family squarks are in the mass range [Formula: see text], and for the gluino we find [Formula: see text]. We do not find any solution with natural supersymmetry which yields significant enhancement for Higgs production and decay in the diphoton channel.


2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (38) ◽  
pp. 2909-2916
Author(s):  
G. LÓPEZ CASTRO ◽  
J. PESTIEAU

We propose some empirical formulas relating the masses of the heaviest particles in the standard model (the W, Z, H bosons and the t quark) to the charge of the positron e and the Higgs condensate v. The relations for the masses of gauge bosons mW = (1+e)v/4 and [Formula: see text] are in good agreement with experimental values. By requiring the electroweak standard model to be free from quadratic divergences at the one-loop level, we find: [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], or the very simple ratio (mt/mH)2 = e.


2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (27n28) ◽  
pp. 5082-5096
Author(s):  
R. SEKHAR CHIVUKULA ◽  
ROSHAN FOADI ◽  
ELIZABETH H. SIMMONS ◽  
STEFANO DI CHIARA

We introduce a toy model implementing the proposal of using a custodial symmetry to protect the [Formula: see text] coupling from large corrections. This "doublet-extended standard model" adds a weak doublet of fermions (including a heavy partner of the top quark) to the particle content of the standard model in order to implement an O(4) × U(1)X ~ SU(2)L × SU(2)R × PLR × U(1)X symmetry in the top-quark mass generating sector. This symmetry is softly broken to the gauged SU(2)L × U(1)Y electroweak symmetry by a Dirac mass M for the new doublet; adjusting the value of M allows us to explore the range of possibilities between the O(4)-symmetric (M → 0) and standard-model-like (M → ∞) limits.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document