The influence of imprecise quantum measurement on remote state preparation protocol

2020 ◽  
pp. 2150040
Author(s):  
Tianxiong Wu ◽  
Yunxia Li ◽  
Bingbing Luo ◽  
Jiahua Wei

In this paper, the influence of imprecise quantum measurement on remote state preparation scheme is investigated. By analyzing the measurement parameters and corresponding errors, we obtain the evolution of output state in the process of remote state preparation. In terms of the fidelity of initial state and output state, the influence of imprecise quantum measurement is discussed. The results of this paper have the reference value for the selection of measurement basis when the quantum measurement on remote state preparation is imprecise.

2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (03) ◽  
pp. 1250030 ◽  
Author(s):  
YANLIANG ZHANG ◽  
QINGPING ZHOU ◽  
GUODONG KANG ◽  
FANG ZHOU ◽  
XIAOBO WANG

We present a scheme for remote preparing a general two-particle state by two entangled states serving as the quantum communication channel. In this scheme, it is possible for the receiver to perfectly reconstruct the initial state that the sender hopes to prepare with the method of introducing an auxiliary qubit and postselection measurements in the situation of non-maximal entangled quantum channel. Furthermore, we investigate the influence of the dissipation factors on the processing of the remote state preparation when the entangled resources are in the Markovian and non-Markovian noisy environments. It is shown that the fidelity of remote state preparation is decreasing exponentially over time in Markovian environments and attenuating oscillatorily in non-Markovian. However, when the non-Markovian and the detuning conditions are satisfied simultaneously, the fidelity can be preserved at comparative high levels, effectively.


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (11&12) ◽  
pp. 975-987
Author(s):  
Ming-Ming Wang ◽  
Zhi-Guo Qu

Quantum communication provides a new way for transmitting highly sensitive information. But the existence of quantum noise inevitably affects the security and reliability of a quantum communication system. The technique of weak measurement and its reversal measurement (WMRM) has been proposed to suppress the effect of quantum noise, especially, the amplitude-damping noise. Taking a GHZ based remote state preparation (RSP) scheme as an example, we discuss the effect of WMRM for suppressing four types of quantum noise that usually encountered in real-world, i.e., not only the amplitude-damping noise, but also the bit-flip, phase-flip (phase-damping) and depolarizing noise. And we give a quantitative study on how much a quantum output state can be improved by WMRM in noisy environment. It is shown that the technique of WMRM has certain effect for improving the fidelity of the output state in the amplitude-damping noise, and only has little effect for suppressing the depolarizing noise, while has no effect for suppressing the bit-flip and phase-flip (phase-damping) noise. Our result is helpful for improving the efficiency of entanglement-based quantum communication systems in real implementation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 1405
Author(s):  
Nan Zhao ◽  
Tingting Wu ◽  
Yan Yu ◽  
Changxing Pei

As research on quantum computers and quantum information transmission deepens, the multi-particle and multi-mode quantum information transmission has been attracting increasing attention. For scenarios where multi-parties transmit sequentially increasing qubits, we put forward a novel (N + 1)-party cyclic remote state preparation (RSP) protocol among an arbitrary number of players and a controller. Specifically, we employ a four-party scheme in the case of a cyclic asymmetric remote state preparation scheme and demonstrate the feasibility of the scheme on the IBM Quantum Experience platform. Furthermore, we present a general quantum channel expression under different circulation directions based on the n-party. In addition, considering the impact of the actual environment in the scheme, we discuss the feasibility of the scheme affected by different noises.


2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 751-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Xing Luo ◽  
Xiu-Bo Chen ◽  
Yi-Xian Yang ◽  
Xin-Xin Niu

1998 ◽  
Vol 290 (4-6) ◽  
pp. 543-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashish K. Gupta ◽  
Daniel Neuhauser

2018 ◽  
Vol 98 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Som Kanjilal ◽  
Aiman Khan ◽  
C. Jebarathinam ◽  
Dipankar Home

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document